Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Safavid Georgia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. First of all, start using edit summaries. Secondly, you were reverted once, thus, per WP:BRD, you need to open a talk page section wherein you can raise your concerns. You can't just change information in a GA article like that. This article is about the Safavid province, hence the usage of the Muslimized names of the Georgian rulers. - LouisAragon ( talk) 12:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
1.This article is about Kingdoms of Kartli and Kakheti under Safavid State. These Kingdoms were vassals (always mutinious BTW) of the turkic Safavid Dynasty, not direct regions.
2.In this article the names of the Georgian Kings are muslimised, however some of them never converted to Islam (for example Teimuraz I of Kakheti) and even they who did convert bore georgian and muslim names together, and issued many official documents where they had Georgian names (Rostom not Rostam; Vakhtang VI together with Hosaynqoli Khan etc.)
3.Sometimes in this article the names of the Georgian kings are not even muslimised but persianised (for example Lohrasb). This is totally unacceptable. Safavid dynasty was turkic not persian (as you know till XX c. Persia was ruled by turks), that state was founded by Qizilbashs who also were turks. Giorgi Mechurchle ( talk) 13:19, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Continuation of the war first reported at the edit warring noticeboard on 24 April. On the talk page, I see no evidence that anyone else supports your changes. EdJohnston ( talk) 13:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom of Kartli, you may be blocked from editing. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
I am not engaged in an article content dispute, I made some important clarifications — all of them are sourced.-- Giorgi Mechurchle ( talk) 22:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon ( talk) 20:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:LouisAragon. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 22:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
I do not attack anyone, but this editor - "Louis Aragon" - tries to falsify Georgian History. He slanders our saint Kings, their biography, even names... --
Giorgi Mechurchle (
talk)
23:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - LouisAragon ( talk) 23:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 00:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk)
02:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)