This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
With something that old unanswered, I'd be inclined to say no email was received- a quick search is not throwing anything up. I'd be inclined to delete it. J Milburn ( talk) 23:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for quickly coming along and throwing the protection up on the page. It was desperately needed, with the glut of kids thinking it was witty to see themselves listed as a Heisman winner. -- fuzzy510 ( talk) 02:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you blocked PhoneBed ( talk · contribs) as a sock. Is TheDopestEthiopian ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) from the same stable? Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks you for cleaning up this mess. If you have time, could you look at the moves in this diff [ https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/?title=Special:Contributions&target=Sensei_0208 ]? It seems that this new user and his sock puppets are trying to establish a different Japanese naming convention from the MOS. Thanks! jmcw ( talk) 09:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
I've restored Category:Article Incubator candidate for articlespace, it's used by a WikiProject. It'd have been better for you to have checked with me (as I created the category) or at WT:Article Incubator before deleting it. I've added the emptycat template now. Fences& Windows 22:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
No you don't :) On first viewing it was a sensible proposal, and I can see why you suggested it for renaming. It looks like the whole dance by type/nationality tree's pretty messy, so it was good to get someone giving some of it a once-over, whether the renaming suggestion succeeded or not. Grutness... wha? 00:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Be interested to join THIS? --Legolas (talk2me) 11:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Would you please delete Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisiana/Stubs? It is obselete and I moved the existing stubs to here. Thank you. Btilm 22:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Although the posting editor posted notification [5] of this category for discussion for renaming [6] only one editor of many who consistently work on TM related articles posted a comment. I, at least, was not aware of the discussion or would have posted. I would like to request that the discussion be reopened, and I will post notification on the talk pages of the TM related articles to ensure all editors are aware of the discussion. If you don't feel you can do this I can always open a new discussion. Thanks for your effeorts and consideration. ( olive ( talk) 15:49, 18 December 2009 (UTC))
"When nominating a category, it's helpful to add a notice on the talk page of the most-closely related article. Doing so would not only extend an additional courtesy, but possibly also bring in editors who know more about the subject at hand."
There is an ongoing discussion at Talk:Lady Gaga discography#Other appearance concerning the appropriateness of including Lady Gaga's credits as songwriter on tracks performed by other vocalists. As you have previously weighed in on the "discogrophy" vs. "songography" question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discographies/style, I would like to invite you to contribute your opinion to the debate. -- Peter Farago ( talk) 08:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
This is not correct, and I've explained that Atlantic Records does not consider it as such. Chase wc 91 23:49, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Why did you remove Justin Bieber's songs out of the Category:Justin Bieber? Candyo32 ( talk) 03:24, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, regarding Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 7#Category:Neighbourhoods of Gdańsk and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 7#Polish boroughs - you closed the discussions to rename, but the renaming hasn't happened except for one of the boroughs categories - could you set the wheels in motion for the others? Thanks,-- Kotniski ( talk) 20:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Recently, the Category:Rugby union footballers was changed to Category:Rugby_union_players, but unfortunately all the subcats have not been done. I have asked the question at the CfD talk page as well, but are you perhaps aware of an easier way to do this huge renaming. Apart from the 87 subcategories, there are a host of other categories that also contain the "footballer" term, and need to be renamed... Any chance of a bot doing the hard labour? - Sahmejil ( talk) 12:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
