You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Golan Heights Winery. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Do not revert again please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ani medjool ( talk • contribs)
Hello Hertz,
You're a mighty fine archivist, in regards to information on different types of footwear; its rather interesting all the types that are out there. Cheers -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 04:23, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
What brought you there? Such a low traffic article to have happend to have edited while I was. Daniel Christensen ( talk) 20:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Just so you are aware, I proposed israel-deadsea.com be added to the spam blacklist - MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist. I hate spammers! -- Biker Biker ( talk) 14:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for help with the edit on LORAN. I think I might need some help on cleaning up the citations (see my previous edit). DrWhatIKnow ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC).
In an effort to create a navbox for urban parkways in the Boston metro area, I have come to the realization that what is really needed is something that ties together the entire system first envisioned by Charles Eliot in the late nineteenth century. I feel that this should be a cooperative effort, probably created as a subproject of WP:MASS. However, initially I am seeking comments and/or assistance from several editors that have contributed in various ways to elements of the scope of such a project. This note is being posted to the user pages of Beland, CaribDigita, Denimadept, EraserGirl, Grk1011, Hertz1888, Jameslwoodward, Markles, NE2, Polaron and Swampyank. I apologize in advance to anyone who wishes to comment that I have left off of the list of users, as I may have unintentionally forgotten them and others. Please feel free to comment on my talk page under the heading I have created, linked here. Thanks – Sswonk ( talk) 05:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
You removed my reference to Mondo tracks from the Track and field athletics page. Do no mistake my posting of a link for brevity as an attempt at commercializing Wikipedia. There was already an appropriate reference to Tartan track which was the first successful artificial running surface. Mondo tracks are becoming the top tracks in the world. Without definition, the name could be misused as a genericized trademark for rubberized running tracks. I did not place the reference to the name Mondo, all I did was place a link to the company who makes it. The majority of World Championships, Olympics and major competitions take place on Mondo tracks. It is almost the defacto requirement in order to host a major competition, certainly an overwhelming leader of the market. It deserves its own article to discuss how this form of track, a rubber carpet essentially, differs from other tracks, why it is faster than most other surfaces in the All weather track world. The whole subject of all weather tracks is yet another article that should be written. I haven't got the time to flesh all that out, to the standards that it should be fleshed out just to survive the barrage of attacks the censors of wikipedia will impose upon any new article. I am an expert in the field, I'm probably the one to write all these articles in the future. Suffice it to say, I placed that link on a temporary basis, so people could go to the website of the manufacturer and gain the information about their system. I'll probably have to interpret that company's information to write the article. Its a stopgap, a temporary solution. At least it does provide information, as opposed to the way you have left it, which is incomplete. I don't want to get into a battle with you, please just restore the link. Trackinfo ( talk) 01:34, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your contribution. It's fine with me; we'll see if it will satisfy ParaGreen13; I think he will object to any suggestion of "inaccuracy", but we'll see. My rationale for "no, they're really not that accurate between updates" is on the talk page, it just took me a little to get the first version saved, and you must have looked and made your edit in that window. Cheers! Jeh ( talk) 00:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
I've nominated List of former Jews, List of former Christians, and List of former Muslims together for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Jews. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 17:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I'm curious. Why did you remove "New York" from the location of the fictional town of Bedford Falls in the film, It's a Wonderful Life?
Thanks in advance for your response. MCB, Jan. 1, 2010, 3:32 MST. 67.173.237.220 ( talk) 22:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
I notice you are doing a good job of monitoring this page. I Identify the latest additions by 99.3.151.168 as vandalism but I don't know how to revert properly back about 3-4 levels to one that is proper. Someone did revert away some of the vandalism, but did so through editing which also eliminated valid content. I would like to get this right, as you see I have made significant contributions to this article. Trackinfo ( talk) 23:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Shalom Hertz1888,
I thought I would let you know that your name has come up in the list here.
