Hi, DarkMatterMan4500. I am “NTM”, the user you blocked on “Awesome Games Wiki” and “Crappy Games Wiki”. I just wanted to apologize for the trouble I caused, I didn’t mean to be a troll. I was just so confused on the thought, “How can a game be good AND bad at the same time?” I understand why I got blocked, and when you decide to unblock me, I promise to never make that mistake ever again.
Nate86824650 (
talk)
23:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Re: edits on Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore
Hello, this is regarding the edits made to the November 2020 section; I was actually merging the references into one cell for the cases between 21 Nov and 30 Nov, similar to how the refs for the cases for 1
-10 Nov and 11-20 Nov are grouped. I apologize if it came off as malicious removal of content.
HzgiUU149377 (
talk)
03:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm reaching out in response to your comment that my edits on Van Jones' page constitute vandalism. I'm distressed and confused by this accusation--the first section of Jones' page read before I edited it (and reads now) that he "led the fight" to pass a certain initiative. Language like this belongs in rousing campaign speeches and interviews about personal accomplishments. It hardly belongs on an individual's Wikipedia page meant to impartially describe the material facts of their life and record, especially in the case of a visible media figure like Jones.
I changed that language to read that Jones worked with the Trump administration and members of Congress of both parties to pass the
First Step Act, a widely accepted truth which has been reported out extensively and acknowledged publicly by Jones himself, in a CNN article I linked.
Oh, I apologize for that. You see, as I have explained to at least a couple of users, I have been very vigilant about vandalism these days.
No problems. Fighting vandalism is usually a good thing until you get to the point of being too tired to read the actual text on a tiny screen and start making mistakes. When you reach that point again, you need to take a break away from your screen so can at lease regain your sanity. Keep up the good work (when you are not tired). --
68.50.32.85 (
talk)
03:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, I used to use my Zangoose&SeviperMan4055 account, but of course, since I have 2 accounts on Wikipedia, I had to choose which account I should use, so I decided to go with this account instead. My old account won't really be used anymore.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
10:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I feel like an absolute fool to do something stupid like making a complete mistake, so can anyone please tell me what I should do to resolve this issue and to prevent something like this from happening again in the future? Any good advice will do.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
22:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)reply
You know what?
From now on, I'll take a look at edits before reverting them, as what that user has pointed out to me, I had a habit of carelessly reverting edits without even looking. I'll keep an eye out for more editing vandalism from here on out. That IP editor really had a good point of my carelessness, and not to mention he was right, and I was WRONG when I did all of that.
SPI alerts
Hi DarkMatterMan4500, what is the reasoning behind your notification of various accounts of open SPI investigations? It seems you've notified five accounts in the past month.
CMD (
talk)
16:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Well, there was a couple that were argued, one confirmed, and one for any defense that they may have. As for the reason you are asking, I had suspected some were sockpuppets. There was 1 that I got right, and it was the one on I alive, so there you have it. That's my answer.
I'm not asking about investigations you opened, I'm asking about your decision to talk page notify suspected sockpuppets from other investigations, eg.
[1].
CMD (
talk)
16:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The example I linked to was not an Ineedtostopforgetting sock. So far as I can tell, the previous four users you notified of SPI investigations have all been blocked as socks.
CMD (
talk)
01:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)reply
(
talk page stalker) Way back when I first took part in sockpuppet investigations, probably about eleven or twelve years ago, I used to provide accused sockpuppets with information about the investigations, in the belief that doing so was only fair, to give them a chance to defend themselves. However, I found out the hard way that more often the effect was to alert them to what gave their sockpuppetry away, so that they could be better at hiding their future sockpuppets. Unfortunately, I eventually came to the conclusion that in most cases it is better not to inform them. I suggest that it is normally best to leave it up to the editors making reports to decide whether to notify or not, and if in a particular case you strongly think the editor making a report has made a mistake in choosing not to do so, it's usually better to raise the matter with them, rather than taking the matter out of their hands by unilaterallly overturning that decision.
JBW (
talk)
21:59, 14 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Hi, you recently reverted my edit on
1991 NFL season and I was wondering on the grounds under which you considered it not to be constructive? As I said in the edit summary, the purpose of the edit was to remove the unnecessary prefix 'Template:' from a template and to fix a missing end italic.
