![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Funandtrvl. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - ... (up to 100) |
A discussion has begun about whether the article 2010 Kalgoorlie-Boulder earthquake, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Kalgoorlie-Boulder earthquake until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bidgee ( talk) 08:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, this is just to inform you that elections for Clerkship at WP:UAA have started on the talk page. You have been sent this message because you were recently active in handling submissions or discussions. Discussion is ongoing and you are encouraged to voice your opinion on the candidates.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Fridae'sDoom ( talk) at 06:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC).
Hello, Funandtrvl. Your post on my user talk escaped my immediate attention and I didn't want you to think I was ignoring you. Thanks for your congratulations and to answer your question, I did not attend UA. Alas, when I was of college age I was too poor and lacked the motivation to consider UA. It was good hearing from you...keep up the good work Tide rolls 01:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl! I have noticed that you changed the formatting of a source in the article Third Battle of Mount Hermon. I must say that I am puzzled by both changes. While it might be proper to include co-authors (this can be discussed separately), I can't say I understand why the Hebrew title is necessary when the book has an English title (not my translation, but the book's own title in English). Also I am puzzled by the use of diacritics, like in "Karṭa". I am assuming that you copied these from WorldCat, but assure you that diacritics are not used in most publications and/or citations, and are confusing to the reader. What is the reasoning behind your edits? Cheers, Ynhockey ( Talk) 20:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello Funandtrvl,
I was simply trying to translate David Zenon Jacome-Moreira into Spanish, I don't believe the page should be deleted since there hasn't been any problems with this page, and it's linked to other important pages. It's been referenced from outside sources, and fixed multiple times from Wikipedia.
It would be great to have this fixed, and be also to view the page in Spanish as well. The link for the Spanish page was: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Zenon_Jacome-Moreira
Thanks, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.62.19 ( talk) 06:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
...that deleting factual information from an article, as you did with Michael_Jacobs_(footballer) without so much as checking it or attempting to add (easily avaiable) sources really is the height of laziness?
imagine if everyone did the same on every article here... 129.11.76.216 ( talk) 13:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I have removed your CSD:G1 tags from the Ezekiel templates, as G1 is not for things written in plain English. As it says at Wikipedia:Csd, it is for "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history". The templates are all up for TfD, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:Ezuw-vandalism4, so please feel free to comment there if you wish. Best regards -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 22:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Okay. I joined the wiki templates project. I like wiki messages with nuvola/svg images for some odd reason. Anyway, I found a way to warn users without having to go back to the pages the template messages are on to copy it. Here it is;
Ezekiel! Talk to meh. See what I'm doin'. 00:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove the references to JFK bigamy again. Perhaps. in your haste, you overlooked this section of W policy on reliable sources "reliable sources include university-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers"-- Tumadoireacht ( talk) 21:43, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification on external links. From my reading of the docs, it sounds like it would be appropriate to add Dell to the list of providers with a link to Dell. Am I correct? Thanks! DellTechWebGuy ( talk) 04:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
It has been suggested that 4 US related project be merged into Wikipedia:WikiProject United States due to a long state of inactivity. I noticed that you had made some edits to at least one of them recently so I thought you might want to voice your opinion about the merger. Please comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States#Close out some Inactive/nonfunctional US related WikiProjects. -- Kumioko ( talk) 18:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Funandtrvl, given that you're one of the more well-seasoned Wikipedians within the WikiProject Travel and Tourism, I was hoping to get your input on a draft of an article that currently resides in my userspace here.
Having been diligent about establishing WP:Notability by citing WP:RS, and by writing in accordance with WP:NPOV, I feel that this draft is ready to be moved to mainspace. As the subject happens to have been a client of my employer (which is how I became familiar with the subject matter), I see it as important to disclose any potential WP:COI upfront; though I don't feel that this has affected the neutrality of the article draft (which covers all aspects of the subject, including litigation). In the interest of gaining consensus, I'd like to get a second opinion before doing so. Can you perhaps take a glance and let me know your thoughts? Jeff Bedford ( talk) 18:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Howdy. I edited the prayer page. I made 2 changes:
-I just clarified the wording of the 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph. I don't know why you would delete my edit since all I did was clean up. -My second thing was to add that some Christians pray almost exclusively to Jesus. I know I can't easily look up a citation for this, but I guarantee that it's true from personal experience. I've gone to several Evangelical, Charismatic etc churches in my area and they all do this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.76.19 ( talk) 19:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
i dont understand why you lot keep calling it vandalism? the correct spelling is cross-cum-shot, not cross-come-shot!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.102.139 ( talk) 19:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I reverted your HotCat-assisted categorization of " Vintage Season" under "Time Travel Novels" since it's not a novel. Just FYI. — JerryFriedman (Talk) 18:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
The only reason for my revert was because it was a cut-and-paste move, this causes copyright problems because it loses the edit history (see WP:MOVE#Before moving a page). The user should have made a request at WP:RM. January (talk) 18:49, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I left a suggestion on WP Illinois' talk page. Please let me know if the project would mind if we do this. -- Kumioko ( talk) 18:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm sure you are correct. Could you please link me to the page in question? Thank you. Op finish them ( talk) 19:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
No problem, I should be able to do it. Op finish them ( talk) 19:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I edit this article, because "Sun never sets" set to Spain at 16th Century, and 18th Century to English empire. What's wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.50.27 ( talk) 14:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Dear Funandtrvl, I received a note from you referencing the need to provide citations for the my edits on Dudleya setchelli. I added the references that clearly show the dialogue, actions and decision making made by Santa Clara county and their board of supervisors regarding approval of the project at Communications Hill and its impact to the local flora and fauna. Part of the mitigation measure that were agreed upon is buried in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), which is not available online, but I have personally read. I am a field biologist by education and have worked extensively on habitat and endangered species conservation. It would be nice if someone whom is editing text on an article was equally familiar with the factual basis of an item before simply deleting it. I attempted to link a citation to the statement made, however it did not attach. So if you have better instructions for attaching the citations from non-electronically available documents, please advise.
Cheers -
Richard Pontius Boo Hollow Botanicals CA. Nur. A0237.001 Aromas, California —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.126.95.114 ( talk) 17:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Benjamin Harper did attend to Glashan PS check on google, if not witch school did he go to in grades 7 to 8? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.114.160.54 ( talk) 23:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
I believe that Benjamin Harper did attend Glashan PS please check <Benjamin Harper + Glashan> on google so that i may prove my point Also if he didn't go there then where did he go?
