Hi DBishop, Good work on the Four article - I saw your edits yesterday and was going to thank you then, but ran out of time. A lot of people had been adding to the controversy section (so its obviously a running issue), but nothing was being referenced (which you've now fixed). I had my attention drawn to the page as a vandalfighter (I'm not in a country where Four exists), as it looked like the PR department of the company who make Four were doing a bit of censorship. Along with Josie, there were two other editors (an ip and the nicely named Phusionmarketingasst) that have made no edits to wikipedia apart from removing critical info from the page. As far as I can see; with your improvements, there needs to be a good argument for the removal of criticism. Its probably worth watching the page to see if the unexplained blanking continues... Thanks for your work on this, cheers Clovis Sangrail ( talk) 22:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
DBishop, absolutely I think images of Woodruff's medal and the current display would be great for both Woodruff's article and the article on Hillman Library. Thank you in advance for uploading them! CrazyPaco ( talk) 22:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)