![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 |
![]() |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
For your work with improving articles, joining AfD discussions and standing by your !vote even though you sometimes become the victim of petty insults. Just continue doing what you are doing. Thanks. BabbaQ ( talk) 23:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC) |
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Motorcycle fork, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.--
Rocknrollmancer (
talk)
20:59, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw in this edit of List of Pixar staff, you added the initials "KW" but you did not provide the name of the actual person. I assume this was unintentional, right? Can you please add that person's name to the appropriate place in the article? Thanks, - Paul T +/ C 04:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dennis, as you may know I have recently wrote an article on Energica Ego. Will you please review my edits and help bringing the article to better quality. I don't have much experience on editing so I rely on you guys to correct my mistakes and regulate the data I add. But this time you guys have't edited or reverted my edits.
Thank you
- Navinsingh133 ( talk) 08:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Rifle Association, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bloomberg and Mother Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
On 29 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sharon Calahan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sharon Calahan is the first member of the American Society of Cinematographers whose feature film background is entirely in computer animation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sharon Calahan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Sharon Calahan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dennis, I'm not sure why you have reverted some of the links that I have added - for instance the link to Tourism Saskatoon is actually the Tourism Organisation of the town which is run by the city which is the link above it. So if the link above it is Ok then the tourism link should be OK. I don't understand the rationale unless it has to do with the fact that I added the link not somebody else. If it's not OK for me to add links then why do I have access to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidcronk ( talk • contribs) 03:27, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
You seem to be particularly interested in adding links to http://www.travelodium.com to many articles. Usually you add these links apropos of almost nothing. The site isn't journalism that I can recognize. It looks like clickbait, and advertising. In other words, it looks like spam. Is there a reason why you post so many links to travelodium.com? -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 03:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Was was wrong in my edition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KrzysG ( talk • contribs) 00:54, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bessie Stringfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Social Security ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I've noticed that you keep changing my edits , I wanted to let you know Everyone who is black isn't "African American" i'm seeing many people who are of Jamaican American heritge , Nigerian American Heritage , Kenyan American Heritage, Puerto Rican , etc being falsely labeled as "African American" Please respond sir because your falsely labeling people who are Nigerian American as African American Both are Black but seperate ethnic groups — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philly2166 ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
It has come to my attention that you have created a page called Draft:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster which is an unattributed copy of Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster. Take a read of Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia to see what you need to do to avoid this being a copyright infringement. I don't know why you are making this a draft, but be aware that the original page has been quite controversial, so please be careful and establish a consensus before anything major changes! Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 00:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vehicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
I wanted to complement you on your balanced and well reasoned input on the NRA talk page. I don't agree with all of the comments but they have all been well reasoned and I appreciate that. Just thought I would let you know. Springee ( talk) 18:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dennis. I would like to suggest a change to the Turo (Car Rental) header, it should be updated to Turo (Car Sharing) since car rental and car sharing is different. This is a different industry that includes companies like Getaround, Drivy, and Turo and it should be clarified in the header of the Turo page. Car rentals are a car rental company that rents out the fleet of cars that they own, car sharing is a marketplace made up of car owners who share their cars with travelers and car sharing marketplace guests when they need a car.
Thank you for your consideration in making this change. Christin
Christin at Turo ( talk) 23:38, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Art Center College of Design people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Burgess ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
You left a Talk comment about the article for Nextdoor. I've written a an in-depth proposal describing my complete redraft of the article here: /info/en/?search=Talk:Nextdoor#Request_for_Review
Would you mind weighing in to the discussion?
Thanks,
BC1278 ( talk) 21:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278
![]() | ||
![]() the meetup page for Art+Feminism. |
Wikipedia is one of the most wide-reaching repositories of shared knowledge, yet a 2011 survey found that less than 10% of its contributors identify as female, suggesting an alarming absence of voices. What and how information is shared is skewed by this gender disparity. To help change this, the Jacob Lawrence Gallery is organizing a quarterly series of Edit-a-thons to improve Wikipedia's coverage of womxn artists of color.