I am just trying to remove that excess column and the }} on the election 2010 box. I dont know where it is coming from. Can you remove that for me? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Politics2012 ( talk • contribs) 00:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC) 174.114.160.54 ( talk) 23:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Template:Islamic terrorism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Listen I'm 13 and I go to Glashan P.S, I always see the graduates photos from 2000 to 2010 I saw him last year. I didn't want this to happen but I saw him on the graduate list. I saw him on the spikers award too and math so perhaps write math Olympics ottawa glashan Harper or volley glashan Benjamin Harper. -- 174.114.160.54 ( talk) 13:26, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
it'S true period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi my name is John Forrest. I recently tried to post an addition to the resources area of the Self Esteem page. I would like to post my site on this page about Self esteem because I believe it adds alot of value on a very misunderstood science. I understand that my site currently doesn't meet the standards for admission but I would like to know what I can do to have my website part of this article because I do believe it adds value to the resource that is not currently there. My site is Self Esteem and Confidence Center
Thank you for your help,
John Forrest —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.12.110 ( talk) 05:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Re: this edit to Talk:Signiphoridae I would like to have the article removed from these categories. Sorry I simply went ahead and deleted it. I feel putting a page on "low importance category" is not only unnecessary (if it's not important, people will not be looking at it and therefore you don't have to tell them it's not important), it's also innacurate. "Low importance" is not the same as "low priority". As you can see, it does have some importance for some of us. You should know this is very common when you're dealing with organisms. -- Land Moil ( talk) 19:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm a registered user, just not logged in. Why did you revert my edit to World in Conflict? I trimmed down the plot, as per WP policy. 90.201.227.126 ( talk) 00:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Jesus Christ claimed to be Jesus Christ also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.129.115.34 ( talk) 00:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for checking my Turkey link. I agree, disco didn't belong either - good edit. Digitallib ( talk) 21:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello
This is Afterrock81. Why do you insist on taking out a valid claim? What right do you have to limit valid theories from being understood by the general public? ALL THEORIES of how life on Earth began are rooted in pure faith. ALL of them. Even yours. Once it can be proven and re-proven life started from abiogenesis, then it will no longer be a theory.
The only reason I added this section here (and not on a different page) is because the search for "Origins of Life" redirected to the page showing only possible theories of spontaneous biogenesis. Once this tag is removed (and others general enough to include abiogenesis), I will gladly remove my section from this post. Until then, it belongs there as it is a perfectly valid (though, likewise unproven) theory.
Sincerely,
Afterrock81 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afterrock81 ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
??? As I pointed out, I do not know how to reference the website properly. I have looked at the website and it is a valid source. Therefore, rather than remove the information, I would appreciate it if you would correct the link instead. Also, I linked to the other Wikipedia pages as the information is all there.
In my original post, I needed to remove some information- which I did. This time, why don't you let ClueBot identify such problems?
Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afterrock81 ( talk • contribs) 05:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, could you please undo your reversion of my edit? I believe my edit improved the neutral point of view of the article yet you undid it citing neutral point of view. This does not make sense to me. The claim that fiat, well renowned at one time as maker of some of the worst vehicles known to mankind, has improved its quality is a pro-fiat claim. For neutrality we should insert the word "alledgedly" to indicate that this claim has not been verified. At this moment fiat has no vehicles in the united states, and mass produced european vehicles in general continue to rank amongst the worst in JD power surveys year after year. There just is no reason to take this claim as fact at the present time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.20.123.143 ( talk) 16:12, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
HUH? I merely edited the Venice in High School page to say that the school was in Mar Vista, and for that, you are threatening to block my IP address?!?!?! I deleted the part that said Venice's boundaries extended east of Walgrove Ave., because that's false.
76.168.205.230 ( talk) 16:52, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Toronto/doc, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:WikiProject Toronto/doc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:WikiProject Toronto/doc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kumioko ( talk) 03:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into {{ WikiProject United States}}. It appears that you have been a regular editor or are a member of WikiProject U.S. counties and I thought that project might be interested in doing this. I am going to contact some of the other members of the project as well. If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --- Kumioko ( talk) 06:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps my edit of the Jim Thorpe article (adding 'extreme' before racial inequality) was not the perfect addition, but the statement "during a period of racial inequality" needs to be changed. It implies that at some point in American history there has not been racial inequality, which I do not think is a matter of debate. This phrase should either be removed, or changed to note that this time period had increased inequality if that is true. If not, it should be removed, or restated in such a way that it shows racial inequality is a part of American history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.155.58.186 ( talk) 03:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
The fact that he is a convicted felon is sourced elsewhere in the article. It is not controversial, it is not libel --- it is a NPOV fact determined by a jury of his peers, and very widely publicized. It is also now what he is most notable for, and belongs in the first sentence. I am reverting your revert. 67.62.75.193 ( talk) 13:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Tom_DeLay#Number_of_convictions and comment there.-- Chaser ( talk) 16:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
While I disagree with this user about the image, its quality and its use in the article, there appears to be no justification to using Huggle to revert the Plasticine article. We should be discussing this issue at the article's talk page, not just reverting (myself included). Alansohn ( talk) 18:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
You reverted yesterday night's edits on fluorine chemistry: this one [3], this one [4], this one [5], and this one [6]. All of these were constructive, and they were made to relieve the boredom of late-night labwork. It's evident that you have no notion about chemistry. I'd recommend that you stick to things you know about and take to heart the immortal words of Dieter Nuhr: If you don't have a clue: just shut up. 128.226.130.123 ( talk) 19:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
i am so sorry for changing stuff without ur permission. i just saw a part tht marked edit n i deid. so sorry. but i live in guyana...all my life n i think i will know my towns cities n villages as i am youth volunteer tht travels.. as for citing reliable cites i would like to believe tht some1 who is familiar with the geography n landscape of their country would know wat they are sayin. not tryna be disrespectful in any way but am jus saying. thanks. eddy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.80.120.31 ( talk) 18:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Are you the one who just sent me a message? sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.59.45 ( talk) 18:23, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
the links I added and you delated referred to the major tomato canning associations and boards in Europe. I believe these links were appropriate with the canned tomatoes article. ( talk)
I added WikiProject District of Columbia to {{ WikiProject United States}} but im still kinda new to Banner templates. Would you mind double checking to make sure I got it right? -- Kumioko ( talk) 02:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank You for the heads up. Request for change made. Have a great day.
