What do we do with vandals? Remember Hdt83 reported it to an adminsistator when 9999a9999 put fake warnings on three of our talk pages? Did he just choose a random administrator or what? Sorry for wasting your time because I found out that you had to deal a lot with a vandal (the one that said he/she did not vandalize a talk page and said he/she can do anything he/she wants with his/her talk page) in Wikipedia. I want to tell you that the IP address 70.244.161.33 recently made a lot of unconstructive edits. I think the IP address will be blocked soon, but I'm just telling you in case it isn't blocked yet.
I want to tell you I currently have over 650 edits. I have been editing a lot yesterday and today. LADodgersAngelsfan 03:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I had 700 edits recently. This is my 701st edit. Congratulations on you 4000th edit. Hope you make it to 5000 soon. I want to ask you if Hdt83 knows that I changed my username from 55555five55555 to LADodgersAngelsfan. Can you ask him that for me? LADodgersAngelsfan 08:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
This distorts images like flags when they are layered on top of one another, it also occasionally distorts text. I just thought I'd let you know, so that, if you know how, you can fix it (because I have no idea). =) The fixed on top layer notice also seems unnecessary. Also, what are the origins of your new name. You must also get alot of vandalism for the admins to grant your userpage semi-protected status. - Imperator Honorius 15:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my userpage. RuneWiki 777 23:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for this as well. ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/ Oohhh! 23:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Reverting a recent edit - I recently edited the spice girls article, and was quickly reverted, ill explain my reasons for my edit; I felt that the section was, poorly written (mistakes in it too) with bad grammar, pretty much repeating what was said earlier in the article, also even if it should be kept at all it should not be under the "Future" section of the article considering it talk of nothing apart from the past
Thanks very much for reverting the vandalism on my user page. It is much appreciated! Chickyfuzz14 (user talk) 05:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Splitting up the page into too many pieces (each letter) is going too far. I would think splitting it into about four pieces would be enough, don't you think? And it should be set up so the pieces can be transcluded easily into a combined list for those who want the complete list on one page. NoSeptember 10:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
I honestly don't think it's a big deal, but I changed it for you. alphachimp 01:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I would like to nominate you so that you could become an administrator. Would you accept or not? NHRHS2010 Talk 02:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Considering your edit count (over 4500, larger than mine), I figure that you don't actually want to be adopted anymore, but if you're still interested, I'd be happy to help you out. If not, you should probably remove the infobox from your user page, as it puts you in the category of users wanting to be adopted. If you want some help from an admin in regards to getting adminship someday, you should probably head over to Wikipedia:Admin coaching. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 21:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Be assured that conduct like this is extremely uncivil and will come up in your eventual RfA. You may now move this message to your hall of defame. alphachimp 20:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
In cleaning up the articles, most of the pictures that were on that page were moved to a Wikimedia Commons link. If possible, please move the pictures on that page that you uploaded to the Commons. They will then be included in the Wikimedia Commons link. Thanks. -- AEMoreira042281 01:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your support in
my recent RfA, which passed successfully at 40/2/1, making me Wikipedia's 1,250th
administrator. Your comments were much appreciated, and I will endeavour to fulfil your expectations as an admin.
| |
File:Ck lostsword copy.png |
ck lostsword • T • C 17:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
RE: [edit] Please stop
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to De Stijl, you will be blocked from editing. NHRHS2010 Talk 20:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, but please be careful with your accusations. I do not recall changing the De Stijl page and if I did, it would not have been with the intention to vandalize. If anything (which I don't recall) , it would have probably been a grammatical error that needed fixing and I imagine I would have had to be in a pretty anal mood to do even that.
I don't know what authority you operate under but obviously you do have administrative power on here. Please use it carefully- I find messages such as yours abrasive and mildly off-putting.
Thank you,
Matt Cable (mattycabes@gmail.com if you have any other concerns).
Hey there! Congratulations on your 5000th edit! Keep up the good work you are doing. I am also letting you know that I am up for adminship here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Hdt83_2 if you're interested. Thanks and once again good work on your 5000th edit! -- Hdt83 Chat 02:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Wow, over 5000 edits. Congratualtions. This either proves that you are a massive nerd, or have way to much time on your hands. Good on ya though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smeagain ( talk • contribs)
It's unbelievable that you already made 5,000 edits in only three months. I found that you have over 5,100 edits right now. It seems like you are working at a normal pace right now so I think my guess of you making 10,000 edits in October might be correct. Keep up the great work. I'm looking foward to find out that you made your 6,000th edit. LADodgersAngelsfan 05:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Not only did you revert 4 vandalisms to my user page and get the vandal blocked, but you even updated my vandalism counter! Now that is full service! Poindexter Propellerhead 08:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
And here, late's better than never...
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For reversion above and beyond the call of duty. Poindexter Propellerhead talk 17:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC) |