In regard to the above deletion, made 16 December 2009, can I request you to reconsider deletion as the reason stated "Non-free picture of a living guy" is erroneous: the subject died in 2007. Babakathy ( talk) 07:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete those images? we already had a discussion on the images and how i had legitimate permission to use them in the first place. they should not have been nominated for deletion anyways because i explained that the owner of the copyrights from Discogs.com gave me special permission to use them for wikipedia use only. can you please explain why i was not notified of this deletion beforehand and why i was not given a chance to explain myself? this is highly unfair and out of line. -- J miester25 ( talk) 15:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm a bit new to this but I was wondering how a discussion is concluded in the case of deletion requests. In the case of the alternate album cover deletion proposal Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_December_19#File:UnitedNotions_ToshikoAkiyoshi_FSR.jpg I see the original proposal for deletion (with a justification based on what was incorrectly presumed by the submitter to be the only image differences - in logo and font) and I see (only) one fairly lengthy, but I hope rationale, response (from me) to keep. I see no other discussion. Apparently you found my keep arguments unconvincing. Or perhaps I "buried" my keep vote too far down into the text - or I failed to check some "keep" box? I'm certainly willing to accept a deletion if that is an appropriate conclusion but I was a bit surprised at the lack of discussion before the deletion. Also, comparing this deletion to others proposed on the same day (some deleted, some still under discussion) I feel no better enlightened on the appropriate application of Wikipedia non-free content criteria in these 'alternate album cover' cases. It still seems a bit ambiguous / arbitrary. Many thanks for any insight you can provide. Pugetbill ( talk) 18:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. Please be a little more careful when using automated tools such as twinkle to delete files. For instance, the fair-use dispute tag placed on File:Free music logo.png does not provide a valid reason to justify the file's deletion per WP:CSD#F7. Rather, this issue could be addressed by placing a {{ Non-free reduce}} tag on the page (which was already done). - FASTILY (TALK) 00:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
I posted a question at WP:HELP DESK here however they didnot give me a concrete answer. Could you please take a look? --Legolas (talk2me) 11:36, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
I do not believe your rationale for keeping File:TheSinglesCollectionCover.jpg was correct and I have thus taken the issue here. Feel free to comment. Chase wc 91 06:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Explicit! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 759 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 06:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
How come you deleted my page so quickly ? Does wikipedia provide you a tracking mechanism ? Or are you a bot ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexsoddy ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Can you look over my RPP for Template:Same-sex unions? It's been over 14 hours, thanks. CTJF83 chat 19:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks. Cheers, Pdfpdf ( talk) 11:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Helping me with the Gaga wikiproject bot. Could you also take a look at this FLC? Its huge! --Legolas (talk2me) 08:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
The concern isn't length but bit-rate..
If they already below about 96Kbps in bit-rate terms ( The guideline is technically 64kbps but this was reckoned to be too low on IRC), then the non-free reduce tag can be removed. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 21:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
Just wondering why you deleted the Liam Frost 2nd Album promo image...I am the subject of this article, and under my label Emperor Records, I own the rights to this image. If you could explain to me what I've done wrong here, it would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to this.
Thanks for reading
Liam
Pitseleh1983 ( talk) 12:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm a new contributor to Wikipedia, and I've been hired by musician Jason Ricci to maintain his wikipedia page. I have finally managed to edit and rewrite his page to pass muster, having to learn all the proper documenting and formatting rules in the long process, but I seem to be stuck on adding his photo to his page. I have read and re-read the rules and procedures, and have made more than a good faith effort to do this properly, but my photos keep getting deleted.
You deleted my most recent attempt to add a photo. My first attempt was also deleted. This puzzles and frustrates me greatly, and it certainly annoys Jason. The first photo was taken from Jason's online, public electronic press kit, abailable specifically for publicity, informational, promotional, and press usage. I do not know why it was deleted, as I can't imagine any copyright issues with something he put out there with hopes to be used publicly. This time, I tried what I thought was an even more foolproof plan, and that is to upload a picture taken by my friend at a recent local show. I have the friend's enthusiastic permission, and I have the picture in my posession.
