An article you recently created, Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. It also needs copyediting to instil encyclopaedic style —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 12:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PRehse ( talk) 00:02, 2 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 15:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Rosguill ^talk 04:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 18:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC) reply

It is an original source, http://www.zerozero.pt/ keeps record of all competitions and it its an official web site for FUTEBOL, FUTSAL, HÓQUEI EM PATINS, ANDEBOL, BASQUETEBOL, and VOLEIBOL. All the informations on there are official and approved by the respective sport directory. -- Daniel AR Pires ( talk) 18:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grupo Desportivo Águias de Camarate. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia / cheap sh*t room} 06:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC) reply

You did the same thing, and if someone here " started an edit war" was you, if I undoed what you did was because you were only deleting huge parts of an article that clearly you did no research, instead of deleting you should went looking for information. Like I did, I undo your attacks and went source for more sources to improve the article, if there is anyone here violating any sort of rule, it's you because you blindly attacked an article instead of improving it. And your statement of me "generally showing complete ownership over it." it's completely false because I support and encourage others to participate on Wikipedia, I do not delete any other user edit, but what you did was not an improvement of the article but something that can be called vandalism.-- Daniel AR Pires ( talk) 20:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC) reply