Best wishes for the new year! -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 08:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, in this revert you have taken out references (ISBNs and OCLCs) for the bibliography as well as several other useful changes. As you did not explain in the edit comment what you objected to, I'm puzzled as to your intent. Perhaps you didn't mean to revert all of my edits and end up leaving the Bibliography inconsistent?— Ash ( talk) 10:51, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
be careful, you violate 3rr by add back in "Israel cuisine" category. Ani medjool ( talk) 23:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I noticed this. Care to follow your own advice and discuss in talk? -- John ( talk) 01:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'm afraid I have no particular expertise on the subject, but I'll join the effort to help maintain Wiki-peace. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 00:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the Cambridge cattle pass photo. Never knew it was there and couldn't quite imagine what exactly the historic place looked like! Swampyank ( talk) 02:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Hertz1888
Your information is incorrect concerning the family name used in the movie Breaking Away. The spelling is Stoller, not Stohler. Reference #3 is incorrect on the page as well. Please do not change the page citing vandalism.
Thanks, Dalestoller ( talk) 18:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hertz,
I've nominated Israeli cuisine for GAR. I know you've contributed to it so can't review, but I was wondering if you had the time and inclination to look it over before the review, as you've made helpful corrections to things that have slipped through the cracks before. I'd appreciate it if you could, but no pressure, of course! Thanks, -- Chefallen ( talk) 05:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
This is a school, with multiple computers. if you blocked this IP address, would that prevent editing of wikipedia from all the computers? -- 204.185.47.129 ( talk) 18:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I took an interest in this article, believe it or not, after looking at the article for Mary Carillo, who apparently received an Emmy for a feature she did on the Hoyts for Real Sports on HBO. While I understand your concern about the structure of the article, I doubt if it is actually plagiarized. I took the time to search for a few of the sentences in the article and came up with nothing, as I'm sure you did or you would have deleted the content by now. It is quite possible that the contributor (Hockeygirl10) wrote the article herself, possibly as a school project, and was simply unfamiliar with the structure and format of a wiki article, in particular, how to incorporate references.
Assuming that this is the case, I fixed and organized the references in the article after verifying that the cited points are actually covered, to the extent that this is possible. I was able to find most of the references online but do not have access to Sam Nall's book. It seems reasonable that the points citing the book as source would be included there since it is apparently biographical. I stopped short of removing your warnings about possible plagiarism, but you might want to consider doing this yourself.
The article still needs a bit of a rewrite to make it more encyclopedic, but that should be relatively trivial since the citations have been checked out. Eegorr ( talk) 07:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
I suggest you cut your vandalism, it is criticism not bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.108.154 ( talk) 04:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
WHY ARE YOU DELETING MY COMMENTS? WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF??? Bilcarter ( talk) 07:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the change but if you want to really be neutral I advise that you include how some people view government of Israel as terrorists just like how people view hamas and others as terrorists. Also include their actions. Yusef —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yusef91 ( talk • contribs) 07:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Stop vandalizing VAWA article, next time read the discussion for the explanation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.108.154 ( talk) 23:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I had an inkling you’d be watching, and was editorially content with your following edits; Taking 4 paras to 3 relevant sentences took considerable synthesis, which I was concerned might be seen editorially in caps; I believe the ref ended where the cite started. I’d like to comment toward a question and hopefully learn from your response, if you would do so. That learning would help avoid OR, since quite untypically, I admit a wanting to learn; it helps my npov result. We seem collaborative there, with previously exhibited AGF. I do not read any type of .he, am stuck with .en, but delve into the former by using the latter for description; do you .he? Specifically, is using the phrasing ‘traditional Judaic or modern Hebrew’ OK;? Should it be an 'and'. Researching on several relevant background pages, refs, and the existing words, led to that word choice. Also, how do you consider the ref on an RS scale. Editorially, my concern is the modern political phrase in .en with capital letters in both words/languages, when a single capital 'I' is often more accurate and neutral. Regards, CasualObserver'48 ( talk) 04:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: Lexington-Concord Sesquincentennial commemoration stamps: Again, aside from Washington DC, my reference was to THE five cities in Mass' where the stamps were first put on sale. This is not to say that other locations were not involved. Your contention that other cities were involved was and is not in dispute, so your ommision of 'the' was rather pointless, per your claim about other locations. Gwillhickers ( talk) 04:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Hertz.. Yes. Didn't realize his stay here on the planet was so brief. </p<
