Welcome!
Hello, Dwalin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Ysangkok (
talk)
21:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
I note your revert here and wonder what you mean by "only one plant for IAEA". Johnfos ( talk) 00:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey Dwalin, Thank you for your attention with the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project Links. I try to talk with user Sachinvenga about this links. Best regards ChNPP ( talk) 14:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Pontificalibus (
talk)
15:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. * All the information is cited and Unbiased, if you think anything wrong you can discuss on talk page. Just don’t delete without discussion.
. Shlok
talk .
15:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dabomb87 (
talk)
16:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Hi Dwalin, your 'thanks' on my reversion of your edit a very gracious response. Cheers. Oska ( talk) 02:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi! I re-reverted! your revert and in the explanation I wrote that "the word "working" means that the satellite behaves as expected and is not out of control, whether it has started broadcasting the Internet to users or not (functional)." Maybe a better word can be used instead of "working". Meysam5670 ( talk) 20:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)