![]() | You can stop the bot by pushing the stop button. The bot sees and immediately stops running. Unless it is an emergency please consider reporting problems first to my talk page. |
Just to let you know, this bot’s edit of the population info in the infobox of the Balearic Islands article made it so that article didn’t display any population info, so I reverted it. Blaylockjam10 ( talk) 19:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, on the page /info/en/?search=Afghanistan , There are three section about the population are wrong. number one:The population section on the right bar section of the page where it shows 31,575,018. It suppose be 37,135,635 instead of 31,575,018. number two:The section sentence where it shows "Afghanistan is a unitary presidential Islamic republic with a population of 31 million". it suppose to be 37 million population at least. number three:Under the demographics section, where it shows"The population of Afghanistan was estimated at 31.6 million in 2018. Of this, 16.1 million are males and 15.5 million females. ". The population of Afghanistan should be 37,135,635.
Here is my reference https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/afghanistan-population/
Can you change the three section that I mentioned? 37,135,635 or 37 million is the most updated information of Afghanistan population currently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.178.118.50 ( talk) 12:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Please can your bot work its magic on links matching the pattern couchnoise.com/articles/, as found, for example, near the foot of Out of Water? they all seem to be dead; compare [1] and [2]. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Andy Mabbett, it is in 9 articles and appears the entire domain is dead not just a sub-path portion. I logged into IABot ("Fix dead link" from history tab), "Manage URL Data", set domain global state to "Blacklisted" then "Run on All Pages". The job is queued and should run in the next day or so. -- Green C 12:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
During this edit the bot removed the article infobox's closing braces, making it unrenderable. Would you check the bot's logic circuits? Dhtwiki ( talk) 00:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
In this edit the bot doesn't seem capable of handling a link that uses templates for the display text. Modulus12 ( talk) 01:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Just noticed this edit. Per WP:DABREF, disambiguation pages should not have references. Is there an additional check that could be made for this? Caeciliusinhorto ( talk) 13:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
disambig}}
or a variant. --
Green
C
13:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
{{
Given name}}
, which is in
Category:Set index article templates. If I am reading
User:GreenC bot/Job 11/How right this should already be filtered out, so maybe this is a bug?
Caeciliusinhorto (
talk)
14:57, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
{{given name}}
was
just added. --
Green
C
00:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello GreenC, I've just come across this edit from last month which added {{ France metadata Wikidata}}. As you can see it overwrote the template's closing tags and left the page a bit wonky. I didn't notice other pages with this problem, but maybe it would be good to check if any other of these 30,000 articles are no longer transcluding {{ Infobox French commune}} in case the bot removed other tags. Best, -- 213.220.68.67 ( talk) 00:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey...just noticed the bot made some changes to 2015 NCAA Division I FCS football rankings to update archive links since WebCite is currently offline. Unfortunately, it's pulling in Wayback archives from different dates than the original grabs, so incorrect archived versions are being linked.
Many of the references came from a static URL of a college football poll which was updated with the latest poll each week, and each was archived through WebCite shortly after the page was updated in order to preserve the data from the page before it got wiped in favor of the following week's poll.
So any archive that wasn't captured within a week of the original poll publication displays the wrong version of the poll. I appreciate the intent of trying to convert these archived links to a more stable source, but an incorrect archived version of the page isn't any better than not having an archived version at all. In fact, it might be worse, since it gives the impression that the link will show the correct information, when it in fact does not. WildCowboy ( talk) 04:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
{{
cbignore}}
next to each and hope that webcitation comes back online, or a mix of these two options. --
Green
C
13:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Hi, I have marked a link as a dead link in an attempt to stop the archive bots from adding an archivelink to it. The newspaper that ran the article has pulled it from its live site. It has also apparently disabled the archivelink from working. How can I stop the archivelink from being added over and over? It is not helpful because the article shows up but then it is pulled. Here is the link to the diffs: [3]. Thank you. dawnleelynn (talk) 18:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
@
Dawnleelynn:, use {{
cbignore}}
to keep the bot off a citation. BTW even if the newspaper pulled the story, why wouldn't we include an archive link so readers can still see it? That is the purpose of archive links, when links are no longer available (ie.
