I'm not sure why you duplicated White American but White American People is a redirect now. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

CambridgeBayWeather, this article is not a complete duplicate. There is accurate info on this article that does not reflect the info found in the other article. This is obvious to anyone. I am confident that you understand.

Conley1 ( talk) 17:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to White American, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I didn't remove any template. All I did was modify it to reflect accurate info. This is in response to your non-sensical removal of my article. And I don't understand why you removed it.

Yes, you removed two maintenance templates (pp-semi and a cleanup template) which should never be removed without explanation. You have done this several times under your alternate accounts. You apparently never got the hint after all these warnings; that's such a huge shame. -- LjL ( talk) 17:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

I have explained to you in the past why it was removed. But, because of your stubborness, you refuse to ackowledge the reasons. You continue to do this knowing why this is done, yet you pretend like it's news to you. It looks like you don't understand anymore. What a waste of american trash.

You have repeatedly been warned to stop your vandalism of articles, such as those you made to White American, on Wikipedia when you came here using other IPs. Please stop. You are welcome to contribute real edits to Wikipedia but all vandalism done by you will be reverted and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. You are welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

Again, I did not vandalize, so I don't know what you're talking about. You say I'm welcome to contribute to wiki, yet you delete my info and when I create an article, you completely removed it without any warning or discussion. Why do you do this? Your actions are not taken lightly either. Keep that in mind.

Is that a threat?! I sure hope not. -- LjL ( talk) 17:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

If it were, you're too homo to do anything about it. A wise man long ago told me that it's so easy to be brave online. But in real person, it's a whole other ball game. It must suck being a coward.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a free user account of your own. I also urge you to stop creating forks such as White American Race and White American People

I did create a new account. But when I created a new article, it was somehow deleted and I don't knwo why. And, why do you not want me to create an article of my own? Is it because you feel threatened by the accuracy in the info that you feel that you have to lash out like a little girl by dleting my info? Why don't you be a real man and let others do what they do. In the same manner that you don't want me to interfere with your article, don't interfere with mine. Don't be a hypocrite.

The reason why you shouldn't create that kind of new articles is explained at Wikipedia:Content forking, which I linked. Please read it. The reason why you should not create a new account and use it to bypass a block is, on the other hand, explained at WP:Sock puppetry. -- LjL ( talk) 17:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

The reason why I should create that article has been explained to you already. Get the hint. The reason why I should create a new article is NOT to bypass a block. It is to bypass your ignorance and racist views on your article. You're clearly a racist from your actions; you don't respect other people's views; you post highly inaccurate info; you're an american who doesn't understand other cultures; and finally, you're NOT A REAL MAN.

For your reference, see, among others, User_talk:68.173.95.37, User_talk:68.173.95.177 and User_talk:Tngah for previous warnings.

-- LjL ( talk) 17:19, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tngah for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuh Wuz Dat 17:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm accused of sockpuppetry, but the author isn't. That makes no sense. You know, I've finally come to the realization that wiki is nothing but a bunch of american racists. I swear I will do everything in my power to disrupt your servers.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User_talk:Conley1, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- LjL ( talk) 18:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply

... such as this, are not tolerated. Given the warnings you've had as other accounts about this, and given that you do not appear to understand that we are telling to you stop, I have blocked your account indefinitely. Read this page. It will explain why such attacks are not tolerated. If you can demonstrate that you understand, feel free to place {{ unblock|your reason here}} below. lifebaka ++ 19:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC) reply