What gives? Please help. Thanks.Blake
Blake46long ( talk) 13:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Did you see my querry at Aaliyah FAC? Other than that I have a problem. Can you chime in at Talk:Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song)/GA1? A deeply biased reviewer is basically stating that the article is a pile load of shit becuase it is full of critical reviews and receptions by other people. Can you help? I'm basically in deep coma after seeing the level of biasness from this reviewer and his absurd demands like contacting the record company of Gaga for their certification of the article. :-o --Legolas (talk2me) 06:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, you deleted the Vega Strike logo [7] because it was unused and non-free. It is actually an open source game i.e. a public domain artwork. It was used on the article for some time and then someone deleted the link because it wasn't a free image or something untrue. Of course logos may be used anyway, free or not for illustration purposes. I have restored the link to the logo on the article and I wonder if you would undelete it please. I will hunt it out and upload it again anyway if that's not possible but check out if you like the game is a Sourceforge project. If the license is not given properly I think I will be checking back and fix it to whatever one they are giving on Sourceforge. ~ R. T. G 18:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Copied from meta. Since your SUL doesn't exist, can you please confirm this here? Thanks, Pmlineditor&inbsp; ∞ 08:27, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 04:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
The image for the Selena article is needed here on the wiki. This picture is displayed all over web-sites! So why can't wiki allow it here? And another thing just becuase this is the only article that has this picture doesn't mean that this picture is not notable it is. AJona1992 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC).
Hi there. This editor added a link to the Islamophobia article into the "See also" section of a BLP article. I then reverted the editor's edit, placing a NPOV tag on the user's talk page. The other editor then reverted my edit. I stopped my edits there, and brought the issue to both RfP and AiV. On AiV an admin wrote this: User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report once the user has been warned sufficiently. Next, I asked the admin for an explanation, and he wrote: You are never violating the three revert rule if you're reverting vandalism. Thus I went ahead and reverted the edit of this editor again, this time citing addition of uncourced material.
How can I now be accused of "disruptive behaviour" when I am not the one who added the controversial link to the BLP article? I am the one fighting off vandalism on that BLP article, and now I am being accused of disruptive behaviour. I asked an admin what to do, he gave me the go ahead to revert the disruptive edits, and now a different admin appears accusing me of edit-war. Could you please look into this matter in detail, and check the time of the edits to see that I am not involved in any edit war, that I am merely fighting off vandalism? Lastly, when you write "discuss your issue on the article's talk page", shouldn't this be what the other editor ought to have done in the first place before adding such a controversial link into the BLP article? Amsaim ( talk) 02:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys, sorry for the late reply, was out last night and just got home a few minutes ago. Anywho, Amsaim, your edit summary here suggested that your reverts were based on WP:NPOV. If an edit violates this policy, it is not vandalism. Also, Fastily ( talk · contribs) reanalyzed the situation and agreed that the reverts weren't vandalism, but a content dispute, as I had pointed out. In your above post, you called the edits a bias point a view, vandalism and unsourced; quite the contradiction. With the notes I left both parties, I warned you both from edit warring. Further edit warring would be considered disruptive, justifying in blocks. Luckily, neither of you have reverted further and a discussion on the talk page has commenced. Please form a consensus there before making reverts in the future concerning this issue. — ξ xplicit 23:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
You might want to jump in on
this AN/I thread.
—
V = I * R (
Talk •
Contribs)
00:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Can I replace "file" with "image"? Tbhotch Talk2 Me 05:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. I requested Vancouver to become semi-protected and was approved by another admin for 5 days. I requested to that admin that its expiry time match that of the article Olympics as the Olympics and Paralympics continue until the end of March. That admin has not replied to my request so I appeal to you. Many thanks. Mkdw talk 11:09, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent deletions there has been multiple issues with the uploaders contributions. Off2riorob ( talk) 21:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'm in the mist of doing some house cleaning and found two salted redirects pointing to the The Fame rather then the latterly created The Fame Monster article. The two redirect pages are The Fame Monster (album) and The fame monster (album), at one point you had salted The Fame Monster but then unsalted citing this news item - I post it here in the hope that it may assist recollection of the situation. Regards, SunCreator ( talk) 00:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
you speedy deleted this file becouse there is one exactly the same in commons, only that becouse of copyright issues the file should and will be deleted from commons while in wikipedia it can stay becouse it is a scout organization logo. could you please undo the delete and delete the one in commons? thank you - LadyofHats ( talk) 23:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Would you please take another look at John Huldt which you recently deleted to make sure it really was the author requesting deletion or blanking the page. Thanks, PanchoS ( talk) 14:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Hiya, I've been trying get my page off Wikipedia for years but the staff keep undoing my edits. I've lost my account password for years but could you delete my page?
