Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Daniel J. Leivick (
talk)
03:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked for edit warring. -- Daniel J. Leivick ( talk) 03:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Societyfinalclubs tried to write an artcile about purdue that was removed before by vote as a hoax before. I am removing everything that I think is not legit. It is better to be safe than sorry- less is better than more if we just don't know. We can not trust homepages about groups. They must be 3rd party sourcing.
Frienlifer (
talk)
03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
We can not have groups that we don't know for sure even if they are legit- it is too much of a risk, and high school frats do not belong here period- it does not pertain to the article topic.They must go. Frienlifer ( talk) 03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Also Ma Wan Da andthe others are honor societies not secret- they should go too. Frienlifer ( talk) 03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
The page should be cleaned of background fluff- and just hav ewhat is relevant.03:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Societyfinalclubs for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. barneca ( talk) 18:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)