WP:LINKROT). --
Green
C
22:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi @ Modulus12: I disabled Javascript completely and cleared my cache in Chrome. You were right, the archivelinks do work after doing that. However, something else strange happens too. I no longer see the Wayback Machine header at the top of the archivelink pages. I tried several and none of them show the header so you know you are on an archivelink site; of course the URL lets you know that you are, but that's it. Thanks though it's a good way to test when I run into this issue. I'll probably keep Javascript on and just turn it off to test for issues. So, your help has been very useful to me; thanks a bunch! Already I can see some UI items missing from this page because I have Javascript off, such as the one that signs my signature for me. dawnleelynn (talk) 23:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC):
In this edit, GreenC bot changed a number of NewsBank citations to non-working links.
For example, a WebCite link:
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)was changed to Archive.org:
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)The Archive.org link says "Error: Your Search session has expired", whereas the WebCite link contains the article. NewsBank links fall under two domains: (1) http://infoweb.newsbank.com/ and (2) http://docs.newsbank.com/. Would you fix GreenC bot to check for when the NewsBank link is expired? Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 05:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
In this edit, GreenC bot changed a number of ProQuest citations to non-working links.
For example, a WebCite link:
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)was changed to an Archive.org link:
{{
cite news}}
: Unknown parameter |deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)The Archive.org link redirects to https://search.proquest.com/news and does not contain a PDF of the article, whereas the WebCite link contains a PDF of the article.
Cunard (
talk)
06:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Yeah. These are soft404's difficult to detect. It sometimes works
[6]. Let me think about it. --
Green
C
13:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
With this edit the bot converted this:
{{citation |contribution= Chapter 15: Ending the Ban on Black Priests |title= [[The Mormons (miniseries)|The Mormons]] (Part 2) |contribution-url= https://www.pbs.org/mormons/view/15.html |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20080718150441/http://www.pbs.org/mormons/view/15.html? |archivedate= 2008-07-18 |publisher=''[[Frontline (US TV series)|Frontline]]'' and ''[[American Experience]]'', [[PBS]] |year= 2007}}
{{
citation}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)to this:
{{citation |contribution= Chapter 15: Ending the Ban on Black Priests |title= [[The Mormons (miniseries)|The Mormons]] (Part 2) |contribution-url= https://www.pbs.org/mormons/view/15.html |url= http://www.pbs.org/mormons/view/15.html? |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080718150441/http://www.pbs.org/mormons/view/15.html? |dead-url= yes |archivedate= 2008-07-18 |publisher=''[[Frontline (US TV series)|Frontline]]'' and ''[[American Experience]]'', [[PBS]] |year= 2007}}
{{
citation}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help); URL–wikilink conflict (
help); Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)By adding |url=
http://www.pbs.org/mormons/view/15.html?
when |title=
was already wikilinked, caused cs1|2 to emit the error message. |title=
(and other title-holding parameters) cannot have both wikilink and external link. Wikilinks can be added directly, as in these examples, but also with |title-link=
– this applies only to |title=
.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 21:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Still broken. With this edit, bot converted this:
{{citation|contribution=Bradford, William, 1722–91, American Revolutionary printer and patriot|contribution-url=http://www.bartleby.com/65/br/Bradfd1722.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081007213621/http://www1.bartleby.com/65/br/Bradfd1722.html|archivedate=7 October 2008|title=[[Columbia Encyclopedia|The Columbia Encyclopedia]]|edition=6th|location=New York, N.Y.|publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] (reproduced on [[Bartleby.com]])|year=2004|isbn=978-0-7876-5015-5}}
to this:
{{citation|contribution=Bradford, William, 1722–91, American Revolutionary printer and patriot|contribution-url=http://www.bartleby.com/65/br/Bradfd1722.html|url=http://www1.bartleby.com/65/br/Bradfd1722.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081007213621/http://www1.bartleby.com/65/br/Bradfd1722.html|dead-url=yes|archivedate=7 October 2008|title=[[Columbia Encyclopedia|The Columbia Encyclopedia]]|edition=6th|location=New York, N.Y.|publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] (reproduced on [[Bartleby.com]])|year=2004|isbn=978-0-7876-5015-5}}
{{
citation}}
: URL–wikilink conflict (
help); Unknown parameter |dead-url=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (
help)Again inserting inappropriate |url=
http://www1.bartleby.com/65/br/Bradfd1722.html
when |title=
is already wikilinked.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 19:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Trappist the monk, normally it skips expansion of |url=
when another URL field exists but |contribution-url=
was missing from the check list. It now has that plus |chapter-url=
, |conference-url=
, |map-url=
, |transcript-url=
and |lay-url=
. --
Green
C
20:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
|archive-url=
are:
|chapter-url=
, |chapterurl=
, |contribution-url=
, |contributionurl=
, |entry-url=
, |article-url=
, |section-url=
, |sectionurl=
– these are all aliases of |chapter-url=
so apply to all aliases of |chapter=
|map-url=
– {{
cite map}}
only but is specific to |map=
which can act as |title=
(italicized) or as |chapter=
(upright quoted)|url=
– of course|url=
from |archive-url=
.|archive-url=
:
|conference-url=
is specific to |conference=
|transcript-url=
is specific to |transcript=
|lay-url=
is specific to the plain-text label 'Lay summary'|url=
from |archive-url=
GreenC bot has been making changes to Latter Day Saints articles and causing some problems. One recent example is over these four changes, where the bot seems to be trying to avoid links that are redirected at the target site. Thing is, the edits caused duplicate reference errors because not all of the references with the same name (and the same content) were changed. Why is the bot making these changes in the first plcae? And if it must make them, why isn't it consistently applying the changes within the article -- why does it only fix some of these links? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 03:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Mike, discussed here. I am also perplexed why it changes some links and not others during the same edit, I suspect something to do with LDS website bot control because it is intermittent (the bot won't change a link if it can't determine the redirect). So I have been reprocessing pages multiple times but apparently some are still missed. This is to prevent future breakage if the redirect is lost, and get Wayback machine tracking at the new URL. It's been a complex conversion but trying to do it in the future without accurate redirect information would be impossible (a problem which happens). Sorry about the trouble it caused. The bulk of it is done. -- Green C 04:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. On the page for Errol New Hampshire I noticed that a date may be wrong. How do I send you a screenshot of what I'm talking about? Thanks. Tim User7998 ( talk) 03:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Have a look what you are doing. Just two examples:
Sorry, there are no Official Singles Chart results for "you are the quarry"
Type in artist name
That's vandalism, isn't it? -- 95.116.186.122 ( talk) 00:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi, |deadurl=
and |dead-url=
have been deprecated in {{
cite web}} and its variants in favor of |url-status=
, and a red citation error message now appears in citations which use the deprecated syntax. However, I notice that GreenC bot is still generating dead-url, which has contributed to the growth of the maintenance category
Category:CS1_errors: deprecated parameters. Are you able to update the bot accordingly? The particulars of the cite template update that applies here are listed at the maintenance category page (and also at
Template:Cite_web#What's_new), but note that the "yes" or "no" values also need to be changed to "live", "dead", "unfit", or "usurped", as necessary. Thanks.—
TAnthony
Talk
17:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
I have made a comment about an action relating to blue linking seemingly initiated by your bot at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#IABot blue linking to Internet archive books to which so far I have had one response which was not particularly helpful. I would be grateful if you would respond there. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 07:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
For the record, because the new actor/comment tables are so slow this is the only query I found so far that manages to complete and count the edits:
MariaDB [enwiki_p]> select count(rev_id) from revision_userindex JOIN comment ON rev_comment_id = comment_id AND comment_id > 284004931 AND comment_text LIKE "Bluelink%#IABot%" AND rev_actor = 177; +---------------+ | count(rev_id) | +---------------+ | 131884 | +---------------+ 1 row in set (52 min 4.25 sec)
Nemo 09:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
See
this edit and
its result. If you are going to remove |url=
you must also remove |access-date=
and |url-access=
(and any other parameter that relies on |url=
). This same applies for the chapter (and alias) parameters.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 18:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
|doi=
links to a working page. Possibly page scrape. I'd need to investigate and find some non-working examples. The page headers always return 200 so can't be used. --
Green
C
17:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
|id=
.
Nemo
13:03, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
|url=
and |archiveurl=
and replace it with the |doi=
/ and for unstructured references simply replace the original link with a link to doi.org/doi_# -- no parsing of unstructured citations required. The key is finding the DOI for the original URL. I think it is possible by web scraping the archiveurl. But if your saying bad DOIs are common then this presents problems for unstructured citations (my bot can't convert them to structured), and anyway in that case it should be option 1, RSN. --
Green
C
14:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Nemo_bis I'm at a loss. Consensus discussion opened at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#sciencedirect.com_..._interscience.wiley.com_..._informaworld.com -- Green C 14:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
For this link: https://worldtracker.org/media/library/Reference/Encyclopedia's/Encyclopedia%20of%20Irises.pdf, can I get a reference replacement?
