This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sorry about that previous edit that has already been reverted. Was not constructive in the least, however it was a tad entertaining. Thanks for putting it back and not taking it completely serious.
- Some random Wiki user. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.221.72.252 ( talk) 20:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Stop reverting at such a quick rate! There are other vandal-fighters trying to get their share of edits. I am a violinist ♫ talk to me here! 13:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thats what i got from the game —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.90.165 ( talk) 01:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
i do declare sir that you have not read the wikipedia rules and they state that you may edit what you belive are facts in the article and thats what i did —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.90.165 ( talk) 01:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Is almost definitely a sock of Access Denied ( talk · contribs), a notorious puppetmaster. Watch him get blocked very, very shortly... Giant Snowman 02:09, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
The amendment i made in this page at the end of the section headed 'Independent contractors' to the word 'ensured' was a legitimate correction. You might like to learn some law and common sense to note that "there was no "free-standing duty" to take reasonable steps to ensure an independent contractor was Insured(not Ensured)" before undoing my change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.253.101 ( talk) 00:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I see the article IQ reference chart has been tagged for expert review since October 2012. As part of a process of drafting a revision of that article in my user sandbox, I am contacting all Wikipedians who have edited that article since early 2009 for whom I can find a user talk page.
I have read all the diffs of all the edits committed to the article since the beginning of 2009 (since before I started editing Wikipedia). I see the great majority of edits over that span have been vandalism (often by I.P. editors, presumably teenagers, inserting the names of their classmates in charts of IQ classifications) and reversions of vandalism (sometimes automatically by ClueBot). Just a few editors have referred to and cited published reliable sources on the topic of IQ classification. It is dismaying to see that the number of reliable sources cited in the article has actually declined over the last few years. To help the process of finding reliable sources for articles on psychology and related topics, I have been compiling a source list on intelligence since I became a Wikipedian in 2010, and I invite you to make use of those sources as you revise articles on Wikipedia and to suggest further sources for the source on the talk pages of the source list and its subpages. Because the IQ reference chart article has been tagged as needing expert attention for more than half a year, I have opened discussion on the article's talk page about how to fix the article, and I welcome you to join the discussion. The draft I have in my user sandbox shows my current thinking about a reader-friendly, well sourced way to update and improve the article. I invite your comments and especially your suggestions of reliable sources as the updating process proceeds. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 20:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I changed the andrews osborne academy equestrian section because I attend the school and they have just discontinued the program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farshiddin ( talk • contribs) 09:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
No problem User:85.166.50.147 21:25, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
I was just given a message saying I changed something on an article to something inappropriate -- I've never done anything of the kind and have no idea why it was traced to me? I'm quite worried -- do you think there's any chance someone is accessing my IP address from a remote location? Would appreciate any help you can give me! 24.228.114.7 ( talk) 03:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)