no edits since 30 March 2014
D6 is a bot operated by User:Docu running pywikipediabot.
Section headers (may) have been added by User:Docu to the talk below. Please use User talk:Docu for discussions not directly related to the bot's operation.
I deeply appreciate your work here, but please read biographical articles before sending your bot to make changes. The article on Robert Boyer (artist) clearly states more than once that he died in 2004. He is not a living person. --- Mumun 21:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I've blocked becuause this bot is running too fast for something without a bot flag. If it needs to go this fast, please request at WP:BRFA for a bot flag. Regards —— Eagle101 Need help? 22:53, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
cool man —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.200.49 ( talk) 09:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Liberty, Gerald Ford's golden retriever, thanks you for elevating her to person status and is delighted that once again no human can find a date when she left for doggie heaven even though she would be 30+ years old! Ruff Ruff :-) Americasroof 21:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
...if only bcz it's reassuring (even if no less embarrassing), now that i've caught onto my mistake, to see that i was far from the only one enthusiastically editing in crap! I don't even regret checking its thoroughness on mine, before seeing that it worked from an alpha list, bcz i suppose that "penance" on my part was a good exercise toward responding, next time, to that nagging uncertainty abt which is the format. Hope you'll keep up the good work.
--
Jerzy•
t
14:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
The bot needs to recognise the 1981 deaths subcat - Category:People who died on the 1981 Irish hunger strike. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 303 17:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
for the disambiguation to the wikilink on my page? Wanna take a crack at the riddle? — BQZip01 — talk 16:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for updating all those links to the GNIS. One thing: {{
gnis}} shows the page name — including disambiguation — unless you add display text: {{gnis|000000}} shows as
U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: D6, while {{gnis|000000|InsertNameHere}} shows as
U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: InsertNameHere.
—wwoods
15:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
{{#switch:{{PAGENAME}} |Marsh Glacier=9458 |Nimod Glacier=10737 |Recovery Glacier=.. etc |else}}
I'm just trawling through the stub templates, trying to get some standardisation, and came across this - would it be difficult to drive it off the stub categories? Just a general query (although it would remove a tiny bit of complexity for me), as I'm thinking about whatlinkshere tags (for other reasons) as well. Rich Farmbrough, 08:57 28 September 2007 (GMT).
I notice that in 2006, this bot made this edit to User:Jonathan Potts's userpage. Does it still do that, or has it been fixed? -- DocumentN ( talk) 01:33, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
If you have a spare moment you could try pointing your bot at List of lakes in England, List of lakes in Wales etc. The thought of doing it manually is daunting ! Velela ( talk) 16:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Did you do the banner on this lake, too? Thanks. 16:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Stan
Hi there. I see this bot created all those "YYYY births" and "YYYY deaths" categories. Is it possible that you set the bot so that it operates on the Macedonian Wikipedia? The templates are working fine, which means everything the bot has to do is create the cat's with the appropriate template and add the interwikis. Please contact me as soon as possible, and thanks in advance! (By the way "Indeed. -- User:Docu" made me laugh out loud, which is pretty rare these days :D) -- iNkubusse ? 03:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
{{{yr}}} births
-> Родени во {{{yr}}}
{{{yr}}} deaths
-> Починати во {{{yr}}}
It's really simple: Born in 1901 and Died in 1901. :D I think it's going pretty well, no side effects, no anomalies. As for how many, I'm not sure if we need the years before 1000 AD... But 1000-2008 are needed for sure. What about the Decade births/deaths and Century births/deaths? Can you create them as well? I'll fix the templates, that's settled. -- iNkubusse ? 19:53, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
{{{yr}}}s births
becomes Родени во {{{yr}}}-тите
{{{yr}}}s deaths
becomes Починати во {{{yr}}}-тите
{{birthdecade|19|7|20th}}
and deathdecade. Only {{deathdecade|19|7|20}}
. I hope it's clear. --
iNkubusse
?
16:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)What is the point of such edit (there were at least a few on my watchlist)? It just replaced capital D with lowercase d. At least it would used the {{ coord}} instead of the depreciated one. Now I think it's just a waste of bandwidth. Renata ( talk) 00:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Stephen Eyre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Terraxos ( talk) 23:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Is there any particular reason this bot insists on changing {{coor dms... to {{coor at dms... in the lake infobox as in Angle Lake? I had just changed that because (in my browser anyway) it causes the coordinates to print right over the horizontal line at the top. Anyway the coordinates are in the infobox so it's superfluous to have them a few lines above. (Maybe when I get my camera fixed and add an image it may be moot). I'll change it back for now and hope it remains. Gr8white ( talk) 00:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Your bot, does not have "bot" in the name per Wikipedia:BOT#Bot_accounts. Please post to my talk page with the name you'd like it to have (suggest just add "Bot" to the end). If you have any questions, please ask me or User:MBisanz. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Dude, your Bot screwed up Cities of the ancient Near East!! Note the extra brackets that appeared at the end of many lines. You might want to take a look before I revert it. And, your bot should have "bot" in the name. Ploversegg ( talk) 15:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)ploversegg
There is nothing wrong with Mursili's eclipse. It's formatted as it should.
The problem with Cities of the ancient Near East is that the name= parameter includes words in square brackets. Apparently {{ coord}} doesn't like that. I will bring it up on Template talk:Coord. In the meantime I will fix Cities of the ancient Near East. -- User:Docu
Hello. I posted a question on the Wikimedia Village Pump and someone suggested that your bot might be able to help. Here is the problem (in Wikimedia, not Wikipedia). Thanks!---- Kenmayer ( talk) 15:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I'm trying to put some order to the category African Americans. Most of the 600+ images need to be reclassified. There are over 100 maps which have been mislabeled by a bot uploader. Is there any way an admin could reclassify these quickly?
The images are locator maps for Georgia, Maryland, Missouri, and North Carolina. Here are links to representative images
It's possible that the bot put these into African Americans because they all have Category:Demographics of the United States. That category and category African Americans have some overlap.
Would it be possible to remove the African American category from files which begin with GAMap, MDMap, MOMap, or NCMa
Unfortunately, only the Missouri and Georgia maps have a category Category:Locator maps of cities in Missouri and Category:Locator maps of cities in Georgia (U.S. state)
I don't relish opening each image, clicking edit, and deleting the African American category.
Can anyone help me, perhaps by pointing me to a tool I can use? Thanks! -- Kenmayer ( talk) 15:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Tore Kannelonning, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Tore Kannelonning is a redirect to a non-existent page (
CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Tore Kannelonning, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
02:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi just a note. If you are creating stubs based on fuller articles from German wikipedia please add a {{Expand German|Article name on German wikipedia}} tag at the top of the page. This means that the article will be flagged for fuller translation later. You may apply this to any article which has fuller contwent on German wikipedia, most of the German municipalities and landmarks probably. Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes for these small lakes most of them are not fuller articles on German wikipedia so perhaps the tags wouldn't be applied. They should however be applied to those articles which have fuller articles on German wikipedia as they are intended as a sort of bridge for information to expand. Keep up the good work with starting these anyhow regardless of tags. Best Dr. Blofeld White cat 19:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I just saw you removed the {{coord missing}} template from FieraMilano where I had earlier added coordinates (not noticing the "missing" tag at all): thank you for that. I had never seen the "missing" template before, and honestly, looking back at the revisions, I could not spot any difference in the "rendered" page with or without that template. Is it some kind of a "stealth" template which just appears in source but doesn't output anything in rendering? -- Andylong ( talk) 23:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok - I give up. What's changed here? Whatever it was, it's removed three bytes, but for the life of me I can't see any difference. This is just for curiosity, but please put me out of my misery ;-) — Tivedshambo ( t/ c) 17:33, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brian Giovannini, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Edcolins ( talk) 19:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
The Geography Barnstar | ||
D6 and Docu, I award you this barnstar for all the geography articles you created today on Mecklenburg-Vorpommern locations! Rosiestep ( talk) 22:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
On the great coordinate-addition work. It makes what I've helped do look piddly, but this is a great bot. Keep it up! Spencer T♦ Nominate! 00:19, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi; I've replaced a few of these so far, drawing on the official latlongs in BCGNIS, which are also the same as those in CGNDB. Don't konw what the sources for those in fr:wiki are but I'd suggest that BC entries in fr:wiki be brought up to officialdom by using BCGNIS as a source there; fr:siki is not a reliable source in and of itself, of course. Fixed Brocklehurst's after your this-morning edit, just saw D'Arcy's which, again, shoudl use a BC-based official source rather than a source in la francophonie or a GoogleMaps location. To use BCGNIS just go to the link on that page and use their search/query; once coords using that source are in place, you can add {{ BCGNIS}} as a ref, but note the syntax in {{BCGNIS|###|name of item in BCGNIS}} as, for example, in Brocklehurst's case, it would display as "Brocklehurst, British Columbia" rather than "Brocklehurst (Community)", which is preferred; the reasons for this will be self-evident as your explore BCGNIS searches a bit as there may be several entries for what seem like the same entry. - Skookum1
Personally, I don't think 2 miles off is that far compared to others in Wikipedia. Obviously a high degree of precision is desirable, but isn't or can't always be attained. We discussed at WT:GEO how to go about the import of coordinates and which precautions to take to avoid errors. This to make sure that Wikipedians at other wikis did mean to code the same location.
