![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Removed copyrighted text from the article. Please review it and let me know if it's fine or if anything else needs to change.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Graphic_India — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarmicRedemption ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback on not using Youtube as a reference. I do note that under some circumstances we are allowed to cite using videos as references. The primary video sources I use are from establish news agencies in South Africa. I will ensure I fix the citation for the source and not use the Youtube information. RamonThomas ( Talk) RJ Thomas 17:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Please clarify the reason for the decline of this article. I have endeavoured to adhere to all wikipedia's guidelines and rules. I believe the content of the article (the businessman Danny Lucas) is of suitable notability. I have provided numerous quality references and ensured the article is unbiased, accurate and fair.
Thanks in advance
Jomo76 ( talk) 18:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
No, I am not Gaurav Agarwal, but know him and have worked with him. From my side, I have made it quite neutral and if you find anything odd, please feel free to modify and delete the things. I want to bring to your notice that people known to me who have lesser credentials are there on wikipedia. Gaurav Agarwal surely deserves to be on wikipedia.
GAURAV AGARWAL (
talk)
22:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I have edited my article per your comments. I removed a lot of unnecessary detail and added many more citations. I can see how you would think some of it was considered promotional, so I reworded to change that. Please let me know if you think anything left still has that feel so I can change it. I'm not sure what you mean about improving the tone, was it to remove the promotion? The only connection I have to the subject is that I'm a historian on the subject and hold a huge collection of memorabilia and literature on the subject. I was never an employee of the company and never had any financial ties to it. Additionally, I'm not an employee or financially tied to Social Knowledge or the owner's club. It's simply a hobby of mine.
Please advise how I should disclose this connection or if I need to. Thanks!
Sunline Fan ( talk) 00:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I made significant changes as suggested by you and resubmitted for review. Could you please review it and do the needfull. /info/en/?search=Draft:Alok_R_Babu
Thanks and kind regards... Kiranpz
Hi,
Many thanks for your suggestions, Have done the changes which you mentioned. Would this is fine for reviewing.
Thanks and kind regards... Kiranpz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiranpz ( talk • contribs) 05:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
HI,
Did you get any chance to review my article. Its been waiting for review from long time. I request you to kindly review it and do the needful.
Thanks and kind regards... Kiranpz
{{SAFESUBST:Void,
Dear Dial911, Thank you for your helpful comments. I have added two extra paragraphs (with secondary sources) which I hope will establish that the painter has an acceptable degree of notability. Ideally I would like to find a contemporary obituary in a local paper. I will keep looking! If I get over this hurdle, I will endeavour to improve the references. Pointing out an example of the problem, however, would be appreciated. Regards BFP1 BFP1 ( talk) 15:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC) BFP1 ( talk) 15:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Also, I have just thought that the inclusion of many of the painter's works in UK public collections (see external sources) suggests notability. Maybe this should have been included in the text? Regards BFP1 BFP1 ( talk) 16:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
There already exists an article on James Madison Pendleton, a contemporary of William Calmes Buck. In 1849, Pendleton and Buck debated the issue of slavery in various publications. I’ve added this topic to the Pendleton article as well as an additional reference - previously there was only one reference. I then linked the topic to the William Calmes Buck article.
I also added the slavery topic to the William Calmes Buck article and linked it to the Pendleton article. I then added additional references and links to the Buck article.
Clearly, I do not understand how to proper work with references.
I hope that these revisions are satisfactory and that the Buck article is now acceptable.
Gordon ( talk) 22:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC) Gordon ( talk) 22:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Dial911!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
The Drover's Wife (
talk)
08:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Dear Dial911,
Thank you for reviewing the article. However, I have a question about the decline of the submission. It was declined before by Kvng on 31 October for a similar reason. After asking about the reasons why he added the following comment for the next reviewer. "The author has alerted me that, in my review, I may have overlooked the extensive sources supplied in the Further reading section ~Kvng (talk) 16:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)" Can you review your decline with his information left by Kvng.
All my best.
