If an admin doesn't choose which edits to rollback, will a message say "There seems to be a problem with your login session."? - LuigiGamer64 ( talk) 04:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Why did you block my IP address? I never even contribute on Wikipedia with it yet! I never did! Unblock it! - LuigiGamer64 ( talk) 02:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
He blocked 65,000+ IPs (and who knows how many people this corresponds to) from anonymous editing or account creation for a year. Yes, my IP was included in this as well. On the blocked IP page he didn't give a reason. David, in the future please use less of a shotgun approach. This block at least includes AT&T's residential fiber service.
- Jynx-Me ( talk) 16:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
But I never edited this wiki with my IP address a long time ago! My IP's block expires on November. That's a long time! it's his FAULT For blocking it! He should unblock it! The reason for my IP's block is just a template-- LuigiGamer64 ( talk) 22:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
I've looked through search results for "functionaries list" and the arbitration committee and am more confused than when I started. So two questions: 1) Can you explain (or link to something explaining) the process for appealing this? 2) Is this actually going to expire in Nov or will something autorenew it? This isn't the first time I've had this IP blocked and for minor corrections I'm not always that diligent about signing in. BTW AT&T uVerse (residential FTTN) IPs are effectively static, so the "restart your router" fix doesn't work; I'm not sure if this whole class B is owned by them but if it is then more selective blocks will definitely be more effective for whomever you were originally trying to block. Nate ( talk) 21:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I was wondering if you could chime in on the recent edits by an unregistered user. I have no problems with he or she adding new information, but no sources were added to support the minor edits. I discussed why I reverted the edits here Talk:Emilio Estevez. Your input would be appreciated. Thank you. Hope you have a HAPPY NEW YEAR.-- CreativeSoul7981 ( talk) 05:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello David Gerard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as
Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
854 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 00:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I have a link to an image of Kymberly Herrin that you should use for her page instead of nothing. The link is ( http://gfx.filmweb.pl/p/63/68/386368/175305.1.jpg). Please consider using this image of this beautiful women. ThomasMetal75 ( talk) 07:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)ThomasMetal75
David, I'm not entirely sure 100%, but I believe that this was a pic from her Playplay issue in 1981. You can also look up other non-nudes if you'd like to use on her page for the image if you'd like. Thanks ThomasMetal75 ( talk) 05:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)ThomasMetal75
The article Slimelight is at AfD, as this is your scene I thought you might be able to rescue the article. Fences& Windows 02:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated DECwindows ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — KuyaBriBri Talk 15:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:UFOs ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Unidentified flying objects ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:VNC ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Virtual Network Computing ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 00:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Review of indefinite rangeblocks. – xeno talk 17:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ian Olsen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Teapot
george
Talk
07:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
David,
Please would you consider removing your comment speculating about the behaviour of Nobs01 from Talk:Conservapedia? Given the history, I think the whole talk page section is more trouble than it's worth, and it can't possibly help to improve the article! Really, I think the best course of action here is to aggressively strip out all comments about the behaviour of other editors and point people towards WP:DR if they feel that another editor is likely to cause problems. Papa November ( talk) 00:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
As you may know Alan Vega's birthdate is currently listed as 1948. There appears to conflicting evidence - the official book - versus the currently sourced Blast First Press Release. I'm trying to build consensus for a change. Please add comments on Talk :Alan Vega. Thanks. Wwwhatsup ( talk) 06:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
You are receiving this note because of your participation in WT:Revision deletion#Community consultation, which is referred to in Wikipedia:VPR#Proposal to turn on revision deletion immediately (despite some lingering concerns). – xeno talk 14:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.
I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.
Thank you.
Vyeh ( talk) 19:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
This article needs to be nominated at T:TDYK. If you want to do it yourself that is fine. Otherwise I will nominate it. __ meco ( talk) 07:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 15 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Serge Monast, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Talk • 12:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Please be specific in your criticism of the Mind uploading article. Exactly what formulations or sources are transhumanist belief rather than philosophy and science? The article lead includes criticism of the concept. What kind of criticism is missing? If that is not clarified, I think the NPOV template has to be be removed. Mange01 ( talk) 13:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, very much, for your kind words at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia about my work on the article. Much appreciated. Cheers, -- Cirt ( talk) 21:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
06:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Church of the Creator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
SummerPhD (
talk)
15:26, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2004 United States presidential election controversy and irregularities. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Kevin Baas talk 16:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterson's Curse (band) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Student7 ( talk) 22:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
[1] Dougweller ( talk) 13:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
You seem to have had more experience with use of this template for images. Can you please weigh in at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Request_for_picture_template ? Thank you for your time, -- Cirt ( talk) 00:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Could you clarify what "this is an external link that points precisely here" means in your restore here? I can't find evidence that there was anything except a redirect at this location, and the exact spelling (with the parenthetical DAB phrase, but without the closing paren) doesn't seem a likely search term. DMacks ( talk) 21:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I remember your commenting on this in 2005. What's your view today? Uncle G ( talk) 10:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Please see this and particularly this, if you haven't already looked and commented. Would you consider unblocking this fellow on some reasonable conditions so that we can bring this madness to a reasonable conclusion?
As far as I can tell he's been found guilty of disagreeing with other editors at AfD, moving articles while they're at AfD, putting tags somewhere other than where somebody else would have them placed, and all manner of other crimes against somebody's ego. I haven't looked at any actual evidence of disruptive conduct because nobody has presented any. Please take a look if you have time for it. -- TS 21:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
I believe Sharonmil may be a sock of Standardfact (which you blocked), Seldonquin, etc. Have a look and see what you think. Nymf hideliho! 23:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
So we're allowed to write any old blather on your talk page and you won't bannerate us to hellandblack? This is how I prefer to remember you. -- TS 01:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi David, long time no speak. Can you please fix the wording on Julian Assange's wikipedia page to correctly reflect that he was involved with one of Australia's first ISPs, Suburbia, but not that he started it? I don't have the privilege to do so, and it appears that the person who was maintaining the page in the main has gone on a wiki break. See my talk entry on Julian's page about Suburbia for further clarification. cheers, Mark. Mdorset ( talk) 09:08, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
Is Coherent Extrapolated Volition notable enough for a Wikipedia article at all? I'm all in favour of it, but has anyone else written about it? Could it be merged with the article on SIAI, or on Yudkowsky? ciphergoth ( talk) 21:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the Creator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD ( talk) 02:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Serge Monast has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
R3ap3R.inc (
talk)
15:54, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serge Monast until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. R3ap3R.inc ( talk) 06:14, 19 December 2010 (UTC)