MulberryTwine (
talk)
13:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)reply
If you want me to, I can semi-protect this page for a while, to stop silliness. I don't like protecting user talk pages, as it can cause inconvenience for legitimate editors, but sometimes it is the best option. A number of times I have protected my own talk page because of trolling and vandalism, and when I have done so I have made available a second talk page for editors who are prevented from editing my main talk page. There is nothing to stop the trolls and vandals from editing the second talk page, but I have found over the years that for some reason they almost never do. Maybe the fun in trolling isn't there if they think what they do won't be seen by many people. Anyway, if you would like me to protect the page then please let me know.
JBW (
talk)
21:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)reply
I have just seen your answer to my message. That was lucky, as I might never have seen it. If you post a message for a particular editor on a talk page, you should ping that editor. Perhaps you know how to do that, but in case you don't, here is one way to do it. (There are others.) Obviously, if you already know how, then ignore this. When you post to a talk page and want a particular editor to see your post, include in your post {{Ping|JBW}} (or, of course, whatever other editor you are aiming at). In the same post make sure you also sign with ~~~~. (It will not work if you use {{Ping|...}} in one post and then add ~~~~ in another one.) The editor will then be automatically notified of your message, unless they have disabled notifications, which as far as I know very few editors do.
I have semi-protected this page for a week, which is about the longest I am willing to protect a user talk page for without there being a backup page so that new or unregistered editors can post to you, and even then I'm not totally happy about doing it. If you want the protection to be for longer, I'll happily do it provided you first create such a backup talk page, with a message on this page directing non-autoconfirmed editors to that page.
JBW (
talk)
21:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)reply
It'd be a good idea to leave SRG alone and not involve yourself with LTAs further. Let others handle reporting and blocking them. --
ferret (
talk)
21:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Ferret You think? I see them pop up targeting me, and what would you expect me to do if I can't bother with SRG? It's repetitive, and thus, I'm much better at reporting on a different MediaWiki project than here, as I have more experience there.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
21:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Suit yourself. At this point you have several sysops monitoring your talk page and ensuring appropriate measures are taken, though. --
ferret (
talk)
21:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I saw that you reverted my edit where I removed South African politician Sediane Danny Montsitsi off the COVID-19 death list. I did so because his article was deleted. As part of the rules, one must have an article in order to be included.
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giubbotto non ortodosso
good evening. I saw that you had something to talk to me about on "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giubbotto non ortodosso". I do edit on urban and reggae articles like Drake's, Chris Brown's, Omarion's, Buju's. Whats's the deal about my edits?--
Morce Library (
talk)
14:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Meh, if it's wrong, then I'll let you continue what you're doing. On a side note, other socks of Giubbotto non ortodosso have edited pages relating to Chris Brown and his albums, so that's what got me suspicious.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
14:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't understand what did I do wrong, and what should I do, I'm asking you if you can give me a wider picture of what's going on. I've never been in this situation--
Morce Library (
talk)
14:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I believe you are the same person as
User:Dmehus. If that is correct, you evaded your 3 month block - almost immediately after it was imposed - in March 2020. It would also mean you are currently evading scrutiny and evading sanctions, because the Dmehus account is under active sanctions, including avoiding all WP space edits. Normally I would grudgingly consider socking that long ago to be water under the bridge, but I have concerns about your current editing, and they relate to your edits in WP space. By leaving the message you left at
User talk:Dmehus recently, you are also currently actively pretending to be two different people. Before I open an SPI, I'd like to give you an opportunity to admit to this if I am right. Please think carefully before answering; I suspect, based on the unwise posting to your old user talk page, that you have edited in a way that will be obvious to a checkuser. --
Floquenbeam (
talk)
15:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Floquenbeam Uhhh, what are you even talking about? The only accounts I own are
Zangoose&SeviperMan4055 and
Just some test account that needs to be locked anyway (which by the way, was a test account that I asked for it to be locked, and nothing else). I only asked Doug where he's been, and for the record, if I was socking, I wouldn't be making
good-faith edits. I don't know why you are even trying to file a frivolous report against me without looking at my IP. My IP (which is what I'm using right now), is registered to Gloucester, Massachusetts, while he lives in British Columbia.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
15:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I've interacted with him on a different project (Miraheze), and I am telling you I am not even related to him. Let me ask you this: Why are you even bothering trying to file a baseless accusation, and where's the proof I was pretending to be 2 different people?