This Saturday afternoon's gathering will focus on creating, editing, updating, and expanding pages for womxn artists from Latin America and the Caribbean. The Edit-a-thon will feature a talk by Dan Paz, Lecturer in the UW School of Art + Art History + Design, an artist, and an educator who explores the labor of digital imaging production as a collaborative site where the intersections of the image-idea and lived experience are produced and contested. Through videos, photography, and sculptural projects that query the ability of documentary processes to be manipulated—to be multiplied and replicated, stopped and started, rewound and advanced—Dan works within the impossibilities of absolute replication to question the very ability of the image to truly represent. Everyone is welcome. Access to UW WiFi will be provided for non-UW affiliated participants. All you need to bring is your laptop, power cord, and ideas. No previous Wikipedia experience required! Childcare, snacks from local businesses, and editing tutorials will be provided. Please check the Facebook event page for updates. When: Saturday, May 12th, 1-5pm |
![]() Jacob Lawrence Gallery, UW, Seattle |
Thanks for uploading File:1920s Ducati logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal:_topic_ban_for_user_BC1278. Edward Mordake ( talk) 20:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Statue of Lenin, Seattle you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Векочел --
Векочел (
talk)
02:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dennis,
I see you are doing good research and working in good faith on Nextdoor and I appreciate it very much. I didn't want to clutter Talk with an off-topic response to your comment wondering why I didn't ask for it to be removed more quickly. When this proposed redraft of this article became a giant mess, with too many discussions going on at once, I was asked by Jytdog if I'd be OK withdrawing all the discussions and RfCs, save one, so we could talk about them one at a time. This section was not then live, as I had removed something similar sourced just to the Florida Group blog (if I anticipated there would be any chance of controversy over this, which I disclosed as COI in the edit notes and on Talk, I would not have removed it as any chance of dispute means a COI editor should never directly edit.) When it went live, I wanted to abide by the agreement to talk about one source at a time, but after a few days it was really bothering me, so I tried to talk it out with the contributing editor informally, on their Talk page. When that didn't work, I asked Jytdog what I should do in light of the prior agreement to only have one discussion at a time. They said to bring it to Talk, so I did. And that is the answer. Thanks, Ed BC1278 ( talk) 21:48, 10 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
This is bullshit. Just because a paid editor notes policy-violating content is no reason to argue to keep it. If you honestly don't understand how that is ax-grinding WP:SYN content, please review WP:SYN. Please also WP:FOC. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 20:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I don't see how the content I put up is being recognized as spam in the Overlanding section. The link is cited as a reference and not in text. It adds genuine content which not only contributes to the topic but was not repeated elsewhere and the link is to a valid publishing source. The Motorcycle category is full of much more heinous pages and citations that are purely spam, yet they still exists without your "careful eye." Please explain yourself in relation to how my posting actually did not meet WIKIPEDIA guidelines...not just your own biases or irrational suspicions. Moreover, I am aware all links on WikiP are nofollow and still post anyway. There is life for information aside from page rankings. You yourself could be a long time SEO shill? How would anyone know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MotoLoco76 ( talk • contribs) 16:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Hahahah...I see you're a rider. Being new to this I felt like I was being attacked or singled out for something I didn't really understand what was wrong. Your initial message sounded like a threat and it didn't seem justified to me. It may be worth keeping that in mind for new users in how things are phrased. You would hopefully do likewise for new riders, yes? If it really matters to you, maybe use a smiley face or something. Despite this, I still didn't use profanity. "Go fuck yourself" isn't within the civil guidelines either is it? Although you did say "please" so maybe that counts. Already asked for some thoughts from the community and am learning about the unique social structure of Wiki. Looks like if you want to be into it, you really gotta be in to it because it's not an easy or short learning curve. Either way, best of luck and sorry about my knee jerk reaction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MotoLoco76 ( talk • contribs) 19:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Please see the recent merger on the Anti-lock braking system page. Some polishing still needed! Arrivisto ( talk) 16:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Have you seen Norman Hossack? Ai yai yai. ☆ Bri ( talk) 15:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dennis,
I added a link (www.vdcon.nl) to the Wikipedia Moto Guzzi Le Mans article ( /info/en/?search=Moto_Guzzi_Le_Mans). I recieved a message from you on 20 July 2013 about removing the link and the reason why.
www.vdcon.nl is a non commercial website, it's not personal, I'm not affiliatied to it, it isn't meant to attract people or to promote anything.
www.vdcon.nl contains a lot of interesting and usefull (technical) information about the Moto Guzzi 850 Le Mans, which is to my opinion much too extensive for Wikipedia.
