Thanks for your contributions to Martha O'Kennon. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and only source is not independent and biographies of living people have high requirements. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 06:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martha O'Kennon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha O'Kennon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— David Eppstein ( talk) 00:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Please note that removing the banner will do nothing to stop the discussion; it will merely make it more difficult for interested editors to find out that a discussion is ongoing. — David Eppstein ( talk) 04:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Good day! Welcome to Wikipedia! As it appears that your edits are focused on Albion College, please take a moment to review the essay on Single-Purpose Accounts. So long as editors conduct themselves appropriately (e.g., by maintaining a neutral point of view and avoiding advocacy) focusing on a single topic is not necessarily discouraged. However, it is also important that editors declare any conflict of interest and avoid contributing to articles on subjects or topics with which they maintain close relations. Thanks! nf utvol ( talk) 15:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Will Carl Rufus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Carl Rufus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

nf utvol ( talk) 15:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:CHP Observatory (Honors) 050.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 19:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Prentiss M. Brown Honors Center & Astronomical Observatory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable building at a small liberal arts college.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:09, 29 July 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prentiss M. Brown Honors Center & Astronomical Observatory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prentiss M. Brown Honors Center & Astronomical Observatory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts ( talk/ contributions) 20:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC) reply