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
15:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
And besides that, you shouldn't even be
casting aspersions. Oh, and about March 2020, I was only editing articles relating to Zoe Quinn and THQ, and I didn't even know who he was at the time until around July 2020 on another MediaWiki project, which is something I have said before. And why does it matter if I edit WP spaces anyways?
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
16:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I said if you're actually the same person, then posting on the other account's talk page would be pretending to be two people. The reason I'm going to file this because, if you are the same person, your current disruption in WP space (in violation of the other account's sanction) will be handled differently than if you're different people (in which case it is a less critical problem). If I have to file an SPI, and it determines you are the same person, then my guess is both accounts will be indef blocked. If it determines you're likely two different people, I'll apologize for the distraction. You know, the way you apologized above for the distraction. No further response needed, I guess I'll get started on filing the SPI. --
Floquenbeam (
talk)
16:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Floquenbeam I wouldn't mind being checked, given that you are making an absurd claim, which got me laughing. I've been falsely accused before, but I have never seen such a ridiculous accusation as this. And besides that, Doug hasn't been around for nearly 3 weeks.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
16:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
To be fair to me, I don't think there was any lack of care in gathering evidence. I don't see any on-wiki evidence that goes against my suspicion; it was off-wiki evidence that disproved it. I never look at off-wiki evidence. --
Floquenbeam (
talk)
20:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Hi DarkMatterMan4500, I hate to do this because the
post just above is so recent, but you need to be putting much more care into your countervandalism efforts. Two of your most recent four contributions have been incorrect reverts:
restoring genres that shouldn't be there, and
restoring an incorrect release year for a song. I didn't spot-check any further because 50% of a random sample is far too high. This is a final warning for all of your countervandalism efforts: not just RCP, but also SPI and anything else related to responding to vandalism or disruption. Please try editing in other areas instead for a while. If you continue making these mistakes, myself or another user will file a request for a topic ban from countervandalism or take some other administrative measure. Thank you.
Enterprisey (
talk!)
23:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Noting, for talk page watchers, onlookers, and future readers, that a large amount of discussion preceded and followed this pair of messages on Discord (mostly in the #meta channel), involving myself, DMM4500, and other admins.
Enterprisey (
talk!)
23:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I changed my mind about leaving Wikipedia for a while now. I'll focus on editing other places, and what have you. All this time, I've been avoiding and/or ignoring acknowledgment or warnings, and such.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
00:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for uploading File:Kirby-and-the-Forgotten-Land.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails
WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Noting the Nintendo website is a
primary source
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
User:DarkMatterMan4500/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
User:DarkMatterMan4500/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, DarkMatterMan4500!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Dan arndt (
talk)
06:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Afternoon, might want to be careful about the above. If you could post something to point to the reason
deny applies here you should be home and dry. But for now I cant see it (but I might not be looking in the right place).
Amortias (
T)(
C)
14:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)reply
There's an obnoxious use of caps and exclamation points, but saying "you guys only use stupid templates" is in no way a personal attack. It's speaking to an action (i.e. the use of templates they consider stupid) which is commenting on the edits, not the editor.--
Jezebel's Ponyobons mots17:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, I noticed that you have been trying to act as a clerk at SPI without being one, particularly requesting global locks for CUs who are perfectly capable of doing it themselves and archiving cases. Since you've already been told at SRG by
Tks4Fish not to mess around in the back end of that project, I'm just going to go straight to telling you this: if you want to be involved in SPI, apply to be a clerk at the SPI clerk notice board. If a CU has time to train you, they will take you on. Until then, please do not take any actions that would normally be done by clerks or CUs.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
02:35, 31 December 2021 (UTC)reply
And about that warning Tks4Fish gave me, that was over me clerking global lock notices (which I've stopped doing so, after that final warning, which pretty much intimidated me at the time) and asking private questions, something that I have stopped doing as well. I would only file global lock requests for sockpuppets that have either been confirmed by a CheckUser or file lock requests on very obvious sockpuppet accounts that have been apparently created to troll someone. I've even made numerous requests against a particular user who kept creating sock accounts to target me and saying a bunch of nonsense like "You have been condemned to die!", and "What is my favorite movie?". Over the past 2 months, I was being tormented by that user, which I have identified as Abigblueworld, known for causing trouble on another MediaWiki project, calling me Darky for some strange reason, and sending me creepy messages with no end in site. --
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
02:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Your recent edits
Of your last four reverts:
This unexplained revert appears to have re-introduced factual errors. I've reverted it.