Having some problems with the licensing of images of foreign stamps, so i removed the thumbs here. GWillhickers ( talk) 10:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help over at the Hurva. Your contributions are vital if this is going to be promoted to FA! Chesdovi ( talk) 00:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't think contributing to Wikipedia with the truth about Jerusalem could be seen as vandalism. Using a robot, Microsoft Encarta, is never a reliable source to be used as a reference. I will get scientific resources proving the city as disputed area. I guess the city is more disputed than its a capital of Israel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omansour ( talk • contribs) 20:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps you would like to join the discussion on the article talk page? I fail to see what needs confirmation, given that the passage in question is supported with a reliable source. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 22:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Per talk, I would like to rename Yonatan Netanyahu to Jonathan. There have been no objections. Since I've never moved an article, and I already messed up on the first attempt, would you mind handling it? -- Wikiwatcher1 ( talk) 02:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Yeah looked odd - probably should have warned but ended up hitting the welcome button Satu Suro 14:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your c/es on the hummus proposal... I'm back in Mexico now...and while internet is never very good here, tonight my internet connection is being powered by a gerbil on a treadmill...its taking FOREVER for pages to update and reload. It literally took five minutes for my hummus proposal to post!!!! -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 04:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hertz, Thanks again for the time and effort you put into editing the Israeli cuisine article. I'm sure that all your fixes helped to get it promoted to GA status! ---- Chefallen ( talk) 19:37, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Apologies if my ES came across more confrontational than it was meant, indeed there has been no discussion on the talk page regarding this. It is my understanding that the previous discussion was regarding a Syrian category. Best, Unomi ( talk) 11:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I see that you've given him a final warning, and that he went back and vandalized the same page. See user talk page. regards, ScottyBerg ( talk) 22:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
I see you very active in Al-Aqsa page. In both times I made changes to the article, you reverted it in less than few minutes so I thought the best way is to leave you a note.
The changes I made are small yet essential. The Aqsa is a site that is revered in Islam for the same reason it is revered in Judaism albiet under a different name. Tomaito/Tomato.
I'm not sure if this is fortunate or not but it is true. The Aqsa, the mosque, was built few hundred years after Mohammad's death. That is certainly not an enough reason to make it a holy place in Islam. Muslims have faced the temple mount/Aqsa for more than 10 years before Mecca became their new Kotel.
There is a lot of confusion even among Muslims as what the Aqsa really is. Please see this site
http://www.atlastours.net/holyland/al_aqsa_mosque.html
Since you are very active in the page I request from you that you consider these changes with an open mind.
All the best.
Marco Polo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.170.158 ( talk) 04:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
I've been banned for making a WP:BLP violation. I was wrong interpreting what WP:BLP entails but I was given an indefinite ban.. I think this is harsh and strange. I've always appreciated your balanced edits and I think you can weigh in as a neutral party to the debate. Amoruso ( talk) 21:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the peer review on the Mass Ave. article. As you can tell, I was mulling over that inbound vs. outbound. Some aspects of the article were working from an inbound perspective, while some were outbound. I was just coming back to reverse it, but given that you have such a good eye you caught it first. :-) Thanks. CaribDigita ( talk) 17:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Toda achi! -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 23:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
The Allah/God link was an error. As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles)#Allah I was intending to pipe it to God in Islam, an article about the Islamic concept of God. Allah is an article about the Arabic word for god, as used by Christians, Jews and Muslims, which pre-dates modern usage as the word for the Abrahamic diety. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 10:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Copy Editor's Barnstar | ||
I award you this Copy Editor's Barnstar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. NickCT ( talk) 13:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC) |
You remarked in your edit-summary: "wording & structure of the lead are per consensus". I don't mind the link that you reinstated, now that I've digested the political/cultural significance, but it is unwise to assert with a blanket statement that no one can edit the lead: that is the implication of the edit-summary.
As you can see from my talk-page comment, I think it's best to remove the first of the huge raft of sources for the "biggest city" thing. Please let me know if you disagree (on my talk page). Tony (talk) 13:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
What do you mean by "Wording of the lead has been established by editorial consensus. Changes require consensus"?