Link to my user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sina_Rahmani —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.120.250 ( talk) 16:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that back on February 9 you deleted File:Wangchenrinpoche.jpg that I nominated here. Perhaps you overlooked the second image File:WangchenRinpoche2.JPG by the same uploader with the identical issues that I mentioned should be deleted, but you did not delete it at the same time. Will you do it, or do I have to renominate it? Drop me a talkback when you respond. Cheers ww2censor ( talk) 02:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I wanted to add a page for Artificial Intuition, but I see that you deleted a previous page on 4 Dec 2009 at the request of the author. Is there any way of retrieving this page to see what it was about? Is there any objection to creating a new one, if not?
Thanks.
Msml ( talk) 07:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit
You closed Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 5#Category:Association_football as "rename all". All but one of the categories has been processed by the bots, but one is still stuck in the queue: Category:Football (soccer) logos to Category:Association football logos.
This one needs a bot to complete the move, as explained at Wikipedia_talk:Categories for discussion/Working#Bot_needed_to_move_Category:Football_.28soccer.29_logos_to_Category:Association_football_logos.
I have opened a request for a bot to do this, at Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 34#Bot_needed_to_change_template_parameter_for_football_logos. Please could you take a look at the bot request, and add your comment there on what you think of the request?
Thanks! -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs)
license for image file: RoccoRossi-image1.jpg was revoked.
I have uploaded the exact same image again, this time however I have included different information in the tags. Please contact me via my user page or here (on your userpage) about any issues surrounding this image before it gets deleted. The article is about a candidate involed in a Toronto city mayor campaign and their campaign office has been having issues with vandalism on their candidates page. (I am merely an impartial third party trying to supply my wikipedia skills to produce fair and NPOV writing across all the articles involved into this mayoral race.) THanks Explicit! -- Contributions/Skychildandsonofthesun SKY child 08:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you please revert this back. i ve done all the nessary steps to prevent on deletion. and pl provide me valid deletion of this image. thanks regards . ( Eeriyaka ( talk) 08:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC))
Any idea why Category:Football (soccer) logos to Category:Association football logos is tagged no bots on the work list? Vegaswikian ( talk) 21:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
{{non-free logo|football (soccer) logos}}
. Cydebot can't get through that, so it's pretty much stuck there. There's currently a
bot request to get another bot running for this task, so we're waiting on that. —
ξ
xplicit
21:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Can you please delete this redirect? The page should be moved like it was moved in German Wikipedia. Her official name is Nystad. -- Yoda1893 ( talk) 22:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
These two images were used in the M26 Pershing and the Tiger I articles, respectively.
The deletion rationale used was "F5" that these were unused, non-free images.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=File:Tiger_I_-_M26_Killer.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=File:M26_Fireball.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1
They are both very likely U.S. Army Photos - I just have not had the time to trace their roots and properly document that they are free use images.
In any case, whether they were non-free, fair use or free use images, they were both being gainfully employed in their respective tank articles to illustrate important points. I have NO IDEA why they showed up on your radar as being "unused". If it was some bot that you are using to search for these things, well, it ain't working right.
I would appreciate it if you could restore these two images, the written content that went with both of these images, and put them back into the articles where they were located.
I put a fair amount of work into those two photo files. I was rather shocked to find them completely erased with absolutely no warning, notice, or even a hint of where or why they disappeared. DarthRad ( talk) 01:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting the 'Mexican Drug War' article. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Could you please do the same with its navigation template?: Template:Mexican Drug War. Did i say thank you? Thank you. -- BatteryIncluded ( talk) 19:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello,
I tried to create an article about a group on YouTube. I have tried creating it once before but it came up with a warning regarding autodeletion so I blanked the page. What information do I need to include in the article to make it eligible.
