Welcome!
Hello, Despayre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Maelefique
(talk)
22:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't answer general article question on my talk page, that's what the article talk pages are for. And if you start throwing around accusations, I'm not going to answer entirely. I added another source for the budget. I'm sorry that everything isn't a mouse click away, but sometimes you have to actually use print sources. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 02:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad that you're expanding the portal, however, you should not add a section header to portal contents like this...
== Example ==
and you should only use images that are free from copyrights, use any image from the commons not the Wikipedia
• S • C
• A • R
• C • E •
02:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• S • C • A • R • C • E • 12:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Despayre
Thanks for your message. My reference is the South African publication, Two Oceans page 256, and the authors are pretty expert so I tend not to doubt what they say. However, I see that Leonard Compagno, who is THE world shark expert, doesn't give a max weight (you may have seen his book co-authored with Dando and Fowler, Sharks of the World), and it is possible that that may be indicative of some uncertainty as to the reliableness of the data. On the other hand, I do know that sharks get to a certain length and then start to seriously bulk up -- a 6m great white, for example, is a monstrous thing, which is to say, doing a straight line extrapolation on the weight of a smaller animal (as you have done with the whale sharks you saw off Mexico) will absolutely not work in practical terms.
I hope this information is of use to you.
regards
Seascapeza ( talk) 07:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Despayre, and thank you for your interest in copy editing. I am happy to help you out by reviewing these two articles and showing you additional improvements that I completed. The first article I looked at was Archives for UFO Research. On the first edit, I used some scripts to fix dashes and un-link common terms. I also used asterisks to create a bulleted list. People viewing the site with a screen reader will immediately realise that they are being presented with a list when you format it that way. On the second edit, I did some more clean-up and copy editing. The punctuation mark goes before the closing ref tag, not after it. The term "approximately" is not required because it is obvious that the number has been rounded off. Terms are linked only on the first occurrence. Use of "etc" is considered too informal for the encyclopedia. The website does not need to be listed as an external link as it already appears in the article several times. I cleaned up the grammar and punctuation. It is normal to have information in the lead that is repeated elsewhere in the article, as the lead is supposed to summarise the article.
I will look at the other article tomorrow. Hope this advice is helpful! -- Dianna ( talk) 04:40, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
The second article, Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, is already at Good Article status and is undergoing a peer review, which is a step on the way to Featured Article status. That's the reason why it's already in really good shape. Thanks again for your interest in helping out with copy edits. -- Dianna ( talk) 02:26, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
Hello Despayre. Thanks for joining in our copy editing efforts. I saw your note about Albion class landing platform dock on the requests page and took a look. You did a nice job on choice of wording, although you did overlook some rather strange commas and a non-sentence. I've done a quick tweak, and here's the diff. If you'd like to discuss any of it, please do (I'm watching this page), and of course, if I made any mistakes please correct them. Best regards, -- Stfg ( talk) 18:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I think you're talking about that sentence with the tractors, and yes, that was apparently where the coffee started wearing off! I re-read that this morning and thought "that doesn't make sense", but didn't have time to correct it before I left for work, but had made a note to fix it today. And good catch on the 8th ship being actually the 9th. The only change you made which I didn't think was needed was in the section at the bottom, with the sub-heading "HMS Bulwark". That section is only about that one ship, so I would have thought it's unnecessary to state the name of the ship again to start off that second paragraph. "The ship" seems shorter, and doesn't lose anything. But that's minor minor too, I think. You definitely improved it from where I was, and I'm just glad you didn't find 50 things! Thanks for the look-over. -- Despayre (talk) 21:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Despayre, hope things are going well with you. I'm wondering if you would be willing to help with a copyedit of Ahalya? It was unsuccessful in its most recent FAC and has just undergone a significant peer review. The article's creator asked me to help out, so in addition to going over the article myself I thought I'd mention it to a couple skilled copyeditors I knew as well. It is a kind of long article, so if you don't have time/interest enough to go over the whole thing doing a section or too that would still be much appreciated. Mark Arsten ( talk) 23:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
I suggest that possibilities other than deletion are options. See also Energy law. What do you think? Bearian ( talk) 22:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Despayre. Thank you very much for your interest in helping out with copy edits during the GOCE March copy edit drive. As a routine part of the drive, a random copy edit of yours was checked for quality control. The article is in good shape, but here are a couple of further improvements I was able to complete. Those wacky Germans capitalise all their nouns, but we do not. I fixed several instances. You need to decide whether or not serial commas will be used in an article, and stick to that choice throughout. That's everything! Diff of Thomas Borgmann. I hope you find these suggestions useful. Thanks again for your participation! -- Dianna ( talk) 03:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Futoshi Matsunaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Most Wanted ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Despayre, I was wondering if you could take a look at this article that I've been working on, if you have time/are interested, of course. Any help would be welcomed though, feel free to make copyediting changes or leave suggestions on the peer review that I have open. You input was pretty helpful on Elias Abraham Rosenberg, I'm just about ready to try for featured status with it. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Interesting looking article! I haven't got to your last one yet (but ya, that one was a long one!) I probably won't get to this one before the end of the month either (at least with more than a cursory look-over) when the copyedit drive is over, I'm almost done an 11,000 word article, and it's painful :) It'll be more so if I don't get it done before the end of the month. I will definitely look at it as soon as the month is over. -- Despayre (talk) 03:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
