Hello, Giangkiefer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to
Kiefer Sutherland does not have an
edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.
Thanks!
Dl2000 (
talk)
17:59, 27 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Giangkiefer, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Giangkiefer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at
the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (
I'm a Teahouse host)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Article 99, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Troy Evans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Kiefer Sutherland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Brian Cox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Marlon Brando filmography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
Robert Preston and
Christopher Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Kenny G, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
David Benoit. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Lou Diamond Phillips, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
The Outer Limits. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
File permission problem with File:Ain't Giving Up Single Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ain't Giving Up Single Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!09:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Down In A Hole Album Artwork.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Down In A Hole Album Artwork.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!09:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Blonde Nothing Like This Single Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blonde Nothing Like This Single Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!10:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:No Holding Back Artwork.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:No Holding Back Artwork.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!10:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Following My Intuition Album Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Following My Intuition Album Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!10:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:One More Time 2016 Single Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:One More Time 2016 Single Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!10:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Milton's Secret Theatrical Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Milton's Secret Theatrical Poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!10:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
You're My Number One (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
File permission problem with File:Bad Boys Limited Edition Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bad Boys Limited Edition Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!08:21, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Shanghai Noon And Shanghai Knights.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shanghai Noon And Shanghai Knights.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!08:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Brazilian Nights Album Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brazilian Nights Album Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!08:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:Hermione Corfield.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hermione Corfield.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!08:32, 21 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Donald Sutherland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Lock Up. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the
Lock Up (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the
plot summaryedit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for
films,
musicals,
television episodes,
anime/manga,
novels and
non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
DonIago (
talk)
14:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Let Me Love You (DJ Rebel song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Shaggy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
My Traffic Value for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
File permission problem with File:Perfect Money.png
Thanks for uploading File:Perfect Money.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
17:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC)reply
File permission problem with File:DJ Rebel Let Me Love You.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DJ Rebel Let Me Love You.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see
this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in
your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's
image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Kellyhi!08:51, 11 October 2016 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Hello, Giangkiefer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you're new to the process,
articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on
how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Perfect Money, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read
the guidelines on spam and
Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Mean as custard (
talk)
15:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Hello, I'm
MereTechnicality. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
MereTechnicality⚙04:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movin' (Mohombi song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
MassiveYR♠05:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (
Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Your addition to
Flatliners (2017 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
04:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)reply
A tag has been placed on
File:Linkin Park And Friends Concert Tour.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant
copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at
Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question
here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Majora (
talk)
03:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
All of your uploads are currently copyright violations
Hello Giangkiefer, I wanted to leave you a note and ask you to go back and fix all of your uploads. Just because something is on the Internet does not mean that it is in the public domain. Quite the opposite actually. They are still copyrighted and you can't just take them and use them here without following proper procedure. That is copyright infringement and it is something we are forced to take very very seriously.
Scrolling through
your uploads it looks like most of them fall under our
fair use policy. What that means is that as long as you fill our a
fair use rationale for them they are fine to stay here. You can use premade templates to do this for you. It looks like {{non-free use rationale album cover}}, {{non-free use rationale poster}}, and {{non-free use rationale book cover}} are the ones you are looking for. Please go back, fill these out for each of your uploads, and put them on the file pages. If you need help please don't hesitate to ask but in the meantime please stop uploading images until you understand what you are doing. We can't have repeated copyright violations on Wikipedia as it can lead to a whole bunch of issues. Thanks! --
Majora (
talk)
03:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
A tag has been placed on
File:Paddington film logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792(talk)03:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Love On The Rise.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Love On The Rise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Flatliners (2017 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
James Norton (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
Orphaned non-free image File:Love On The Rise Single.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Love On The Rise Single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the
sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Giangkiefer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The
summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Curb Safe Charmer (
talk)
19:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the
guidelines on the notability of people,
the golden rule and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and
Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is
verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Giangkiefer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
A tag has been placed on
File:A Girl Thing TV Movie.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant
copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at
Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question
here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
This also applies to:
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information.
You are hereby warned that if you upload any more images which fall foul of copyright rules, you will be blocked. Copyright is taken very seriously on Wikipedia.
Mjroots (
talk)
05:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Giangkiefer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I've just tagged the page, using our
page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 2 issues - is it notable enough for a standalone article?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on
my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at
the Teahouse.
Wikipedia editor
Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Giangkiefer: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand
Wikipedia. Cheers,
Abishe (
talk) 17:49, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
Add four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
You mentioned in my talk page regarding the edit count
I suggest you that you should not care about the number of edits but about the good contributions. I have noticed that you have created about 60 articles which is a remarkable record and you have contributed to several projects by creating these articles. The secret of the increase of my edit count is my average edits per day is approximately 34 much greater than that of
yours. Your average edits per day is just about 3.8 and I think you aren't editing Wikipedia regularly. But I encourage you for your efforts as you are senior Wikipedian when compared to me. I suggest you to use semi-automated tools such as HotCat, Twinkle etc. By the way, I feel sorry and apologies to you for replying on this doubt due to my busyness.
