From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Epicfailure 2)









Click here to scroll to the bottom of the page.



dyk

Hey, Epicgenius! So here's the thing about dyk: if you haven't created preps, you have no idea what prep-setters and admins at dyk do or what challenges they face. Many editors who are regular nominators and reviewers think they'd be willing to admin, but have never filled preps, and when they become admins and start moving preps to queues, they quickly realize they didn't know what they were volunteering for. A prep-setter doesn't just create a balanced set. They also do a quick re-review on many of the hooks; you get to know whose hooks you don't have to review too heavily, but you always have to at least go check for a recent edit war or tags. If the nominator or the reviewer are new or known to be sloppy, you'll have to do a full re-review of that hook. Often prep-setters have questions they have to ask at the hook, and they deal with pushback from noms/reviewers/passersby for that. Then once you've finished a prep you have to deal with fallout at DYK talk and ERRORS. Admins do the exact same thing -- a re-review, because prep-setters miss things too, then the move (fairly simple), posting questions at DYK talk and pinging involved parties, dealing with pushback from them, and finally any fallout at ERRORS when someone finds an error you missed. So if you think you would be willing to admin at dyk, definitely go fill preps for a while to see if you like it or not. Some people love it -- I did, and I like adminning there -- but not everyone is cut out for it. It's a high-visibility job. People catch your mistakes, and the only way to prevent that is to catch other people's mistakes first. —valereee ( talk) 15:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Valereee, thanks for the advice. That is good to know. I think this sort of stuff should be enjoyable for me, even if a bit difficult. I just read the project page on prep areas, and it seems a bit difficult to get a good balance on hooks. epicgenius ( talk) 15:23, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply
That's one of the most fun parts of setting preps. The thing to do for your first prep is pick the bottom empty set (which right now gives you three days to fill it but normally six days.) Count to figure out whether the image hook needs a bio or a non-bio (it alternates by day). Go find one, vet it, and transfer it. That'll let the other prep setters know you'll fill that set. Not that they or an admin won't move stuff in and out if they need it or think another set is better for that hook, but in general one prep-setter works on a set. Then start putting the puzzle together -- no more than four bios (alternating in the set with non-bio), no more than one music/science/military/whatever subject. Not too many from any one country, though 2 - 4 USA hooks will be necessary. A balance of geographical area, not all from English-speaking countries. A balance of long and short. And of course a quirky. It's an art. Don't be afraid to trim or tweak hooks, but read the nom first if you do, as there may have already been discussion. Keep on top of talk in case someone asks a question about one of the hooks in that set, because some people won't realize they need to ping you as the promoter. :) Ping me any time, and Yoninah will often leave pointers on how to improve at your talk. When she stops, you know you're getting near the point of competence. :) —valereee ( talk) 15:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Subway articles