Category:WikiProject Golden Horseshoe Roads articles, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 08:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WikiProject Golden Horseshoe Roads/Articles' Qualities. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Golden Horseshoe Roads/Articles' Qualities redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Imzadi 1979 → 09:12, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Happy Sunday to you wherever you are. I am having a little trouble with the coding for {{ WikiProject United States}} and was hoping you wouldnt mind helping. I would like to add logic to allow independent classing and assessment for the District of Columbia project and I can't seem to make it work. Thanks in advance for the help. -- Kumioko ( talk) 23:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
...for this. A Macedonian, a Greek. ( talk) 17:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Done your changes at Template:WikiProject District of Columbia, did you want any protection (semi/full) for Template:WikiProject United States as a high visibility template? Drop me a note if you do. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
This article is getting almost a quarter-million page views a day. This is our chance to look good. If you see more bare URLs in the article [7], then drop a note on my talk page rather than tagging it and I will fix the problem within 24 hours. Or you could pitch in yourself. :-) -- Chaser ( talk) 06:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
I have noticed that you have reverted one of Oldmedia's troublesome edits on the DLSU Pops Orchestra page and warned him (the latter to no avail, I presume). but I want to ask if there is anything that can be towards that said troublesome user? His account page is non-existent (except from his discussions and contributions page, of course) and the reversion that you did was just some of his continued blatant vandalism. I would have done things myself but I'm not really familiar with the things around here as I very rarely go online.
Much, thanks. Pathbinder ( talk) 07:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Actually, I have two citations. Please give me an hour to add them as I am busy at the moment.
I can't help noticing the rest of the article has no citations. Also, is it an article, a category or what?
In fairness, I'll bet most or all are real military acronyms, but whoever created this (not me) didn't appear to cite anything.
Telemachus.forward ( talk) 16:49, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
I am having a little problem getting the portal to Show up for WikiProject District of Columbia. Would you mind taking a look when you have some time and see if you can figure out why the portal isn't showing up? -- Kumioko ( talk) 22:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Wikipedia:WikiProject Photography, has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Traveler100 (
talk)
20:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 16:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
It appears that the category you added to the Quality content is causing the show hide boxes to render incorrectly. Its causing all the show hides to bunch to the left. I tried to figure it out but I don't know what the problem is. Would you mind taking a look at it? -- Kumioko ( talk) 15:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
I know I've been leaning on you a lot to help with things in WPUS and I appreciate everything you've done. I noticed that you made some edits over the years to Portal:United States and I was hoping you might be interested in helping out wiht that a bit too. Know that the WikiProject United States is up and running I am looking at focusing some attention on that portal since I feel its under our scope. Would you be interested in helping me get that portal back to featured status again. If not could you offer me any advice as to what needs to be done? I am going to update some content but aside from that I'm not sure. I think that foundation of the portal itself is sound we just need to add/update its content. I figure once its up to speed it shouldn't take more than a couple edits a week to keep it maintained. -- Kumioko ( talk) 17:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Please don't revert — the only way that G8 can be applied to redirects is if the parent page is a redlink or is itself tagged for speedy deletion. You must take these redirects to RFD. Nyttend ( talk) 21:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I've been cleaning out the backlog at Wikipedia:Dead-end pages, and since the backlog is down to just barely the P-T sections, I was thinking to remove the Wikipedia:Dead-end pages/Header filing app from that page (maybe leave a link to it hidden on the page). In it's place, we'd have the bot-populated by-moth WP:DEP listings, and one single page of all the backlog. I know you've worked on the Header, so wanted to check with you first. Proposed here: Wikipedia_talk:Dead-end_pages. Please let me know if you have any objections. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 02:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Greetings. I just wanted to let you know that I asked about a bot to automatically update the DYK and On this day sections of the portal. The News section is already automatically updated. Not sure how hard this will be but I think its doable and will be a lot better than having to manually do it everyday. I also added a comment to the Portal talk page about adding a section for a featured Project of the Month US related projects of course). Let me know what you think about that idea if you don't mind. I should get done tagging all 685 portal subpages with the category today BTW. -- Kumioko ( talk) 18:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. -- Nlu ( talk) 20:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Be well. 77.78.12.31 ( talk) 04:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I found this article, which is obviously about 10 sailors (an aircrew) from U.S. Navy Patrol Squadron 4. However, I consider this page as utter nonsense. Its content may only be a footnote in the VP-4 article, in my opinion (if at all). Maybe you might want to delete it. I also notified User:High Contrast, but he does not seem online. Cheers Cobatfor ( talk) 16:36, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Section template list has been nominated for merging with
Template:Hatnote templates documentation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -
DePiep (
talk)
21:26, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
All input welcome. Cheers. walk victor falk talk 00:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
I was hoping to not have to bother you and I think its probably something simple I am missing but I modified {{ WikiProject Smithsonian Institution-related/sandbox}} to include a taskforce for the Archives of American Art and I hit a snag in the building of Categories. I created the categories I needed and they seem to be working as seen by the Top Importance link in paranthesis after the task force name in the template however it shows the categories in red below that as though they are not seeing the Project at all. Could you take a look and see what I am doing wrong. Thanks. -- Kumioko ( talk) 04:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion starting up at Talk:Batavia (disambiguation), that may be of interest to you. The subject is technically a page move discussion, but the purpose of the discussion is to decide where Batavia should redirect. Until earlier today, Batavia redirected to History of Jakarta, but during this discussion, it is redirecting to Batavia (disambiguation). Your comments and suggestions are welcome.
Thanks for your help. HuskyHuskie ( talk) 22:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
You are receiving this because you are one of the principal editors of one of the articles that is linked to Batavia (disambiguation). This notice is being posted to all of the top three editors of each of these articles (in terms of total edits), with the following exceptions:
This is an attempt to be a neutrally-phrased posting in keeping with the principles of WP:CANVASS. If you find anything in the wording or the manner posted to be a violation of that guideline, please notify me at my talk page.