Abishe (
talk)
15:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Happy New Year!
Giangkiefer, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a
Happy New Year to you and yours! ~~~~
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Man of The Woods. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Man of The Woods (album). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for
speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at
Man of The Woods (album). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at
the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the
article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
Theroadislong (
talk)
18:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Thanks for uploading File:Young Guns cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hi. We don't use ampersands (&) in article titles unless it's part of a collective's name. As Sean Paul and David Guetta are two separate artists who collaborated for one song, we would write "and", and
Mad Love (Sean Paul and David Guetta song) already exists. Please bear this in mind in future. Thanks. Ss11213:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)reply
If you are engaged in an article
content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek
consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's
dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the
relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
As there is not enough content or support to split The Good Doctor episodes into a separate article, please refrain from doing so and instead create a draft page, until there is data for the second season. ScottKnight02Talk18:34, 8 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
The Good Doctor (TV series) into
List of The Good Doctor episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk)
20:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)reply
This article had and AfD, that was closed as draftify after it's [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Never Be the Same Tour
|discussion]]. As the new version looks like it was created based on that now made drafts source, I ask why did you recreate it so soon, only one day after the discussion was closed?
WikiVirusC(talk)18:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Hi there, I'm
HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:Julia Meade (character), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13.
Hello, Giangkiefer. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
Julia Meade".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
If you're new to the process,
articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on
how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Hi there, I'm
HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:Julia Anne Meade, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13.
Please read the talk page and reach consensus when there has been discussion about page names. You moved the page against consensus. I have moved it back to the consensus name and version. Please engage on the talk page before reverting other editors. -
CorbieV☊☼20:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
If you're new to the process,
articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on
how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
WP:DEL7 – there does not seem to be any proof that this is an album that exists nor is ever planned to be released. Searches for any 2018 FIFA World Cup albums online turn up no results, and all five citations in this article make no mention of any 2018 FIFA World Cup album at all. The title "The Official Album of the 2018 FIFA World Cup" is similarly unverified and seems to be completely fabricated, anecdotally based on the name format of previous FIFA World Cup albums.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
San Fu Lou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not
credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about
what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
reddogsix (
talk)
16:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)reply
I saw you created the awards and nominations for Blue you forgot to add the organisation you should re- edit the page and add them
ManEdit01 (
talk)
15:46, 26 July 2018 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Hello, Giangkiefer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Your addition to
Death of an Angel (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk)
22:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Hello, Giangkiefer. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
I Can Dream".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Orphaned non-free image File:Bad Boys Limited Edition Cover.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Bad Boys Limited Edition Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hello Giangkiefer, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
The Buddy Games have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper
paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create
copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see
Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples,
hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to
verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not
original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the
public domain (PD) or under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at
Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the
help desk or the
Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see
Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in
Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be
blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Siddiqsazzad001<Talk/>15:45, 23 January 2019 (UTC)reply
A page you started (Bees Make Honey (film)) has been reviewed!
Based on the provided references, notability is a bit borderline. #2 is a solid review in what appears to be an RS, but #1 isn't independent and #3 is routine.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
The link in the single citation is broken, making it difficult to verify claims in the article. Moreover, while the songSeasons in the Sun is clearly notable, it is unclear whether the album also meets notability guidelines.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitle Westlife Eleventh Studio album until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nahnah4 (
talk |
contribs)
13:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)reply
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Template:Bruce Willis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion discussion, such as at
Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here. --
woodensuperman09:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi. I saw you made
Medicine (Jennifer Lopez & French Montana song) after I made and subsequently redirected
Medicine (Jennifer Lopez song), which I made over 15 minutes before your article appears to have been created. You can merge the content you created if you wish, but I don't think there's much to merge. I have recreated my article with basic information because it was the first version of the page to exist and was going to be made soon anyway. I don't know if you saw that the article title "Medicine (Jennifer Lopez song)" existed so decided to make the article you did, but I think you should know by this point that we don't credit featured artists on songs in the title of articles per
WP:NCMDAB, and we don't put an ampersand between the artists' names anyway.
I copied nothing from your article, but just in case you or any user wants to raise a concern that I did, I have requested a histmerge at the article I created so an admin who performs them can assess whether there is anything to merge. Please create articles in the correct place in future. If you can't because there is a redirect already in the way, create the article in your userspace (e.g.
User:Giangkiefer/Medicine (Jennifer Lopez song), or make it as a draft and request it be moved via
WP:RM/TR. Thank you. Ss11217:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)reply
A page you started (Find Me (Aciman novel)) has been reviewed!
An article you recently created,
Opus (Marc Anthony album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)05:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
Pending reviews and other details from reliable news sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Opus (Marc Anthony album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Opus (Marc Anthony album), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
An article you recently created,
Opus (Marc Anthony album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
15:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wreck-It Ralph (franchise) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Satellizer el Bridget(Talk)15:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Black Widow film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk)04:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (
Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with
Untitled Black Widow film. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a
bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please
report it.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online03:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)reply
A page you started (Axis Sally (film)) has been reviewed!
