Thanks for the warning, Hqb (and I honestly do appreciate it). My recent cleanups were made using AutoWikiBrowser, which for some reason has this "unconventional" setting for the interwiki links' position. I figured that the program had the most appropriate settings in regards to article syntax; I will have to look into why that would appear to not be the case. In the future, I should try to be more careful to balance AWB's automatic settings with what is in fact tried-and-true convention. Alekjds talk 12:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
There really is the Pinsky Phenomenon in mathematics. I am not making it up. Refererences provided. So many researchers use it. Help me keep this. It is mathematically imprortant. AmeliaElizabeth (talk) AmeliaElizabeth ( talk) 00:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Kelly Taylor (actress), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{ prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot ( talk) 16:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Kelly Taylor (actress), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Taylor (actress) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 04:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
hi, i certainly accept my 3RR warning. my question though is this - how does one aggressively keep defamatory information out of a BLP, just as jimbo states, when faced with the sort of POV push the user in question is attempting? i'm at a loss. i've reported it on the BLP noticeboard, but this is really frustrating. we're supposed to be aggressive in reverting this kind of stuff - but 3RR becomes a problem in that case. Anastrophe ( talk) 19:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Please make sure you don't add duplicate entries to WP:AIV as you did with Garrettanderson983. Thanks - Milk's Favorite Cookie 16:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Hqb, I noticed you do good work with vandalism-reversion. I was wondering, would you like rollback rights to help make vandalism-reversion easier for you? Acalamari 21:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
You: Gee, what can I say? Me : Wel, I decided to introduse the article to see how I can create a new one, but Now I am unable to find out how to delete it until I've finished the article. IF you know how then i'd be grateful to know... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Armaghanj ( talk • contribs) 10:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Thornberry Animal Sanctuary, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thornberry Animal Sanctuary. Thank you. Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 23:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I was just about to self-revert myself . . . I had mistakenly read the statement to have pertained only to the following equation. — Myasuda ( talk) 22:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, sorry. I hadn't read the discussion page. Kadellar ( talk) 21:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
I have now added the references - I have not long written the article (which I have researched over a number of years) so intended to add them anyway but thanks for the prompt. 1952mgyb ( talk) 17:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your all your help with editing - looks really good now. 1952mgyb ( talk) 20:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Your fag army's edits to Iraq appear to be war crimes, unfortunately they cannot be reverted.
By the way, where are the weapons of mass destruction? Do you have a reliable source who can attest that they ever existed at all?
-- 64.180.248.212 ( talk) 12:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! κaτaʟaveno T C 20:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for answering my query at the entertainment Reference desk way back in March... I've finally started the article. Cheers! -- Flyguy649 talk 05:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my error on Beta decay. Huge difference between 1.2779 and 1.277×109!! (EhJJ) TALK 21:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help in fixing up my article; apologies for the deletion of your comment, was trying to revert to a post-vandalized state and must've erased your contributions in the process. Would appreciate advice on how to prevent future vandalism - can users be ip banned from editing certain articles? (As opposed to a wikipedia-wide ban).