Thanks in advance, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.44.7 ( talk) 05:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
I was hoping the troll would go away, but I guess life under its bridge must be boring. -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 01:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Hertz1888. I accidentally completely screwed up the page Holon (and I mean completely screwed it up), and I can't seem to fix it. Could you spread the word and see what you could do to help? Thanks!-- RM ( Be my friend) 05:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I guess the troll noticed your comment. [2] -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 01:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
An IP address and a new user are disruptively removing material from IHH (İnsani Yardım Vakfı), the Islamist organization sponsoring the ship in the Gaza flotilla. Here is the material:
The Daily Telegraph calls the IHH, "a radical Islamist group masquerading as a humanitarian agency." [1]
According to Henri Barkey, an analyst for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the IHH is, an Islamist organisation as it has been deeply involved with Hamas for some time," and "Some of its members went on the boat saying that they had written their last will and testament." [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Broad Wall ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Hertz1888, please: before removing a section of an article, check the references cited therein. The reference I gave for an allegation came from a slate.com article which, if you read, shows an author's name.
Furthermore, please understand the distinction between documenting a sourced allegation with the allegation itself. I neither support nor deny allegations that Caroline Glick is racist. In fact, I would love to see evidence disputing that she is a racist. Please respond with neutral content within an article rather than attempting to censor it. I know that everyone makes mistakes. 69.110.12.49 ( talk) 17:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
It is not "caution" to make wholesale deletions to an entire category of an entry and level accusations of edit warring. 69.110.8.85 ( talk) 18:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
This IP account, 69.110.12.49, has called others who don't share his viewpoint, "vandals." I filed a complaint against him here and encourage you to do the same. He also appears to be a notorious edit warrior, using several different IP accounts to circumvent edit warring rules. Respectfully-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 02:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
I respectfully disagree with Jiujitsuguy: I think we can be more effective at advancing our perspective if we occasionally incorporate the language and assumptions of those we oppose in order to undermine them. This tack will be more effective in the long-run, trust me. Jiujitsuguy has been getting himself (and by extension, all of us) into hot water by multiple users by being too blatant. Hence I am writing anonymously and occasionally incorporating "pro-Palestinian" language while making sure content stays in line with our interests. Just thinking aloud here... 67.180.26.60 ( talk) 06:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Please refer to my talk page for further comment. Jerusalem is not recognised as the legal capital of 'Israel'. You may refer to "The international community largely considers the legal status of Jerusalem to derive from the partition plan, and correspondingly refuses to recognize Israeli sovereignty in the city." here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem#Political_status Your inference about my motives and neutrality is NPOV. Your writing also breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopaedia. The existing wording is extensively sourced and is equally extensively repudiated. Keith-264 ( talk) 15:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Its hard to have a discussion with someone who thinks that they and their opinions are infallibly neutral, while everyone else who disagrees with them is "always wrong and a POV-pusher". Sigh.. -- nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 21:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi ! Thanks for all your work on copy-editing my expansion of this article - you'll be pleased to know that it's passed its GA review. Claritas § 19:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Well put. - Denimadept ( talk) 02:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
I think it's best to let him die of starvation, so I've stopped responding to him. If he persists in talking to himself, no big deal. If he changes an article, he can be reverted, dinged as a vandal, and blocked. I like your take on his most recent edit. - Denimadept ( talk) 05:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Hm, looks like he may have created a sock puppet. - Denimadept ( talk) 05:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Oh dear, looks like he tried it. Good catch. - Denimadept ( talk) 16:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Please point ou which specific point you consider discussion necessary. "(Reverted good faith edits by Iferera; Stripping lede of this essential info. does not improve it; the other changes are controversial & sbould be discussed."
