Hello, I'm
Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Bostik—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Fuzheado |
Talk
19:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Fuzheado |
Talk
20:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Eme.Line.SEO. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Bostik, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Eme.Line.SEO. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Eme.Line.SEO|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Gyrostat (
talk)
14:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear @ Gyrostat: , Thank you for your message. My tutor on Wikipedia France also told me that I had to integrate this mention into my FR user profile. It is therefore done [ [1]]. I will also do it on the EN version (profile not active in English) to be sure to respect the rules. Please don't ban me ! ;-)
I received your email. Please note that it is highly discouraged for editors with a conflict of interest (COI) to edit affected pages directly. Please make sure you read our guidelines at WP:COI. Disclose your COI, make edit requests on the article's talk page, and have these requests handled by a neutral individual (e.g. myself). Please see WP:COIREQ for help with the second point. Going down this route will make the handling of your potential content additions easier for everyone involved. Furthermore, the "slight details" that you say are to be provided by the company cannot be included unless they are already public (via the company's website or otherwise); otherwise, they are not verifiable (and Wikipedia should not be used to publish new information). Regards, IceWelder [ ✉] 16:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Both Yazdi and Ritter saw the potential for video games on mobile, and the strong opportunity for growth. They aimed to innovate within the market using a new approach to game design, streamlining publishing and trialling user friendly creative concepts.
(no source)Both Yazdi and Ritter saw the potential for video games on mobile, and the strong opportunity for growth. They aimed to innovate within the market using a new approach to game design, streamlining publishing and trialling user friendly creative concepts.
(no source)The name ‘Voodoo’ comes from Yazdi and Ritter’s belief in the ‘magic’ of the mobile industry, and its ability to drive trends in gaming.
(no source)In 2016, Voodoo released Fight List and Paper.io, which both were the first majorly successful releases and allowed Voodoo to expand its operations.
(used an article from 2019 for a number from 2020; I used it for the 2019 staff count instead)Voodoo increased from 100 employees at the end of 2017, to 200+ employees in 2020 with further plans to grow the number of staff.