I added the impact of Twitter on the public health system and on education and backed it all up with sources. You reverted it with the justification "no substance. Not a link repository. Turn it into a section with actual information".
Since I consider my contribution as "actual information" I would like to know what you actually mean? I have done some literature research on http://isiknowledge.com and www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ and found these articles which - if you ask me - provide incremental information. Is it the links you are having a problem with? If yes, it would be no problem to remove them. It is just that I thought it is a good thing to (1) back up information with sources and (2) to provide further information. Please tell me what you exactly mean with your statement - maybe I have overlooked something - you know, I am quite new as a Wikipedia contributor. It actually is quite frustrating to invest a lot of time in meaningful changes when they are reverted with one single click...
Looking forward to you answer, Borkert -- Borkert ( talk) 17:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The edit to Michael Scott (The Office) wasn't a joke. You shouldn't have changed it. -- Whatsup90 ( talk) 08:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. I agree that protection is needed, and it looks like someone beat me to it. Let me know if you need assistance with anything else.-- Kubigula ( talk) 03:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
The edits that you are reverting on this page are not vandalism and should not be reverted using rollback; please revert in the normal way with a descriptive edit summary. Thank you (-: Stifle ( talk) 19:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
When adding a user warning to a user talk page, as with User talk:PrizerebelMan, please make sure to substitute the template to prevent future template edits from changing or erasing the intended message to the user. Thank you. (I've done that for you there, but please remember for the next time you use templates.) -- an odd name 15:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Read the article to find out why. I've removed it from the list of conlangs. Simlish was designed to create the sounds and tones of conversation in no particular language; at least in the first version of The Sims, the voice actors weren't even given scripts [1] but just told what the sims would be doing at that point. Simlish doesn't therefore have a vocabulary, grammar and syntax like Esperanto or Klingon. Paul S ( talk) 16:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 16:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk)
15:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk)
01:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumi-Taskbot (
talk)
19:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 04:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)