This is Epicgenius's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives:
Index,
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43,
44,
45,
46,
47,
48,
49,
50,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56,
57,
58,
59,
60,
61,
62,
63,
64,
65,
66,
67,
68,
69,
70,
71,
72,
73,
74,
75,
76,
77,
78,
79,
80,
81,
82,
83Auto-archiving period: 7 days
![]() |
|
2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Other talk pages: |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
|
Click
here to scroll to the bottom of the page.
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
Hey, Epicgenius! So here's the thing about dyk: if you haven't created preps, you have no idea what prep-setters and admins at dyk do or what challenges they face. Many editors who are regular nominators and reviewers think they'd be willing to admin, but have never filled preps, and when they become admins and start moving preps to queues, they quickly realize they didn't know what they were volunteering for. A prep-setter doesn't just create a balanced set. They also do a quick re-review on many of the hooks; you get to know whose hooks you don't have to review too heavily, but you always have to at least go check for a recent edit war or tags. If the nominator or the reviewer are new or known to be sloppy, you'll have to do a full re-review of that hook. Often prep-setters have questions they have to ask at the hook, and they deal with pushback from noms/reviewers/passersby for that. Then once you've finished a prep you have to deal with fallout at DYK talk and ERRORS. Admins do the exact same thing -- a re-review, because prep-setters miss things too, then the move (fairly simple), posting questions at DYK talk and pinging involved parties, dealing with pushback from them, and finally any fallout at ERRORS when someone finds an error you missed. So if you think you would be willing to admin at dyk, definitely go fill preps for a while to see if you like it or not. Some people love it -- I did, and I like adminning there -- but not everyone is cut out for it. It's a high-visibility job. People catch your mistakes, and the only way to prevent that is to catch other people's mistakes first. —valereee ( talk) 15:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Once again, very impressive work on very important station complex and line articles. There is more to be added about the change in BMT plans re:Canal Street. Eventually, Clark Street Tunnel should be its own article. Also, the citations for IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line are really messed up and include self-published sources like nycsubway.org, and there is more history that could be added. A lot of my older GA nominations should be looked at again for things like this. Also, for Union Square, it is worth mentioning the impromptu 9/11 memorial, and the post-2016 election post-it notes ( https://mashable.com/article/power-of-post-it-note-protest-subway-therapy, https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/post-it-notes-left-union-square-election-preserved-article-1.2913344, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/12/19/post-election-subway-therapy-sticky-notes-taken-down-but-not-thrown-out/, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/nyregion/subway-election-therapy-wall-sticky-notes.html). Kew Gardens 613 ( talk) 14:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
This technology does not meet ADA standards, and since there is currently no technology that does, there is no fully accessible solution for the southbound platform. We are including an option for providing elevator service to this platform in this report with the understanding that this will not provide a fully accessible solution at this time.So I suppose this means the southbound platform can get an elevator, it just won't be ADA-accessible because gap fillers, by their very nature, are ADA-inaccessible. – Epicgenius ( talk) 15:47, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Bumping thread for 30 days.
Epicgenius (
talk)
22:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ― Buster7 ☎
On 25 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New York City's Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch (pictured) once had a puppet library? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
In the article Soldiers' and Sailors' Arch, you added text referring to "symbols of Brooklyn". I looked around, and there isn't much on the topic on Wikipedia or the Internet generally. This article from the Brooklyn Public Library says that "Seventy years ago Mrs. Florence A. Blum lobbied to make Forsythia Brooklyn's official flower," but I don't see that it was accepted. Are there any unofficial or official symbols of Brooklyn? Abductive ( reasoning) 07:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
On 26 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Guinness World Record holder for the world's largest menorah, in Grand Army Plaza, is smaller than a menorah in Grand Army Plaza? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Grand Army Plaza (Manhattan)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠ PMC♠ (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Oliver Gould Jennings House you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammi Brie --
Sammi Brie (
talk)
04:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
Oliver Gould Jennings House you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House and
Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammi Brie --
Sammi Brie (
talk)
05:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
Oliver Gould Jennings House you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House for comments about the article, and
Talk:Oliver Gould Jennings House/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammi Brie --
Sammi Brie (
talk)
23:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
NoobThreePointOh --
NoobThreePointOh (
talk)
22:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) and
Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
NoobThreePointOh --
NoobThreePointOh (
talk)
20:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn) for comments about the article, and
Talk:Ocean Parkway (Brooklyn)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
NoobThreePointOh --
NoobThreePointOh (
talk)
20:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Epicgenius. Back in June we discussed the possibility of adding the following sentence to the lead of the Brookfield Properties article: "As of 2024, Brookfield Properties operates corporate offices in nine countries around the world." At the time, you said you were unfamiliar with some of the additional sources I cited to back up the primary ( WP:ABOUTSELF) information at the Brookfield Properties contact page. I have done some additional research and I have found some prominent and more familiar secondary sources to support this information. I hope you'll now be more comfortable adding this line back to the article:
Thank you, Claudiailagan ( talk) 19:14, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
Henry T. Sloane House you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Henry T. Sloane House and
Talk:Henry T. Sloane House/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
ZKang123 --
ZKang123 (
talk)
08:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The Growth team released
Community Configuration at all Wikipedias. You can access it at Special:CommunityConfiguration
.
