Hello, I'm GizzyCatBella. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Lithuanian nobility that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GizzyCatBella 🍁 06:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Lithuanian nobility. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. GizzyCatBella 🍁 07:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Elmenhorster! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "
adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a
WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
GizzyCatBella
🍁
13:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC) |
---|
|
|
A reliable source reporting a claim made by an unreliable source does not make the claim reliably sourced. In this case, (according to Politico) the source of the identification is TASS, which is not considered reliable. Reliable sources have not reported this as fact, attributing the claim to TASS or using the vague "reportedly". This is not enough for to meet verifiability requirements for a biography of a living person. If/when identification is confirmed, there is little doubt mainstream sources will report it as such. Until then please do not re-add. Thanks. wjemather please leave a message... 23:34, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Heinrich Reuss. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:BURDEN and consult WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source, WP:DUE for why secondary sources are needed. JBL ( talk) 22:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Heinrich Reuss, you may be blocked from editing. On the Heinrich Reuss article, you removed referenced material identifying statements given by the article's subject as antisemitic and conspiratorial. Per WP:FRINGE, we absolutely do refer to such statements as conspiracy theories when reliable sourcing does so. Your removal of the referenced antisemitic material is outright vandalism. Review our policies on these statements. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 18:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Elmenhorster reported by User:JayBeeEll (Result: ). Thank you. JBL ( talk) 22:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JBL ( talk) 23:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 01:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.