I had to remove the plot summary, which appeared to be a copyright violation. Additionally, while principal photography has begun, the coverage available about the film so far is very routine and doesn't contribute much to notability.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hello, Giangkiefer. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
Kevin Bacon".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Langdon Film Series.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Langdon Film Series.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blue Mauritius (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
BOVINEBOY200819:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)reply
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hi there, I'm
HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:The Manuscript (film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13.
Hi there, I'm
HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:Opus (Marc Anthony album), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
WP:REFUND/G13.
Hello, Giangkiefer. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
Opus".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi Giangkiefer! You created a thread called Someone undo my 24 edits without a clearly purpose. at
Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been
archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion
here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please
create a new thread.
Hi Giangkiefer,
It is Inspiring Dreams. Are you still editing on Wikipedia? If so I would like to ask you if you would please help me with adding information to the Robin Sherwood page.
Best,
Inspiring dreams
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
The Boxer (1997 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Brian Cox. Such links are
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.)
An article you recently created,
Raging Fire (film), does not contain enough sources and citations to be considered
notable. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
BOVINEBOY200820:58, 17 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Hi! I see that you recreated the article after your submission was declined. This is not helpful, as when you do this, you will lose the edit history of the original article. If you contest the submission, then leave a message with the User that reviewed it, or attempt to address their concerns.
BOVINEBOY200809:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Seconded. You will get nowhere by trying to overwrite or overrule other editors' actions (in this case, mine), and instead you put your work in jeopardy. The page can remain a draft until it is closer to release and is able to satisfy
WP:NFO. If you have any questions, please ask me on
my talk page. —
Bilorv (talk)
16:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Substantial coverage usually takes the form of full-length professional reviews in national newspapers, while articles about the film's existence or actors are generally routine so do not demonstrate notability under
WP:NFO.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Raging Fire (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Raging Fire (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Speedy deletion nomination of Unicity International
Hello, Giangkiefer
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Unicity International for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
A Time for Mercy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous
copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from
https://www.wellesleybooks.com/book/9780385545969. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at
Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question
here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —
Amkgp💬14:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Justlettersandnumbers Hey, can you unblocked me, I didn't do anything wrong, just try to find the plot of the article
A Time for Mercy, I don want to violate the copyright, yes, I have a little woolgathering, but not in purpose, sorry with my actions, but I didn't do that with purpose. I have search for the Wiki 6 years ago, and created over 130 articles, why are you treat me like that ?
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Justlettersandnumbers won't be getting notifications because you're not signing your posts. If you want to be unblocked, you'll need to follow the instructions NinjaRobotPirate left for you and address the reasons for your block.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
10:13, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Thanks,
Cordless Larry! – I do have this page watch-listed, though. Giangkiefer, I said earlier "To be unblocked you'll need to show that you understand what was wrong with these edits, and also explain how you will avoid making the same mistakes again". That's unchanged, if you can convince us of that you'll be unblocked; you'll need to address the three numbered points in the yellow-beige template immediately above your last post, just as Cordless Larry has told you. To date you've shown no recognition of the nature of the problem, and no intention of avoiding it in the future. I'm afraid that just asking will not get the block lifted.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
10:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
NinjaRobotPirate I made a violation copyright. I know why I have been blocked, I changed the plot with violation the copyright, It's a very serious big mistake, I make a damage and disruption on Wikipedia, it not be happen again, I will not make a disruption or damage like that again. I will make useful contribution on Wikipedia since now.
Justlettersandnumbers I made a violation copyright. I know why I have been blocked, I changed the plot with violation the copyright, It's a very serious big mistake, I make a damage and disruption on Wikipedia, it not be happen again, I will not make a disruption or damage like that again. I will make useful contribution on Wikipedia since now.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
I made a violation copyright. I know why I have been blocked, I changed the plot with violation the copyright, It's a very serious big mistake, I make a damage and disruption on Wikipedia, it not be happen again, I will not make a disruption or damage like that again. I will make useful contribution on Wikipedia since now
Decline reason:
As copyright violations can potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, you will need to demonstrate that you understand what copyright is before we can consider unblocking you; please review
WP:COPYVIO for more information. I am declining your request.
331dot (
talk)
09:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If English is not your primary language, you may feel more comfortable editing the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language.
331dot (
talk)
09:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Copyright is violate others's words/paragraph, I know what copyright is, I make a serious big mistake, please forgive me.
Decline reason:
This isn't any better than your previous request. You've got one more attempt at this before your ability to make further appeals is withdfrawn.
MER-C20:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an
administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a
CheckUser or
Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the
Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the
unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Hello, Giangkiefer. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:Bailamos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Hello, Giangkiefer. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
Bailamos".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, Giangkiefer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:American Revenge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Hello, Giangkiefer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Raging Fire (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Hello, Giangkiefer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:The Road Dance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Hello, Giangkiefer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Project X-Traction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, Giangkiefer. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Articles for Creation submission or
Draft page you started, "
Raging Fire".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.