Anywhere where that link is found, replace the text between <ref> and </ref> with Austin, Claire (2005). Irises: A Gardener's Encyclopedia. Timber Press, Incorporated. ISBN 978-0881927306. OL 8176432M.? See this as an example: [8]. Thanks! -- evrik ( talk) 20:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
http://www.encyclopedias.biz/dw/Encyclopedia%20of%20Irises.pdf
). An offset of 24 pages though if that offset holds for every page I have no idea. Given there are only 75 cases and not all with page numbers ideally someone could determine the new page numbers for the 2005 edition before a bot deleted the original page info. (BTW the PDF is pirate but useful for finding page numbers). --
Green
C
22:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)This was a blunt patch but it's done. In case anyone is interested in the "1-line" unix command:
awk -ilibrary '{IGNORECASE=1; f=sys2var("wikiget -w " shquote($0)); c=patsplit(f,field, /[{][{][ ]*cite (web|book)[^}]+[}]/, sep); for(i=1;i<=c;i++){if(field[i] ~ /Encyclopedia%20of%20Irises[.]pdf/) {p = ""; if(match(field[i], /[|][ ]pages?[ ]*[=][ ]*[^\|}]*[^\|}]/,d) > 0){sub(/[|][ ]*pages?[ ]*[=][ ]*/,"",d[0]);p="<!-- " d[0] " in diff edition -->"}; field[i] = "{{cite book | first= Claire | last=Austin | title= Irises: A Gardener\x27s Encyclopedia | publisher= Timber Press, Incorporated | isbn = 978-0881927306 | year = 2005 | ol = OL8176432M | page=" p "}}"; f = unpatsplit(field,sep); print f > "/tmp/out"; close("/tmp/out"); print $0 " ---- " sys2var("wikiget -E " shquote($0) " -S " shquote("Fix cite [[User_talk:GreenC_bot#Reference_replace|per request]]") " -P /tmp/out") }} }' pages.txt
-- Green C 05:24, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
In this edit the bot deleted a working archive-URL and posted a dead link notice. Toddy1 (talk) 23:53, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
The archive.today site doesn't appear to be working.
The archive link added by this edit [1] doesn't load. Same with the archive link added by this edit. [2]
Whywhenwhohow ( talk) 22:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
I wonder if you'd consider having the bot update this page more often (currently once a week). It is quite common for there to be new errors, and it can be hard to gauge progress as any items that one corrects improperly will not be re-listed for some time. I was thinking every two or three days? Another advantage is that the updates will show on watchlists more often. (I have been working with this page, but I forget about it as it hits the watchlist inoften... and IMO Wikipedia's non-improvement of watchlist mechanisms is the real issue but...) Thanks, Outriggr ( talk) 08:01, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
You deleted the section disappearing of reason not understandable, no source.
I think the connection of watchdogs and dog houses should be noticed. In countries where watch dogs are forbidden (like Sweden the last 50 years) there are no dog houses anymore. In fact watch dog culture and dog house culture are the same.
This topic is the only content in the Swedish Wikipedia page of dog house. -- Zzalpha ( talk) 11:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop immediately with your replacements of operational Google Books links by (subscription!) archive.org links. For the ones I encountered, I saw no advantage in the replacement subscription link, and this should be brought up on the individual article's talk pages before bot-implementing in mainspace. Consequently, I'll stop your bot. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 07:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I don't know what the intention of this edit was, but please stop the bot permanently when it continues to apply deteriorations to references. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 19:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
This is a revert of a completely useless edit of your bot. I stopped the bot. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 12:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Note, that as I mentioned above, the edit summaries produced by the bot are completely inappropriate: the book was already bluelinked before the edit, and the edit didn't bluelink any book. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 12:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
See
this edit. When deleting |url=
, the bot should make sure that it deletes all parameters that require the presence of |url=
. These include: |access-date=
, |archive-url=
, |format=
, |url-access=
.
Also, the edit summary is a bit misleading: Move 2 urls
suggests that the urls were retained in a different position. Instead the urls were deleted; removed.
