This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | → | Archive 53 |
This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 2 • February 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse |
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Chemical graph generator at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 23:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Augustynolophus on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Science information on Wikipedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AAAS.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
On 21 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chemical graph generator, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the first generators of chemical graphs (example pictured) was developed in the context of NASA's Mariner program to facilitate the automated identification of chemical compounds in the search for life on Mars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chemical graph generator. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Chemical graph generator), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
This Month in Education
Volume 10 • Issue 3 • March 2021 Contents • Headlines • Subscribe In This Issuse
|
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Malassezia on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Hey Daniel, this might be a little bit too basic to ask you, but I was wondering if you have any insight on this. What happens when I create the wikidata item & then the biography for a scientist? Is there an easy way to update the info about them? For example, I recently created the item for this scientist and doing this search there are a lot of articles that have her as an author, but is there a way I can automatically change/update this data? Thanks. Scann ( talk) 18:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
|
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Ayurveda on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the United States on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
|
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
– Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk)
14:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Archimedes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
|
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, I was talking to Femkemilene today at Wikimania, and she mentioned Wikipedia:IPCC_citation/AR6 - a rather complex report to cite! Do you have any technical advice on how our advanced citation tools can make it easier? Also tagging User:Phoebe, Andy Mabbett, DarTar and Diego de la Hera because I saw your presentation today! -- Slashme ( talk) 20:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)