So I would ask you to reconsider the decision to remove the link and again add it to the Moto Guzzi Le Mans article.
Regards,
Jan van Dooren Netherlands — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mglm850 ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Draft:John Penton -- could be published with a little polishing and there's plenty of material in his Motorcycle Hall of Fame notes if nothing else. ☆ Bri ( talk) 17:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the Welcome! As you can see, I am here to stay. The article cited is written by Ijeoma Oluo herself and therefore conforms to the rules.
Svengalista Svengalista ( talk) 22:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop putting incorrect and uncited information on the biography of living or dead people as you just did on the Ijeoma Oluo article. Thanks
Svengalista Svengalista ( talk) 22:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
The article
Statue of Lenin, Seattle you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Statue of Lenin, Seattle for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
00:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Good Article Barnstar | |
I award you this barnstar for your fantastic work at Statue of Lenin, Seattle. Congratulations for getting this to GA status. MX ( ✉ • ✎) 18:36, 6 August 2018 (UTC) |
The article
Statue of Lenin, Seattle you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Statue of Lenin, Seattle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
MX --
MX (
talk)
18:41, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I agree with Brian that the subversive theory in the statue's content is very interesting, and an excellent hook. I'm also fascinated by it being a privately owned work of art on private property; i.e. 1,000,000% protected by the First Amendment. It's unarguably art, it's definitely not public, and it's never been accused of being obscene. So no government agency has any say. At all. Yet it's discussed in the same context as publicly owned art on public property supported by tax dollars. To me that error is fascinating. Also the belief that it is displayed in jest or irony. Neither the original American buyer, nor his heirs attempting to sell a the statue, ever had ironic motives. But it's widely believed that is why it is there. It's fascinating how so much of this is in the eye of the beholder. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 03:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
I may not be doing this right because unlike you, I've never done this before. Jackhammer111 ( talk) 03:39, 10 August 2018 (UTC) ![]() |
Who's interest are you serving by closing a discussion page? It's particularly inflammatory considering what I wrote about the recent death of the former national record holder, at 11.81, Pistol Pete Grassellli. You warn me about edit warring and tell me to use the talk page, then you close the talk page? Jackhammer111 ( talk) 05:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
|
![]() |
Hi Dennis Bratland,
I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself.
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board.
Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 07:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Re: recent change. Valid. It is in the article. Appreciate your work. Flyte35 ( talk) 01:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
I indeed did add the avengers to the list of outlaw motorcycle clubs.. I am neutral when posting and followed all the guidelines.
thank you. Mopar360 ( talk) 05:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Its not necessary to add citation to every sentence, there is enough referecnes, and if you use so much eenery to tag all those sentences why just use that energy to add those, if you think it needs those ?. No you just force to use double amoiunt of work to that article, much easier to add refs than ask others to add them --> Typ932 T· C 11:27, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Typ932. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Alfa Romeo V6 engine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks. >
Typ932
T·
C
17:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Be more careful with ur postings, you started this personal attackin with ur fuck off comments. Next time Ill made official claim you might be blocked for editing --> Typ932 T· C 19:48, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Now go re-read What is considered to be a personal attack?, even more carefully. Do you see anything there about not telling you to fuck off? Do you see any policy prohibiting profanity anywhere on Wikipedia? Anywhere? Do you know what fuck off means? It means "go away". Is it uncivil to tell you to go away in salty language? Generally, yes. But when dismissing someone who has called you illiterate, an idiot, and a "zero contributor and doing nothing good here", "fuck off" is very much the best way to say it. You earned your "fuck off", bud.
You did all this based on the absolute nonsense opinion that a personal web page, often crowdsourced or simply-self-published, in any way can be cited as a reliable source based solely on the fact that some Dave guy who made the page put in a footnote with the title and author of a book he says he got his information from. You blindly copied Dave's citation without having any idea what the book "Complete Handbook of Automotive Power Trains, Jan Norbye, 1981" says. All of that will be laughed out of Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard in a heartbeat. You probably need to get yourself a copy of Norbye's book and verify you're not making an even bigger fool of yourself. Dishonestly pretending to have read a book that you have never seen is not something you want to be caught doing.
