This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Thank you for uploading Image:Diminazene.png. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags, for a list of copyright tags, that you can use. Thank you. If you created this image, you can use {{PD-self}}. Thanks.
<>Who ?¿? 7 July 2005 10:50 (UTC) Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.
A tag has been placed on Quarkkäulchen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
RT |
Talk
13:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Daniel Mietchen!
I noticed you were a member of WikiProject Education, and thought you might be interested in WikiProject Homeschooling. In this "WikiProject," we have been together working on the collaboration of Homeschooling-related articles. As a member, I really hope you can join, and let me know if you need any help signing up or with anything else. If you have any questions about the project you can ask at the project's talk page. Cheers! RC-0722 communicator/ kills 23:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
|
-- Zeitgespenst ( talk) 15:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
This isn't right, the USA should all be in caps. I've reverted this on the DNA article but you might check any other edits you've made with this bot. All the best Tim Vickers ( talk) 16:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, i oppose the move, pls, see Talk:Transparency_(research)#move_opposed, so we can discuss the matter there. thanks. Mion ( talk) 19:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
There are replies to your question on my talk page.-- ragesoss ( talk) 17:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo_of_the_Open_Access_Scholarly_Publishers_Association_(OASPA).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 02:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom ( talk) 22:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
PS: I noticed you archive SuggestBot's posts to a sub-page, so I added the template there, so the bot will post new suggestions there instead. Hope that's not a problem! DS.
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true
. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false
in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot ( talk) 18:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Skoch3 ( talk) 03:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC):Good to run into you on Wikipedia & thank you for fixing my typo on the glomus tumor photo!
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
(but the reply is from me :) LoriLee ( talk) 18:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Great to meet you and talk a bit about getting better SCIENCE on up on Wikipedia at the GLAM session at Wikimania. for a repository of the work that our courses have done please see User:UMChemProfessor. Look forward for us to be working together! MichChemGSI ( talk) 15:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 ( talk) at 18:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
Great to see that you have ignored all my research on NC licenses, see
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/55771006/ -- 84.62.68.9 ( talk) 22:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Your proposal for Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Open Access is great and I appreciate the work you put into the Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science position. I want to set up the Wikiproject Open Access page. Have you or anyone else done any work preparing a draft for this? I do not want to duplicate work, but am happy to do all the setup.
Also please help me define a scope. I just made this navbox - Template:Open navbox - because I was interested in organizing all articles about the concept of "openness". Can you tell me what you think is the overarching term which describes every kind of open topic? For example, is "open access" the top-level descriptor for all other terms, such as "open science", "open source", "open communication" and the rest?
How would you feel about this Wikiproject being about improving all articles on the topic of "openness", and not just science or journal-related articles? I have a list of such articles here; in your vision, would they all be included in this wikiproject to be formed?
Thank you for your attention and I hope we can work together. After this is set up I think that I can recruit others to join. Blue Rasberry (talk) 06:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
I saw that you put the OAFD on WikiProject Open Access. How will this work? Is there any template that we can use to make this file and its description change automatically every day? If it did that, then I think a lot of people would put such a template on their userpage and look at it every day. Have you heard of such a thing? It seems like you just manually inserted today's picture, right? Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikificator sample search 2009-01-05 1050.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 02:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
On 15 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Research Works Act, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Research Works Act proposed in the U.S. House of Representatives would ban open access mandates for federally funded research? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Research Works Act.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I split the open access file of the day to its own template: {{ Open access file of the day}}. You can edit that page each day to change the image, instead of directly editing the pages which include it, which will make for cleaner edit histories. It'll also make it easier to add the image to other pages, like user pages, if desired. i look forward to working together on this "open" stuff! – Pnm ( talk) 02:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the GLAM tools overview! I really appreciate it.
If you have the ability to request it, I would love for someone to submit a talk about the open access media importer at Wikimania!
Thanks. Sumanah ( talk) 19:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Osteopathic medicine in the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gina Rinehart. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/64979561/ -- 84.62.68.124 ( talk) 15:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Circumcision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Copyright transfer agreement at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Quantum mind. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 00:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Web 2.0. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 01:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
On 2 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Copyright transfer agreement, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that academic publishers often ask authors to sign a copyright transfer agreement before printing their work? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Copyright transfer agreement.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cold fusion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 02:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Why do you keep adding {{ WikiProject Open Access}} to Talk:Paedophryne amauensis? The article has nothing to do with open access. Yes, the species was announced in an open access journal, but that's merely a citation and open access isn't even mentioned in the article. You can't go adding {{ WikiProject Open Access}} to each and every article which cites an open access source. Modest Genius talk 11:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Dear Daniel Mietchen. Could you please confirm this rename request I filed for you on nlwiki? Please use either Mietchen or Daniel Mietchen (both accounts are created overthere), but please give us a sign which one you want to use and which one should be renamed. Oh, and please confirm it locally overthere and not here as a reply. Thanks! Trijnstel talk 12:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Erection. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 03:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder whether you can take a look at my abstract at Wikimania 2012 and if my article is selected, I would like to invite you for my talk (I have no idea about the fate of my paper at present :) )-- C.R.Selvakumar ( talk) 23:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wind power. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Smithsonian Institution Archives Barnstar | ||
I, Sarah, hereby award you, Daniel, with the Smithsonian Institution Archives Barnstar for your excellent contributions during the women in science edit-a-thon! Thank you, and we look forward to your continued contributions regarding the project! Sarah ( talk) 20:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Emma Lucy Braun, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages East Coast and Moonshiner ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:31, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Usage share of web browsers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 04:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings,
I need your help to lead the next Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting! Will you leave a message if you can help? It requires no advanced preparation, just the ability to welcome everyone and move us through the agenda.
The next meeting has been scheduled for Monday, April 23 at 20:00 UTC. See the meeting information page for joining instructions and a time converter. Hope to talk with you on Monday! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) ( talk)
Hey Daniel! So happy that you came by the Smithsonian Institution Archives project and signed up to participate! We've got a great list of subjects that need to be improved upon or written about. I do hope you'll visit the to-do list and dive in - do let me know if you need anything. And of course, your contributions can earn you the official oh so fancy SIA barnstar :) Thanks again! So happy to have you on board! SarahStierch ( talk) 23:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Thermal equilibrium. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
The current science collaboration of the month article is: Science communication Please help improve this article to featured article quality standards.
|
from: Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
|
Hi, I saw that you added a number of stub templates to articles on academic and scientific journals. I didn't check all of them, but at least some of them were rated as "start class" and a stub template is therefore inappropriate. Also, there are many different stubs for journals (see Category:Academic journal stubs; that cat actually also says that articles should not be placed into it directly, but rather into appropriate subcats) and in general it is better to use a more specific template than "journal stub". Just a heads up. Happy editing! -- Guillaume2303 ( talk) 08:44, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Big Bang. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I'd like to talk to you by email, if possible. Please contact me at svenmanguardgmail.com at your earliest convenience. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:John F. Ashton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 06:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The current science collaboration of the month article is: Natural science Please help improve this article to featured article quality standards.
|
— Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
On 2 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Access2Research, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Access2Research is petitioning U.S. President Obama to issue an open-access mandate for publicly funded research? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Access2Research. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Astrology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 07:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for expressing interest in the Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. I'm investigating ways to make the meeting more effective, and I'd love to get feedback from you as to what we could do to improve the meeting. Please weigh in on the discussion there! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) ( talk)
Hi Daniel, how are you?
I believe this paper and its videos could be useful on Wikipedia. For the time being I've just cropped its leading result for display on the main page of the Hebrew Wikipedia. Have a good day, ליאור • Lior ( talk) 09:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
A collaboration with the MSA sounds like a great idea. I can definitely get the project an entry in next week's news sidebar as well as the weeks before and after your talk. We're currently working on a special series of interviews with sports projects which will take up all of July and most of August, so the earliest I can get WikiProject Fungi scheduled for a full-blown interview will be late August to early September. - Mabeenot ( talk) 02:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blekko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 08:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Daniel, in order to finish off the review—I'm assuming you meant to formally approve it—you need to add an approval icon. If it isn't approved, then use one of the other icons to indicate where you think the review is. In order for the software to pick up what the review status is (which it does through the icons), please be sure to put your icon (and explanation) below the red arrow icon I inserted. Many thanks, and good job on the hook rephrasing! BlueMoonset ( talk) 13:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Daniel,
You registered your interest for GLAM-WIKI 2012 a while ago - this is to let you know that registration, and the call for papers, are now open. Hope to see you there! Andrew Gray ( talk) 22:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I have approved your nomination of PeerJ for DYK here. Would you not like to include yourself as joint creator of the article? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 08:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I put the Fred Richards article up for peer review but have gotten no takers so far - I'm hoping maybe you'd be willing to give it assessment as an experienced wikipedian who can help the fledgling WikiProject Biophysics figure out what really counts as GA or above in our field. As a possible inducement, Fred had a history as an influential early advocate of open access for coordinates (and even of data) from protein crystallography. Any help you can manage will be very greatly appreciated! - Dcrjsr ( talk) 23:21, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
On 26 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article PeerJ, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the open-access journal PeerJ runs in the cloud on EC2 and S3? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PeerJ. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shrimp. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 09:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
|