BCGNIS isn't necessarily much more precise as their degree of precision seems to be 1' (compare the table at WP:GEO#Precision). Their degree of precision has the advantage that conversion from Albers shouldn't be an issue [4]. Anyways, if you can convince them to upload their gazetteer to wikipedia, this would be great.
The bot wont import coordinates to any place that already has coordinates, once all on [5] or [6] are done it will be over. I doubt frwiki has coordinates for all of those, though. For now, just four sets were of BC. -- User:Docu
Moved to Talk:Corsiaceae
Are these edits automated or are you reviewing them individually? If they are automatic, you need to file a WP:BRFA. – xeno ( talk) 19:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi D6 - I've noticed that this bot (and occasional editors) have been changing "Image:" to "File:" lately. What's this about? It seems to me to be replacing a clear and specific keyword with something less specific, for no obvious benefit. Colonies Chris ( talk) 09:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi D6,
I saw your editing on the Albannach (album) and I was wondering if you could look over these which I created yesterday.
They are just stubs and I'm sure I've made mistakes..any help appreciated. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕))
16:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you removed the "ndashes" I put into the references of the Batavian Republic article at the express request of the reviewer of that article, who made those "ndashes" a prerequisite for GA-status as per MOS:ENDASH. (See Talk:Batavian Republic/GA2) Are you trying to get the GA-status revoked? Please explain?-- Ereunetes ( talk) 23:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on X?á:ytem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Anturiaethwr
Talk
18:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I tried adding coordinates to that article. I don't think it's exact. Can you please make sure? The address is 620 Brock st, Winnipeg. Thanks, Happy138 ( talk) 06:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Docu! Just wanted to let you know that I reverted the addition of the {{ coord missing}} template to the articles on Russian republics ( example) because I incorporated the coordinates support into {{ Infobox Russian federal subject2}} instead. Now, if the coordinates in the infobox are not supplied, the infobox calls {{ coord missing}} automatically. I don't know how you bot detects the pages which do not have the coordinates (if it looks at the presence of the "coords missing" category, it should be fine), but I thought I'd give you a heads up on this so the bot doesn't go back and re-adds the template which is now redundant. Cheers,— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); 14:13, May 8, 2009 (UTC)
Non-existent buildings don't get coordinates. Adding them to places that don't exist causes lots of peripheral problems, e.g. the building will show up as a location on maps throughout the internet. In the case of buildings where construction has begun (even excavation) this is probably fine, but it's problematic when another business still occupies that space, as is the case with the Signature Tower site. Kaldari ( talk) 16:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
This robot's edit to Ibodutant seems to have broken some markup. I've already fixed it. See [8].
Thanks -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 09:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
I see you are removing the coords missing template from pages where I've added coord. Obviously makes sense, and I'd be happy to do it myself, but I'm not see what it looks like. For example, I just added coords to Stephen F. Austin State University but I don't see the template I should remove. Sphilbrick ( talk) 19:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Never mind, I just scrolled up and read I can't see them and they are removed by a bot. Sphilbrick ( talk) 20:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
ISBN reports
Formats for 13-digit ISBN:
Incorrect:
|
I notice that D6 has "corrected" the ISBN numbers for "Jonathan Crowther (2006) A-Z of Crosswords, Collins ISBN 978-0-00-722923-9, ISBN 0-00-722923-2" in the Azed article. Those numbers were exactly as printed in the book - I have it in front of me at this moment. Could you explain the reason for the changes, please?
