|
|
Not your fault but I thought you should know; Wikipedia_talk:Twinkle#AfD_bug. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Dear Greatuser, Thank for your contributions to Kuch Toh Log Kahenge. However, your edits have been reverted as the plote section is too long and there is already a summarized section titles as plot. And secondly more than two non-free images are not allowed in a single article. Please respect the policies of Wikipedia. For more information please visit the following articles:
However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Tamravidhir ( Jiva is Shiva!) 14:59, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleting references is pure
vandalism. Stop or you may be
blocked from editing. And "opening credits of the show" is no citation. And logo means the LOGO (Hope you know the meaning) and not the "BODY of the protagonist". And not even when the show is to air. Just the Logo. --
Tamravidhir (
Jiva is Shiva!)
15:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Stop changing images in articles unnecessarily or just to have your own upload featured.-- Tito Dutta ( talk) 01:24, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Galli galli.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
The article List of accolades received by Don 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
---zeeyanketu
talk to me
06:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Category:User:Greatuser, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tito Dutta ( talk) 11:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello Greatuser. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Blackton, Arkansas, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 15:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
On the page of 2013 Bollywood movies, would you be able to explain your reverts of the addition of 100 years, as it is sourced with an acceptable source? gwickwire talk edits 16:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Are you ready to give Slug and Lettuce GA status yet? Farrtj ( talk) 11:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you claimed credit for Rani Mukerji. The first two edits you made were reverted. Same for the third. This happened again with the fourth, fifth and then your final edit. You cannot claim GA credit for this. All edits were also made after the article was promoted to GA.
I see that you also claim GA credit for Kajol. Almost all of your edits were reverted here, with a single edit staying on the article. ( One and Two.) Again, all of your edits were made after the promotion.
The final article I looked at was Vidya Balan - which you claimed GA credit for, despite the fact that it's a featured article. Here almost all of your edits were reverted and you started an edit war. See 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18.
You just shouldn't and can't claim GA credit (or FA) for any of these, with contributions as minor as these and edit warring on the article. Please do not claim credit for them, or any articles where you make minor changes, in the future. Thanks. Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 17:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Zara Nachke Dikha.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:05, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kaali - Ek Punar Avatar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Show ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you kindly for you review of Slug and Lettuce. Farrtj ( talk) 13:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Benhen1997's talk page.
Hello. You have
a new message at Benhen1997's talk page.
Hey, you haven't provided exact reasons for nominating Chopra's article, pls do so to complete the actual nomination.so, we'll review it.Thanks Pks1142 ( talk) 13:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Greatuser, I see that you claim to have "worked" on Shahrukh Khan, Salman Khan, Vidya Balan and other such articles. Let me remind you that all of your edits on Balan's page were non-constructive and were removed. Also, your edits on Shahrukh and Salman's pages are minor (you have less than 13 edits) and mostly non-constructive. Keeping that in mind, I request you to remove such claims from your userpage. Also, i see that you have nominated Shahrukh's article for GA without consulting with any of the major contributors. Please refrain from doing so in the future. -- smarojit (buzz me) 07:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 13:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
You recently nominated Sapnon Hai Pyaar Ki Kahani for speedy deletion. Please note that the category you tagged it under(blatant hoax/vandalism) was incorrect, as the subject of the article is verifiable and notable. Please also note that an article's quality is not criterion itself for deletion, and we should always try to improve articles than deleting them.
The article under question undoubtedly belongs here, and I suggest you please look into Wikipedia:CSD before nominating any further articles.
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 15:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at WT:STiki's talk page.
The article has failed to meet GA criteria. However, some suggestions are there in the review page. The article has potential. Please consider re-submitting it after appropriate improvement. Regards.-- Dwaipayan ( talk) 22:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
While it is nice to see a new editor (especially from India) who is actively interested in editing Wikipedia, I would suggest that you get to know a few things around here before you actually work extensively. For example, it usually is not a habit for users to add articles they have nominated or reviewed to their user page [At the same time, please also note that since we are talking of user pages, it would not be that much of a problem]
However I am quite concerned over how you reviewed Bade achche lagte hai, for example. It might do you good if you learn up on how the system works before diving headfirst - One of the reasons why i do not do GA reviews. Also, you might be interested in this programme - Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user.
Cheers, TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 13:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
I was undoing edits like this [1] by 2.24.45.207, so your recent edit seem to be a mistake. Please check out the article's history 2.24.45.207's edits and revert yourself. Thanks. -- 182.185.45.108 ( talk) 17:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Your removal of content at Sunil Gangopadhyay was inappropriate as the text added was not vandalism. Please be more cautious in your use of STiki, as we want to minimize errors as much as we can. I have reverted your edit back.
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Please also note that i have also reverted your edits to Surf Coast Shire and List of Kung Fu Panda characters on similar grounds. TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 10:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Will you please stop blindly reverting my edits to Kelis Was Here without any reason whatsoever? There is absolutely nothing wrong with them. Snap Snap 20:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
With regard to your request , as you are using Stiki anyway, I have now accorded you the use of the rollback tool. Please note however that rollback may only be used for clear cases of vandalism and can be revoked if misused. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 23:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Galli galli.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Greatuser, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and TheStrike Σagle 05:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello, Greatuser.
I've just had a look at some of your reverts and disagree with some of them. I would also suggest expanding on the STiki edit summary in some cases.