Now, I say again to you: fuck off, Typ932. Fuck off now. It means "go away". If that isn't clear enough for you, it means "stay off my talk page". Don't post here again, at least not until you do something about your obvious misunderstanding of basic policies like WP:V, WP:RS, WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, WP:OWN, and WP:PERSONAL. You'd be welcome to come back to my talk page if you can correct your ignorance, and (just saying) learn some minimal spelling and grammar. Calling people idiots and illiterates while not knowing how to spell "blame" or "can't" or "your" is not a good look.
If you think you've got something to report to some noticeboard, you go right ahead. What you won't do is post here again, because you've been told: fuck OFF. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 20:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Dennis, I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but I'll give this a try. I saw your comment (and then your reversion back to the prior version) of my addition of "left-wing" to describe The Stranger. I believe you objected because there was no sourcing or reference to back up that description. I have a question and a comment. First, how would one find an objective source or reference (besides the publication itself) describing its content as "left-wing"? What would satisfy this requirement? That seems problematic. No one would seriously challenge the assertion that The Stranger is a left-wing publication...but again, I'm looking for guidance on what objective sourcing or reference would be required to make that description acceptable to Wikipedia standards. Second, I checked for consistency on your request, so I looked up Ben Shapiro (as an example) to see how he was described. I see that he was described as a "conservative" and yet there was no reference or sourcing when that adjective was included to describe his political leanings (which is accurate to state he is a conservative). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justthefactsnow ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dennis Bratland,
I believe that you removed changes I made to the Ballard neighborhood description. Your changes indicate that you consider only one source of neighborhood information- e.g. the City of Seattle- as authoritative. But wiki and knowledge in general is not controlled by the city. The purpose of the article is not to repeat what may already be stated by one group- people could simply look at the City of Seattle web pages and documentation to see what that government body "thinks". The purpose is to discuss the totality of considerations on the topic and that does include blogs.
Your changes include incorrect statements, for example implying that Crown Hill is just north of Ballard. This is not true. Even the wiki page for Crown Hill (which is incorrect*) identifies that Crown Hill ends to the west at 15th Ave NW. Since Ballard extends to Puget Sound, your current description leaves a large gap above Ballard (precisely the gap that the blog and my description described as part of Ballard).
Your edit also loses the information about those extra neighborhoods that are part of Ballard. This is an important part of Ballard neighborhood identity. Even the city implies the sub-neighborhood in its description of the council district and Ballard. I just spelled it out as was done in the neighborhood blog.
I note with amusement that your central edit- pointing to the "official" City of Seattle neighborhood map- itself contains a disclaimer " The neighborhood names and boundaries are not intended to represent any "official" City of Seattle neighborhood map." This means that your central description "The City of Seattle's official boundaries" are controverted by the link that you supply. These are not official City of Seattle neighborhood boundaries! In fact, you will be hard pressed to find official neighborhood boundaries which is partly what I was trying to show. All neighborhood boundaries are subjective and while there is some agreement there are also long standing areas of contention.
I note that at least one link of mine that you deleted was also an official City of Seattle map. The purpose of learning about these neighborhoods is not just to know what they are right now but to understand and learn from the past. The map I supplied from 1909 did just that, it provides information to interested people to see what the neighborhoods used to look like. The tone of your edits seems to imply that this is not important but I can tell you that it is exactly that type of information that I look for and I do not believe I am alone in this. For example, looking at the wikipedia article for Greenwich Village, New York for comparison the authors have noted the historical disputes and points of contention. Some points in the article are unsourced, possibly for the same reason that I used the wording "some people"- because it is local knowledge that is not necessarily published and therefore not suitable as a reference. The oversimplification that you reintroduced is not helpful and simply makes the wiki article unreliable. The truth is that the boundaries are messy and contentious.
In short, your post is clearly incorrect even taken at its current logic and arbitrarily leaves out alternate points of view that were cited.. You mention that a blog is unreliable. But you have provided no evidence that what I posted does not accurately reflect the totality of ideas about the boundaries of Ballard or that the blog is unreliable. It is an expression of ideas in the community and that is all it needs to be.
