You have been identified by checkuser Dmcdevit as a sockpuppet of Veesicle ( talk · contribs). As you are evading the indefblock of that account for abusive sockpuppetry, I have blocked you indefinitely. WjB scribe 20:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Gentleness ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
After thinking about this for a while, I'm requesting an unblock. My original indef block accused me of abusive sockpuppetry, but I've never votestacked or abused multiple accounts in any way [although I may have made comments on other accounts/whilst logged out]. As you can see from this account, I was making an attempt to contribute constructively here. I created two articles, Dirt Farmer and Up in Them Guts and I don't think I was being disruptive, so my block came as a bit of a surprise. I'm not sure what the justification for the checkuser was therefore, but I don't really care, all I'm asking is to be unbanned so that I can carry on editing normally. Thanks. 19:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This account was clearly used abusively to avoid a block in violation of WP:SOCK. — Yamla ( talk) 19:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
That's a bit unfair isn't it? Everyone says that if you get banned and really want to come back you should just get a new account and edit non-disruptively. And I did! And I got banned again anyway? Even though I'm not being disruptive anymore [and my contributions are proof]?