Archive 1 (9 Sept 2006 - 20 Aug 2007) |
Please click the "new section" tab above to add a new message below.
If you are a registered user and I left a message on your talk page, I probably added it to my watchlist, so you can reply there if you prefer and I should still read it soon. However, I no longer check Wikipedia every day, so please also leave me a note or a {{ talkback}} here. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2009 Fayenatic (talk) 14:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Happy new year! Kala jan 01:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Well done. Sorry: I cannot help on references; I know it only from experience, but I am sure there must be some literature on it. Peterkingiron ( talk) 23:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I think it looks much better now. Nice job! Eric444 ( talk) 13:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The sources only say that Rajmohan Pillai was convicted by a Special CBI Court. According to the law in India, he was eligible to appeal to a higher level of judiciary and Mr. Pillai had done it already. This information was not available in the wesites shown as references 3 including former bank official get jail but was present on the regional newspapers Malayala Manorama and Mathrubhoomi dated 12 December 2008. So at this point of time, we cannot conclude him as convicted. Doing so will be a violation of Biographies of living persons and also will be a personal harassment to Mr. Pillai. -- Z16bsr2 ( talk) 15:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
When redirecting or merging articles, it is nice if you make sure that the infomation is merged aswell. Chesdovi ( talk) 21:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello Fayenatic! Thanks for your invitation to join WikiProject Anthroponymy - I was there and left a message on the discussion page. I would be glad to join. Thanks again!
TedSwarovski ( talk) 17:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
FYI [1] Gordo ( talk) 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Fayenatic. You think a redirect is a better on the Windows Media Player LossLess page? I was thinking a delete proposal such that the information could be reviewed, merged into the page I proposed, and then maybe that page could be deleted. The one incoming link could also be updated. I feel like simply making a redirect instantly purges the information on that page without any review. Any thoughts? Shields020 ( talk) 19:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Concerning this edit I would like to inform you that for for article pages we use Category:Year of birth missing (living people) instead of Category:Date of birth missing (living people). Please read instructions in both categories and WP:BLP for more information. Thanks, Magioladitis ( talk) 16:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
my brother Fred R. Shapiro, editor of the Yale Book of Quotations, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_R._Shapiro suggested that i contact you and ask for your help.
Another reason is that i see that you are a Star Trek "fayenatic"...
Last week, i created a page about myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_N._Shapiro
It has been neither deleted nor approved... they seem to want me to make further changes... but i do not know what to do... could you please edit it for me, i trust your judgment, you will know what formatting changes they are looking for...
Thanks, Alan —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanNShapiro ( talk • contribs) 16:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Dravecky ( talk) 13:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
I, electricRush, hereby award you this Working Man's Barnstar for your hard work. - electric Rush | Sign! 23:18, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
I think there is huge history to Coventy Cross. Now that I have your attention, are you coming on my walk on Wednesday 4th February 2009? Gordo ( talk) 09:27, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't know how this "article", Sian (Goddess), survived so long, but I can assure you that it is utter nonsense - there is no such figure - and can be safely deleted as a hoax. Regards, Enaidmawr ( talk) 00:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there - I don't know how to re-submit something to the server...let me post something to WPSS and see if anyone has any ideas. Thanks for the haeads up - Pegship ( talk) 18:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
In your last edit to Westminster School, you moved part of the references higher up the article. I have replaced it back at the bottom as it disrupted the look and feel of the article, but you have a particular reason for its placing, I have no problem with its replacement. Thanks Tmwerty ( talk) 21:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
To answer your question, the "parts" referred to from Trek episdode "Return to Tomorrow" were not props. The script for "Spock's Brain" i.d.'ed the controls McCoy used as scavenged from the incomplete androids. Furthermore, the reference book Star Trek Compendium explains about the unnamed actor, including an edited blooper reel after his scene with Diana Muldaur and Leonard Nimoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Energicko ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! It was getting so ludicrous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noveltykid ( talk • contribs) 18:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Moin Fayenatic london,