Once again, very impressive work on very important station complex and line articles. There is more to be added about the change in BMT plans re:Canal Street. Eventually, Clark Street Tunnel should be its own article. Also, the citations for IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line are really messed up and include self-published sources like nycsubway.org, and there is more history that could be added. A lot of my older GA nominations should be looked at again for things like this. Also, for Union Square, it is worth mentioning the impromptu 9/11 memorial, and the post-2016 election post-it notes ( https://mashable.com/article/power-of-post-it-note-protest-subway-therapy, https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/post-it-notes-left-union-square-election-preserved-article-1.2913344, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/12/19/post-election-subway-therapy-sticky-notes-taken-down-but-not-thrown-out/, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/nyregion/subway-election-therapy-wall-sticky-notes.html). Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 14:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Kew Gardens 613, the pleasure is mine. I do agree that the Clark Street Tunnel should get its own page in the future. I've also noticed that there's a lot more that can be said about the Broadway-Seventh Avenue Line, especially its construction, and will have to work on it gradually. The biggest mess, though, is the Canal Street article - there are a lot of details about the BMT station that are just not mentioned at the moment, and the article in general needs more refs.
As for the Union Square station, the article already mentions both the 9/11 memorial and the post-it wall (the second paragraph of 14th Street–Union Square station#Artwork). I thought one paragraph would be sufficient, seeing as how the artwork was not sanctioned by the MTA but seems to be covered by multiple reliable sources. – Epicgenius ( talk) 14:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I fully agree. I missed it somehow. Don't forget the Stantec studies, like the one that found making Clark Street accessible was infeasible, and which provides some sourcing for station layout (i.e. platform length/width). Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 15:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply
It also is probably worth mentioning the 1990 fire in the Clark Street article. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 15:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I agree and can get around to that soon. In the meantime, I was looking at the study for Union Square, which says: This technology does not meet ADA standards, and since there is currently no technology that does, there is no fully accessible solution for the southbound platform. We are including an option for providing elevator service to this platform in this report with the understanding that this will not provide a fully accessible solution at this time. So I suppose this means the southbound platform can get an elevator, it just won't be ADA-accessible because gap fillers, by their very nature, are ADA-inaccessible. – Epicgenius ( talk) 15:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Yeah. Also, unrelated, but the 1990 Clark Street Tunnel fire was very notable, and there were major reports done on fire safety/communication, etc. in its aftermath. It would warrant an article of its own. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I also think the 1990 Clark Street fire should get its own article. (I think the fire happened just east of the Clark Street station, though, not in the tunnel under the river.) In terms of recent NYC Subway disasters, the fire has had at least as much of an impact as the 1991 Union Square derailment or the 1995 Williamsburg Bridge subway collision did. – Epicgenius ( talk) 17:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Also-the provisions in the Eastern Parkway Line used for the Clark Street Tunnel connection were initially intended for a line over the Manhattan Bridge. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 14:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC) reply
That is interesting. If we can find a reliable source for this, I could add it to the Borough Hall or Eastern Parkway Line articles. – Epicgenius ( talk) 14:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I have seen reliable sources for this-if you cannot find them, I can look for them after I get my final paper for the semester done today. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 14:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I started a draft Clark Street Tunnel article here: User:Kew Gardens 613/sandbox 7#Clark Street Tunnel. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 14:41, 7 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Have you seen this article before? Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 16:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Kew Gardens 613, I have, but thanks for clipping it. The first part of that source seems to largely duplicate the New York Herald Tribune ref that's already in the Fulton Street station article. But it has some info that isn't mentioned in the NYHT source, specifically the 535-foot length of the station. The second part of the source could be used for the Broad Street station article though. – Epicgenius ( talk) 17:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Outstanding work on the article. We really shouldn't be using The Station Reporter as a source. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 18:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply
There is stuff to be added about flooding/water intrusion problems at Canal. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 17:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
There was a report put out. I found two articles I had clipped ( https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-new-york-times/98305321/, https://www.newspapers.com/article/times-union/99774843/) Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 17:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I agree. I've noticed quite a bit of info about how Canal Street's proximity to the old Collect Pond contributed to tons of water problems there. I can add these sources in later. – Epicgenius ( talk) 18:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
It was a paper, not a report. I haven't found it online. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 18:14, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
I found it. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 18:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
This journal is a great source for construction details. I found one article with details on underpinning and other aspects of subway construction from 1919, one on sewer siphons, SI transportation, and Columbus Circle construction Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 18:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
That's very interesting. I might have to look through this journal to, um, shore up some architectural articles as well. That Canal Street article was really detailed, and I expect the others will be no different. – Epicgenius ( talk) 18:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Also one on train dispatching, the Manhattan Bridge Plaza, and the ENY tunnel Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 18:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Sorry for spamming here, but also Joralemon, and here, excavation, the Atlantic Av improvement, and Brighton Line improvements Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 19:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem. I will just add all these links to a subsection of User:Epicgenius/sandbox/to do, where we can both track it easily. – Epicgenius ( talk) 21:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
Signaling, car design, and ventilation, and IRT track design as well Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 18:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply
There is this thorough masterpiece on Dual Contracts construction. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 19:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Bumping thread for 30 days. Epicgenius ( talk) 22:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Bumping thread for 60 days. Epicgenius ( talk) 16:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply
Bumping thread for 360 days. Epicgenius ( talk) 17:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Epicgenius ( talk) 17:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Kew Gardens 613, by the way, we might want to flesh out User:Epicgenius/sandbox/article-draft1, my sandbox on the Manhattan Bridge subway closure. I'm planning to bring the Manhattan Bridge article to GA, which will probably require condensing the Manhattan Bridge#Trackage history section, and the closures are a notable topic that I've been meaning to finish writing about for a while. – Epicgenius ( talk) 23:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Epicgenius I have been very busy, but, when I have a chance, will try to get back to this. Amazing work on all the bridge articles. Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 13:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Happy Holidays

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ― Buster7 

DYK for Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch

On 25 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New York City's Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch (pictured) once had a puppet library? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Symbols of Brooklyn

In the article Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch, you added text referring to "symbols of Brooklyn". I looked around, and there isn't much on the topic on Wikipedia or the Internet generally. This article from the Brooklyn Public Library says that "Seventy years ago Mrs. Florence A. Blum lobbied to make Forsythia Brooklyn's official flower," but I don't see that it was accepted. Are there any unofficial or official symbols of Brooklyn? Abductive ( reasoning) 07:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Abductive, thanks for pointing this out. I had a look at the sources again; they're not so much referring to symbols of Brooklyn, but rather, the city seal of Brooklyn. I'll fix that now. – Epicgenius ( talk) 13:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC) reply

DYK for Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan)

On 26 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Guinness World Record holder for the world's largest menorah, in Grand Army Plaza, is smaller than a menorah in Grand Army Plaza? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 00:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Oliver Gould Jennings House

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oliver Gould Jennings House you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie ( talk) 04:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Oliver Gould Jennings House

The article Oliver Gould Jennings House you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House and Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie ( talk) 05:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Oliver Gould Jennings House

The article Oliver Gould Jennings House you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House for comments about the article, and Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie ( talk) 23:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NoobThreePointOh -- NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 22:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)

The article Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) and Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NoobThreePointOh -- NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 20:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)

The article Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) for comments about the article, and Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of NoobThreePointOh -- NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 20:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Brookfield Properties follow-up

