Welcome!
Hello, Eegorr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --
Pointe LaRoche
05:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Whatever rationale you use for the other album covers for Meat Loaf (and other artists) should apply here. If you feel it is necessary to handle this one as a special case... delete away! It is no skin off my nose... just trying to add some value here. Eegorr ( talk) 20:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Meat Loaf Bad Attitude.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sahuaro HS Cougar Logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Raúl_Grijalva and several other articles about U.S. Congressmen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please stop adding disparaging comments about HR 669 to articles about Congressmen. Your statements are opinion, not fact, and they are not supported by the citation given. -- Orlady ( talk) 21:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I read through the bill. Your statement is your own opinion about it, reflecting your interests and biases. If you want to tell the world what's wrong with the bill, I suggest that you start a blog, write letters to the editor, and write your own Congressman -- just don't use Wikipedia for this purpose. Wikipedia is not a platform for personal opinion and it does not accept original research. -- Orlady ( talk) 23:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi there,
Sorry about the image deletions, I came across a user who almost certainly was lying about the copyright status of a bunch of images, I found a few of them on the web that were clearly there before they were on-wiki. A few of them were kind of fluff images, like File:Continental Ranch.jpg, which was an aerial image of a suburban housing development, an image of a golf course which claimed that it used reclaimed water for irrigation (but it really just looked like a golf course) and an image of the Westin La Paloma resort to decorate the section on North Tucson. The image that I thought was a nice addition was an aerial image of aircraft sitting at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, though it was pretty much decoration, too. These are all nice images to have in the article, but not when they're almost certainly images that the user found out on the web. If you're interested in taking some yourself, that would be fantastic, though I wouldn't worry too much about trying to duplicate the ones deleted. Just get some nice iconic shots from each neighborhood to add some color to those sections. However, I have listed an image of the Pima County Courthouse and I'm about to list an image of the Unisource Energy Tower for deletion, and those are both images that would be very nice to have, so if you can take decent photos of those two buildings and replace them, it would be very nice. Please let me know if I can be of any help in getting those photos uploaded.
I visited Tucson a few months ago and quite enjoyed it. I wish I had taken some more photos.
Thanks! kmccoy (talk) 07:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Eegorr. I noticed that in some recent edits, you have been moving punctuation marks such as periods to be inside quotation marks (e.g., changing ". to ."). I wonder if you are aware of the guideline at MOS:LQ, which explains the Wikipedia standard for how quotation marks relate to other punctuation. In some instances you have changed the punctuation contrary to the guideline. For example, in this edit, you moved a period inside the quotation marks, when the period did not appear in the original material that was being quoted. I know that some style guidelines call for punctuation to be handled this way, but Wikipedia's guidelines say to include the period inside the quotation marks only if it was part of the original quoted material. I've reverted this, and wanted to leave you some explanation. Let me know if you have any questions. -- RL0919 ( talk) 17:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1975 American Airlines Tennis Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Alexander ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pernell Roberts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pygmalion and Bernard Shaw ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Eegorr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Eegorr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Eegorr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I would appreciate if you would comment on the talk page of the article and not in my personal one, when you want consensus on an edit you made. -- FantinoFalco ( talk) 04:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey, at least I'm still around. Did you quit or was your account deleted? Seems like we will never know. Eegorr ( talk) 03:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Jorm ( talk) 02:26, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Is a talk page not for discussion? Tyrants like you are why I spend almost no time editing the Wikipedia anymore. I will no longer donate, either. Frankly, I would prefer to see this enterprise die a slow, agonizing death than contribute to keeping it alive. Eegorr ( talk) 03:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)