Hi, I refer you to [1], in which I reverted your edit with the comment "rvv" (revert vandalism). It is obvious from your edit history that you are not a vandal, but unfortunately your edit to Argentina created a link to a Vietnam page, and as this sort of thing is deliberately created by vandals much more often than accidentally by typographical error, I reverted using "rvv" without checking your edit history first. My apologies... Viewfinder 22:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Your opinion would be welcome at the ongoing straw poll. Thanks, -- E Asterion u talking to me? 11:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Forms_of_government is becoming rather unwieldy: its lumping together an uneven mix of real & hypothetical governments, mixing style & substance. I'm making an effort to link together common political subjects to eliminate redundant comparisons: my first attempt has yielded Template:Authoritarian types of rule/ Template:Authoritarian. I'm thinking of a similar template for represenative systems (Democracy, Const. Monarch, etc.) & a template for "styles" of government (Meritocratic; Patriarchial). Getting those in place, and assuring my current template survives a deletion vote, my idea is for you or someone to re-make your template in a simpler form, referring to these differing subjects of governance. Cwolfsheep 17:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Template:Styles_of_government may help. Cwolfsheep 19:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
{{
Styles of government}}
There is an ongoing discussion on how to describe the status of Kosovo. I have seen you working around on controversial issues and realised you are levelheaded and stick to a NPOV attitude. I would appreciate your input on this matter. Regards, -- E Asterion u talking to me? 21:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to just copy statements made by Lemonhead elsewhere to this page, whithout checking his sources first. The mongolian governement wasn't "illegally overthrown" in January, it was dissolved and rebuilt following the relevant clauses of the constitution exactly to the letter. Check Talk:Miyeegombo_Enkhbold for some related discussion (so far rather fruitless, unfortunately). -- Latebird 23:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, just regarding your edits to the introductory sentence in Politics of Poland (the other edits are appreciated, by the way),
Somehow this sounds a bit artificial and can be opaque on first reading. You know, rather than saying it plainly like "Poland is a representative democratic republic with a parliamentary system, ... " I'm itching to rephrase this, but I have a memory of seeing this formulation somewhere before - is this a standard introductory text in some of the "Politics of nnn" articles? If so I guess i'll leave it there to keep the standard. Deuar 13:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
I saw you removed the ideological orientation from the Template:Netherlands general election, 2003. I don't disagree with you. But I posted the proposed change on the articles talk, and then you removed the change without posting anything on the talk page. It's not that I disagree with you on the change. But I would urge you to take issues first to the talk page, before removing an edit of someone else. C mon 12:11, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for creating the basic page for the above. I've translated its Hungarian article into English. Adam78 18:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
PS: On your user page, the Hungarian city that you've visited and which has a red link will be Siófok, instead of Slófok. I'd rather not make a redirect since the latter doesn't make sense. I hope you'll correct it. Adam78 18:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi again, I'm afraid " Saxony Anhalt: ]]" will be a mistake on your userpage. Adam78 01:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted your edit regarding candidate numbering in the article. I thought your edit made it appear that the number of candidates starts at two, rather than the number of the candidate. Alun 06:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
For all the regard I hold for you, dear Wilfried, I think you are not neutral about Italy. History will teach us... I don't know what former members of PLI you know, 'cos most of them (the most important ones) joined FI. The interesting thing is that the only thing Italian wikipedians agree on is that FI is a liberal party, while some questions about its christian-democratic or conservative and others are pretty sure that FI is a libertarian (in the sense of economically liberal) and neo-liberal party. That could sound good, and FI has also many social-liberal members: even Berlusconi, althgough himself Catholic, had taken always secular positions on ethical matters or prefers not to speak about them, for the reason that he doesn't want to hurt the freedom of conscience of any of FI members. -- Checco 12:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Do you keep supporting the merge, or do you want to remove the notice? I don't think there's a need for a merge, both subjects are notable and deserve their own article. Cheers! Afonso Silva 19:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you please unprotect this page deleted on the course of anti-userbox orgy by User:Doc glasgow& company? I think the current deletion notification should be replaced with
![]() |
Per the German userbox solution, {{ User Liberal}} was moved to {{ User:Ashley_Y/Userboxes/Liberal}} |
. -- Constanz - Talk 11:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