NG 1989 ( talk) 13:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Gordon ( talk) 21:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
There already exists an article on James Madison Pendleton, a contemporary of William Calmes Buck. In 1849, Pendleton and Buck debated the issue of slavery in various publications. I’ve added this topic to the Pendleton article as well as an additional reference - previously there was only one reference. I then linked the topic to the William Calmes Buck article.
I also added the slavery topic to the William Calmes Buck article and linked it to the Pendleton article. I then added additional references and links to the Buck article.
I've generally changed the references and minimized references to WCBs memoirs. However, I note that the references used are themselves strongly based on his memoirs. It seemed better to me to use the original source.
Although I am a descendant of WCB, I don't really consider myself to have a conflict of interest. However, in filling out the forms to create the article, I felt forced to mark conflict of interest.
I hope that these revisions are satisfactory and that the Buck article is now acceptable.
Gordon ( talk) 21:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Dial911 for the suggestions to the article /info/en/?search=Draft:Vibha_Batra. I have made the changes and have also removed the external links from the page. Please let me know your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dial911 ( talk • contribs) 05:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble Dial911. Thanks for highlighting the same. Regards. Daphinevadhera ( talk) 08:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dial911,
This is my first time creating a Wiki page, so I am a bit ignorant about the various rules and nomenclature! Your feedback was: You should include prominent sources and work in the format of the submission. What constitutes prominent sources, and what do you mean by 'work in the format of the submission'? Thank you for your patience!
Best,
Nlatoyas ( talk) 21:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I understand you have deleted the page and moved it into draft due to issues with references. I read about providing "Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves". So can I use this criteria to provide reference as of now or could you suggest me how I could reference the page better so that you will give me approval and help me pin point to the exact issue so that I can rectify the same for your approval hence not resulting in page deletion in the future. I really want to get it right before I submit for another review. Thanks in advance.
Mm fantastic ( talk) 02:16, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for the recommendation. I went through the material as you said and those are little bit difficult to understand. The thing is I am not paid to create a page on behalf of the person. I am just a fan who constantly follows the work and was really thrilled to start a wiki page about the person and this is the only page I have written. After I wrote to you I added more references than what I could manage previously. So can you kindly please check whether the references added are enough and what all I could do to get it published back again cause everything written there is fact. Thanks again.
Mm fantastic ( talk) 02:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911, The data provided there is all true and I have referenced the links to the information as much I can as you asked earlier. There is no newspaper article or news channel coverage on the person until now. Do I have to wait till something like that appears or is there any alternatives. Also please do help if you could tell me if I have to wait for news coverage. How much days this page will remain without getting lost in the draft section of Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. ( Mm fantastic ( talk) 15:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC))
Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate the time and guidance. I wanted to follow up for clarity because another editor had told me to remove the inline citation from the page. I added them in as footnotes as you can see below. I will add in more footnote citations to the eight that are already there as I believe that is what you are asking for.
Thanks again!
Greenough Ben ( talk) 22:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dial!
Super weird but the article Draft:St.Yesterday you reviewed should never have been submitted, the draft is not completed and it looks like an unregistered edit was made to the page pushing it into afc prematurely. I've never had a draft get high jacked like that so it's pretty odd. On a side note there was an actual article waiting for review that's been in limbo for quite some time if you feel like checking it out at Draft:Slash Puppet
Tokyoyo ( talk) 22:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The easiest (in my opinion) way to archive threads is to use Lowercase sigmabot III's archiving tools (some use ClueBot III but I find it a bit too convoluted). The long and the short would be to place the following code at the top of your talk page:
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(15d) | archive = User talk:Dial911 /Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 120K | archiveheader = {{Talk archive navigation}} | minthreadstoarchive = 2 | minthreadsleft = 4 }}
The various params are fairly self-explanatory; the only one that's not "what it says on the tin" is |algo=
, which is the "age" of the text before it's archived. I'd suggest a histmerge between your two existing archives and renaming one of them to
User talk:Dial911 /Archive 1 so that when the bot starts archiving it puts everything where everything else is. Happy to help out with that.