As one of the editors who has done more than one edit at List of regions of Illinois, you are invited to join in a discussion on its possible deletion. Thanks. HuskyHuskie ( talk) 03:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl, I gave a level 2 warning to a user today who then blanked it and I see you issued him a level 2 warning a little later. You may want to consider issuing a level 3 to him in case he comes back. His
contribs. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕))
23:33, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
sorry, took me quite a while to sort out evacuation as I ended up reading the refs and moving some to more appropriate places whence they once came. Very hard to avoid tripping over other peoples work. Complex edit conflicts every time. Sandpiper ( talk) 21:12, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
consensus discussion, guidelines for use at
WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot ( talk) 20:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Userboxes articles, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 14:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Responded on my talk page. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
I just added WikiProject US government to the list of projects supported and I notice that the icon for it and for the Library of Congress are a bit small. Is it possible to adjust the size of these 2 images to be a little bigger? -- Kumioko ( talk) 16:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
.--
Kumioko (
talk)
02:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, for your help fixing the template {{ Political neologisms}}. Much appreciated. ;) Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 19:16, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
You've previously assessed the article. I would like to know if you have any objections with merging its content to the university article. Moray An Par ( talk) 02:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl - I see you've recently made two subpages for {{ Stub category}}. It would have been nice if you'd commented about them at WP:WikiProject Stub sorting before you did so, but even so it would still be worthwhile us knowing exactly why you made them and what purpose they will serve. I've made a comment at WT:WSS - any chance you could add some form of comment about them there, please? Cheers, Grutness... wha? 02:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you are of course right. I was on vandalism patrol and reverted the edit (originally made by 192.148.117.83) then mistakenly reinstated it. Oops Prunesqualer ( talk) 13:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
I have been a season ticket holder at VVV Venlo for many years. Alex Nkume has a nickname of "The Duke". Please donot change it again as you know not of the subject. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.122.138.44 ( talk) 19:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Hasn't this user had enough chances? Is there a way a user can be reported to admin for a block as it has a number of disruptive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilbur2012 ( talk • contribs) 21:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
This revert you did was in no way a test edit. The IP just added the Kannada title for the article.— Abhishek Talk to me 09:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject United States for a Signpost article to be published on the Fourth of July. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions and responses may be trimmed if the final article becomes too long. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - Mabeenot ( talk) 22:36, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at List of sovereign states. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the Discussion of criteria. Best regards, Nightw 04:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Funandtrvl, many thanks for the nice award, and more importantly, for your recent on-the-mark edits of the A Hitler entry! All the best, Malljaja ( talk) 14:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Why did you take the "s" off of meters in the infobox? If it is to do with making the template work I don't want to touch it but grammatically it doesn't seem to make sense. Rmhermen ( talk) 01:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl,
as you could have seen by examing the histories, these pages were moved on purpose last year, following a consensus decision to rename "The Wikipedia Signpost" to "The Signpost". If you want to advocate a return to the old name, feel free to do so and obtain consensus. But until then, please undo you actions and move the pages back to reflect the Signpost's current name.
Regards, HaeB ( talk) 07:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
HaeB is correct that the inconsistency is deliberate due to the rename agreed just over a year ago. Some pages have remained under "Wikipedia Signpost" to avoid unnecessary duplication or complication of our already complex templating system. Whilst new issues should technically live below Wikipedia:Signpost now, it doesn't seem crucial enough to justify recoding much of our system and making it harder to update in future. If you are brave enough, you are welcome to move the internal pages such as the Newsroom/Archives etc! If you're finding it "harder to find the pages", remember all internal areas you will need are listed in the Index and everything we've published is listed in the archives. — Pretzels Hii! 11:34, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Funandtrvl. This is a note to draw your attention to a very curious thing. On june 30, you left a comment here about some improper editing in the article List of travel magazines. Fortunately or unfortunately, I happen to be the user of this IP address and to the best of my knowledge I'm the only one to use it. I don't remember making any edit in the article in question. I've never even seen this page before! As you may understand, this is a very confusing situation for me and I'll appreciate if you clarify these weird stuff a bit. Thank you.-- Sayantan ( talk| contribs) 14:41, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Please explain your removal of the category unsourced template from Arna Mer-Khamis. Debresser ( talk) 21:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Please see here, and I hope you'l understand why I was forced to undo your edit. Respectfully, -- -- -- 22:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Why did you remove so many municipalities from Category:Chicago metropolitan area.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 03:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Another editor has made some good edits for concision of late. As you may recall, we had discussed streamlining the article, recently. Anyway, on the talk page I wrote a section as to several photos I thought could be removed. I invite your thoughts as you had expressed interest recently. Cheers, Kierzek ( talk) 14:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure out how to upload two pictures to my wiki page for Philo Records (Folk) and haven't managed to do it. My account is authorized (or so I think) but still no luck. Sorry to be a bother, but could you point me in the right direction? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mperlmang ( talk • contribs) 03:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
I see now what you were getting at... I did not realize that we had competing parallel articles... Mark Sublette ( talk) 21:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Mark Sublette Mark Sublette ( talk) 21:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, This is a random survey regarding the first sentence on the Wikipedia policy page Verifiability.