This edit should not have been classed as vandalism, you should have manually classed it as blanking. I could have considered this to be good faith. This edit is not vandalism. This should not have been reverted at all. This edit isn't vandalism and should not have been reverted. Why did you revert this edit? It seemed to have a source - just. This should have been classed as good faith, not vandalism. Use edit summaries... This was good faith - they tried to add a source. Despite it being unreliable, it was not vandalism. Needs better edit summary. Not vandalism at all. Not vandalism. Not bad enough to be classed as vandalism - AGF. What is this? You reverted the removal of a good faith edit as vandalism. This again. More like good faith. Different edit summary needed. AGF. AGF without research. Not vandalism. Not vandalism. Not really vandalism. Just capitals, not vandalism - AGF. Would not class as vandalism. Should not have been reverted. This must be the "worst" revert of them all. It should not have been reverted and it seems like you have added a massive paste from a website or book back into the article.
On an unrelated note, why did you make this edit? Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 09:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 10:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
William J. Whalen and William J. Whalen III aren't the same person, ya know.-- 94.65.5.207 ( talk) 10:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
|
Enough of misunderstandings already now!!! Lets just enjoy a cup of coffee and look forward to your happy editing stay at Wikipedia. Just be sure before making any edit which you are doubtful of, and ask me or any of the editors when in doubt.
I think you will make a great contributor to Wikipedia. Cheers!!!! TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 14:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC) |
P.S. I suggest you join the Adopt a user programme. That will ensure you make no mistakes, and be a valuable contributer here. TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 14:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Have you read WP:FIES? -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 14:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)If necessary?
Hello, I am new to wikipedia and can't get my head around the referencing. I work for East Street Arts and I'm trying to edit the out-of-date information on the current page. I spent a whole day on it and now my edits have been removed, even though they are factually correct. The version you have reverted to contains incorrect information. I need to change many sections and remove old material, but I'm not sure how to do that without you removing them. It's all new to me so might need to give me advice. Do I need to archive everything, rather than delete it? Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.25.239 ( talk) 11:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I'd just like some explanation here. See, every review/nomination you've listed on your talkpage you review/nominate as "in my view it meets the criteria". Then, in the case of the nominations, they are opposed quickly. In the case of the reviewers, other editors quickly come and point out major glaring problems with the articles. I'd like to request that you take a look over the Good Article Criteria and Featured Article Criteria before making any more nominations or reviews, or explain your previous actions here. Thanks. No need for talkback messages, I'm watching this page. gwickwire talk edits 03:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Resilient Barnstar |
Hello Greatuser! I've been seeing you a lot months and days ago at WP:PERM. I'm impressed with you because after all your works in this encyclopedia and those "Not done" that you were receiving at PERM, you still proving on how you will be a good editor. Well-deserved on you now have rights on rollback. Kudos! :) Mediran ( t • c) 03:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading
File:Pyaar Kii Ye Ek Kahaani.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Greatuser. I'm just letting you know that I have removed your use of the rollback tool. I am very concerned that you are incorrectly reverting edits as vandalism. Also, I'm asking you to stop using Stiki now, until Andrew has been able to review the situation. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 13:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as
vandalism, such as the edit at
Poacher (fish), are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can
discourage newer editors. Please read
Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.
Psychonaut (
talk)
17:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Socratic Award |
Awarded for this important step forward. For as Socrates said, to gain understanding one must first understand which things one does not understand. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 19:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC) |
The use of the Double Feature font actually requires that you credit the author. Its much like a Creative Commons license. See here and here. To avoid issues, please add Double Feature font by David Shetterly somewhere on the page you are using the font. In this case on your front user page. If you fail to do so, it will be subject to editing and changing back to a regular font or having the attribution added for you.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 02:39, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Glowing Christmas Tree |
Merry Christmas to you, GreatUser! -- TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 14:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC) |
Want to join me and (possibly) other users to collaborate on improving India related articles? TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 14:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I needed the C.I.D. logo for the Bengali series (the article is just started, but it'll be expanded over time): C.I.D. Kolkata Bureau. I have added your uploaded image and added a second rationale for the use of the Bengali TV series article! -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
For future reference.."If the proposer of the merge did not start a discussion for the merge, and it is not obvious why the articles should be merged, it is acceptable to remove the tags. If the reason for the merge is obvious, you can either merge the articles boldly, or start a new discussion." If you don't begin a discussion as the merg proposer...it is almost immediatly a stale merge. So unless it is obvious..the tag could have been removed without it being considered an edit war. See Wikipedia:Merging, Help:Merging and Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 07:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
User:Greatuser/sandbox 1, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Greatuser/sandbox 1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Greatuser/sandbox 1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 11:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
It would have been a good idea to check this user's edits Special:Contributions/Turtlees which is a vandalism only account before thanking them for a feedback in which they were happy to vandalize Wikipedia (where the feedback provided was after that account had vandalized various articles). Next time, try not to blanket copy paste messages on each feedback before checking the person's contributions. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
I believe a trouting is in order.
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 09:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
And here is some chips to go with your trout -
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 05:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey,
I see that you are trying to nominate List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan. I just breezed through the nomination that you sent, and I found that there were many places you marked "Done" but did not edit the article appropriately. Do you want me to co-nominate the article? I could help address all of those concerns. If your answer is a yes, first remove ALL the "Done"s you have posted. Let me check if they are actually done or not
Cheers, TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 13:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
STOP! Dont edit before I say you can. I am in the middle of an edit, and you editing the article will lead to non-recoverable edit conflicts! Just wait before doing anything to the page or the FLC nomination page. When I say you can, only then edit please.
Alright. I am taking a short break for now. There are way too many problems with the article. See what changes I have made, and please learn from them. See which are the problems that I have marked as solved, and how I have solved them. Make any edits you want in the next few minutes. When I want you to stop and allow me to do them, I'll tell you. TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 14:58, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | A very HAPPY BIRTHDAY to you GreatUser!!!! From Soni. |
TheOriginalSoni (
talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year and a very Happy Birthday!! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
I hereby award you the Editor's Barnstar for your contributions to List of awards and nominations received by Vidya Balan. Forgot to put name 17:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC) |