Regards,
Dinoceras ( talk) 13:39, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder why this article needs coordinates? It is a system with 8 separate campuses, each with its own separate article and presumably coordinates. clariosophic ( talk) 18:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
To add 57°18′22″N 4°27′32″W / 57.30611°N 4.45889°W to the top of an article, use {{ Coord}}, thus:
{{Coord|57|18|22|N|4|27|32|W|display=title}}
These coordinates are in degrees, minutes, and seconds of arc.
"title" means that the coordinates will be displayed next to the article's title at the top of the page (in desktop view only; title coordinates do not display in mobile view) and before any other text or images. It also records the coordinates as the primary location of the page's subject in Wikipedia's geosearch API.
To add 44°06′45″N 87°54′47″W / 44.1124°N 87.9130°W to the top of an article, use either
{{Coord|44.1124|N|87.9130|W|display=title}}
(which does not require minutes or seconds but does require the user to specify north/ south and east/west) or
{{Coord|44.1124|-87.9130|display=title}}
(in which the north and east are presumed by positive values while the south and west are negative ones). These coordinates are in decimal degrees.
Optional coordinate parameters follow the longitude and are separated by
an underscore ("_"):
dim:
N (viewing diameter in metres)region:
R (
ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 or
ISO 3166-2 code)type:
T (landmark
or city(30,000)
, for example)Other optional parameters are separated by
a pipe ("|"):
|display=inline
(the default) to display in the body of the article only,|display=title
to display at the top of the article only (in desktop view only; title coordinates do not display in mobile view), or|display=inline,title
to display in both places.name=
X to label the place on maps (default is
PAGENAME)Thus: {{Coord|44.1172|-87.9135|dim:30_region:US-WI_type:event
|display=inline,title|name=accident site}}
Use |display=title
(or |display=inline,title
) once per article, for the subject of the article, where appropriate.
I have noticed that the bot has been adding the {{ Coord missing}} template to articles but has been placing the existing stub templates in articles before the caregories. According to WP:FOOTERS the stub templates should follow categories with two blank lines between them. Can the bot be changed to give the correct ordering rather than having to go round manually after it moving the stubs back to the correct place. Many thanks. Keith D ( talk) 20:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
G'Day,
Elizabeth Street is named after the WIFE of Governor Lachlan Macquarie, not after Lachlan Maquarie himself.
Your Bot deleted the words - the wife of -.
I have re-inserted them.
Gazza23 ( talk) 10:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Gazza23
Hello - I noticed this edit - would you mind sharing the reason? Thanks. Socrates2008 ( Talk) 11:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
1. The broken changes by User:PigFlu Oink were never fixed or undone.
2. The new bot is still making incorrect changes to disambiguation pages. Disambiguation page headers at top level is not correct. If disambiguation page headers were incorrect at sublevels, the solution would be to change them to bold. See WP:MOSDAB#Longer lists. This formatting change may also be incorrect for lists. This bot should ignore all non-article pages for now.