This reverts a three-year-old removal of a warning, which there's really no good reason to do, and arguably goes against
WP:DENY.
This edit, while as a matter of policy valid under
WP:BANREVERT, did nonetheless re-introduce a factual error, and on that basis was reverted by
User:Sro23.
Please consider this a warning for inappropriate use of Twinkle rollback and for factual errors.
Furthermore, you've made two edits
[20][21] dancing close to the line of actions that would normally be done by clerks or CUs (per
TonyBallioni). Maybe not quite across that line, but I would not want to be taking chances in that regard if I were you.
And I don't want to come down too hard here, but I can't help but notice that, of the edits you made yesterday (UTC), you've also
asked an admin to correct a trivial typo in a block summary of a user with 8 edits, and
c-blanked the word "hello". The first edit serves to waste admin resources, and the second, like your third revert, is not particularly harmful but there's also no reason to make it.
That means that of the 11 edits you made outside your userspace on 1 January (UTC), 9 were either unnecessary or detrimental to the encyclopedia. Please be much more careful. Thank you. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they)01:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I'm going to be a little more direct: Stop worrying about LTAs and sockpuppets, period. Just walk away from that entire space, both here and on Meta. --
ferret (
talk)
02:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
It'd be great to see you focus on them. We've had several discussions, and your talk page archive is full of similar here and on Meta. You need to really understand that at some point, you'll end up blocked if you continue to disrupt these spaces. --
ferret (
talk)
02:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Oh, so you've finally noticed the archive I've set up, eh? Well, the issue was, I couldn't find a bot to automatically archive the sections I've added here. And let's be honest, I think I've been out of touch with what the true core of what this project is supposed to be.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
02:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I haven't finally noticed anything. There's a big archive box. I've watched your talk page for months, it's not like I'm unaware of the constant warnings and requests that you leave these areas alone, and the subsequent archiving of such. --
ferret (
talk)
03:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Can one of you guys block my
Honeyheliosk account? It was an account I made in 2014, even though I abandoned it, and I just don't want to use it for evasion if I ever get blocked? The user page can be confirmed just for recordkeeping. I could bring it here to confirm it to you guys, if you want.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
03:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict × 2) I'm likewise glad to hear you'll be switching focus. A note in that regard, if I may: I think there's often this assumption that "Focus on content" means "Go write an article". And if that's what works for you, great! But if it doesn't, we have a huge number of mainspace maintenance backlogs, some of which may appeal to similar things that anti-abuse work does for you. Personally, I enjoy working on
CAT:CN, which has that same sort of concept of "Find something that might be bad, figure out if it is, do something about it." But there's many more, compiled at
WP:BACKLOG. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they)03:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
And here's my alt account that I've created in 2014. As you can see, my edits are pretty much overlapped with one another. Besides, a CheckUser result at this time between this account, and my current one will match anyways. I'd like my Honeyheliosk account (which is the one I'm using right now) to be blocked indefinitely, so I don't use it to evade if I'm ever blocked. --DarkMatterMan4500 (--
Honeyheliosk (
talk)
03:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC))reply
Tamzin I'll leave the SPIs aside, as I am currently working on the Kirby & The Forgotten Land article on this very wiki. And there's also another article that I'm creating on a different MediaWiki site, called Miraheze, which the article is on Craigslist, which I might create on a wiki called Rotten Websites Wiki.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
03:48, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
You've received numerous warnings to stay away from SPI clerking areas. Despite this, you've continued, creating an invalid category that a clerk had to request be deleted. --
ferret (
talk)
15:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Ferret Hi there, I'm going to say something about my block. I don't particularly mind being blocked for 2 weeks. Seeing as Tamzin and you were concerned about me continuing this, despite me pledging not to do any pseudo-clerking on SPIs. I could take the 2 week block (given that I did go on a hiatus from editing from January 4th, 2022 to the 19th), I just couldn't help but notice that. I was going to respond to Tamzin's thread, but before I knew it, I was blocked. After that particular edit I made on that SPI category, I just moved on from it. But I'm going to say, I knew this was going to happen, and I apologize for all the mayhem I may have caused for you SPI clerks. (Although, I don't think anyone will believe this, but we'll see).