Thank you
JAGProduct ( talk) 19:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Could I get you to take a look at this? Reverting the socks and IPs is getting tiresome, and the report has gotten buried under a pile of processed reports so I don't think anyone is even looking at it anymore.— Kww( talk) 22:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
I've replied to your comment at CfD. I wonder if perhaps you were a bot operator or whether you were interested in becoming one, because there seems to be consensus for this proposal but it will be a lot of tedious work to implement. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 08:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
First off I would like to thank you for deleting the image of the ROH World Television Championship. Next is the problem of this user in the section title Tnarocks. He has been repeatedly warned and temporarily blocked for constantly uploading images that are copyrighted that he takes credit for. Would permanently blocking Tnarocks the next course of action? Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 07:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi there,
I'm the one trying to upload the pictures for DJ Jamad as well as for Floyd The Locsmif, Wes Felton ect. You are the one who has deleted them for the second time. Can you please let me know what the problem is? I'm the copyright holder and therefore should be able to use these pictures.
If you could please tell me what changes I should make, or what information I should add, I would appreciate it a lot.
Thanks already!
Dsgschwaeder ( talk) 00:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for explaining!
Dsgschwaeder ( talk) 03:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment at the floowing FAC? Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Give It 2 Me/archive1. You did the GA review , now the article has progressed further. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent)LOL. go and watch Gaga's "Telephone" video. That should give you a kick. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice. Maurreen ( talk) 06:14, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
The album genre(s) of the album isn't just R&B and New Jack Swing, it also has hip hop soul. If you look at some of the singles from the album, some of them have hip hop soul. From Dbunkley6.... talk.
Regarding the article cross-ndj (hieroglyph), the Talk page was deleted. I assume it was just a vandalized page? I am now Doint the TalkPage-(for the first time)(I looked at my contributions, and never did the TalkPage for it), with the {AncientEgyptBanner}.....(from the SonoranDesert, ArizonaUSA)--.... Mmcannis ( talk) 19:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
U online? Immediate full-protection of Telephone (music video). Another fan article created inspite of strong oppose from Talk:Telephone (song), which, is turning into a fan vs editors of WP war. Help with some administrative actions. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, could you delete the following files?
And delete the past revisions of these.
Also, could you move these files so they agree with their MIME types?
Twinkle needs to add the date when tagging and I should have used PNG to begin with. Thanks so much! – Scarce ✉ 15:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
The motivation for creating Telephone (video) after your protection of Telephone (music video) seems pretty obvious.— Kww( talk) 23:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you were the one who fully protected Telephone (music video) so that no one could create the page on there own, but now some new user created a page (without censuses) under the title "Telephone (video)", I was wondering if you could fully project the page so that it could redirect to the music video section on the songs article. Thanks, Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 23:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the page for Selena does not include her vast career. Where are the sections; "Stage", "Voice", "Influences", "Crossover Deal", "Selena Etc.", "Selena Museum", "Selena The Musical"? Even though some of these have their individual pages they need to be mentioned in this article. This article is not a good reliable page at all! So I'm here willing to partner with you so we can add these sections and more so people can understand Selena and not just a brief story about her. AJona1992 ( talk) 19:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey Explicit, I have been referred to you by another editor. I seem to have stumbled upon a source and I'm not sure what to make of it's reliability. Here's the source and here's the more specific section, tell me if you think it's reliable enough be used for France sales in album pages. Thanks!-- PeterGriffin Talk • Cont.
Hey, Explicit, I need some meat-puppet action on the talk:onion. Could you protect the article and semi-protect the talk page? Thanks, as usual. 71.36.119.226 ( talk) 00:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
It would be appreciated if you could add your opinion to the above discussion to try and resolve the situation and if you could please vote on this non-consensus binding survey. Official Telephone Cover Conflict Resolution.
Thanks Lil-unique1 ( talk) 01:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you could help me move two pages to more appropriate titles. I have requested the moves on the requested moves page, but the bot seems to be removing them without taking action.