In your own words, what does this mean? Thank you. Regards, Bob K31416 ( talk) 03:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for doing new page patrol. You tagged this page for speedy deletion as a test page. However, it seems to be a real attempt at a substub, and I have converted it into a redirect. The page may be unsuitable for inclusion as a unsourced BLP with only "inherited" notability, but it was not necessary to tag this page with the wrong tag a minute after creation. Please be a little more careful and try not to WP:BITE the newbies. Thank you, — Kusma ( t· c) 06:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Did that help? -- Kumioko ( talk) 03:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Association Football in Australia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Pee
Jay
23:47, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
I'm concerned that you are engaged in an edit war at Cuban Missile Crisis. While you are correct in your assertions The 3 revert rule applies because the edits being reverted are not covered by any of the exemptions given. Consensus via the talk page is going to be necessary to solve this. -- Mrmatiko ( talk) 16:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Someone nominated my templates for deletion, and I feel I'm gonna get blocked! You have to help with the protest (link on my profile page.) Ezekiel! Talk to meh. See what I'm doin'. 20:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for your recent updates to various cleanup templates. I've undone some of the changes to emphasis: the prevailing style is just to emphasise the verb phrase which describes the problem, rather than peppering these templates with bits of bold. I've also gone through and reworded some templates which just said "and requires cleanup" to better describe the problem. Cheers. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but latakia and burley are types of tobacco, not brands. Frotz ( talk) 04:36, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Please do not alphabetize a chronological list.-- Craigboy ( talk) 23:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, I haven't had a lot of experience with Template documentation pages.-- Craigboy ( talk) 21:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
A message to me indicates that I may contest the speedy deletion of Template:Higher Education by country by pressing ""Click here to contest this speedy deletion". But there appears to be no such place to click. Can you help? Thanks. Student7 ( talk) 19:56, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I was going to revert this edit, until I saw it was you. As one of the more respected names I encounter, I've decided to instead just ask "What's up?" The edit seems counterintuitive to me (since over 80% of Aurora is in Kane County, not DuPage), but I also know that there's a lot of policy shit that I don't know beans about. So what's the thinking, amigo? HuskyHuskie ( talk) 02:05, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
My modification were explained here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Passports
as:
I had just deleted Iroquois and World passports from the templates. It isn't a passport but a camouflage one. A passport is issued by a recognized State or by a subject of the international society such as Palestinian authority. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.71.8.131 (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You redo ?
DG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.71.8.131 ( talk) 00:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch ( talk) 21:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Just how many of these redirects that break Rdcheck are there? Might it not be better to update Rdcheck to be able to handle all the variations of redirect syntax that MediaWiki itself accepts? Anomie ⚔ 22:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, following on from User talk:Redrose64#Why aren't you an admin??, please see recent posts at User talk:Redrose64#Future admin?. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 16:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I was editing the city names, and those names are more than likely Villages, would that suffice to be put back on there?? Badgelady2000 ( talk) 01:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
regarding the sculpture section that you just edited at the
Lafayette article, this
[9] is what the
Smithsonian has to say on the subject:
Grieff, in the more or less standard work on the subject of sculpture in Indiana states, "Lafayette's visage is also among those carved on the pediments of the courthouse itself".
[1]
As
Oscar Wilde once wrote (or perhaps he just said it) "The truth is seldom pure and never simple." Einar aka
Carptrash (
talk)
02:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh, a flake is not a bad thing to be, and it was my term in any case. My girls argued for years as to whether I was a dork or a nerd. I think that they finally settled on both. Thanks for reconsidering your Lafayette edit, architectural sculpture (and sculpture in general) is my passion, so I was happy that a second look proved I was on the right track. Life is good. Carptrash ( talk) 02:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia is one of the few places on earth where pointing out someone's error can garner a response. At best ( opinion) some clerk will pass the info on to the webmaster who . ............actually quit 3 years ago and no one else . . .......... well you know how it goes. Too bad we can't just make these corrections ourselves, but, wouldn't the WWW be an interesting place if ALL websites were open editing? Carptrash ( talk) 21:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I see you've been cleaning up some of the dead link/cites in this article, thanks for keeping up with that. I didn't realize that there was even a "cite conference" template. I do have some questions about some of your changes though.
When the work itself does not change but the pages do, I usually put <ref>Author's last name, Page #<ref> or <ref>Author's name, Title, Page #</ref>. Would that be acceptable to you if I changed the second instance (of those sources being referenced, but with the different page #s) to the author name/page number variety? Thanks, Shearonink ( talk) 21:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Closeapple ( talk) 05:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you tagged some categories for deletion. Usually these categories are kept even when they are empty; what's up in this case? — Carl ( CBM · talk) 00:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for completing the category removal of all those dead WikiProjects & Task Forces. I have been working on them off and on for months now and those finished up that particular task. --
Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)
06:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Food and Drink Barnstar | |
I want to thank you for all of the hard work you have been doing on the categorization and templates lately. Good job! Jeremy ( blah blah • I did it!) 20:48, 26 November 2011 (UTC) |
Let the vandal be. I have already reported him. | help dןǝɥ | 21:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Ramesh Ramaiah talk 02:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Look at Index of energy articles need feedback help on talk page ideas. Awesome editing job by the way. Shawn Worthington Laser Plasma ( talk) 03:07, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl,
You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.
Thank you.
Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumi-Taskbot (
talk)
19:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() | Just a happy Birthday message to you, Funandtrvl, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Hi,
Yesterday, on January 21st, I added a date to the Wikipedia page about said day. Only few minutes later the page was been reset by you, claiming it would "not appear to be constructive".
But it is. In fact, this very day January 21st 2012 might be the greatest and most important date since October 10th 2010 for a certain, constantly growing subculture, Bronies to be precise. It may not be crucial for you, but for these people all other the world it is. On that day the Brony-Community was initially fully acknowledged by the show and the creators. It never happened before in the history of television that a originally not target group fandom influenced a show in that dimension as it happened on that for Bronies historical day.
I know my entry wasn't really much formulated since I was to busy jumping around in joy, but still I demand the right to add an article about something important on Wikipedia, even if it's only for a certain group of people.
Yours sincerely
Benjamin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmt Brony ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you cleaned up the code for Template:Infobox holiday/doc some time ago, you escaped the entire template code using <pre></pre>. This, however, had the undesirable result of escaping the {{#time}} parser functions which were used to generate dates for parameters and should have been displayed as years on the documentation page. Articles in which the code was used verbatim subsequently had their dates messed up when the year changed. I've fixed the documentation page in question, but you might want to check if there are any other similar pages. Thanks. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 06:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed this edit to Template:Category diffuse; whether or not that edit contributed to the problem, you can probably help! Please see Template talk:Category diffuse#Problem with parameters. – Fayenatic (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry ( Message me) 14:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Off-topic-inline has been nominated for merging with
Template:Relevance note. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —
SMcCandlish
Talk⇒〈°⌊°〉
Contribs.
17:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, can you please explain why you've removed Category:Broadcasting in article TV Transmitters? Thanks. Nedim Ardoğa ( talk) 09:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
According to statistics of the Israeli Ministry of Tourism, in 2010, 3.5 milion tourists arrived to Israel. http://www.tourism.gov.il/GOVheb/Ministry%20of%20Tourism/Tourism%20Development/Documents/report%20-%202010.pdf (in Hebrew,page 4}.