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 12:16, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
{{
dead link}}
templates --
Green
C
14:57, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Hi! Should the bot really be editing outside article space with edits like this or this or this? — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 22:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This edit here at Great Expectations does not work. The correct link for the source is there; I copied it and saw the book, but it does not go to the page where the quote is found. I do not understand how to add a blue link to a short format reference or I would fix it. Can you? -- Prairieplant ( talk) 11:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
On the 8 March 2020 the bot made this edit to the article about René Caillié. The article cited the 1799 edition of a book by Park using sfn with ref=harv and provided a link to the Google scan. The bot changed the year to 1815 and provided a link to an Internet Archive scan of an 1815 edition of the book. This broke the sfn link and the page number. The bot should be programmed not to change links to scans when the year is different. Sometimes more than one edition of a book is published in one year so great care is needed. In general I prefer to cite the Internet Archive but a scan of the edition that I was citing was not available on that site. - Aa77zz ( talk) 15:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
I don't imagine this would happen very often, but this edit wasn't ideal; this is a better fix. Graham 87 02:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, in this edit to Joan Baez, the bot said it was reformatting two archive links when, unless I'm completely losing the plot, it only reformatted one. Graham 87 14:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello the BOT appears to be adding a date in an invalid format as the |archivedate=
for example
here. The date also does not appear to be the archivedate for the URL.
Keith D (
talk)
17:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
|archivedate=
and when the archive URL timestamp and |date=
are the same date. --
Green
C
21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)This revision to Ellicott City, Maryland was just wrong: for no apparent reason it replaced a working archive link for the Ellicott City CDP with an irrelevant archive link for the North Potomac CDP. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 15:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Diff, why is the bot removing perfectly valid archive links from sources? This is the second one I have reverted? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
|url-status=
is only used when there is an |archive-url=
, it has no purpose or function other than to tell the cite web template which order URLs are displayed (archive or url first). It does not mean "this URL is dead", you would use {{
dead link}}
for that. A |url-status=
without an |archive-url=
is superfluous. --
Green
C
17:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
User:Gonzo_fan2007: Two problems: 1)
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/24972268/mrs_kelly_death_notice is not a
web archive. Web archives are archive.org, archive.is, etc.. listed at
Wikipedia:List_of_web_archives_on_Wikipedia. 2) The |url=
and |archive-url=
are identical URLs which is not the purpose of |archive-url=
. The correct solution for |archive-url=
is
https://archive.is/xAVsp which means that if the |url=
ever dies, There is a web archive backup. --
Green
C
17:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
|url=
and |archive-url=
are exactly the same there isn't anything to do but remove it. If the |url=
is dead it would have replaced with an archive URL. If in the future the |url=
dies a bot will replace it. The problem is when there is a URL taking the |archive-url=
real-esate, if/when the |url=
dies, the main archive bot (InternetArchiveBot) will skip it, so it never gets saved and you end up with link rot.{{
open access}}
template). I'll fix it. --
Green
C
21:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
I've reverted two edits so far, 1 and 2, where the article was using a scanned copy of the original article as a source and your bot replaced it with a web.archive.org link based on the date that the scan was taken (ie, 2011) rather than the date of the article (ie, 1986), and of course the 2011 archive doesn't have the actual article from 25 years earlier. Robman94 ( talk) 18:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
|archive-url=
field because they are specialized sites for saving copies of links on the Internet. By putting non-web-archive links in the |archive-url=
field, that link will die and (probably) never get saved because there is no place to put the web archive link, and not bots and processes that will maintain it. In this case it should be |url=
http://www.rockabilly.net/wikiscans/rs-12-18-1986.shtml
and |archive-url=
https://archive.is/gdM5
(archive.is in this case but you could use any listed at
WP:WEBARCHIVES). --
Green
C
21:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
|archive-url=
field, at any rate, the 2 web archive links that the bot substituted are no good as they are from 2011 not 1986. I will update the articles accordingly. Thanks,
Robman94 (
talk)
21:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Re:
this edit, if GreenC bot is clever enough to remove comments around two parameters, perhaps it could be made clever enough to make sure that |url-status=
has valid parameter values?
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 13:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
had to fix [14] [15] [16] ... Frietjes ( talk) 22:53, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
|name=
is an unrecognized alias of |title=
, will fix. --
Green
C
23:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Hi !
Maybe you must take a look at the article the Bot created : Data:Wikipedia statistics/data.tab , it seems to me that there are something missing in it. Alexcalamaro ( talk) 10:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, in
this edit the BOT added an incorrectly formatted ISO date to |archive-date=
parameter.
Keith D (
talk)
11:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Chancellor Whiting passed yesterday June 4, 2020 at the age of 102.
Ashley Elder — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.240.140.43 ( talk) 19:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)