Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Berlin Museumsinsel Fernsehturm.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 05:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:SNCF TGV Duplex Viaduc de Cize - Bolozon.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 05:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Château de Maintenon 2008.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 9, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-01-09. — howcheng { chat} 20:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:RhB ABe 4-4 III Kreisviadukt Brusio.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 09:01, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Thanks for the reassesment. I'll copy your comments to the article's talk page if you don't mind, it gives pointers to both other editors and myself. I may not do too much more (other than adding a few photos), several senior editors (mainly Australian it appears) seem to regard my style as "fluffy", "twee" or "old-fashioned", so I'll leave it to others to adapt the article to an acceptable mid-Atlantic style! Once again, thanks. Martin of Sheffield ( talk) 12:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Narbonne Cathedrale Saint Just et Saint Pasteur.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 08:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
|
There's some discussion there that could use your input. Cheers! Adam Cuerden ( talk) 14:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Ambassador news update
|
---|
Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador. You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here. Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course. If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.
First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible. Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at: Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list). After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.) As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.
In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:
We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.) Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training. The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it. Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way! -- Sage Ross (WMF) ( talk) 20:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC) |
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Roadkill on Route 170 Okatie Hwy by the Chechessee River, SC, USA, jjron 09.04.2012.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Jujutacular (
talk) 03:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
|
The TAFI Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your contributions to WikiProject Today's article for improvement, which have served to expand the project and increase participation and collaboration there. Northamerica1000 (talk) 12:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hey Elekhh - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 16:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Barrow Offshore wind turbines NR.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 12:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi Elekhh. On the FPC could you possibly indicate whether you still (weak) oppose the candidate notwithstanding the changes? Thanks. Grandiose ( me, talk, contribs) 16:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh - thanks for the barnstar! Unexpected and much appreciated. Cheers. Maias ( talk) 00:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For adding picture for the Kunstkring Art Gallery and all those numerous helps in the past . Rochelimit ( talk) 07:10, 3 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Just want to draw your attention to my suggestion in 'Oscar Niemeyer' about inserting a new section title ("Early Career") after the second paragraph of "Personal life and education" to break up this long section and to correctly title the subsequent information about Niemeyer's early career and professional contacts. Didn't know how to do it correctly. See my comment on Talk. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.17.209.191 ( talk) 18:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
I have gone through the listed items and have addressed them as best as I could. Can you look at the article to see if more should be done? Thanks. Pentawing Talk 06:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Oxfam East Africa - A mass grave for children in Dadaab.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 16, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-02-16. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 02:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Lorentz National Park map-en.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 16:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
|
Have you seen the main page is being adapted to include a short section on "Today's articles for improvement" which also links to a longer list. Maybe you could push for at least one article on architecture to be included every month? -- Ipigott ( talk) 07:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Crossrail BR 185 Hohtenn.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 22:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
|
Concerning your removal of one of the lead pic that was added today: I have been looking for an appropriate image that contrasted a modern city with the wide view of Florence.
The two pictures (and their captions) refer, in one case, to the impact of a single architect and a single structure on a city and on architecture and the architect. The second picture demonstrates very clearly the uniformity created by 20th century structures of the so-called International style. Although in the body of the article, almost every building is individually notable, and such is not the case in that picture, the picture demonstrates a significant trend in architecture.
The article is not simply about significant buildings. In each case, the significant buildings has been selected to demonstrate the aesthetics or principals of a wide region and era, or an architectural philosophy.
I want to emphasise that the image of Florence Cathedral has not been selected simply on the grounds of it being a great representative work of architecture (like the Parthenon, St Peter's Basilica or the Taj Mahal). It is not simply an iconic building. It is the building that launched the notion of the "architect".
The homogeneity of the Manhattan skyline is the antithesis of the image of Florence. Read the two captions. I believe they make the point, without labouring it.