Hey, why you call my edit a "test edit". You do this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Arab_towns_and_villages_depopulated_during_the_1948_Palestinian_exodus&diff=479362935&oldid=479049749. That was not a "test edit". That was a valid edit. This church is in East Jerusalem, not Israel. You're bullying tactics of reverting with false summaries is not acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nassiriya ( talk • contribs) 19:53, 5 March 2012 (UTC) I have undid the edit. Don't just remove my edit again, there is no consensus for that category!
But you can add categories with no consensus? Why only removal has to have consensus? Other people write that addition must have consensus. What are the rules? But I'm sorry for extra "i", but that doesn't make me edit a "test edit". Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nassiriya ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
FYI, see these threads. thank you. Frietjes ( talk) 16:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, I am new to Wikipedia and I have been helping out with WikiProject Kentucky as a way to get my feet wet. While doing this I noticed that some of the stuff wasn't displaying quite right and after looking at the template I think I found out why. It appears that Kumioko made some changes to the template and then no one answered his requests to have them implemented. Then when you synced the sandbox with the main page here it wiped them out. Would it be possible to fix those items in the template so the stuff for the Eastern mountain coal fields task force will display correctly? I would try it myself but I don't wanna mess somehting up in that template. ShmuckatellieJoe ( talk) 03:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I am proposing to move the page On The Issues per the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Thanks. Tassedethe ( talk)
I noticed you had removed a category for the Lincoln Colored Home. I'm very new and just wanting to understand why it was removed. Please explain. Thanks!
Thecuban99 ( talk) 23:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Thecuban99
Hi Funandtrvl, the aforementioned category is intended to name individual mountain peaks seen in the image, best by using image annotations. Just saying that this mountains are in Salzburg (state), will not solve the puzzle. In the image linked, there are at least two significant peaks left and right to Gamsleitenspitze, which can and should be named. Can you help? cheers. -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 17:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello Funandtrvl, please see my reply at Wikipedia talk:RefToolbar 2.0#Cite not shown on the toolbar on top of the editbox. Kaldari ( talk) 14:42, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Which stands for "for my interest"... What does the edit summary of this edit stand for? Debresser ( talk) 23:53, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi--I don't think adding a "Related information" link is really necessary at the bottom of an external links section (re: Alaska, Illinois, etc.) It's not recommended at MOS:LAYOUT and it's only adding kbs and clutter, so I'm removing it on Alaska and probably Illinois. -- Funandtrvl ( talk) 22:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, Wikipedia articles are prone to the addition of lengthy and often repetitive infoboxes, navigation boxes, templates, and internal and external link farms. An example of this was Minnesota a week or so ago ( this version), which contains, in the See also section, links not only to the Minnesota outline, index and portal, but also links to the outlines and portals of the United States, North America, Geography, and History. Then in the Minnesota navigation box there are links to the Minnesota Index (I have since added the Minnesota Outline there as well). In the United States nav box there are links to the US book and portal. There was also some kind of geographic direction box, showing the relationship to neighbors, which is duplicative of the text, and also contained links to the Minnesota outline and index. I removed the duplication and links to information not specific to the state, for the reasons expressed at Talk:Minnesota#See_also_section.
Minnesota is a featured article, and during its FAC, a decision was made to remove the See also section entirely. I think that was correct, under the principles of WP:SEEALSO. Links should be relevant, and should appear only once, and oulines and indexes to general topics should not be included on articles for specific locales. We do not need the continued accretion of duplicative information to the Minnesota article, the other featured articles at Virginia and Oklahoma, or any other state. As indicated by the discussion here, and the edit history at Michigan and perhaps elsewhere, the issue needs to be discussed at a central location, with notice to the relevant wikiprojects, including FAC and GAC. Kablammo ( talk) 16:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Category:High school sports associations in Illinois, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Closeapple ( talk) 04:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
According to the statistics of the Israeli Ministry of Tourism , the number of tourists that arrived to Israel in 2011 was 3.45 million tourists. This is much more reliable source. Of course that the Israeli Minister of Tourism ,Stas Misezhnikov, mentioned it several times.
http://www.tourism.gov.il/GOVheb/Ministry%20of%20Tourism/Statistics/Pages/Arrivals-By-State.aspx (in 2011) click on כניסת מבקרים-סיכום שנתי. (the statistics are written in english) -- Friends147 ( talk) 21:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The statistics are not including domestic visitors only international visitors. I added a reference in your talk page... 3.45 million INTERNATIONAL arrived to Israel in 2011 and that's a fact.-- Friends147 ( talk) 21:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Please spot check the Table of United States Micropolitan Statistical Areas to ensure that we now have the correct data. I've added the CBSA code to this table to make future updates easier. I'll check the other statistical area tables for errors. Thank you so much for your work on this. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I've modified WPCleaner to handle the situation you where describing in fr:Discussion utilisateur:NicoV/Wikipedia Cleaner. Is it ok ? It probably requires some more testing. I've just tested it on 1269. -- NicoV ( talk) 11:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for fixing all those Robotics assessments. Are you interested in robotics in general or was it just something you spotted in passing? Chaosdruid ( talk) 13:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
You might be interested in participating in Wikipedia_talk:Double_redirects#Wikipedia:Example_of_a_double_redirect, because your the person who removed Wikipedia:Example of a double redirect from the page. Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 17:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Just a reminder that when you move a page the talk page comes with it, but not the archives or other subpages, they must be moved separately. Don't worry about it in this case as I've already moved them, just mentioning it for future reference. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
fixed. Frietjes ( talk) 20:54, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Funandtrvl! Thanks for your contributions.