This new special page replaces Special:EditGrowthConfig
. For now, all Growth features can be configured using Community Configuration. Configuration for
AutoModerator (
T365046) and other features will be available in the future.
You can help with translations. The interface translation is done at Translatewiki.net. You can also help translate the documentation.
If you attend Wikimania 2024, please join us for the session about Community configuration's future!
Newcomer Homepage Community Updates module
We will add a new Community Configurable module to the Newcomer Homepage that will allow communities to highlight specific events, projects, campaigns, and initiatives. We have released a simple version available to beta wikis. We will conduct an A/B test at our pilot wikis using the new Metrics Platform. We still welcome community feedback on initial designs and plans, in any language at our project talk page.
Increase constructive activation on mobile
As part of the Growth team 2024/2025 Annual Plan, the Growth team will explore various ways to increase the percentage of newcomers who successfully start editing.
Editing a Wikipedia page requires too much context and patience. It means many trial and error for newcomers to contribute, meaning a steeper learning curve and potential discouraging reverts. To support a new generation of volunteers, we will increase the number and availability of smaller, structured, and more task-specific editing workflows (E.g. Edit Check and Structured Tasks). The Growth team will primarily focus on Structured Tasks, while working closely with the Editing team to ensure our work integrates well with Edit Check.
Growth team weekly updates are available on wiki (in English) if you want to know more about our day-to-day work. If you want to receive more general updates about technical activity happening across the Wikimedia movement (including Growth work), we encourage you to subscribe to Tech News.
Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
The article
King Manor you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:King Manor for comments about the article, and
Talk:King Manor/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Reconrabbit --
Reconrabbit (
talk)
18:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
185 Montague Street you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Rollinginhisgrave --
Rollinginhisgrave (
talk)
22:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
Henry T. Sloane House you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Henry T. Sloane House for comments about the article, and
Talk:Henry T. Sloane House/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
ZKang123 --
ZKang123 (
talk)
00:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
185 Montague Street you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:185 Montague Street and
Talk:185 Montague Street/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Rollinginhisgrave --
Rollinginhisgrave (
talk)
04:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
The article
185 Montague Street you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:185 Montague Street for comments about the article, and
Talk:185 Montague Street/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Rollinginhisgrave --
Rollinginhisgrave (
talk)
14:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing my limited concerns, you made it very easy.
I'm not sure if you've seen, but I've been working through the backlog on Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Art and architecture. I've avoided reviewing the same nominator's work twice, in case they don't like my review style. As it stands, half of the backlog I feel comfortable tackling are nominations by you. Would you be okay with me continuing to review your nominations, or would you prefer to have some variety in reviewers? Rollinginhisgrave ( talk) 14:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey there, welcome to the 25th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 March 2024. We've got a ton of wonderful editors taking back their pitchforks today. Don't worry, for they come in peace, to forcibly fix and extend existing scripts you use with sheer passion. There's so many, them forks have got what's basically their own column now! gift us with some rows before it's too late Aaron Liu ( talk) 04:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script
here!
The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:
Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few
review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at
eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to
Thebiguglyalien (
submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal ( talk · contribs), sawyer777 ( talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 ( talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/2
/info/en/?search=User:Bigeez/sandbox/3
Cheers, Eli Bigeez ( talk) 15:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Epicgenius, please take a peek at your earliest convenience. I took your advice and split them up. I realize there are necessary edits forthcoming, and I also wanted to tell you how very impressed I am with your acumen of NYC and your articles. I will email Linda (RD archivist) to tell her to become a Wiki editor and edit the articles where it is needed. Between you, her, and me, we should be able to place a decent article on the UN Plaza buildings and Dinkeloo. Cheers, Eli
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
New York State Pavilion you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Rollinginhisgrave --
Rollinginhisgrave (
talk)
04:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
In March 2019, you added lots of valuable content to Seneca Village. One particular phrase that caught my attention - "Some residents, such as foundry owner Edward Snowden, simply relocated elsewhere [in New York]". I found this to be an interesting coincidence of name (to Edward Snowden), and I found your source to be accurate.
In short, thanks very much for providing and properly citing material to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, and I think it would make an interesting DYK hook if it was nominated five years ago. Cheers. LR.127 ( talk) 06:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
The article
New York State Pavilion you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:New York State Pavilion and
Talk:New York State Pavilion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Rollinginhisgrave --
Rollinginhisgrave (
talk)
07:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)