Thanks, but with an article that small, 3 pictures is too many. 1 is plenty. I've left the 3 up now, could you pick one and link to the others? Thanks. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Im dealing with a few issues related to it. - Ste vertigo 18:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
-
down
load |
sign! has given you a
bubble tea! Bubble teas promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{ subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
No, please do not merge Fay and Faye. If people do not know the correct spelling they will access the other spelling under "See also". Kraxler ( talk) 00:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your editing - it's always much better if a native speaker revises the text! :) Лъчезар ( talk) 14:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
I had forgotten one small matter. You changed the original Panarin's text on Gorbachev "but when it came to work, it was a different matter" to "but he could not do anything to make his vision work". The original text may be a quick Russian to English translation but even imperfect, it more exactly reflects what Panarin means. Do you mind if I (of you if you want) change this text back to what it was? Of course, if you can come with a better sounding version that doesn't change the meaning, that would be even better... Лъчезар ( talk) 09:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Which sequence of tenses do you use as a native English speaker? Now that I read about this (I didn't even know how this thing is called in English!) it turns out that I've used the "natural" sequence of tenses in my text, especially the "Interviews" subsection. Is this OK, or would the "classic" (as I've been taught to it!) "attracted" sequence of tenses be better? Needless to say I prefer the current "natural" one but if you firmly think that the "attracted" one is better, I could rewrite the text... Лъчезар ( talk) 17:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Well done for the great job in moving the category in the correct place. -- Magioladitis ( talk) 17:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm puzzled by this edit summary: "consequent link have to be avoided, if possible". Please would you explain here? - Fayenatic (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
I meant "one after the other" :S Manual of Style reads: "If possible, avoid placing two links next to each other in the text so they look like a single link, as in [[film]] [[actress]] ( film actress). Consider rephrasing the sentence, omitting one of the links, or using a single more specific link instead." -- Magioladitis ( talk) 21:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article KWordQuiz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fayenatic (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi Fayenatic. It's certainly true that many references to Blackwall Peninsula turn up, so I suppose from that viewpoint there ought to be a redirect. Are they valid references though? Loads of these actually mirror old copies of Wikipedia, so must be ignored. Of more credibility is an LDDC article ( http://www.lddc-history.org.uk/planning/index.html ) which is actually talking about an entirely different peninsula - in Blackwall - the one surrounded by the Lea. Many of the rest are clearly not by experts of any description. You have edited the article to say 'for much of the 20th Century it appeared on maps as Blackwall peninsula' with a reference from a newspaper entertainment section that actually says "..in pre-Dome maps, always called the Blackwall Peninsula (no mention of Greenwich)." It depends how far back you go - for example the OS 1:2,500 scale maps of 1867, 1894 and 1914 call it "Greenwich Marshes". It was certainly generally known as East Greenwich (that's the alternative name for Blackwall Point Power Station for example). Can you point me to any map which shows the name Blackwall peninsula? If so I'll shut up. Pterre ( talk) 00:49, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Sure looks like they're all the same person. One problem is the two different spellings in the Holweck, but I can try to check on them and maybe check the lists of books printed then to see if there aren't two separate books by similarly named people. I do think they are the same, though. John Carter ( talk) 16:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Happy New Year to you to Fayenatic. Thank you so much for reworking the page. I am practicing and using other pages that look good to me and still learning more about what is accurate so I appreciate the attention. We have Editorial coming from the Music Journalist community that should be published soon concerning Greg London having been declared the highest charting new and indie single on Media Base and R & R, hopefully this week. DJ Laurent Wolf does not have a US Wiki page yet. I will see about getting one up in order to substantiate that new relationship better, however, the song is coming to You Tube soon as well and could be referenced in the video channel at that time. Within one week the collaboration should be news, I am told. Publicity for Greg London is LUCK Media and they are highly reputable, no faking or hyping. The FMQB Chart and USA Today Media Base Chart is posted on the Greg London Official website at the moment on the home page.
I look forward to additional corrections or aid.