I just wanted to let you know that a few cities that you categorized as border towns aren't really border towns. They are considerably near the border, but they technically do not touch Mexico. Here are two of them: Mercedes, Texas; Donna, Texas. Cheers. ComputerJA ( talk) 02:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
I thought this was frowned upon per WP:TEMPLATECAT? Frietjes ( talk) 23:52, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Template:Lincoln cabinet sidebar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Lincoln cabinet sidebar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mitchumch ( talk) 07:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
I have added a section on the talk page for the article Richard Nixon titled "Section deleted on 13 December 2012." Please share your thoughts on the talk page. Thanks. Mitchumch ( talk) 17:24, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 05:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
A small problem with changing to {{ Assessment Class Summary}} is that it doesn't include the class SL used in WP Plants. Because the template generates the non-article list immediately after the article list, adding a manual entry for SL puts the information in the wrong place. Do you see any fix for this? Peter coxhead ( talk) 11:44, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Categories articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 18:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Funandtrvl. I finally have time to check what is wrong with OKBot! It is always this one buggy line or so. Anyway, the source code is available and it is under a free license just in case I get too busy in the future. Thanks for contacting me.-- OsamaK ( talk) 16:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you added the tag |botanist=
to the documentation for
Template:WikiProject Plants
here but did not leave an explanation for its use. It looks like it might be to designate "WikiProject Plants botanist articles" but it's not evident. Could you please update the documentation explaining how to use the |botanist=
tag? Thanks! -
ʈucoxn\
talk
22:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Check it now; I just fixed it. I forgot to test it in a sandbox before making an edit, so the extra brackets got reproduced. Nyttend ( talk) 22:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
— Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:27, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Forestry |
Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page. |
Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld ( talk) 13:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl, hope you don't mind my reaching out to you, but I saw that you're a WikiProject Business participant and wondered if you'd be able to look at an article draft that falls under this project's scope. I've written a new draft for the marketing software company Vocus and am looking for editors to review it since I have a COI with the topic, as I wrote the draft on behalf of the company. Due to this COI, I will not make any edits to the Vocus article myself.
The current Vocus article is not in the best shape, and the draft I've written aims to provide a clearer overview of the company's operations and products, with better sourcing. You can see the draft here: User:16912_Rhiannon/Vocus and there's a full explanation of the draft in my request on the Vocus Talk page. As I've explained there, I'm looking for impartial editors to read the draft and make sure it's neutral, non-promotional and otherwise follows Wikipedia's guidelines. One editor has reviewed the draft already and made some edits, but hasn't provided any comments, so it would be great to get your feedback and have you move the draft if you feel it is ready. If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon ( Talk · COI) 20:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi again, Funandtrvl. Thanks again for all your help on the Vocus article. I'm sorry to ask, but I was wondering if you'd mind adding the company's logo to the infobox for me? The request edit on the article's Talk page hasn't led to any replies and, since it's a small edit, I was hoping you might be able to do this if you have a moment. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon ( Talk · COI) 14:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Portal:Coffee, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Coffee and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Coffee during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
Re your edits to Category:Companies based in North Las Vegas, Nevada. Did you know that North Las Vegas is a city? Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:12, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl, re: your recent , I was wondering why do you might think that Category:Lists of people by occupation is less appropriate than Category:Lists of health professionals. Although many psychologists are employed as health professionals, very many others are not. Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Fuse (electrical) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
You are invited to join WikiProject Cannabis, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to Cannabis. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to the plant. The WikiProject Cannabis group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants. |
The project has not been as active lately, but there remains much interest and much work to be done, if you are interested! -- Another Believer ( Talk) 02:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
No Problem I shall fix those templates, thanks for pointing that out. Also I've noticed that you've removed Roads and Highways Department from Template:Automotive industry in Bangladesh could you explain why? Seqqis ( talk) 04:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Okay Seqqis ( talk) 20:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kurt Ballou may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Category:Prisons in Spain as a residential building? Not saying you are wrong, but that seems so odd. Vegaswikian ( talk) 00:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl
I have noticed that you have been editing number of templates concerned with the broad class of Underwater diving.
I have undone some of your edits for Category:Underwater orienteering, Category: Underwater hockey and Category:Underwater rugby, because these underwater sports are NOT adaptations of the terrestrial sports. In all cases, these sports have evolved independently and acquired the references to the terrestrial sports much later in their respective existence largely due to codification of rules at international level when the sports’ names were standardised and for the desire to attract more participation. In the case of underwater hockey, the name was changed from Octopush 25 years after its invention because a number of non-English speaking diving federations when finalising the International Rules did not like the word ‘Octopush’ despite it being an accurate reflection of the game.
I am also concerned about the creation of Category:Underwater sports templates and its addition to a number of navbars (i.e. Template:Diver training, Template:Underwater divers, Template:Recreational dive sites, Template:Diver organisations and Template:Underwater diving). As implied above, the peak article for the broad subject of ‘being underwater’ is Underwater diving of which Underwater sports is one of the sub-sets. Therefore, the Category:Underwater sports templates should be renamed Category:Underwater diving templates.
Cowdy001 ( talk) 22:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
I left a note at Talk:Aisén River. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 01:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests#New REFBot for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- Frze ( talk · contribs) 04:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Online source has been nominated for merging with
Template:Press. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
Steel1943 (
talk)
22:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Administrative divisions of Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Housing authority ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give
Template:User wikipedia/Autoconfirmed a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Dogmaticeclectic ( talk) 00:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day ( see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
![]() |
Hi Funandtrvl! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editors are welcome! (But being multilingual is not a requirement.) Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 21:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, I saw that you just received the protected template editor userright. Are there any full protected templates that you'd like to edit? Let me know and I'll downgrade the protection so you can do so. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Category | Current status |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() | |
Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",". | |
![]() |
Best wishes -- Frze > talk 04:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of portmanteaus may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Category:WikiProject Category Suppression pages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. John Vandenberg ( chat) 07:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Funandtrvl, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Buckeye Sun, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's not a hoax or something just made up, it's just a little newspaper that serves a little town. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 ( talk) 12:31, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I see suddenly all my restaurant and chef article pass by on my watchlist. What is the general idea behind your efforts? Although I see hardly anything really strange (a few foreign restaurants moved to a cat with just two articles) but it still makes me a bit nervous. The Banner talk 21:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
by most ways of seeing the archipelago - and there have been some beauties at times (islands of the pacific and so on) - is in south east asia, and in most cases the 'australasia' and 'oceania' arguments of about 4 or 5 years ago have died down. there is also a new oceania project (relatively speaking)... so, have reverted your category of indonesia being in oceania - it isnt. cheers satusuro 01:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I nominated today's Driehaus Architecture Prize laureate Pier Carlo Bontempi to be featured on the start page of Wikipedia at "In the News". It'd be great for the whole discipline if you could support this nomination.