There is a discussion going on on the talk page of this article. Thought you might be interested. Intangible 17:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Could you have a look at the recent changes to Liberalism and radicalism in France? Not a topic I know particularly well, but I find the recent changes to the lead paragraph very confusing. - Jmabel | Talk 04:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to disturb you during the summer. Do you believe a Category:French liberal parties should exist (it was deleted in a CFD)? I know that no French is a members of ELDR or LI, but Liberal Alternative comes close to whatever is left of liberalism in France. Cheers. Intangible 16:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Greetings Electionworld. A recent edit to {{ Danish parliamentary election, 2005}} has removed all party logos from it. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this matter? In my book, such use was encyclopedic and thus fair use, but I'd like to hear you thoughts on this. For example, I don't know if you prefer a standard layout for all your templates. Regards. Valentinian (talk) 16:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Guess you must be interested to take a part to decide whether this template should stay. :-) — Insta ntnood 20:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You're right that D66 is no longer spelt D'66 but it is easy short cut to typing Democrats 66, because it is a redirect, that's why I used it on the Brinkhorst article. -- C mon 11:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
hey if you're making stubs about the No GST Party then where's the article for the Santa Clause and Merry Christmas Party? Didn't they actually get a Federal Senator up? -- Ga rr ie 01:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
OK, no Presidents fot the Chambers of the Parliament. But in the Politics and Government of the UK template there are the speakers of the Lords and Commune! As far as I know, "Speaker of the Lords" (in the UK) is similar to "President of the Senate" (in Romania). -- ES Vic 09:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
It's nice that you liked my table on List_of_political_parties, and thanks for filling it all in! I had expected to do it myself over the next couple of days, but am now spared the trouble. However, I was going through the table (only the states marked as multi-system for now), and found that several of them are not described as multi-party states on the corresponding state-specific page. I am not an expert, so I won't debate the classification, but I'd like the two classifications (in the table and the individual pages) to match. Below is a list of the non-matching states (multi-party in the table, but something else on the individual pages). You could change the table, change the individual pages, or place comments below, but lacking another plan, I will update the table in a couple of days.
List of political parties in Bahrain
-
List of political parties in Bangladesh
-
List of political parties in Belarus
-
List of political parties in Benin
-
List of political parties in Botswana
-
List of political parties in Burkina Faso
List of political parties in Canada - List of political parties in Cape Verde - List of political parties in Chile - List of political parties in the Republic of China - List of political parties in Colombia - List of political parties in Comoros - Political parties of the Democratic Republic of the Congo - List of political parties in the Cook Islands - List of political parties in Costa Rica
List of political parties in Dominica
List of political parties in East Timor - List of political parties in El Salvador
List of political parties in French Polynesia
List of political parties in Ghana - List of political parties in Greece - List of political parties in Grenada
List of political parties in Honduras - List of political parties in Hungary
List of political parties in Jamaica - List of political parties in Jordan
List of political parties in Kenya - List of political parties in Kyrgyzstan
List of political parties in Liechtenstein
List of political parties in Macau - List of political parties in Malawi - List of political parties in Malta
List of political parties in Mauritania - List of political parties in Mongolia - List of political parties in Mozambique
List of political parties in Nicaragua
List of political parties in Paraguay - List of political parties in Puerto Rico
List of political parties in St. Kitts and Nevis - List of political parties in São Tomé and Príncipe - List of political parties in Senegal - List of political parties in Seychelles - List of political parties in South Africa - List of political parties in Spain - List of political parties in Sri Lanka
List of political parties in the Republic of China - Politics of Tonga
List of political parties in Yemen
Best regards -- Torfason 13:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
WT:RFA contains statements saying that you are the same user as User:Wilfried Derksen, and that you want adminship transferred to User:Electionworld. This is likely to spark off a discussion anyway, but it would help the discussion (and your case) if you posted below from both accounts as a confirmation. Thanks. -- ais523 08:17, 4 August 2006 ( U T C)
What I mean is that if you are an admin. under one account (where you are known and have a reputation as being an admin.) and then have your adminship moved, people will not know who you are or possibly not lend you enough credibility if they have never heard of you or seen the work you have done. Do you understand? Michael 08:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your Adminship ;-) Stephen B Streater 20:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to know were you got references for this article, ¿do you refer with it to the actual Broad Front?.