So if you could take a look at them and tell me what you think, that would be great. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 16:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I got a problem and it concerns this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Between_the_Lines_(Stone_Temple_Pilots_song)
some dude for no reason removed the Alternative Songs chart peak from the page. is there any way u can fix this? David1287 ( talk) 18:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Per the discussion, two people !voted to keep and one to delete. What was your rationale in discounting the majority opinion? — BQZip01 — talk 22:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Can you delete this revision of my userpage please? Thank you. WJetChao ( talk) 00:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Could you delete this page too? As you U1'd this. Thanks. Rehman( +) 03:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey there,
I've seen you have deleted JLaine_turntables.jpg. But I have already send an email to permissions.en@wikipedia.org confirming that I own the copyright. That was on March 31st. So I guess that has just not been seen yet. Do you have the possibility to check that status? Cause I don't think I should upload the pic again, right? They will just "undelete" it once the permission email is being processed? Thanks for your help.
13:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsgschwaeder ( talk • contribs)
I have emailed permissions@wikipedia.org several times giving permission for the four images that i uploaded. WHY ARE THEY CONTINUING TO DELETE THEM!!!!!????? Annoyed user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominic2009 ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. You were apparently the admin who deleted this: [ [8]]. May I ask how three votes to Keep and three votes to Delete is a consensus to delete? Thanks. JTRH ( talk) 00:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I have tried and tried to do everything right here. It's just I don't like the decision of removing the Alternative Songs chart peak from the Between The Lines page. So, I would like for a reversal of the decision so that it should stay in the page. I don't want to get in trouble for this. So I'm begging u. Please let it stay there. The Alternative Songs chart is a rock chart. For all I know, there are songs that peaked higher in Rock Songs than in Alternative, but that doesn't require the Alternative Songs chart to be removed from the songs' pages. Just think about this. David1287 ( talk) 01:47, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
how do I gain consensus from the situation? David1287 ( talk) 19:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
This poor thing keeps moving. I'll just point out that it has been released without a ".":
I can't find a market where it was released as "Raymond v. Raymond", although I agree that that is how I would have spelled it.— Kww( talk) 04:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
The album is shown w/the "." in text at usher's official website (top right box that says 'order now' and lists 'exclusive offer'), Metacritic and most of the sites that reviewed the album, Amazon.com CDuniverse, Overstock, Tower and other product sites, Billboard, news stories about the album's chart debut ( MTV, EOnline. However, some other sites, including Billboard which includes the period on the album entry page but not on a news story, do not like digital music stores (iTunes, Rhapsody). This may be a misenterpretation of the album cover having no period in its graphic design. But Id trust the Usher official website as it directly deals with things about Usher. Dan56 ( talk) 13:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I have recently uploaded a picture of my Boss "Nima Behnoud" to his Biography and you have deleted it. We took this picture of him but I am very confused as what type of licensing or copyright i need to pick would this be {{ GFDL-self}}?? and if it does where can I re upload that. You can see from my email address nicole.savoy@nimany.com that I work for nimany.com and Nima Behnoud is the main founder and a celebrated artist in new york city.
Second issue was the brief description of NIMANY, the clothing label that Mr Behnoud has started. Since the word NIMANY is being mentioned few times in his biography U wanted to point it to a brief description of what it is. That was deleted as well. I see other brand names on wiki can you please also tell me how I can resume that as well. I really appreciate this as I am very green on wiki.
Nicole —Preceding unsigned comment added by NicoleSavoy ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, Can you explain your rationale for keeping and not re-listing Category:People from Willemstad, Netherlands Antilles. Last time I checked, one person cannot make consensus by themselves.-- TM 11:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi there,
I just noticed that on the 14th you deleted the image Hungargunn bear itn mind 2010.jpg under the F7 Invalid fair-use claim on criteria for speedy deletion. As the original uploader, at no point was I given any warning about this and so I was unable to add a hangon tag onto it while I corrected the fair-use claim. As it stands I don't know why it was thought to be an invalid claim, and I'd like to know why this image was deleted - not so much because of this image but because I have other images uploaded on similar reasoning and I'd like to fix those claims before they too are removed. Thanks Miyagawa (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. I am sorry for the delay; I am working on your question while I do other work. I'll try to post my answer by this afternoon. Best, ceran thor 12:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
You recently deleted File:SpywareProtect09block.PNG. Please explain how the given rationale was not good enough. — Supuhstar * § 03:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
← Okay, I've restored the file in good faith. Sorry about the trouble. — ξ xplicit 06:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |