Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 6 Dogs, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 ( Chat) (Very Busy) 22:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 6 Dogs. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yoshi24517 ( Chat) (Very Busy) 22:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, HiResolutionEdits. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page 6 Dogs, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Yoshi24517 ( Chat) (Very Busy) 22:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Yoshi24517 ( Chat) (Very Busy) 23:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Hai (。・ω・)ノ゙
There is a three revert rule, if you disagree with content on a page, please start a discussion on the talk page rather than edit warring, ty. A Socialist Trans Girl 10:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Title. Discussion is here [1] A Socialist Trans Girl 11:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
11:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Hi HiResolutionEdits, regarding your message at Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy, please focus on the article content when writing on article talk pages.
As these are about content, not user conduct, meta discussions about who made an edit or why, or who is currently in contact with a moderator and why are unnecessary ( "No meta").
Thanks! ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 14:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)