Let me know if you have any further questions. Primefac ( talk) 04:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi - I have created the page for Yashita Sharma who is an upcoming singer in India. She has sung many songs for Indian movies some of them being top chart busters. Hence I believe that her having a permanent page on Wikipedia is pertinent. Also there are already 21 other articles on Wikipedia which mention Yashita and would benefit from linking to Yashita Sharma's page (once created on Wikipedia). You can check the articles mentioning her here: /info/en/?search=Special:Search?search=Yashita+Sharma&go=Go Kindly move the page from Draft to permanent status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulkarninikhil ( talk • contribs) 12:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dial911, I have read your comment stating a need for references which discuss "the person in depth and not just their work". I do not understand the comment please. As a phd student I have never come across an official pair-reviewed book/journal which discuss a 'person', such references only discuss the 'ideas' or 'works' of a person...unless it is a biography novel, or indeed newspaper journalistic interviews and articles. Newspaper journals and media interviews have indeed been provided rather extensively (countries include UK, China, Russia, Malta, Pakistan, Argentina, European base, Kosovo, US base + quotes from established international personages). So I am confused what the comment is about please, if you could kindly clarify. Thanks a lot in advance. Lidasher
Hello Dial911, thanks for reply. The article is about the 'painter' so, the focus is more the art. Does that work please? I mean should the word "painter" be in the title you mean in this case? Regarding disclosing association, yes I included the standard COI Template to disclose it. Lidasher
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dial911 ( talk) 17:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dial,
Just wanted to follow up on Draft:Slash Puppet - I re-cited a number of sources to give info to the original publication/air date. Due to the age of the group and the rapid change in the Canadian music market during that time many of the original sources from MuchMusic and CHUM are difficult to recover so I tracked down archived sources for their various award shows and referenced them according to WP:YOUTUBE with one additional source made from an official Facebook account (adhering to WP:FACEBOOK), that said most of the additional main sources come from magazines ( Bravewords was published physically for years however finding archived copies is difficult so I sourced the web articles that are still archived), books, and television media. In regards to WP:42 and notability this group meets several requirements of WP:BAND including; multiple non-trivial published works, winning first place in two major music competitions (Toronto Music Awards, LA Music Awards), being placed in heavy rotation nationally by major radio and music television networks (CHUM, Much), and has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across national TV networks (CHUM, MUCH, MusiquePlus).
I'd appreciate a re-review (understandably my sources could have been cited better - those are now fixed) but I firmly believe this group meets several requirements for notability and definitely left their mark on the Canadian music scene during their time (during my source hunting I even turned up a video of Skid Row taking about the group - fun but not used in the article)
Cheers, Tokyoyo ( talk) 21:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Draft has been cleaned up per your feedback! Thanks for your input. If you have any other suggestions, please let me know. JacobPace ( talk) 17:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
As per naming conventions, Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper name.
I suggest you move the article to its original and correct title, with e in encounter in lowercase. Thanks. Xzinger ( talk) 17:42, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911,
I would like to ask what specific sources are to be done in this article.
I have provided almost every academical work or article about the F. G. Emmert and specifically listed the definite pages of works listed. It is unfortunate that there are not English articles or works about this composer so sources have to be in Czech.
I will be more than happy to develop the article, so I am asking you for your specific demands.
Thank you for your time. 85.71.106.115 ( talk) 21:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hey there,
thank you for your help. I have provided some more references thoughout the article so all the informations can be found in the references listed (not mentioning further readings that are to be found on the internet). Please seek some Czech/English reviewer to help.
Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.71.106.115 ( talk) 20:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
thank you once again for your brief response and passing of the issue. I shall wait for the (hopefully positive) feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.71.106.115 ( talk) 21:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Dial911 ( talk) 16:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Thank you! I finished the work on the article, please, review it in order to move it back. YalePolitiCaste ( talk) 01:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Joseph M. Martin now meets the criteria of WP:NSOLDIER as he is a Major General commanding a division and additional citations have been added showing his role as the commander of ground forces in Mosul.