You also removed information about the Ballard council boundary- why? That is from the city of Seattle.
You also removed information about the links between the Ballard community and the Fisherman's Terminal. Yet Ballard is known as a fishing community. The purpose of those links was to illustrate some of those ties from the north and south shores of Salmon Bay. You had provided no reason for removing this either.
I ask respectfully that you reinstate my edits. If you would like to talk about alternate wording, please let me know. Thanks
I'm not quite sure how to sign the post so I'll try Rberge0108 ( talk) 05:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Rberge0108 or Rberge0108 ( talk) 05:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Ruth Berge
I would focus on expanding the body, then bring the lead into line later. I would avoid citing weak sources like myballard.com, and using weasel words like "some people say..." If we don't know the name of whomever thinks this or that, then their opinion probably isn't significant enough to mention.
Talk:Ballard, Seattle is the best place for further discussion, since there are many other editors besides us two who are interested in this article. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 06:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for weighing in at Talk:USS Fitzgerald and MV ACX Crystal collision. I had just written up much the same argument, and you did it better (and faster). But I did have one thought, about "Accusing any of us of having a conflict of interest..." If you're talking about Lyndaship's citation of "...not the place to memorialize deceased friends...", I for one certainly didn't take that as an accusation because it ends "...or others who do not meet such requirements." Maybe there's something else going on here that I'm not seeing, but I read their edits as in good faith and without accusation of bad behavior on my part. So perhaps that line is not necessary? But I do appreciate everything else you did in this exchange. Cheers. PRRfan ( talk) 04:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
I find it rather amusing that you template me for edit-warring, when I made one revert, while you've made three. You might consider following your own advice, friend. Parsecboy ( talk) 20:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating the Washington ferry map. Is it missing the two Everett ferries? And the Kitsap Transit Seattle Pier 50—Bremerton fast ferry? ☆ Bri ( talk) 22:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
I think the article is clear enough when it says "there are many ferries all over Washington, and here are some examples". We probably won't always have an accurate accounting of every ferry run that comes and goes. -- Dennis Bratland ( talk) 00:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Please do not post off-topic trolling, as you did here. If you continue to make WP:POINTy disruptions, we'll be headed to ANI. It would also be wise to avoid any appearance of WP:WIKIHOUNDing other editors. Remove this warning if you want, but consider yourself warned nonetheless. Parsecboy ( talk) 17:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Dennis, since you were involved with this category change discussion I wanted to see if you had a suggestion for the next actions now that it has closed.[ [1]]. The discussion closed with no consensus. I feel that is sufficient to challenge the closing from less than a month earlier. I simply don't know the correct forum so I'm seeking advice. If this question violates your previous request to not post on your talk page please undo my edit and I will not post here again. Thank you. Springee ( talk) 01:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dennis Bratland. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Dennis Bratland. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
If you are in the Seattle area, please join us for our
Cascadia Wikimedians annual meeting, Saturday, December 29, 1 PM. If you cannot attend in person, you may join us virtually from your PC, Mac, Linux, iOS, or Android at this link:
https://zoom.us/j/2207426850. The address of the physical meeting is: Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102)
47°37′23″N 122°19′22″W / 47.622928°N 122.322912°W
The event page is here. You do not have to be a member to attend, but only members can vote in board elections. New members may join in person by completing the membership registration form onsite or (to be posted) online and paying $5 for a calendar year / $0.50 per month for the remainder of a year. Current members may renew for 2019 at the meeting as well. Cascadia Wikimedians User Group is a recognized 501c3 non-profit organization in the US. EIN # 47-3513818 Our mail address is Cascadia Wikimedians User Group, 520 Kirkland Way, PO Box 2905, Kirkland, WA 98083. |
I'd like to invite editors who participated in the deletion discussion to give their input at article talk. There was considerable interest in cleaning up this article in one way or another, but there have been few responses to my proposal to trim the passenger lists. Alternative proposals are certainly welcome as well; I'm hoping that we can build some sort of consensus for the scope and direction of the article moving forward. Thanks – dlthewave ☎ 21:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)