3. It is not clear that the automation of this formatting change is productive at all, and the balance of previous and continuing problems makes it counter-productive. Aside from incorrect changes, the list of articles affected by this bot is just a list of articles that need {{ cleanup}}, {{ copyvio}}, or {{ prod}}. A formatting tweak is worthless on a dead broken page, and can be detrimental. — Centrx→ talk • 23:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/report: headers
Greetings...The excellent bot D6 keeps changing the headings here List of American artists before 1900; and those of us who constantly edit this article prefer the navigation to remain as it is. Its not broken, please don't fix it...Thank you... Modernist ( talk) 13:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
When your bot edited The Saxon Shore it didn't change anything the picture went from .jpg to .jpg. Just thought you might want to know. SADADS ( talk) 02:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, about this edit. The reason given is WP Check WP #16, but I can't find any documentation on that other than a name. There's something wrong, though, since the effect of the edit seems to have been to remove a Unicode character whose presence was desired (I believe it was a no-width space, put there to prevent wrong display of phonetic symbols in many browsers - this is a commonly used workaround). Can you ensure the bot doesn't remove any more of these?-- Kotniski ( talk) 07:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Please can you stop your bot readding coordinates that have already been removed (as at Golin, Lubusz Voivodeship)? I've spent a lot of time removing such incorrect coordinates, so it seems counterproductive for the bot to keep readding them repeatedly. (Yes, I know in an ideal world I would have removed them from pl.wp as well, plus any other wp's where they might still be hanging around, but one only has a limited amount of time, and there are a lot of these...) Surely the bot could be programmed only to visit a particular article once?-- Kotniski ( talk) 08:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
This edit produced invalid coordinates because it mistook hundredths of a degree (of latitude and longitude) for minutes. If this bot doesn't understand the difference, please shut it down and revert any similar edits. -- Stepheng3 ( talk) 20:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering if you would be interested in this project. Your bot skills would certianly make a fine edition to the team if you could use it to generate list of missing articles from other wikipedias in our new project space. The first stage is to identify what is missing and list it in a directory on here. To do so we need a few bot operators running to read articles on other wikipedias which don't have en: linked and use it to generate pages by category.sub topic for each language. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
I would like to seek your view as to whether we should eliminate from the lists of diplomatic missions by sending/receiving countries all references to representative offices of sending states that do not have formal diplomatic missions with the host states. This would affect a large number of articles which relate to Taiwan, Palestine, Kosovo and other states. Please provide your views here. You have received this notice because you have regularly contributed to either kind of article, or have had dealings with editors concerning the conduct of this dispute. Thank you. Kransky ( talk) 06:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I believe your excellent interwiki coordinates copying bot uses {{ coord missing}} tags as a cue that an article may be geolocatable. I have recently tagged over 10,000 more of these, many of which may be geocodable by your bot: would you be interested in re-running your bot to bring these up to date? -- The Anome ( talk) 13:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Regions of Asia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regions of Asia. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 08:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
List of Australian Open Singles Finals appearances, go comment to keep this from being deleted. 69.137.120.81 ( talk) 22:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Jose Luis Gonzalez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ––
Jezhotwells (
talk)
11:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
I have nominated Jose Luis Gonzalez, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Luis Gonzalez. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –– Jezhotwells ( talk) 16:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
D6, Please see Talk:Sheer Point#Confusion & Talk:Sheep Point#Confusion Peter Horn User talk 22:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
The article The Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
David in DC (
talk)
01:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment. LuciferWildCat ( talk) 05:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of rock formations in the United Kingdom, an article that you have participated in editing, regarding the scope of the list and a proposal. --20:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Lakes/Articles/with Infobox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Lakes/Articles/with Infobox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Lakes/Articles/with Infobox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 05:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Docu, this user bot page is currently categorised under People by status.
I believe this was done to provide a documentary guide to categorisation within Living people, but that category now provides it's own guide.
As the only page within People by status it sits oddly, I recommend you remove this categorisation.
Thanks. -- Andrewaskew ( talk) 03:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayor of Highland Park, New Jersey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayor of Highland Park, New Jersey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 02:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
This edit along with others is not correct because template:Infobox holiday does not contain a scheduling parameter. Please revert the change until it is added to the template. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 04:56, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding the holiday infobox parameter that indicates when the event will be celebrated next year to articles on ancient Roman holidays. These haven't been celebrated for centuries. Though there may be neopagan reconstructionists who attempt to do so, this has nothing to do with the content of the article. Cynwolfe ( talk) 15:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Does this really qualify as a 1-day holiday? It's celebrated on two separate days (after sundown nov 1st, and during the day on nov 2nd). You could argue that it's only a 24-hour period (sundown to sundown), but in practice it's thought of as two days. Tarl.Neustaedter ( talk) 21:29, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Karl Möbius (SS officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
02:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Lac de Gérardmer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
QueerEcofeminist
"cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their]
15:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 13#Lake harriet (hennepin county, minnesota) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Leschnei ( talk) 19:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Moqua well and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Moqua well until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Heanor ( talk) 15:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Drawsko (jezioro) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5#Drawsko (jezioro) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. eviolite (talk) 04:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jonathan Bruun and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Jonathan Bruun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 21:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Template:Infobox body of water/fm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 16:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)