Wiki fighter99 ( talk) 08:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Wiki_fighter99
I apparently am horrible at creating wiki pages, as my original Jeff Bates post got marked for deletion twice! Thanks for fixing all the links up, and even linking back from the Rob Malda page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtabraha ( talk • contribs) 17:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing me to MOS:TITLE in regards to Death in the Clouds. I wasn't aware of that style rule and will ensure other Christie pages are changed in accordance!-- Jtomlin1uk ( talk) 14:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
As the creator of {{ SubatomicParticle}} template, could you explain to me please why "{{SubatomicParticle|charmed Xi+}}" creates a horizonal scroll bar in the List of baryons page? Thanks!-- Crzy cheetah 22:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
If you continue to threaten innocent users as you did to User: Skinnydipping you'll be blocked.-- FiserQueen ( Talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skinnydipping ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
There was a discussion a while back on the Harry (name) talk page, where it was determined that listing all the people whose first names are Harry is unhelpful. The page that I redirected had no content, except a partial and arbitrary list of articles beginning with Harry. This list is linked to from the given name template; thus, a full list of Harrys [1] is probably redundant; certainly, having separate articles for Harry and Harry (name) is redundant. Feezo (Talk) 21:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Jughead And Friends Digest was incorrect. Please don't do this anymore.-- Oldsunnygirl ( Talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to add a parameter to Template:Structurae so that we can add a last accessdate like most citation templates such as {{ cite web}}.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 04:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion is what you desire? How about a little patience? Or doing research within Wikipedia first, so see whether the person is already mentioned elsewhere? Frankly, I'm very much annoyed by such trigger-happy "patrols". -- Matthead Discuß 13:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
It is negative speculation, of no statistical significance, where most books concede that AHP lived longer and more functionally than most stomach cancer victims. It is SOAPBOXing negative editorials into what should be a simple bibliography, listing the books. There are far more important summaries for many books than that. I would appreciate it if you remove it without additional discussion. Thank you.-- TheNautilus ( talk) 11:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
My contribution to Samarium had an error in it and you were correct in rejecting it and I offer my apologies. But the subject of the contribution was the reported Alpha instability of EE62Sm146 which I notice that your previous contributor had managed to not discuss during his discussion on the isotopes of 62Sm. So in the interests of the subject matter wouldn't you think it reasonable to include something about 62Sm146 in that section of the article?WFPM WFPM ( talk) 14:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
So I cant contribute about Samarium or speculate and in the meantime the information in the referenced Los Alamos source must have been changed to correct the errors in your isotope section, and a discussion of a Supposedly "synthetic" isotope, EE62Sm146 has been omitted. I understand that encyclopaedic articles dont have to be correct, just well referenced. But I thought maybe the wiki system mught be sufficiently agile to overcome that deficiency, particularly in the fields of science, which is pretty dynamic these days.WFPM WFPM ( talk) 20:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Your data shows 3 long lived alpha emitting isotopes od Samarium and calls 62SM146 a "synthetic" atom. But your article still talks about only 2 longlived radioactive isotopes and doesn't mention 62Sm146.WFPM WFPM ( talk) 21:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)I had asked about 62Sm146 in Talk Samarium on 8, April,2008.WFPM WFPM ( talk) 21:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC) I have an idea. Maybe you could take the 14,April contribution to Isotopes of samarium that you threw out and put it into Talk Samarium. Maybe we could get some discussion about that.WFPM WFPM ( talk) 22:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hqb--
Hi. You replied to my reversion of the page, saying: "(ftr, I think bolding the hatnote is inappropriate, but I added a comment directing potential editors to the relevant section of the Talk page)"
You may be right that bolding the warning that the other meaning of "groupoid" is under "magma" is nonstandard. I admit that it's an ad hoc solution. On the other hand, the "groupoid" folks don't seem to want a disambiguation page. So what should I do? DavidHobby ( talk) 00:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for that - I haven't figured out how to do that yet. Taking notes! Brunton ( talk) 22:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the template. Was about to do it but getting food at the same time. Will change all the redirects soon but have asked for AWB as there are so many. Waterden ( talk) 18:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop vandalizing this page.-- Oldsunnygirl ( Talk) 7:07 PM —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC).
Hi. You PRODded Celebrity Horror, but its author has contested it. I've sent it to AFD. Thought you'd might like to have your say there... The JPS talk to me 22:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, The Artistic Yoga article got tagged for reading like an advertisement. I have removed a lot of content so that it sounds more objective. Have also added inline citations. Thanks! Divya Sivaramakrishnan ( talk) 18:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you comment at Structurae_(2nd_nomination). This doesn't look like an un-useful site to me, but I have no knowledge of the area. Shenme ( talk) 07:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the help! -- Stone ( talk) 22:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)