I have removed the PROD tag from One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication, it was kept as no consensus at a previous deletion discussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication, if there are copyright violation concerns, it may be eligible for deletion via {{ db-copyvio}}, providing you can show where the source material comes from. If not, it will have to be nominated through the AfD process. Cheers. -- kelapstick( bainuu) 22:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Copy Editor's Barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Despayre for copy editing 27 articles to a total of 49,707 words during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you for this fine contribution and for your care over matters of copyright. -- Stfg ( talk) 19:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Leaderboard Award – Number of words edited – 4th Place | ||
This Guild of Copy Editors Silver Award is awarded to Despayre for copy editing articles to a total of 49,707 words during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your efforts. -- Stfg ( talk) 19:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Leaderboard Award – Number of 5k articles edited – equal 4th Place | ||
This Guild of Copy Editors Silver Award is awarded to Despayre for copy editing 4 articles of 5000 words or more during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 GOCE drive. Congratulations on winning this prestigious award. Thank you for your efforts. -- Stfg ( talk) 19:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
The 10k Copy Edit Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Despayre for copy editing Shinji Takahashi (11,285 words) during the Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive. Thank you for taking on this major task. -- Stfg ( talk) 19:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Ata Hussain Fani Chishti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hakeem ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors March 2012 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the
Guild of Copy Editors
March 2012 Backlog elimination drive! This is the most successful drive we have had for quite a while. Here is your end-of-drive wrap-up newsletter. Participation Of the 70 people who signed up for this drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Special acknowledgement goes out to Lfstevens, who did over 200 articles, most of them in the last third of the drive, and topped all three leaderboard categories. You're a superstar! Stfg and others have been pre-checking the articles for quality and conformance to Wikipedia guidelines; some have been nominated for deletion or had some preliminary clean-up done to help make the copy-edit process more fun and appealing. Thanks to all who helped get those nasty last few articles out of the target months. Progress report During this drive we were successful in eliminating our target months—October, November, and December 2010—from the queue, and have now eliminated all the 2010 articles from our list. We were able to complete 500 articles this month! End-of-drive results and barnstar information can be found here. When working on the backlog, please keep in mind that there are options other than copy-editing available; some articles may be candidates for deletion, or may not be suitable for copy-editing at this time for other reasons. The {{ GOCEreviewed}} tag can be placed on any article you find to be totally uneditable, and you can nominate for deletion any that you discover to be copyright violations or completely unintelligible. If you need help deciding what to do, please contact any of the coordinators. Thank you for participating in the March 2012 drive! All contributions are appreciated. Our next copy-edit drive will be in May. Your drive coordinators – Dianna ( Talk), Stfg ( Talk), and Dank ( talk)To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
tested -- Despayre tête-à-tête 03:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of State of flux, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/state+of+flux.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot ( talk) 20:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on State of flux requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ben Ben ( talk) 21:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
The article State of flux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Ben Ben (
talk)
21:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Sure, I get your point :) Wasn't sure if I should pipe up but the pointlessness of the issue's been annoying me all evening it's hard to stop myself now. Malick78 ( talk) 22:32, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Despayre. I see you have placed your name on the waiting list to get a Jstor subscription. Please let me know how this turns out. Thanks -- Dianna ( talk) 01:17, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their May 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate January, February, and March 2011 from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. EdwardsBot ( talk) 18:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC) |
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 04:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for becoming involved in WP:RS/N! I've only recently noticed your participation, but it is valuable and helps the community. Thanks! Fifelfoo ( talk) 22:01, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You're receiving this message because you commented in the RSN discussion of sourced criticism at Secular Islam Summit. There is now an RFC on the subject at the article's talk page. Please consider visiting the RFC to help build a consensus. Thank you. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 22:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Reference to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120(Defence.lk), I have added the Tags "Single Source" and "POV" on Lies Agreed Upon.