Your previous review was on 00:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC). Crameraj ( talk) 02:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Please check my Swastika Dutta page before deleting this.. Don't delete this page it's about a Bengali actress. Please check once again I edit much more and add some external links that's help you to get identify this person. Please check once again.. Rakhi ( talk) 02:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dial911. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Richard Feldt, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: suitable merge/redirect target exists ( WP:ATD). Thank you. So Why 08:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911 ( talk), I would like to remove this profile photo from the WikiCommons which I had uploaded as it belongs to myself. But I do not find any "delete" option. Could you help me please? /info/en/?search=Draft:Lida_Sherafatmand#/media/File:Lida_Sherafatmand.jpg
With thanks Lidasher ( talk) 11:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I am not exactly sure why my article was declined. I would like to know what I need to do to fix my article so that it can be published on Wikipedia.
L.redd ( talk) 19:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
The draft page for Ran Neu-Ner has been updated with better citations, improved in-line referencing, spelling errors and expanded slightly for a neutral point of view.
RJ Thomas 19:56, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Respected wikipedia editor,I need some help on the article IPFT.If you want to help then talk on my page.Thankyou! Binamra Deb ( talk) 12:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the mistake it is Indigenous Peoples Front of Tripura(IPFT) Binamra Deb ( talk) 13:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Dial911,I want to edit the Indigenous Peoples Front of Tripura(IPFT).In Tripura Legislative Assembly election, 2018 it has own 8 seats.But I am not able to edit this.So can you help me how to allocate the seats.Thankyou...! Binamra Deb ( talk) 05:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
No its not done I have checked.Please help.Thankyou. Binamra Deb ( talk) 06:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks.I have submitted a new draft will you see it kindly at Draft:N.C. Debbarma. Binamra Deb ( talk) 12:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
I have given 2 more references of times of india and indian express.Hope it will work.please see it.Thankyou. Binamra Deb ( talk) 13:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Please see the Draft:Jishnu Deb Burman.Thanks..!
Binamra Deb ( talk) 10:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for accepting the article N.C. Debbarma.Will you please check Draft:Lal Sarkar (film).
Binamra Deb ( talk) 07:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Please see now I have added more but I am not able to add the youtube link.Please help me.And I have added lots of citations also. Binamra Deb ( talk) 14:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
I am new here. I was wondering if you could help me with some basic editing. Thanks! Collossal ( talk) 09:39, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
I have submitted a Draft:Jishnu Deb Burman for review but another wikipedian copied my draft and created the article Jishnu Deb Burman.Please compare them and tell.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb ( talk) 07:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Thankyou Dial911,Can I show Jishnu Deb Burman on my list of Created articles. Binamra Deb ( talk) 09:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks.Please see Draft:Bijan Dhar. Binamra Deb ( talk) 18:02, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Dial911,will you please see my new Draft:Santana Chakma.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb ( talk) 11:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Sunil Wadhwani notability question. I've added secondary, independent references. Was it just the type of references or the style in which he was referenced? Any suggestions on improvements would be appreciated. Thank you.
Jruscetti (
talk)
20:55, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911
I have submitted the below draft for review and it was declined by you with proper reason. Now i have added the references properly. Could you please review it and do the needful. /info/en/?search=Draft:Anusha_Rai
Many thanks Kiranpz
Hello Dial911. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jamie langton, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The subject is described as directing numerous notable television series and winning numerous awards. This is miles away from A7 eligibility. Thank you. – Joe ( talk) 15:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
− − Hi, this was a joint effort between representation and myself. If this still fits in to your guidelines I can supply most information to back up my vast programme experience please do let me know what else you would like to see. Here is a link to one of my shows that received an RTS award last year. https://rts.org.uk/award/regional-awards-north-west-2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie Langton ( talk • contribs) 17:13, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
−
− − I've never seen a site so complicated to use, in particular finding simple explanation of rules and regulations and to communicate with moderators. For your information, I did not pay anyone to write the article it's a factual biographical! To be honest, whilst I appreciate anyone can write anything they like if you let them, as a writer of thousands of hours of primetime TV, news and BBC Watchdog (I know the importance of getting facts right) I'm insulted by wikipedia's attitude with regards to my professional background and standing even after supplying several sources for your cross reference as requested. Perhaps you can tell me how you can cross check your facts on anyone on Wikipedia and define a reliable source? I'm impressed by you being so thorough about facts on simple individuals, however whilst working in TV I've heard of several production companies refusing to use Wikipedia as a reference for things like 'processes' as they feel it's often not an accurate source. On that note, may I suggest as a moderator perhaps you could please at least check you have the right name when researching someone. I will look at escalating my view on this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie Langton ( talk • contribs) 18:44, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
−
−
−
I've just returned from filming in Nicaragua (can supply proof of this if you wish) so have only just taken a closer look at all of your replies, I think you are overrating yourselves.
