![]() | This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
Hello, Communitarian703, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Criticism of United States foreign policy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gabe Iglesia ( talk) 21:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Communitarian703. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 23:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Communitarian703. We
welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.
Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.
Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia ( WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{ requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
MrOllie ( talk) 16:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Hello,
We were wondering if there is a Wikipedia page where it would be appropriate to cite anything from the following two articles: " Are You a Candidate for Donald Trump's Coronavirus Vaccine?" and " The Coronavirus Will Be With Us For Years to Come."
Thanks for any help you can provide! Communitarian703 ( talk) 13:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)