Since you are involved on the above discussion, please discuss further on regarding the Tags added and the reliability of the content on Wikipedia based on the single major source. Sudar123 ( talk) 20:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I followed your suggestion at RS/N to simply use the two separate sources but this hasn't really helped. I'm now being criticised for SYNTH, so I was wondering if you might be able to weigh in at the dispute resolution noticeborard ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#NGO_Monitor) with your reasoning for this not being SYNTH. Thanks. BothHandsBlack ( talk) 09:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
My bad, thanks for letting me know. CartoonDiablo ( talk) 23:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
You have been mentioned at WP:ANI#Incivility at Talk:Prequel. JJB 21:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you would advice me here. Its a bit urgent, hence the notice. Hope you're not too busy . Cheers! ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 13:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors
May 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
Participation: Out of 49 people signed up for this drive so far, 26 have copy-edited at least one article. It's a smaller group than last drive, but we're making good progress. If you've signed up but haven't yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us! Progress report: We're on track to meet our targets for the drive, largely due to the efforts of Lfstevens and the others on the leaderboard. Thanks to all. We have reduced our target group of articles—January, February, and March 2011—by over half, and it looks like we will achieve that goal. Good progress is being made on the overall backlog as well, with over 500 articles copy-edited during the drive so far. The total backlog currently sits at around 3200 articles. Hall of Fame: GOCE coordinator Diannaa was awarded a spot in the GOCE Hall of Fame this month! She has copy-edited over 1567 articles during these drives, and surpassed the 1,000,000-word mark on May 5. On to the second million! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg
>>> Sign up now <<<
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, Despayre. I apologize for becoming a pain in your a** in RSN. I'm unfamiliar with the forum to know whether I'm now arguing with "uninvolved" regulars there or spillover from the other article. Thanks for your help! Location ( talk) 20:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
What about this change?
Current text:
Please keep in mind that reliability depends on context (that is, on exactly how you are using the source). You will get a faster and more useful response if you include: |
New text:
Before posting, please be sure to include the following information (if applicable): |
A Quest For Knowledge ( talk) 22:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
I noted that you were a little discouraged by the comments made against you on RSN. My advice: it will be forgotten in two weeks, so do not let it get to you. I have seen your edits on RSN and they have been objective (although you disagreed with me once, you were fair) and I see you as an asset for Wikipedia. I have seen too many good users retire over these types of issues, and I think you should not join them. Personal attacks etc. are not worthy of bother. You should just shrug your shoulders and forget them. In the long term, those making personal attacks usually get on the train to blockland, and it will be forgotten. You are making a positive impact, because WP:RS sourcing is a bedrock of Wikipedia. History2007 ( talk) 20:28, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the words guys, I'm not so overly sensitive that I'm going to take it too personally, I just wanted to express my opinion. I think we get a lot more work done on RSN when we aren't hosting spill-over page disputes where editors argue the same thing they couldn't agree on in the first place. I don't have a problem with other editors disagreeing with my opinions at RSN (although, even though I have no idea about what opinion H7 and I disagreed on, I'm still sure I'm right . I do have a problem with editors that think we should change how the page functions because he's cranky that a 70 year old propaganda film should be the top of the RS chart for WWII, and then go on to berate me in various places throughout the page because of it. -- Despayre tête-à-tête 00:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
There is a dispute about Sondra Locke's year of birth. Some sources say 1944 while others say 1947. Because of this dispute, both years are listed in the opening sentence of her Wikipedia page. None of the sources that say she was born in 1947 are reliable. However, there are many reliable sources that say she was born in 1944:
Sondra Locke's marriage license [2] to Gordon Leigh Anderson on September 25, 1967 (available publicly through the state archives or Ancestry.com) lists her birthdate as 5/28/44. MSN movies [3] and the Internet Movie Database [4] say that she was born in 1944. A 1989 People magazine article [5] gives Locke's age as 45, correlating to a 1944 birth year. The Middle Tennessee State University yearbook from 1963 has a photo of her [6] appearing in a university production of Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible. For Locke to have attended a university during the 1962-63 semester, she would have to have been born no later than 1944 unless she graduated high school early, which is unlikely given that she makes no mention of it in her autobiography. Locke does not mention her year of birth in her autobiography. On 28 May 2011, Sondra Locke turned 67 according to ABC News [7], Yahoo! News [8], the Associated Press [9], Leigh Valley News [10], and The Boston Globe [11]; this directly correlates to her being born on 28 May 1944.
Sondra Locke's Wikipedia page, in my opinion, should only list 1944 as her year of birth. There is no question that she was born in 1944. I am requesting that you make this correction to Sondra Locke's page, because every time another user has made this correction, their edits have been reverted without merit. 131.239.63.5 ( talk) 03:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
What is the policy for statistic dates? I have been listing the previous day because my stats updates are based off of information that is updated through the previous day. Any new information from the current day would not be reflected. AutomaticStrikeout ( talk) 17:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
That was my thought too,but apparently that's the style used by other RS sources for stats. Although having spent a few minutes looking at the link provided by Z, I cannot find any dates on the stats listed, so I will strike that portion of my comments. Thanks. SOP=Standard Operating Procedure. -- Despayre tête-à-tête 18:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
He now claims that my stats update was not correct, while failing to provide any evidence to support his claim. He also did not specify what was incorrect. AutomaticStrikeout ( talk) 16:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Despayre, thanks for helping at DRN (and welcome to the dispute resolution community). Would you please close the thread, when you think that it's time, using the {{ DRN archive top}} & etc. closing templates and syntax listed at the top of the DRN page? Again, thanks, and best regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 17:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your recent answer on my post on the RSN [12]. It was really helpful and well thought out, and I especially appreciated that you didn’t just answered my query, but actually went to the trouble of finding a better source for the article! This resolved the issue, and I have used your source on the article. So, I guess what I am saying is: thanks for going above and beyond the “call of duty”.-- Luke Warmwater101 ( talk) 12:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to Despayre for copy editing 4 articles and achieving a total of 14,748 words during the Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thank you for your contribution to the drive. -- Stfg ( talk) 08:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC) |
Carthage44 reverted an update to Jose Quintana's page, claiming the stats were incorrect. I didn't find any errors and I asked him about it on his talk page. He then deleted my question. What recourse do we have to put an end to this? AutomaticStrikeout ( talk) 03:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors
May 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago. Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by
EdwardsBot (
talk)
15:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Hi Despayre, this is regarding my RS/N post. Sorry about the wall of text. I generally try to be concise, but Goldberg's article is very long, and has many problems, and this is the only reason my post is long. Regards, IjonTichyIjonTichy ( talk) 15:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, what is so significant or surprising about the quotes you linked to on your userpage? Bzweebl ( talk • contribs) 22:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Invitation from the
Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their July 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on July 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on July 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to eliminate the articles tagged in April, May and June 2011 from the queue and to complete all requests placed before the end of June. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 6 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in April–June 2011", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot ( talk) 18:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
Hello. Please explain your utterly bad-faith assumptions at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Howard W. Hunter. I think it's pretty clear that your comment there did not assume good faith, at the least. Thanks. → B music ian 13:06, 25 June 2012 (UTC)