The Western Wall (Hebrew: הכותל המערבי) (Arabic: غرب الجدار), in Judaism referred to as the Wailing Wall or simply the Kotel and as al-Buraaq Wall in contemporary Islam,[1] is the main Jewish religious site in the world and is located in the Old City of Jerusalem. Just over half the wall, including its 17 courses located below street level, dates from the end of the Second Temple period, being constructed around 19 BCE by Herod the Great. The remaining layers were added from the 7th century onwards.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Iferera ( talk • contribs) 18:49, 14 July 2010
See Brooklyn Bridge history please. - Denimadept ( talk) 04:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
TYVM. If he just wanted the other picture, he could've just done that instead of trying to be insulting. <shakes head> - Denimadept ( talk) 04:36, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Its a quote, please change back to a small "a" in: "[the Oslo Accords]" -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 23:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Avira Security Software, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 14:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC) PlantRunner ( talk) 00:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for improving the INN article. RS101 ( talk) 05:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
he has no right to keep on coming back editing talkpages. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 15:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
User:85.93.203.235's edits at Jerusalem do not meet the definition of WP:Vandalism. Please refrain from using the vandalism user warning series for this type of edit. I have reported the anonymous user for violating WP:3RR. Please consider instead using an applicable user warning, or writing a personal message. -- Bsherr ( talk) 18:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
For your clear and concise commentary when addressing disagreements on sensitive subjects. nsaum75 ¡שיחת! 02:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
You might want to make sure all four of those articles are on your watch list. Looks like they're the honeypot for era warriors. -- Steven J. Anderson ( talk) 19:17, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thank you for your help with the article. i did not focus as much on the grammar, sentence structure, etc. as i should have.-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Why did you take it down? Are you going to put up the gibberish that doesn't make any sense? Cause from where I'm standing, Everything I just said can be proved if you know your history? Shall I explain? The Bible and History go together.
Didn't know how else to contact you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.13.66 ( talk) 21:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
On 26 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nava Applebaum, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:10, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Mr. Bean on Blue Peter
Hello, Thank you for your activities on the Mr. Bean Episodes Page. Do you have any videos of Mr. Bean at Blue Peter? I'm a great fan of Mr. Bean and i collect every bit. Thank you for looking falk85570 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falk85570 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism about User:Candy853. It is so helpful to have a report which explains so clearly what the situation is, instead of the all too common vague reports that leave an admin to spend time searching to find out what the person reporting already knew and could easily have said. I have indefinitely blocked the vandal. JamesBWatson ( talk) 19:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the rollback of vandalism from my user page. Sentinel R ( talk) 12:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism#Just_curious Sean.hoyland - talk 06:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hertz! Hoping you and yours are
spiritually warmed by the holy lights of
חֲנֻכָּה
Hello, Hertz. Do you realize that you've just violated 1RR yourself? Instead of you I'd quickly self-revert and take the anonymous user to AE. -- ElComandanteChe ( talk) 23:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hertz.... I want to introduce myself. My name is Nate. I noticed that you are an active editor and participant to the article on Radio. Let me say congrats on the great work that you do. The reason why I am writing to you is to give a fair warning. A few days ago I made an edit or two to the article on the Marconi vs. U.S. case that essentially gave the radio patent to Tesla in 1943. The references I gave as you probably saw, were reliable and verifiable. however as you also probably saw, I think I may have stirred the pot. Anything pinning Tesla to the underlying principles of radio is never acceptable to another editor on that article, Magnagr. So I wanted to warn you. I have fought him tooth and nail for over a year over this agonizing subject. I've reverted several of his unsourced edits, but he will not rest until he fulfills his agenda. His current user name is not even his first as he has several registered accounts on Wikipedia. I have a feeling that nationaliatic pride is also playing at hand here with him as I think he told me once that he was Italian. Hence, that is why he would want to only accredit Marconi as the sole contributor to radio. So it is just a warning. You and the others should be prepared to fight this with him as he will never stop. I gave up a long time ago. I have radio on my watch list so I will be following along and keeping my eyes open to the edits he makes. But you should as well pay very very close attention what he does. If i can be of any help or assistance, please contact me at your leisure. Yoganate79 ( talk) 01:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
STOP DELETING MY POSTS ON BROOKLINE, MA! I will notify administrators if you continue to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbybo123 ( talk • contribs) 01:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Yea, I suppose that CEOs and founders of multi-billion dollar companies aren't noteworthy! Good call moron. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbybo123 ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
A TFD has been opened on Template:Religious text primary. The TfD was opened on 2 December; so is due to close in two days time. Notification being sent to all participants in the previous discussion Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_July_30#Template:BibleAsFact. Jheald ( talk) 23:26, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Korruski Talk 10:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
My bad. Not sure how I missed that. Thanks for catching it. Doniago ( talk) 19:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
[ [4]]. Thanks. - asad ( talk) 20:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
In all seriousness, I have no idea to what sarcasm you refer, nor to what phrase. [5] Please enlighten. I like your work, BTW. EEng ( talk) 02:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
I'm glad we've cleared this up. The removal of your phrase was inadvertant -- an edit conflict. My "very, VERY clever" comments were self-deprecating references to my own addition to the article of the following, allocable to my almost addictive adulation for alliteration: "A 1903 guidebook noted the trisyllabic-disyllabic alternation attending aforesaid alphabetic appellations." I'll be interested to see how long that remains.
As to the photo, to me it presents Back Bay's houses from the worst possible vantage, looking all skinny and squished as if perchjed on a steep hillside, their ugly rooftop mechanical private parts shamelessly exposed. EEng ( talk) 13:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Do you think the section "U.S.Navy Interfaith Service" at Western Wall is correctly displayed? I am wondering whether too much prominence is given to this 10 minute, rather unnotable occurance in the history of the wall. See here. Chesdovi ( talk) 11:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits HERE. I had similar reaction to edits HERE and HERE. Regards, Mercy11 ( talk) 23:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hertz, thanks so much for your kind words about Brattle Street. Now that I have gotten a bit further along, I think I will actually take your earlier suggestion about merging Tory Row into the article. But not yet, I am still running around getting this one done.
I see you have a lot of experience in Cambridge articles. Do you want to collaborate on this one? If you help me expand it, we could go together to ask for a DYK on it. Or Maybe even a featured article down the road. There are a lot of great images that could be added.
One of the glaring omissions I see right now is that I have put in nothing about Longfellow House, which has good stories both from the 18th and 19th centuries. But I'm going to sleep now anyway. betsythedevine ( talk) 07:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Hertz1888, thanks for fixing the article, but may I please ask you why to you waste your time on the article that is witch-hunted on AFD, AN/I , DYK suggestions page and a few user talk pages, and that is certain to get deleted? Regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 06:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
At Loudness monitoring I reverted your addition of a manufacturer's product line link. I felt it was promotional. Binksternet ( talk) 17:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble. What I did to "Breaking Away" was an experiment to prove to all my friends who call wikipedia an unreliable source how quickly any unverified changes are reverted. Since you reverted both my changes within about 10 minutes, I don't think they'll talk down to wikipedia so much anymore.
Keep it up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.18.161 ( talk) 06:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Hertz. Please don't take this too hard, but
what in the world were you thinking? Have you seen the film? It's complex, fast-paced, and at least ten percent longer than the average feature film. Believe me, the current "summary" excludes tons of material and is the minimum amount of content that clearly explains the story.
> If you can think of a better way to keep clumsy IPs from making this plot "summary" even longer, go for it.
The only answer is to ban IPs completely. I heartily favor that approach, but I have no control over it. Also, the IP issue is unrelated to your message-box edit. I approve of every word in that summary, and I wrote many of them myself.
> Not a joke and kindly AGF.
Okay, assuming good faith on your part, I have to assume some kind of carelessness or lack of competence. I would ask you to please be more careful in selecting 650-word plot summaries to be labeled as too long or detailed. This film is long, fast, and complex, so a shorter summary wouldn't do it justice. 650 words is well within the 400-700 word guideline, and there are lots of summaries on Wikipedia that are much longer and include more unimportant detail for shorter, slower, and/or simpler stories. If you haven't seen the film, I would ask you to watch films before declaring their summaries too long, because some stories are inherently long and/or complex.
If your message-box edit was just a brief aberration, then please don't take this reply too seriously. I spend almost all of my Wikipedia time reading and deleting IP edits, and my highest priority on Wikipedia is keeping film plot summaries clear and concise. If you still think part of the current Silver Streak summary is too detailed, please be very specific about what it is and why you think it's unimportant, because I've already spent a lot of time paring it down to its current size.
Have a nice day.
—
Coder Dan (
talk)
04:44, 6 March 2011 (UTC)