Please dont revert wholesale as you are introducing mistakes by doing so at Fidel Castro. Welcome!
Hello, Jerse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
TV Genius
02:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh I am not saying you weren't overall doing a good job just asking for more attention to detail, there were 2 mistakes in your revert and that tool 2 other editors and 2 further edits to fix, its not difficult to revert by hand. TV Genius 02:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not Americanise grammar at Talk:Banana. jimfbleak 06:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid few things are guaranteed to upset non-North Americans as quickly as Americanising spelling or grammar (incidentally the "h" in herb is sounded in Brit/Oz English, which is why it's "A herb"). What American website? Wikipedia is a global project, despite the servers being in Florida, Still, as you say it's a time of goodwill, so MERRY CHRISTMAS, jimfbleak 15:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the reversion - the comment doesn't reflect the spirit of Christmas though. Jimfbleak. talk. 06:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
If you are going to contribute ideas to Talk:Muhammad, please read all of the content on the page. Also, please post in the appropriate spot (bottom of the topic, not at the top). Thanks, -- Hojimachong talk con 03:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
If you have anything about the citation, please mention your comments in the talk page of the article. By not doing so, and continuously blanking the citation, your edits look like vandalism. Please discuss this in the talk page before making any further edits. Thank you. -- Ragib 05:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
List of languages by native speakers is very unstable and appears to be original research (the ranking criteria is flawed as data from various sources are compared, which is an incorrect method of doing comparison). --
Ragib
06:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm not here to "Win" or "fight". There is no problem with me if you provide a ranking of languages based on native speakers, from a
reliable source. But rather than doing so, you just removed the existing citation, and replaced it with nothing. That is NOT the way to modify a referenced piece of information. If you have references (NOT a link to an unstable article), you are welcome to provide that. Thanks. --
Ragib
06:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
HagermanBot
03:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, please don't type is all caps. If someone is changing the ranks, just redirect them to the talk page. Thanks. Cælus 13:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I am puzzled why you reverted my change to the head of the column. The reference given refers to the 1996 (13th) edition of the ethnologue (it was 'updated' 1999, but still uses 1996 data). www.ethnologue.com gives data from the 15th edition (2005). Yes, many of the figures in it are from previous years, but it's still the latest data. And try having a look at some of the figures. You can compare with the ethnologue list of most spoken languages. All the figures in there are from the 2005 edition. Drmaik 05:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Fighting vandals can be tough, but please mind your language a little. -- MoRsE 23:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)