Hello, Epistemologicalbiker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sethia000 ( talk) 09:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 16:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, if you believe I am wrong.
Moneytrees🏝️
(Talk)
19:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Epistemologicalbiker ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not misrepresented the source. An individual has persistently replied to me misrepresenting the source themself, which includes both it's own description of the organization (and numerous others) and a description of what the organization itself says; this individual is stating the source includes only the latter. The first indication of this should have been the fact that the source describes the organization (a la "the organization did ...", "it was ...", etc), only then transitioning into quoting the organization itself ("its website states ..." etc). Please note the source is publicly available on libgen and may be reviewed by anyone.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline, locked — TNT ( talk • she/her) 19:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Epistemologicalbiker ( talk) 19:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
@ Moneytrees: @ TheresNoTime: et al, you might want to compare this one to the Benjiboi sockdrawer: SPI
Especially the edits of the indeffed sock
Both made the same arguments on NAMBLA and related articles, have a similar voice and style (gaslighting, tendentious editing, dramaboard shopping) etc. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 19:55, 7 July 2022 (UTC)