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
15:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
In reference to the recently removed message by an IP, which you removed with this edit summary: Sorry, but please let an admin tell me that.
It's not admin's role to tell you about guidelines and unconstructive editing. Anyone can, and should, help explain guidelines to editors. That an IP said it rather than an admin makes it no less relevant or true. The IP's message was 100% correct.
I'm sorry, but you're entirely mistaken, I don't think I've ever interacted with you before. I saw someone deleting redlinks from articles quoting a commonly held mistaken belief (that red links are broken and need to be removed) and tried to politely explain policy to you and point out what you were doing wrong.
192.76.8.77 (
talk)
18:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I just have a few comments regarding
this message you left on my talk page. First of all this is a collaborative project:
WP:Communication is required. You can't just decide that you're going to ignore all messages if they're not left by an admin. Secondly, one of our key policies for interaction with other editors is
WP:Assume good faith, I assumed good faith about your edits and tried to politely explain policy to you, I ask that you extend the same courtesy to me. I have no idea why you decided to revert my message and speculate that I "might" be an LTA, but you should avoid making such comments unless you can back them up, or they are likely to be taken as a
WP:Personal attack, (I am not an LTA by the way, I'm just a very long term IP editor). Finally, all the information I gave you was in the policy I linked, if you wanted to check that the guidance I was giving was correct it was all available to you there.
Yeah, but lately, I've been finding myself getting attacked left and right here on Wikipedia. While I DO assume good-faith that you haven't really attacked me, I just didn't want to cause confusion. My apologies for the note I left you, dangling down the wire like that.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
18:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I do understand your frustration after all the harassment you've been getting, DMM. But try not to get a
"jaundiced view". This is a good example of the pitfalls of such assumptions: 192.76 probably knows more about editing Wikipedia than a decent percentage of admins. They are correct in this matter (both as to redlinks and as to communication), as they are in most. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they)11:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the apology you left on my talk page. You don't need to get worried and defensive if someone points out that your editing is contrary to policy or the manual of style, you aren't going to get blocked for that kind of stuff as long as you listen and change what you're doing when people point out mistakes.
192.76.8.77 (
talk)
19:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Please avoid edits like
this. Section headers can be in either format and a bit similar to DATERET and ENGVAR, you should not go around changing section headers that are already consistent. I'd have to dig for it but I think the "non-spaced" version is actually preferred in a guideline somewhere. --
ferret (
talk)
14:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The title Bowser's Fury didn't really make a lot of sense to me, so I did the page move to Super Mario 3D World: + Bowser's Fury to accurately reflect on the actual game title. You may revert the change if you'd like.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
DarkMatterMan4500: What exactly is it that you'd like to work on at Wikipedia? It's becoming concerning that you made so many mildly unnecessary and ever so slightly disruptive edits only to revert them. Perhaps some guidance towards what you'd like to work on would help. --
ferret (
talk)
20:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
That all depends, but it should be within the line of video-game related stuff, but I could figure something out once I come around to it. But for the time being, I'll focus on a different community and come back a bit later.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
21:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)reply
It's been moved back and forth so many times I nearly lost count myself. But the article is now in the main space, as it's going through an AfD discussion, so I reckon the talk page should be also. Cheers, --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
17:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)reply
It's already at AfD. The only people who'd be moving the article or talkpage right now would be experienced users going against AfD norms, and I don't think it needs protection from that. If the AfD ends in redraftification, ping me and I'll give it ECP move protection. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they)19:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks for uploading File:Kirby's Dream Buffet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
Hi... I just learned that I reported you to AIV in error the other day. I hope it didn't cause you any problems. I meant to report a very similarly-named editor (who is now blocked). Sorry! WikipelliTalk20:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)reply
[22][23] Edit summaries are not a place to make
forum-y comments, any more than talkpages are. Yes, there's room for a little flexibility in edit summaries (I know I've stuck stray thoughts into ESes every now and then), and if it had just been the first diff I wouldn't be writing to you, but making a cosmetic edit with an edit summary that comments on a living person's appearance is not okay. Please don't do that again. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she|they|xe)19:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Yeah, sorry about that. I just thought King Charles III looked a bit strange on the cover. As for the first one, yeah, I won't make comments like that again, or stupid shit like that in general.
DarkMatterMan4500 (
talk) (
contribs)
20:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)reply