Frankly I'm appalled and somewhat insulted by the tone of the patronising and arrogant, in particular the reference to ones own significance, comments and sincerely hope these are not available for public viewing as they are bordering on slander? I have been in this business for 30 years as a producer and director, but these arrogant replies by you all make me sound like some kind of groupie in search of stardom. FYI many people request information on me so using something on Wikipedia makes sense in that it's available in one place. As a programme maker and even former producer of the BBC's Watchdog programme, I'm fully aware about the importance of cross referencing facts. I'm sorry Wiki is only interested in known names as it clearly doesn't trust anyone else.
The rude and un-nescacary comment about ..."No person, however careful, is a reliable judge of their own significance, or a judge of how their life and career I find very offensive as this was not the reasons behind my article. Despite the fact I've told you I have not paid anyone to write something, you are claiming I must also have an agent? Whilst I appreciate you have a procedure to follow, the tone and content of all of your replies are totally offensive and not something I expect from an organisation like Wikipedia. I want to take this further so will be taking advice on your replies which have been screen grabbed. Please supply me with contact details for someone I can escalate this with.
While we are on the subject of fact checking, I notice you have failed this with a page on Educating Essex in which you state David Clews is the director. I was the gallery director for 7 weeks and directed 65 cameras, whilst I appreciate David was the 'series director' I directed the gallery which you seem to have failed to mention. So with that in mind, who supplied you with that information as it's clearly incorrect please check the end credits for this first of the 'Educating' documentaries.
Dial911, I found more references to "Stephen" than "Steve" (although each name is used in different citations). So I made the change to "Stephen" within the Draft article at Draft:Steve Trafton. Can the article name be easily changed to "Stephen Trafton" (an unused article name), and how would that best be done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seabix ( talk • contribs) 06:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I created a page of suggestions User:Legacypac/Cleanup_Guide#CSD_and_PROD_logging for ways to fill up your CSD log. A sea of red on your CSD log will be a powerful way to show you qualify for NPP. You can also use the log to check that your CSDs are being accepted (ie accurate) and find pages where someone removed the tag. You can then consider AFD or MfD for those cases. Legacypac ( talk) 16:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911
I have submitted the below draft for review.Could you please review it and do the needful Draft:Santana Chakma.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb ( talk) 15:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Thankyou..! I will definitely add more content to the articles if I get more information about them. Binamra Deb ( talk) 03:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911
I have submitted the below draft for review.Could you please review it and do the needful Draft:Ratan Lal Nath.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb ( talk) 06:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I've declined your G11 tag on Swargakkunnile Kuriyakose. The problem with the page is the complete lack of proper sources; but this does not, by itself, make the page promotional. G11 eligibility should be judged on the basis of the prose. In this case, tagging if for refimprove, and possibly sending it to AFD or PROD, would be a better move. Vanamonde ( talk) 09:21, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911,
Can you please review my new draft Draft:Manoj Kanti Deb.Thanks...! Binamra Deb ( talk) 18:25, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks.Yes I will improve them when I get more information and resources. Binamra Deb ( talk) 08:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911,
I have edited the article about the festival following the recommendations.
/info/en/?search=Draft:Avant_Festival
Please could you review it when you have opportunuty.
Thank you!
Max — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makasinych ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Dial911,
Will you please review my new draft Draft:Mevar Kumar Jamatia.Thanks..! Binamra Deb ( talk) 15:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Dial911,Is it done..! Binamra Deb ( talk) 13:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Dial911,Can you tell me how users create articles without undergoing review and no sources?.For example:- Tripura Peoples Front and Twipra Dophani Sikla Srwngnai Motha Was Created by a user with only 17 edits. Binamra Deb ( talk) 18:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Sorry its my mistake but the question is same how can a user create articles without any sources and without undergoing review?Please answer..Thankyou...! Binamra Deb ( talk) 13:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help Dial911. Binamra Deb ( talk) 04:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help Dial911. Binamra Deb ( talk) 04:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
I have edited the article. I think it meets Wikipedia's standards for publication. Please forward to KPJ1 for review. Thank you.