Kindly, Monika London Monika London ( talk) 21:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much, Kindly 71.93.74.74 ( talk) 18:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I think we are slightly askew when it comes to the role canon plays in Wikipedia's coverage of Star Trek characters. However, I think we can agree that very few non-canon characters are notable enough to warrant articles here -- and having a category for the two or three that are seems like unneessarily granular categorization. I switched Calhoun to the broader Starfleet officers cat. since, well, he is, and because the article makes clear he originates in the books and not a Paramount-produced production. Right now, he's the only entry in the non-canon characters cat -- would you object to having that category emptied out so it can be CSDed for its tiny population and implausibility of any expansion? -- EEMIV ( talk) 23:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your correction - but I assume that it is not a place within either Category:London Borough of Haringey, or Category:London Borough of Barnet - as it says on the tin "This category is for places within the London Borough of ...; other items should be placed within one of the more specific linking sub-categories". It seemed that "Buildings and structures in ..." might be less non-acceptable - since I assume the organisation has "buildings and structures" within those boroughs than adding them into a general grab bag. Perhaps there's an argument for a more specific "Organisations in ..." category.
Sorry if that comes out 'snitty' - it's not my intention - just been a long night; I'm sure we can find the right place for this 'thing'. Cheers Kbthompson ( talk) 23:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
See - Category:London organisations; and Category:Charities based in London. HTH Kbthompson ( talk) 08:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that! I thought I had checked for incoming links, but obviously I didn't. Brianyoumans ( talk) 01:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Monika_London&diff=next&oldid=287730121 Monika London ( talk) 16:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia is tantimount to rocket science. Monika London ( talk) 13:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
how about just redirecting it? Calliopejen1 ( talk) 17:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:StKitts Xmas 1983 MS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor ( talk) 16:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Mail on Sunday this coming Sunday's issue. Fox 5 Las Vegas Tuesday, June 16th, Nevada Magazine reader's poll results.
86.217.130.67 ( talk) 23:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
The discussion for Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 June 6#Category:Surnames by country in which you participated was closed as delete and is now under review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 25#Category:Surnames by country. Your participation and input is invited. Alansohn ( talk) 05:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Faye... I'm new to this briefly: i need to re-edit thing on Elisha because the article crosses both Ikings and 2kings, inaccuracy can lead to untruths, those for me go against the grain, I like the grain to go upward. Rubics Icosahedron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubics icosahedron ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello there, Fayenatic. Check your sandbox if you haven't already; I've fulfilled your request on my talk page. Thanks, — Coralmizu (Mizu onna sango15) Drop a line 03:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC).
![]() |
CopyEditor's BarnStar | |
I award you this CopyEditor's BarnStar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. For you great work fixing all my language mistakes in the Igor Panarin and Prediction of the United States collapse in 2010 articles, and thus teaching better English to me!-- Лъчезар ( talk) 17:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC) |
In the List of Mudaliars and Mudaliar articles, some unknown IP is adding many non-notable names. I had reverted the vandalism by such IP many times. Inspite of it adding of non-notable and non-Mudaliar persons continues. Through the revision history of Pillai article, I came to know that you are always stressing the importance of citations and protecting that article. Similarly i req. you to protect these articles from vandalism -- Sureshmaran ( talk) 23:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence | |
For your recent timely report of an error made by xenobot during task 6.1, I award you the Bug Squashers' Award for Excellence in bug squashing efforts. Thank you for catching this error so quickly! – xeno talk 14:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks. It's easy, but then, there are the "what links here" to think about and I had already done that once the same day. Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Actually he is, lots of fans will generally refer to him as just Nathan. If you meant formally, yes, he isnt. I may be missing something, but aren't disam pages for listing everything? I added his name because any casual fan (not necessarily knowing how wiki naming formats are) may just enter 'nathan' in the search bar. Isnt that the idea? Suede67 ( talk) 14:14, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in
Teluk Intan, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
Bob K |
Talk
11:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi F ... I'm not sure what you're asking me to do with your message on my talk page. If you're looking for admin intervention, I'm not your man since I'm not an admin. Perhaps you meant to leave your request with someone else? -- sanfranman59 ( talk) 22:32, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
