If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
2022 NBA Finals, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. —
Bagumba (
talk)
05:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, IcedChocolate!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Eagleash (
talk)
09:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
|
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Sergecross73 msg me 16:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
2022 NBA Finals. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —
Bagumba (
talk)
06:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your assistance in reverting egregious edits on Choi Sung-bong. But I would like to address how you responded to the editor. Despite the inappropriate location, wording, and aggressive edit summaries of the user, they did present a source and were here to contribute to the wikipedia. Yes their edits needed reverting, but dropping a vandalism UWT on their talk page with no further communication was not an optimal course of action. I would suggest that their edits did not constitute vandalism but rather ill-advised first edits on the wikipedia. Because they were dismissed as vandals, they felt attacked and ignored. Remember to assume good faith when dealing with new users. I would suggest the next time a similar edit occurs revert the edit and refer to their talk page, and take the time to write out something guiding them to BLP guidelines and wikipedia standards on Neutral Point-of-View. Instruct them on how identify reliable sources as relevant to BLP and if appropriate, to make a new section regarding a controversy, especially if the claims are easily accessible or even confirmed by the subject. What's done is done, but please try to see the best in willing-to-contribute editors going forward. Thank you for your time. GabberFlasted ( talk) 17:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Rutgers University—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Andethyst
(talk)
14:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Islamic Terrorism, you may be
blocked from editing.
Doug Weller
talk
16:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Egghead06. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Harry Maguire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Egghead06 (
talk)
06:05, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
2022 FIFA World Cup, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Jkudlick ⚓
(talk)
17:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, IcedChocolate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:ESL One Genting 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, IcedChocolate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " ESL One Genting 2022".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, IcedChocolate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:The International 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, IcedChocolate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The International 2022".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)