Welcome to Wikipedia, Cut 2 The Point! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 13:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi - I see you posted to me last year - sorry, I am so busy at times I miss posts and then they are archived. In an edit summary you say "The spliced together quotation in the write-up is terribly flawed. You spliced together two thoughts that Godfrey had in two different paragraphs. You didn't check Godfrey's original sourcing, so you accepted his inaccurate account." I'm not sure what spliced together quotation you mean. If it was "On the other hand, there is very little probability that Benedict built his Tower as a mill...the tower mill form, as contrasted to the smock, post and composite forms, was not common in England until the beginning of the 18th century,...." that was added by an IP in 2007. I'm not at all sure who you meant by "you spliced together". Doug Weller talk 13:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
You're new and don't know what is and what isn't acceptable. If something is disputed, we can't state it as fact, and even Williams apology is only his opinion. I think it's quite possible Ohman found it rather than salted it, but there's no hard evidence that will allow Wikipedia to state it as fact. Please don't reply here, use the article's talk page. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:21, 28 February 2018 (UTC)