![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sure, although I have to warn you, my code is awfully messy and barely commented - not yet ready for public distribution. Can I get your e-mail address and send it to you that way? You can send me an e-mail with your address if you don't want to disclose it publicly. Stu (aeiou) I'm Researching Wikipedia 00:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Bot continues to tag Max Whittier article as "Living Person" though he is long dead. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiTracker ( talk • contribs) 00:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
see headline. -- 84.44.153.157 ( talk) 21:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
So, "I have two fewer dogs than my neighbor" is clearly right, while "I have two less dogs than my neighbor" is clearly wrong, but the situation is ambiguous and leaning towards less in the case of one? Surprising and strange. Not something I would be inclined to edit an article specifically to fix one way or the other, anyway. What did surprise me is that while "one chomosome fewer" sounded right, but a little oddly arranged to me, once I inverted it, it had to become "one fewer chromosomes" to sound right any more.— Kww( talk) 22:33, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering whether you'd be interested in joining the Bot Approvals Group? I've seen you around BRFA and other bot-related pages and you always make clueful comments and evidently know what you're talking about when it comes to bots (both in terms of programming and policy). Seeing as there's quite a backlog at BRFA at the moment, it would certainly be useful to have more active BAG members. If you decide that you are interested, I'd be more than happy to nominate you! Richard 0612 19:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Apologies! I made the "anti-vandalism revert" before it occurred to check your edit history. (Revert was response to "could be made to have four" (ah!) and "this may not be enough to change humans' perception of color" (ah! ah!)) The article is laying out the hypothesis that some people *already* have four color receptors. In the existing text, the editor was (quite artfully) glossing controversies and theories about what exactly is meant by that. The following paragraph clarifies -- but only if it is understood as experimental support for the theory of the previous para. Regards, Piano non troppo ( talk) 12:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Your modifications to these parameters are unnecessary and would be involving the vast majority of Book related (especially fiction) articles. "it is in the minority" in your rationale is just not true. Can we discuss this before you go any further. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 13:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! PeterSymonds ( talk) 13:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Do feel free to add well cited stuff to User:Timtrent/Joyce McKinney while it's in development, too. It may take a little while to get it into the main article space because a prior version was deleted and salted. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 15:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Diff Added a : instead of a | §hep Talk 17:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
I've closed your BAG nomination as successful... which really shouldn't be surprising, since you asked about it on BN, and you got unanimous support. ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! And I'm glad you liked my userbox. Anomie ⚔ 04:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 01:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I need some help and tips on creating good articles. I have made David wyatt (illustrator) and Larklight Trilogy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by XXRonaldo007XX ( talk • contribs) 19:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the help —Preceding unsigned comment added by XXRonaldo007XX ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
How do u like make facts in the side? XXRonaldo007XX ( talk) 20:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
could you add things to my Larklight Trilogy page please? XXRonaldo007XX ( talk) 20:56, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
How do you add pictures to my Larklight Trilogy page? XXRonaldo007XX ( talk) 16:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message & the help with my bot request. As far as commenting on BRFAs goes I don't understand enough about what Bots can & can't do or should & shouldn't do to be able to make really helpful comments - but I'll bear it in mind.— Rod talk 21:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Greetings. Polbot was blocked by User:Docu, due to a concern about its function. Perhaps you could comment at Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval#Block of Polbot? Thanks, – Quadell ( talk) 14:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hey can u help me with Ashlie Michelles page?? I am her rep and am a bit confused! THANKYOU! ( GoSentWin ( talk) 20:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC))
Hi, this article has been rewritten, if you could please revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith in Place to see if your concerns have been addressed. If not I would be happy to address any outstanding issues. Thank you! -- Banjeboi 10:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you don't think I shot your fox - I was looking it up when you PRODded it, and then saw on my watch-list that it had been dePRODded. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 13:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a bit busy myself actually, but I'll resume coding the status parameter updating bot at the weekend, and I'll be happy to change the category as well (may as well do everything in one edit, as you said). Richard 0612 11:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Cheers, I figured being total nonsense if would have gone into the patent nonsense category. Seems I need to reread the criteria! Thanks for the heads up!
Jarry- you helped me with keeping up the TalentTrove page yesterday and now i have a question regarding this. I want to change the name of the page from TalentTrove to Talent Trove. I was looking in how to do this and saw it was possible but could not find out how to do it. do i need to have 10 edits before i can perform this function? and are those 10 edits just edits i make to the page i created? any help you can give would be great. Thank You MichaelScott569 ( talk) 14:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)