Please go there: Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#Driehaus Prize and add Support or Strong Support. Thank you! All the best, Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 15:27, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! :) -- Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 23:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB ( talk) 20:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
If you're going to "enforce" something like this, would you mind cleaning up the rest of Category:WikiProject Sports to move the subprojects into Category:Sports-related WikiProjects? They should all be handled one way or the other, not half-and-half. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 21:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your edit to Clinton Road. You cited MOS:layout as your reasoning for forcing sizes on all the images; however, WP:IMGSIZE says (as does MOS:IMAGES#Size) that images should be displayed with "thumb" set, leaving that up to the user to set in Preferences.
I grant that it also says images should be on the right. I generally disregard that, since it's easier on your eyes to alternate images as your eyes are already doing that to read (In fact research has shown that people generally read further along into a text illustrated with alternating images, for that reason). Daniel Case ( talk) 22:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I gave the tags four dashes so the requests made by the comments might be a little more likely to be seen (rather than assumed to be e.g. coding comments and passed over). What do you think..? Sardanaphalus ( talk) 09:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
I notice in this change, you changed the default sort to be the same as the page title (give or take capitalization). Is there any reason to keep the DEFAULTSORT tag in there at this point? – RobinHood70 talk 00:55, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
United States National Archives WikiProject |
---|---|
|
WikiWomen - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi Funandtrvl! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its
sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot ( talk) 00:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hey, I notice that you have HighBeam access and you seem to have a few topicons. That being said, if you are interested, I've created {{
Wikipedia:HighBeam/Topicon}}
. No reply to this message is necessary (and I won't see it unless you ping me), just wanted to let you know it was available.
Happy editing! — {{U|
Technical 13}} (
e •
t •
c)
23:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl, I was recently caught in the discussion about Air Serbia - Jat Airways relations. Please, if you are willing so, read my whole expose about this issue here: [11], and give your opinion on it, so we can move forward from this stalemate. Thanks! -- AirWolf talk 15:23, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Category:Writers by ethnic or national descent has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Aristophanes68 (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. Funandtrvl ( talk) 15:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you announced that you had come up with a new "key" for Project Autism.
[[:Category:WikiProject Psychology|Autism]]
Are you aware that User:Muffinator has been banned from adding the {{ WikiProject Autism}} tag to any articles or talk pages? This is per a Administrators' noticeboard/Incident decision at [13]
Do you think the new Autism key is in the spirit of this decision, especially since {{ WikiProject Autism}} is not at all a part of the Category:WikiProject Psychology and actually goes against it, being radically different? I guess Psychology members can go there and periodically clean it out, but it seems like it just sets the project up for more trouble. It was the adding of the {{ WikiProject Autism}} tag to psychology articles and biographies that got User:Muffinator banned. Parabolooidal ( talk) 02:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello – I think I understand your intention here, but, given that it means {{#ifeq:}}'s opening and closing braces are no longer aligned, I'm wondering if the result is wise..? Sardanaphalus ( talk) 10:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
While you're at it you might turn the talk pages of the groups into redirects to the Christianity noticeboard. John Carter ( talk) 20:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Christianity Barnstar | |
For your very welcome work in organizing the rather confusing and confused mess the Christianity projects have become over the years! John Carter ( talk) 20:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC) |
The Illinois State Fair is not an independent agency; it is a division of the Illinois Department of Agriculture. I have seen lots of good work from you and wanted to tell you why I have reverted your classification of the Illinois State Fair as a state agency of Illinois. Bigturtle ( talk) 15:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello Funadtrvl. I see on the history page that you have made several edits to the United States banner template (see the talk page). Another user and I need help on getting several WikiProjects and taskforces on the banner template. The problem is how complex the template is on the sandbox and the last time it got synchronized, it caused problems. Could you please help us out? Thanks in advance! Erick ( talk) 22:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl. I would like to invite you to join the discussion about Structured search. You will have a lot of fun. Kandreyev ( talk) 05:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)kandreyev
Hi Funandtrvl, I’m currently working on the page for David M. Cote and I’m seeking out guidance from experienced editors to collaborate with. I’ve disclosed my COI on the article talk page, but have yet to receive any responses there. When you have a quick moment, would you mind taking a look at the draft I have on my sandbox? I’d appreciate any feedback or suggestions you might have. Thanks! -- FacultiesIntact ( talk) 08:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Iranian stock exchanges to Category:Stock exchanges in Iran & Category:Stock exchanges of Pakistan to Category:Stock exchanges in Pakistan Hugo999 ( talk) 11:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Funandtrvl, I noticed you added Category:Frans Hals to Category:Artists from Haarlem with this edit, while removing it from Category:History of Haarlem. I don't follow your rationale. Frans Hals is an artist from Haarlem, and he was already in the artists-from-Haarlem category. The people he portrayed, while important to the history of Haarlem, were not artists. Also, his paintings are objects and not people. Have you done this to more artist categories named after artists? I think you need to discuss such changes first. Jane ( talk) 07:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your efforts, but the fact that a book was written long ago and is of historical interest doesn't make it a history book. And "natural history" isn't a branch of history. Thucydides wrote history; Theophrastus wrote botany. Take care now! Chiswick Chap ( talk) 18:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
I've noticed you
added a {{
Parameter names example}} to a template. Just so you know, you can do that effortlessly with {{subst:Parameters|demo|base={{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}|_base=}}
. Take care.
Alakzi (
talk)
17:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:18th-century establishments in the Netherlands, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! ( talk) 08:54, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)
Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej ( talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Blanked in 2010, never used again after that. Cycn ( talk) 10:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
You recently created a number of categories and subcategories Destroyed landmarks by country. I believe these categories are unnecessary because categories with Demolished buildings and structures by country already existed. Is it possible to merge both categories? See WP:OVERCAT Tridek Sep ( talk) 19:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the skiing articles. Other editors, particularly newer ones, might appreciate revision comments less cryptic than "ce", "nvbx" and "wp". I would. -- Cornellier ( talk) 00:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
I think you should have been informed by the nominator, User:Tridek Sep, that a cat you created, Category:Destroyed landmarks in Belgium, has been nominated for deletion at CfD - via this link. Doubtless there's a template for this message, but it's quicker just to tell you. Eustachiusz ( talk) 16:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Category:Cultural history of Russia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy ( talk) 03:27, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)