Medical Imaging ( talk) 02:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you moved my article Yuva jet to the Draft space, which is perfectly fine no problem, the thing is there;s another article on an Indian airline which has just 2 references and is perfectly fine for notability? Note: The airline is similar to Yuva Jet i.e. yet to begin op's, based at a lesser known airport etc..Yuva Jet was deleted before and so was Star Air (India) but that's back and my article isn't. Fell kinda discriminated btw I'm in no way blaming you just told you my point! Happy editing to you! Bingobro (Chat) 11:08, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
External references concerning the impact of Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems on the field of Bayesian networks have been added, external links have been eliminate, and numerous extraneous references have been deleted. Please let me know if there is anything else. Profrich ( talk) 19:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi , Thanks for reviewing /info/en/?search=Draft:Nana_Maharaj_Taranekar
This is my first wiki and is it about hindu spiritual leader/Guru. As per review comment , I have removed content referred from different site. Kindly revisit same.I will update more details soon to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssneve ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for Input, I have added reference Book name and details for section you are referring for citations , Lot of literature about Nana Maharaj present is in Marathi/Hindi Language. You can find Marathi / Hindi Reference by search (नाना महाराज तराणेकर) ,few links are added for reference, http://www.saamana.com/nana-mahjaraj-in-datta-sampradaya/ ; https://www.religiousforums.com/threads/shrivalllabh-teachings-of-shri-nana-maharaj-taranekar-indore-on-master-knowledge-happiness.85397/ ; http://www.dattamaharaj.com/%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B9%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%9C — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssneve ( talk • contribs) 18:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for getting my first wiki,your review comment helped lot,i will take care all these comments for next pages and will try to make this page better Ssneve ( talk) 14:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, thank you most cordially for reviewing my first article. As I understood from your message there is a certain problem with the citations in Lede and Early life sections of the article. However, I went through some similar Wikipedia articles concerning the topic of contemporary Serbian writers/artists and I can't seem to find where exactly the mistakes were made. I am conflicted on how exactly I should cite the personal life information concerning the author's family or school, as well as what I should cite in Lede when plainly stating her professional vocation and titles of previously published books of which I write and cite in detail later on. Please, would you be so kind as to give me an exact example of how I should excel the article. Hopefully you can help me understand in which manner I should change the citations you find inadequate, or add them properly in order to meet the Wikipedia standards so that I could improve my writing concerning this article as well as the future ones. Thank you very much, best regards!
Gnjoff (
talk)
09:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dial911,
Thanks for approving my Fastly page as part of the AfC process. It has now already been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastly and I wanted to make sure you saw in case you were interested in adding any comments.
Thanks! -- Sykes83 ( talk) 01:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Dial911.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the
New Page Reviewer flag. Can you please head over to
PERM and request it?
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (
per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at
the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, —
Insertcleverphrasehere (
or here)
06:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dial911,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mettaton for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 10:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dial911! Thank you very much for the review and the explanation of the draft: /info/en/?search=Draft:Niko_Klansek. I would kindly like to ask you to review the draft again after I have done significant changes to it. I appreciate it very much. LkHk ( talk) 15:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
LkHk ( talk) 16:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
I sincerely hope you are not discouraged by all of the setbacks. Personally, the user rights are not supposed to be a big deal; however, when you persistently request for them, your editing activity will naturally be passed through a magnifying glass. I thought Joe was spot on about what you should do moving forward; it's not about whether or not you are eligible, rather, it's about what have you done about the concerns other editors raised. I recommend that you save some diffs on some of your AfC works that would address these concerns, and include them in whoever you request to next time. Regards, Alex Shih ( talk) 18:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey, Primefac, Vahid Qazi has not been deleted since a week now. Dial911 ( talk) 20:20, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dial911,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Amelia Boomker should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amelia Boomker .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,