Amandajm ( talk) 13:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
On 2 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Palace Hotel (Copenhagen), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the tower of the Palace Hotel in Copenhagen is decorated with mosaics symbolizing morning, day, evening and night? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palace Hotel (Copenhagen). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:03, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekh, thanks for the suggestion for In the Media. I don't think I'll have time this week to write an In the Media piece, and there haven't actually been many noteworthy stories this week. So I'll probably hold everything over for next week and cover it then. Alternatively, if you want to have a go at summarising the few articles there have been (there are links on the page), and make a feature of the Nick Cave story for this week, please feel free. Best, Andreas JN 466 00:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt maintenance of important articles. And here is a cheeseburger for you, too! Amandajm ( talk) 07:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, I've done some work on the Metabolism (architecture) article - it's a massive topic but I've tried to cover the basics. I'd really appreciate it if you were able to read it through and give me your thoughts. Kenchikuben ( talk) 18:26, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey Elekhh; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 21:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 22:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
|
On 20 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Metabolism (architecture), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that one of the icons of the Metabolist architectural movement was the Nakagin Capsule Tower (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Metabolism (architecture). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
The "legal subject" they are focused on with this assignment is Wikipedia itself, and how it deals with issues of copyright, copyleft, fair use, etc. So, though they have diverse article topics, they'll be especially exploring ways to e.g. reuse content from elsewhere in a legal and community-appropriate manner. It's part of the context of a larger class where they are exploring several innovative uses of intellectual property in society.-- Pharos ( talk) 00:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, the Wikimedia Foundation would like your feedback on Individual Engagement Grants! We have created a brief survey to help us better understand your experience participating in the IEG program and how we can improve for the future. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you created an IEG grant proposal.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback! And we hope to see you in the IdeaLab soon.
Happy editing,
Siko and Jonathan, Grantmaking & Programs, Wikimedia Foundation.
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 01:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Isn't it a bit of an overkill to credit the local collaborator (and possibly Eliasson)? Without having checked up on it, I am quite sure that many of the earlier years' recipients have also had (local) collaborators and HLA was for instance credited alone when they received a Trust Award for the same building. Ramblersen ( talk) 23:47, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:La Tour St. Jacques La Boucherie à Paris ca. 1867.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 27, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-05-27. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Would you consider adopting a more neutral color scheme for this image? Having countries with the most gun-owners appear in red with those having the least being in green has an appearance of bias.-- The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 18:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
hi - per the recent nomination, a few points:
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Franz josef Glacier LC0250.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 11, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-06-11. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment. I uploaded a new version.-- ArildV ( talk) 13:57, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello Elekhh, I'm contacting you because we need some Hungarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hu.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Hungarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) ( talk) 01:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your welcome message and offer of assistance. I have remade the article World Architecture Festival and would like some comments. Hope you have the time to take a look. When the article is ok I was thinking of translating it to Norwegian, but would like to know how much more work it needs before I start. No point in translating it before it is basically ok. I have left some comments on the article talk page. Thanks ツツ Dyveldi ☯ 14:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Did you know ... that since you expressed an opinion on the GA/DYK proposal last year, we invite you to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the matter? Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Regards, Gilderien Chat| What I've done23:04, 28 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hi, would you like to elaborate on your !vote? :) -- Gilderien Chat| List of good deeds 00:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, I am going to be using Wikipedia in class this semester and I would need someone to help out. No need expertise in the topic. I used Wikipedia in class before so, I just need some help with students' editing questions. Look forward to hearing from you! S.mereu ( talk) 15:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Nembrotha cristata bunaken.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 07:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
|