I'm saying this because I'm uruguayan and I don't know what yo refer to.
That's it for now, thanks
-- Ernalve 02:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Michael has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Michael 22:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Because another question shouldn't be answered by another question.
Hi, can you provide a source claimd MOST liberalism support mixed economy? I mean included Classical liberalism and Neo-liberalsim or even Libertarianism? thanks. 203.84.71.138 12:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Electionworld - your new stub template has been listed at WP:WSS/D as an unproposed stub template, where it will be debated before either being accepted or proposed for deletion. Please note that new stub templates should be proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting, so that it can be acertained whether the new stub type fits in with existing stub types. As it happens, your new stub type overlaps with {{ map-stub}}, which is for cartography in general. If you could give us some explanation of the creation of this stub type, it would be helpful if you could add it at WP:WSS/D#Atlases. Grutness... wha? 07:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
|
-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 10:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
If you think that the references in the private life section of Lousewies van der Laan puts too much emphasis on that section then please solve it by providing references for others sections. There is no policy or guideline that I am aware of that supports your removal of references. If you think otherwise then please show it here or on the talk page before reverting. Thanks in advance. Andries 18:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Please do not break the following policy Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English at Lousewies van der Laan I will revert unless you give a good reason for you edits. Dutch contents has to be translated. Please do not remove the translation. Thanks. Andries 20:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)#
I disagree with the way you try to shorten the referencing, because the website may go off-line. With the original form of referencing the contents is still verifiable unlike your form or referencing. Andries 20:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
The reason for deletions is that, all even if they are maps of nort or akrotiri, all can be covered by the small article of map of cyprus. if that article will not have expansions by that article, then i wonder what expansions u can make.
Also category map of north cyprus, will be just for one article, at the moment that it will be a subcategory of map of cyprus. Really, i wonder how a category can be a subcategory of Maps by COUNTRIES. Also don't forget that Cyprus except of country, is an island as well so the article map of cyprus can cover them. Personally I have included Map of Cyprus to the category:TRNC to cover also for north side.
Have you ever seen a category:Geography of North Cyprus? Imagine that this category has several articles and all belong to the category:Geography of Cyprus and none argue since cyprus is an island and someone can say it is geography of island cyprus.
As for Akrotiri, same for the reasons for north cyprus. Also category:Akrotiri ALREADY EXISTS with the name Category:British military in Cyprus.
KRBN 14:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Austria-Hungary existed between 1867 and 1918, so you cannot place maps from another time periods in this category. Categories dealing with former countries should deal with the time period from their creation until the end of their existence. So, please, just look in the future which map is from which time period, ok? PANONIAN (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for catching that flub of mine. I didn't know about it until a few moments ago when I checked my watchlist. -- DavidH Oz Au 13:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Just fyi, I archived all the recent rants/repetitions/and diversions, and re-set-up the breakdown point-by-point of what is left to decide. See Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign#The synopsis, and then Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign#final changes, and options.
I-of-little-patience... Quiddity 18:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC) ;)
Hi there,
I really like your atlas project. I do not want to discourage you, but I think we might have a little problem with that. Please see this discussion. Don't take this discussion of mine as attempt to spoil your work, but as attempt to find it's place under the sun. -- Dijxtra 08:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
The WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology has just been created. Why not take a look? I hope you can join. Inge 17:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
It's that special, special time! No, grandma's not coming over. No, not time to clean out the fridge. It's sidebar redesign voting time! Yes, the community has narrowed it down to 3 different options, and a vote for the same old original sidebar is a choice one could vote for as well. Voting for multiple options is allowed, and discussion on the whole shebang is right there on the vote page itself.
You're probably getting this message because the sidebar fairy ( JoeSmack for now) noticed you commented on the project at some time over on at Wikipedia talk:Village pump (proposals)/Sidebar redesign. Lovely. JoeSmack Talk 06:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Greetings,
Jimmy Wales started a new project on July 4th to help track elections and encourage participatory politics. Campaigns Wikia is going down the the local level, while Wikipedia seems to be limited to the national level. You're welcome to participate. We could really use your help. Chadlupkes 06:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)