I deleted the reception paragraph of 18 (album) because it was too short and insignificant. For example, having a reception paragraph for Play (album) would make more sense, because the album was very popular and sold many copies worldwide. I hope it makes sense to you now. -- James599 ( talk) 11:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
You edited this article. This is a friendly notice that your input would be welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of overweight actors in United States cinema. This information is provided without any request that you support or oppose the deletion of the article. Thanks. Edison ( talk) 04:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't remember the redirect, Dasara in South India (see Mysore Dasara) implies the ten-day festival of Navaratri as a whole and in the North, Dasara implies the tenth day of the festival - Vijayadashami, Dasara as it is now corresponds to Vijayadashami day. What you think we should do? -- Redtigerxyz Talk 16:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Nice work on Kamal_Chunchie Gordo ( talk) 22:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
It's nice not to be the only person who understands that Hilary Duff doesn't belong on the Hilary dab page. -- Auntof6 ( talk) 17:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks man.I ll surely look forward to edit Disney India. st ttb —Preceding unsigned comment added by St ttb ( talk • contribs) 07:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Honestly, I have no idea. I will say, though, that whatever it was, it was my fault but not WikiCleaners. Usually if it's a mistake, it's me mistyping. Not sure about that one. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 05:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Web squared, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web squared. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JamesBWatson ( talk) 14:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Hero Boy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
22:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Wow - what a detective you are ! A very good spot, I may say.
It was 'my' article and I simply took the quote from Sugar Blue on face value. To be honest I am going on holiday for a couple of weeks later on today, so I did not take as much time investigating all aspects of the topic as I might have done. However, you appear to be quite right. I looked at Allmusic and a couple of other sites, and can find no reference to Sidney Bechet recording the song, "Sugar Blues", nor an album of his of that title. There is the track named "Sugar" [9] - which may have been billed on the record label as "Sugar" (Blues). Alternatively Sugar Blue himself has got a little mixed up; and the box of old 78s he saw contained Bechet records and another - perhaps by Clyde McCoy, Bob Wills or Fats Waller - of the song " Sugar Blue". Obviously either 'explanation' is pure speculation on my part. I do feel this is worth investigating further, but, as I say, I am going away so will not be able to delve deeper much before Christmas time.
We perhaps need a Bechet 'expert' (assuming you are not one) to fully confirm our suspicions. Or, and this is a longer shot, someone with contacts with Sugar Blue himself, to see if we can better verify his quote. I suspect that someone, somewhere along the way, may have already pointed out to Blue that Bechet did not record such a track.
If your interest goes no further than posing the questions on the article's talk page, then I understand. Otherwise, please bear with me. Regards,
Derek R Bullamore ( talk) 14:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry and apologize if I sounded harsh. I'm not quite sure, however, how -- if you followed WP:BEFORE -- you missed all the cites here. When one editor fails to do a google news search, at minimum, and then noms an article for an AfD, many other editors end up doing what that one editor alone should have done. That's why I viewed it as a waste of time, and failure to do a wp:before search, as is required. This is happening way, way too often at the music/band AfDs these days for some reason. But apologies if you thought my response too harsh. And thanks for agreeing to the close.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 00:01, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
If you look above, I did answer your last inquiry. There isn't a "malfunction" of WikiCleaner. All of the edits are my own. WikiCleaner just gives an easier to deal with list than regular Wikipedia does. It's not a robot or even semi-automatic. In this case, I don't even remember what I did. I have a feeling it was just a copy and paste issue, which happens. All of the edits are basically copy and paste for WikiCleaner. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 02:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:List of international professional associations... I dont believe the move was discussed or required. Please see my comments there. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 00:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of female stock characters.
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female stock characters (2nd nomination).
Ikip ( talk) 17:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 08:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg. ... Skier Dude ( talk) 05:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EyesOnMeSmall.jpg. ... J Milburn ( talk) 22:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)