Elekhh, this is bang out of order. You have no right to ensure that your claim is shown, but then do your best to hide my claim that your claim is without foundation, and you've certainly got no business edit warring to ensure that this is the case- you have now reverted two separate editors to ensure that my criticism of your claim is hidden. Whether an image is "free" by Wikipedia's standards has everything to do with the image's candidacy at FPC. I have added a new comment, which is unambiguously relevant to the FPC nomination. Please do not remove this. (It would also help if you actually took a look at what I am saying- your claim is baseless. The English Wikipedia, unless I am very much mistaken, has no policy on FOP.) J Milburn ( talk) 12:38, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Elekhh. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Ephesus Celsus Library Façade .jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 20, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-09-20. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, I have problems uploading this image and others by the same author. The license seems to be fine but it tells me that it has previously been deleted. Would you happen to know what the problem is and if it can be uploaded? Ramblersen ( talk) 00:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the "structure" typo. Just letting you know I'm going to add the Aachen category back. The Rathaus sits at the center of the city of Aachen and is one of its most characteristic features. Seems appropriate that it should be in the Aachen category. If there are too many categories, I might recommend that we move one of the three architecture ones instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljpernic ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, I don't intend to get into an edit war here, but I reverted your edit (which you have now reverted back) because my understanding of the definition of a skyscraper is that it is not simply a tall building as we know it today. I referred to the Wiki page Skyscraper where it points out that the term is often applied to buildings that use a steel frame or make a significant impact on the local skyline. This building, built in 1928, is much smaller than they are today, but made a significant impact at the time it was built. Thanks Libby norman ( talk) 08:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 21:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Kairo Ibn Tulun Moschee BW 4.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 15, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-11-15. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 22:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
It might be worth putting a protection on that article for a bit. It's been vandalised fairly heavily in the last couple of days. When the removal of over 1,000 words goes uncorrected in a major article for over 30 minutes, despite the diligence of the watchers, it's a problem. What pleasure do the idiots get?
How do you do the protection thing? Does one need to have a green sticker on ones wiki-license to say that one is permitted? Amandajm ( talk) 01:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I am conducting an audit of all currently featured portals in order to determine which ones meet the modern standards and which ones need improvement. While Portal:Architecture is in excellent condition, there are only 11 selections in Portal:Architecture/Selected picture, while the modern standards look to have at least 20. While there are plenty of options to choose from at Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture, I am not nearly as well versed in the area as you appear to be, and this is a portal you are actively maintaining, so I would very much rather you be the person choosing the images. If you'd rather me do it, I would be happy to, but I wanted to offer it to you first. Please also note that I have added an archive/nomination link to the 11 that exist currently, as every other section had one.
Hope I'm not stepping on any toes.
Sven Manguard Wha? 04:50, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 10:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
|
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n03.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 10:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
|
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:David Faiman of the Ben-Gurion National Solar Energy Center.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 14:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
|
You have voted on the delisting of US Postal Currency 5 cent 1862 1863. Some new information has been presented. Would you consider reviewing your vote?
The deletion request was started because it was assumed that File:US-Fractional (1st Issue)-$0.05-Fr.1231.jpg was the same currency as File:US Postal Currency 5 cent 1862 1863.jpg. The Fr.1231 currency was in better condition so it should replace "US Postal Currency 5 cent 1862 1863" as the featured image. They are not the same. The older file is of type Fr.1230 because it has an ABC monogram on the back. As a security measure, the US Post Office had the front and back of the bills printed by two companies. The back of the Fr.1230 was printed by the American Banknote Company and their ABC monogram appears in the lower right corner. The Fractional currency (United States) article explains the difference but does not show an example. -- SWTPC6800 ( talk) 18:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:34, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Big problem with anything to do with indonesia is the potential - if we had active contributory editors to something other than soccer, the potential utility of regional geography categories far outweighs the argument for merging into single island ones. The question is dumbing down and reducing the number of potential fillable categories presupposes an absent or non existent set of editors who actually help expand the Indonesian project set of articles. Maybe it will never happen (either way), and it will bubble along with an ever increasing set of articles about non notable soccer players, and the geographical features of indonesia will remain a mysterious unfinished project...
but a word of warning - the geographically challenged set of users who are concerned about their penis size also havent the faintest what java is... http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikitrends/2013.html - strongly suggest that the more sub-divisions of information about java - the better... satusuro 06:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Tidar is not and has never been a mountain. We need a hill and not mountain category in the geography of indonesia.
Similarly Turgo and Plawangan are not mountains, so thats 3 that could exist in a not-mountain also not small hill of Indonesia. satusuro 13:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)