Hi Epicgenius. Back in June we discussed the possibility of adding the following sentence to the lead of the Brookfield Properties article: "As of 2024, Brookfield Properties operates corporate offices in nine countries around the world." At the time, you said you were unfamiliar with some of the additional sources I cited to back up the primary ( WP:ABOUTSELF) information at the Brookfield Properties contact page. I have done some additional research and I have found some prominent and more familiar secondary sources to support this information. I hope you'll now be more comfortable adding this line back to the article:

Thank you, Claudiailagan ( talk) 19:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Claudiailagan, thanks for the heads up. I've had a quick look at all of these, and they all seem reliable. Do you mind posting this comment on the Brookfield Properties talk page as well? I might look at it later this week. – Epicgenius ( talk) 19:23, 29 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Henry T. Sloane House

The article Henry T. Sloane House you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Henry T. Sloane House and Talk:Henry T. Sloane House/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 ( talk) 08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Growth News, July 2024

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


15:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your GA nomination of King Manor

The article King Manor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:King Manor for comments about the article, and Talk:King Manor/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit ( talk) 18:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of 185 Montague Street

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 185 Montague Street you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 22:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of Henry T. Sloane House

The article Henry T. Sloane House you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Henry T. Sloane House for comments about the article, and Talk:Henry T. Sloane House/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 ( talk) 00:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of 185 Montague Street

The article 185 Montague Street you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:185 Montague Street and Talk:185 Montague Street/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 04:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of 185 Montague Street

The article 185 Montague Street you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:185 Montague Street for comments about the article, and Talk:185 Montague Street/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 14:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Passed GA on 185 Montague Street

Thanks for addressing my limited concerns, you made it very easy.

I'm not sure if you've seen, but I've been working through the backlog on Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Art and architecture. I've avoided reviewing the same nominator's work twice, in case they don't like my review style. As it stands, half of the backlog I feel comfortable tackling are nominations by you. Would you be okay with me continuing to review your nominations, or would you prefer to have some variety in reviewers? Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 14:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Rollinginhisgrave, thanks for the feedback - it's much appreciated. I'm okay with you reviewing another one of my articles (even though in general I do like having a variety of reviewers). There's a pretty sizeable backlog however, and not a lot of reviewers to choose from, so thanks for taking it on. Epicgenius ( talk) 14:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Yeah I agree that having a variety of reviewers is better. Hopefully even if I don't review all of your nominations, I can clear out the entries that were above you in the queue so other reviewers get to yours quicker. Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 14:48, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25

DCWC August update

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien ( submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal ( talk · contribs), sawyer777 ( talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 ( talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

1, 2, 3 UN Plaza, John Dinkeloo

/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/2

/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/3

Cheers, Eli Bigeez ( talk) 15:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the heads up @ Bigeez. On a quick glance, I noticed that your second sandbox is extremely long, at about 18,000 words. The Wikipedia guideline WP:TOOBIG recommends that articles should be no longer than around 15,000 words. Therefore, I have a few suggestions:
  • I think the details about the architects and the neighborhood could be added to the architect and neighborhood articles themselves, rather than to the UN Plaza article. Then, on the UN Plaza page, the info about the architects and neighborhood can be condensed to one paragraph each.
  • In addition (or alternatively), I'd suggest that 1, 2, and 3 UN Plaza all be split into separate pages. Even though they were designed as part of the same master plan, all of these buildings are also probably notable on their own.
Epicgenius ( talk) 15:33, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Great, will work on it. I'll probably split them up, just for simplicity.
Query: are my drawings acceptable as original work? I drew them off of articles/books etc. to depict the buildings.
I emailed the archivist at Roche Modern for an updated pix of Roche and Dinkeloo.
Cheers, Eli Bigeez ( talk) 15:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Epicgenius, please take a peek at your earliest convenience. I took your advice and split them up. I realize there are necessary edits forthcoming, and I also wanted to tell you how very impressed I am with your acumen of NYC and your articles. I will email Linda (RD archivist) to tell her to become a Wiki editor and edit the articles where it is needed. Between you, her, and me, we should be able to place a decent article on the UN Plaza buildings and Dinkeloo. Cheers, Eli

/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/5
/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/6
/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/7
/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/3
Thanks for the heads up @ Bigeez. I will take a look at these soon. And thanks for the praise; I appreciate it. Epicgenius ( talk) 15:38, 1 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of New York State Pavilion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New York State Pavilion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 04:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Interesting coincidence

In March 2019, you added lots of valuable content to Seneca Village. One particular phrase that caught my attention - "Some residents, such as foundry owner Edward Snowden, simply relocated elsewhere [in New York]". I found this to be an interesting coincidence of name (to Edward Snowden), and I found your source to be accurate.

In short, thanks very much for providing and properly citing material to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, and I think it would make an interesting DYK hook if it was nominated five years ago. Cheers. LR.127 ( talk) 06:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC) reply

Your GA nomination of New York State Pavilion

The article New York State Pavilion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:New York State Pavilion and Talk:New York State Pavilion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 07:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC) reply