This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Hello; since I've seen that disgrace of promo-campaign at en wiki (and I'm bored with edit wars)- would you be interested in reshaping it into a more balanced & truthful text ? As it is, the text is similar to the "Pravda" pamphlets during Brezhnev's era. You got tons of quotable & realistic material at Croatian wikipedia. Best Mir Harven ( talk) 12:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can see, you nominated Edo Stojčić for deletion. I am a bit baffled as as to why you would question his notability (at least you gave no arguments). Please don't do bot's work. Try to help and improve the article or give a good, coherent argument as to why you think Edo Stojčić is not notable enough or why you think his works are not significant enough. ★ čabrilo★ 09:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
On 6 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rimac Concept One, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Rimac Concept One (pictured) has been described as the world's first electric supercar? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rimac Concept One. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 04:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 08:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please give me any advice on use of non-free images? Specifically, I'm not entirely sure what procedure need be followed to have fair-use apply to specific photos. Details are posted at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 13:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! In an effort to make some sense in the Operation Storm article (and get it to GA or FA in the process) I thought to move out a part of material on the Trial of Gotovina et al to a new article, leaving a summary in the Operation Storm article. Basically I moved the "ICTY trials" [sic] section to the new article (fixing an unreferenced claim in the process) breaking it up in two sections (indictments and trial), added background and aftermath sections and the said (slightly modified) summary as a lead. Now, I wanted to start a talk page for the article, borrowing from Talk:Trial of Slobodan Milošević, but there are so many projects listed that got me to pause and ask you to see which would be appropriate to tag this new article. Thanks!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Mind you, the copied material needs a lot of work, but I think it would be best done in the new article.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatian American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Is there a way to include this into the Split Agreement article?-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Just had a look at Karađorđevo agreement - and I noticed that WP.Cro importance of the article was set to High. Since the Erdut Agreement is of Mid importance, I feel something's wrong there, but I'm not sure which. I'm leaning to demoting the Karađorđevo agreement to Mid or even Low importance, but I'd really appreciate your opinion here. Thanks!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 17:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you please help with this issue?-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 19:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi! It appears that the B-class business is nearly over - it only took three months longer than I first thought it would! What happens after the last one on the list is tagged? Cheers!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 22:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Just now I copyedited the Operation Storm article and realized that the article I just recently wrote - Vance plan includes all information contained in the Sarajevo Agreement, while the two are not entirely synonymous. Need anything be done or is that situation fine?-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 08:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot ( error?) 10:17, 14 April 2013 (UTC)What do you mean? Zigzig20s ( talk) 22:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please provide feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Suitable name for a campaign? I posted at WP:MILHIST talk page since the issue largely falls within the project scope, but I trust you might provide a good advice too.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I am glad to inform you that WPS has no unassessed articles in terms of their quality. What do you think could be next actions of members of this project? Thanks in advance.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 13:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I just had a look at the Lisa Stublić and Sandra Perković articles, and it's a real pity those are not already at the GAN... If you know what I mean. :) Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:43, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I have created a discussion at BLP/Noticeboard to discuss Savo Štrbac. Your participation would be appreciated. Stephen! Coming... 12:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Stavil sam vire na Vukopis. Liepo pozdravjenje Vukopisac ( talk) 19:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
In the future, when you encounter this kind of a page, please apply WP:ATP ({{ db-attack}}). -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I actually would have concurred, but another user modified it to be less of an attack page, rendering the tag moot. When I came across it, I just cleaned it up further. The key difference is that "Vukopis" was both an attack page and a fringe biased rant by a single-purpose account, cherry-picking references to largely non-reliable sources and DoSing us with a list of generic uninlined "references", all about a topic that is not generally notable even if it's truthful. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 11:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ted Haggard may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poljana, Bjelovar-Bilogora County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poljana ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Could you please venture an opinon here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trial of Gotovina et al. I already posted there, but I have next to no experience on the AFDs. Thanks.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for tireless contributions to tedious tasks. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Tomobe03 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins ! 19:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
GregorB |
Croatia |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning June 16, 2013 |
A random article patroller with over 130000 edits, more than 20 DYN mentions and 8 tears plus of diligent and active WP participation. |
Recognized for |
"tons of quality edits" |
Nomination page |
GregorB, možeš li mi se molim te javiti e-porukom? Lijep pozdrav :-) -- Roberta F. ( talk) 12:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi! A while ago I posted two entries at WPHR announcements for 28 June. I know GA announcements should be combined together, but I was unsure should that be done when one of them is GA and another A-class. Please feel free to amend as appropriate. Or leave them as is, it is quite likely that both entries will slip down the list sufficiently in a little while to be archived :) -- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For helping to finally clean Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Darius Dhlomo. Wizardman 19:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi! I just had a quick look at the Croatian War of Independence article - and even though I plan to revisit the prose later on - thought of a way to trim the article down a bit. I'll be bold and split of the "Movies and documentaries" section into a list and link it from the "see also". "List of movies and documentaries dealing with the Croatian War of Independence" while accurate seems like an unwieldy title, so I thought to ask if you have an idea? Cheers.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 21:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sword Boys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Green ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Is there a way to use {{ Croatia Yearbook 2011}} and {{ Croatian Census 2011 First Results}} along with the {{ sfn}} template?-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 18:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
You tagged this for lack of notability in May, so you might be interested in weighing in at the AfD. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 12:37, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Čađavički Lug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Čađavica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Declaration on the Status and Name of the Croatian Literary Language may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a copyvio website and was previously and deliberately removed en masse, please do not add to articles as you have done at Mate Šestan. Regards, Giant Snowman 11:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Well, perhaps before this edit - not mine :) -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello GregorB, I'm contacting you because we need some Croatian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Croatian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 23:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Gregor, Jimbo Wales is asking for aditional input from Croatian users regarding the situation on Croatian Wikipedia. Please feel free to voice your opinion. Timbouctou ( talk) 23:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Gregor! I've translated most of Bešker's article. It is quite long and incredibly time-consuming so I skipped some bits where he delves into philosophy and whatnot. His style of writing is a bit pretentious, as you probably know. You can find the text here. Cheers! Timbouctou ( talk) 18:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I recently edited the Battle of the Dalmatian channels article. While the current title conforms to WP:MILMOS naming policy, I'm wondering if redirects are needed to accommodate possible searches of the Battle of the Split Channel and the Battle of the Korčula Channel. Also, do you think a hatnote is needed to distinguish the latter from the Battle of Curzola? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 13:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sports Reference LLC. Since you had some involvement with the Sports Reference LLC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:19, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Poštovani kolega GregorB
Vidio sam da tražite pomoć u prikupljanju činjenica o nepravilnostima na hr wiki, - meni su dali crveni karton 2010. i od tad više ne surađujem na tom projektu - casus belli možete pročitati na meti - Requests for comment/Vitek. Meni se osobno neda petljati sa tom malom rigidnom grupom osionih administratora, pa ukoliko Vam moj slučaj pomogne - da dobijete uvid u ono što se dešavalo - dobro, a ukoliko ne, izvinite na smetnji.
-- Vitek ( talk) 00:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for alerting me. FWIW this is what I wrote to them:
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:11:12 +0200 To: tim@dailydot.com Subject: How pro-fascist ideologues are rewriting Croatia's history Hi, In the article http://www.dailydot.com/politics/croatian-wikipedia-fascist-takeover-controversy-right-wing/ you wrote: Croatian editor Joy, like others who support the current incarnation of Croatian Wikipedia, insist that a conspiracy is afoot to bolster outside skepticism. "[T]he simple fact [is] that some anonymous people generated an online controversy and then immediately latched onto whatever media coverage of it in order to promote the same controversy on Wikipedia," Joy wrote. I'm Joy and you have grossly misrepresented my position. I do *NOT* support the current incarnation of Croatian Wikipedia, nor do I insist that there's a conspiracy of any sort. You cherry-picked an arbitrary quote from what I wrote and completely missed the mark. What I think of the shenanigans at the Croatian Wikipedia is obvious from reading the *entirety* of my comments on that same page I've been aware of these hr: wiki-related feuds for a while now, and I have personally been on the receiving end of abuse of one of the implicated editors in the past over here. None of this changes the simple fact that some anonymous people generated an online controversy and then immediately latched onto whatever media coverage of it in order to promote the same controversy on Wikipedia. This is exactly why we have the policy that Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The fact that these kinds of shenanigans happen all too often in this topic area is exactly why the Macedonia arbitration case resulted in such harsh rules being imposed on it. To think that I (unequivocally) support the Croatian Wikipedia, when I already said that I have been abused by one of those editors, is ridiculous. Also, read my comments at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/2013_issues_on_Croatian_Wikipedia/Evidence/Conduct where I pointed out a specific case of admin misuse of the Croatian Wikipedia and said in no uncertain terms that it needs to end. I expect a public apology and a retraction of the offending statement.
-- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please take a look at the Operation Labrador categories. I'm not quite sure on keeping "Antisemitism in Yugoslavia" and "Battles and conflicts without fatalities" - the thing was not really about antisemitism nor was it a battle. Still, it was about an attempt to portray one group as antisemitic and it was a part of a conflict - hence the uncertainty. Thanks!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 12:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi GregorB, I've got a question. On what grounds did you assess the Valve Hammer Editor article as Start? The two refs are both for the History section, so the article has no source for its verifiability (I know VHE is notable enough to warrant an article, but there's no source in the article saying so). Also, the entire "Files and compiling" isn't about VHE, but about the generic BSP compilation process, so in essence the VHE article is only 5 lines of text, so it fails the "The article has a usable amount of good content" quality criteria as well. -- DanielPharos ( talk) 09:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I recently edited the Battle of the Miljevci Plateau and I am still struggling to figure out one of the categories previously assigned to the article - specifically the "Mass murder in 1992". Sources indicate no civilians were killed on either side and one POW was shot. I doubt that one death (besides combat fatalities) constitutes a mass murder.
I assume the category was added based on this Slobodna Dalmacija article claiming 29 POWs and an unspecified number of civilians killed (SD referring to an unspecified HHO report) for a total of 50 Serb fatalities. I disregarded the source in the article since it appears to be particularly off the mark. Multiple Serb sources (including Veritas, for what it's worth) indicate a total of 40 killed Serbs, all of them Territoral Defencemen, and none besides one (Miroslav Subotić) killed as POWs. To make matters more puzzling, even the earlier largely unreferenced incarnation of the article offered support for the category. As far as I can tell, a war crime was committed (Subotić), but not exactly a mass murder. Thoughts?
Also, since I'm already bothering you with this, what is the proper way to categorize articles: some of items in the Category:Battles of the Croatian War of Independence, e.g. the Battle of Gospić is listed under "G", while the Battle of Vukovar sits under "B". I assume, one of those should be changed to the other, but which?-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 13:15, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please offer an advice on the following: I was checking up an ISBN number, specifically for Rat u Bosanskoj Posavini 1992. / Jerko Zovak, and could not find it on WorldCat, which seems funny enough. The book quite appears to have been published. It is featured here, even sporting ISBN 978-953-6357-86-4 (which draws blank when searched itself). The book was also reviewed by Davor Marijan and the review is available here. For the time being, I included the ISBN found at the bib.irb.hr in the source information, but I would like to verify this if possible. Thoughts?-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 22:36, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hal Abelson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that an awful lot of reference links contained in recently promoted GAs began to suffer from url changes, redirects and outright disappearance and thought to archive at least some of those. Now, there's one particular link - Glas Slavonije reference in the Bombing of Banski dvori article which seems to have gone missing from the GS server, and wayback machine has no archived copy of that. I googled it up some more and found a copy located here credited to GS and the same reporter. What do you think, would it be better to replace GS url with this one or specify this new url as archive, or archive this url at wayback machine and specify that archive as GS article archive? Or is there another way to tackle this? Cheers!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 16:03, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! I'm editing as much as real life will let me, but I don't have the intention of stopping, especially now that I've noticed some naval topics require working on :-). -- Saxum ( talk) 21:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I just edited Operation Vrbas '92 a bit and noticed it is categorized as a "Battle involving Croatia". After reading what sources have to say on the matter, I'm not convinced about justification of such categorization -- Croatia of course supported HVO in many ways, but I don't think the force deployed in Jajce received any direct support from HV or something like that. The battle is also listed in {{ Wars and battles involving Croatia}}, so I thought to ask for advice before removing the article from the two (the category and the template). On that point, would it be sensible to create a category of "Battles involving Croatian Defence Council" or something along those lines to categorize this article and others similar to that one? Cheers!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 14:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:JPL Image has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Tomobe03 (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Best wishes for the holidays and a very successful new year!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 15:34, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi GregorB! Have a very merry Christmas and a happy and a happy new year! Cheers! Timbouctou ( talk) 17:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 20:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Afc2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:14, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Afc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations on your decision to semi-retire, I hope the reason is a happy one. If you happen to be able to spare any attention to the hrwiki evidence gathering pages on Meta while they're still active it will be very welcome and appreciated, but thanks in no small part to your experience and judgment, I believe, with some trepidation, that I've learned enough to see them through to completion. It's been a pleasure working with you, and I'd like to extend my immense thanks for your work and initiative, along with my best wishes for an enjoyable Wiki-semi-retirement! 😎 – Miranche T C 18:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I hope you will not decide against retiring altogether, the work you have done here is tremendous, I think you are an excellent editor with a head much cooler than mine, and good people like you are in short supply on Wikipedia. I would certainly be sorry to see you go. I just hope your decision has nothing to do with the whole hr.wiki affair as it is frankly not really worth it. Cheers man. Timbouctou ( talk) 21:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
– SJ + 21:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am conducting a survey of most active Wikipedians, regarding reasons they may reduce their activity. I would be very interested in having you participate in it. Would you be interested? (If you reply to me here, please WP:ECHO me). Thank you for your consideration, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Here's the applicable part of the survey (Questions 1-3 are for editors who have not reduced their activity, so I am skipping them as to not waste your time):
Question 4. Chose one answer which BEST describes the reason you have reduced your contributions: a) because of new commitments (job, family, another hobby) or health reasons b) because of unpleasant atmosphere, conflict with other editors, or lack of respect c) because of being overworked with Wikipedia needs d) feeling undervalued e) other (please elaborate):
Question 5. Do you agree with the following statement (YES or NO): a) some of the most stressful moments in my life were related to my involvement with Wikipedia
Question 6. On a scale of 1-5, how likely are you to start contributing again (or return to your peak activity levels)? (1=Never, 5=Definitely, it's just a matter of time)
Question 7. If you would like to elaborate on the reasons you reduced your contributions, dispute that claim, suggest reforms to Wikipedia that would make it a better place for you to edit, or provide any other comments (including links to Wikipedia pages), please include them below. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hvala na odgovor, I tried copying your template but it's just showing a red link but whatever it's cool though Zastavafan76 ( talk) 22:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Opet velika hvala! Zastavafan76 ( talk) 00:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, i just found out you recently rated an article, i am the main contributor of, as "at least start class." What was missing for a "C-rating" other than the missing picture? Thanks, by a rather inexperienced user. Rka001 ( talk) 13:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Our Lady of Sinj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mehmed Pasha ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tramontane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levante ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Regarding [1], this was live for three years so there's little point in outright removing it now; I archived it instead. It was not an insulting discussion as such (unlike the previous one). -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 07:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Studenci, Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamešnica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
You need to add a modicum of justification somewhere on that article and/or its talk page... the lead section still uses the Croatian spelling and the talk page is empty. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 11:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I would appreciate your help with copy editing of Leftist errors.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! What are you trying to do at Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/Frame? Does it have anything to do with the tabbed page design discussed at WT:CRO a while ago? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 13:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
ona prava bosanska baklava :D :D WikiLite91 ( talk) 00:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi! Could you please take a look at the Croatia-Serbia border dispute in terms of B-class assessment and I'm not entirely sure if there should ba a hyphen or an ndash in the article title (please move accordingly if necessary). Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 23:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to redo that edit, go ahead, but do the same for all the analogous items. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 21:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Happy holidays and enjoy Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/News and alerts. Be sure to let me know how do you like that page.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 23:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
There's redlinked "showcase" link in the navigation. I thought to have User:JL-Bot maintain an automated listing of recognised content. One such listing maintained by the bot is available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Balkan military history task force#Article statistics. Cheers.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirko Kovač ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
I just noticed that interesting discussion you had on WP Croatia over minority languages. I have two questions.
Firstly, I noticed you said that it is fine to add minority names in infobox of municipalities and settlements that officially introduced bilingualism/multilingualism. Let me explain, I mean specifically municipalities that take step to introduce bilingualism, not just municipalities that are obliged to do so under Constitutional law but maybe still did not (Plus I would exclude Vukovar until we get final picture). It would be municipalities like Borovo or Kneževi Vinogradi. I know that the user DIRECTOR make big issue about that last time, but does this last discussion shows that his position does not enjoy majority support of community?
Second question is if someone can add section "official languages" into infobox settlement as I improvised in article Trpinja?-- MirkoS18 ( talk) 13:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering if you might be interested in resources offered by the Wikipedia Library and I thought to drop you a note that they're granting access to various otherwise paid resources for free at Wikipedia:TWL.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I've replied to your message over there (just in case you aren't watching that page) -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 19:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sanja RTL Televizija.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I had created a list of Top 10 WP:CRO DYK articles before my last block. If you think this is useful, please copy it somewhere so I can delete the content from my subpage. Timbouctou ( talk) 12:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Category:Specific-source templates by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
On 4 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Savo Zlatić, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Savo Zlatić took up chess composition while imprisoned, using chess pieces made of bread? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Savo Zlatić. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Great job promoting Savo Zlatić to the Main Page. The hook you proposed was great. Keep up the good work! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 03:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC) |
Congrats on the DYK. Have you considered a GAN? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you seem to be a smart and cool-headed editor. There is a page similar to the Shaitsu page, with many of the same contributors, and some similar debates. Seems to be a group that is split strongly between pro-altmed and Skeptic or anti-altmed viewpoints. A few more neutral voices would be helpful. Like Shiatsu, it's a challenge to keep a neutral, encyclopedic tone. Would you mind watchlisting this page: Rolfing, and if the mood strikes you, chime in? I hear that you are semi-retired so I'm sure you have plenty on your plate, so I would really appreciate it. Thanks!-- Karinpower ( talk) 22:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello again GregorB, I have appreciated your input in the past and especially that you seem to have a neutral yet educated point of view. I humbly request your assistance again. Three new Skeptic sources have been added to the Rolfing article; all 3 of these sources only mention the word "Rolfing" once, and only in a long list of alternative medicine topics. In each case, the author is making a blanket complaint about alt-med (though the grouping is quite different in each of the sources), and there is no specific information or criticism about Rolfing provided. The Skeptic's Dictionary is already cited, which is a much better Skeptic source, offering a full page of information and several specific criticisms. I believe these three new sources should be disallowed as they don't add anything about Rolfing. However, I am outnumbered as the editors on this page tend to favor a Skeptic source regardless of its quality. I realize this comes down to policy rather than a simple "vote" but a few more voices, and perhaps different opinions, would help. Everything is civil but I don't think we are going to be able to reach consensus on this matter. Thank you in advance!-- Karinpower ( talk) 22:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nenad Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nenad Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, GregorB! FYI: The following has been proposed on Talk:Sportsperson:
I currently have no opinion on which way to go, however, there is some discussion regarding the "athletics" vs. "track and field" issue that we've stumbled over previously. Cheers! Location ( talk) 06:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Imas email od mene. Pozdrav! -- Kolega2357 ( talk) 15:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi GregorB.
I just created an article about Paškal Jukić. Since this topic was not within my main field of interest before, if you know more about it will you please check if I have made some mistake there before I nominate it for DYK. All the best.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Looks like someone got to it before me following a WP:RFPP request; please feel free to use that in the future yourself, this is a no-brainer. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Can you please contact me at tomogrigor@gmail.com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrwilhelm ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
On 2 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1806 Franciscan friar Paškal Jukić was an editor of Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin, the first Croatian-language newspaper? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Template:Croatia Yearbook 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 ( talk) 09:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This War of Mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Fixed. DS ( talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I believe your concerns with the DYK nomination of the above have been addressed.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
It has been said that repeating the same actions over and over while expecting differing results is a definition of insanity. What then do we call it when 50 or so of the world's most powerful men collaborate upon the repetition?
I hope my Sigma war games series will cause others to wonder the same.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 22:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
On 19 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Living Truth, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Božidarka Frajt won the Golden Arena for Best Actress for playing herself in The Living Truth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Living Truth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 11:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 15:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
In appreciation for your contribution to the George Kline article LoveMonkey 17:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and your family! Timbouctou ( talk) 13:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |