Hi there, I wanted to apologize for my hasty revert on the Twitter page edit this morning--that'll teach me to edit before I've had my first cup of coffee! Very sorry about not reading the edit history more carefully. All best, Innisfree987 ( talk) 23:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne Dupree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Dupree until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sorry. I tried, but nothing turned up more than a passing mention. Let's hope someone else can do better than the job I did at looking, eh? – 🐱? ( talk) (ping me!) 20:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
~~~~
. I'll keep an eye on the page and fix it if you make a mistake. Cheers --
RexxS (
talk)
18:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)@ Bishonen: You're right, should have added User:What cat? and pinged. My mistake. Apologies. Cllgbksr ( talk) 20:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Cllgbksr,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Yashovardhan (
talk)
09:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Yashovardhan ( talk) 12:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)@ Dodger67: Thank you for your help on the article. Cllgbksr ( talk) 17:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Loomer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Loomer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 15:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add spaces after a sentence and before a reference, nor between references. They are supposed to come immediately after the period or previous references for the same statement. (talk page stalker) Crash Under ride 23:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Crash Underride: I will do that. Never hesitate to send me a message if I make those type of mistakes again. I welcome constructive criticism. Thanks for letting me know. Cllgbksr ( talk) 23:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Crash Underride: Haha! That's great! I'm the same way. Look forward to it! Cllgbksr ( talk) 03:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
I saw your comment about writing. I try to be a better writer too.
I started running the grammarly add on, to my browser. It gives advice. Mind you it is great on suggesting changes to spelling, punctuation, and some grammar. It can't help with suggestions that require genuine comprehension. But its free.
Oh, for what its worth, not leaving an opinion in an AFD, because you started the article? I have never seen anyone make that choice. I am fine with you changing your mind on that.
Cheers! Geo Swan ( talk) 11:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Geo Swan: Appreciate the input. The investigative portion of finding online news articles is the easy part for me, writing the article with proper grammar and in a way that flows and easy for the reader to follow - is where I run into problems. I just spent an hour on the Loomer article trying to clean it up. Do you have a link for the "grammarly add on"? I'd like to see how that works. Also as it relates to me not leaving an opinion on my own article when it's in AfD, I assume you're referring to my post below the AfD notice where I said I wouldn't vote? I felt by voting on my own article it could expose me to another user calling my vote out as me possibly being biased as it's creator. So I took the road of the populous deciding and recused myself. Does that make any sense? Cllgbksr ( talk) 14:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent contributions to Laura Loomer. Now, please stop thanking me for every edit. Excessive thanking can be annoying and is occasionally taken the wrong way. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) -- Dr. Fleischman ( talk) 17:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
@ DrFleischman: Roger that on the "thanking". Will no longer thank you or other editors for every edit. Been an editor less than a year, still trying to figure out the proper protocol. Also I like how you restructured the page. It flows better now. Been thinking of adding a photo of Loomer to the article so the reader can put a face to the subject, but Wikimedia commons does not have a photo of her. Any suggestions? Cllgbksr ( talk) 17:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
If you decline to work in good editorial faith, you'll need to discuss your proposed addition on the article talk page; there is no consensus for the wording of your addition, which does not reflect a balanced and NPOV reading of the article source in question. Please open a thread on the article talk page and discuss your proposal. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 15:57, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
I already opened the thread. Cllgbksr ( talk) 16:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Heldman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Heldman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheValeyard ( talk) 22:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I checked the source for Laura Loomer "strolling" into a polling station and could not find any reference to the way she walked, so I changed it back. If you have another source, just add it and revert my change. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 20:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Greetings again, Cllgbksr. I just changed the 'descriptive label' of two sections of Laura Loomer from "stunt" to "incident." "Stunt" strikes me as POV and, possibly, a little weaselly, ie too slanted. I detest Ms. Loomer, but always prefer neutral terminology. Regards Tapered ( talk) 04:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cllgbksr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Mel Bernstein, Cllgbksr!
Wikipedia editor Gaioa just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Not very notable, but indeed notable enough. Many mixed sources about this local madman ensure his right to a Wikipedia article.
To reply, leave a comment on Gaioa's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thankful for cooperation, thankful for Wikipedia, Gaioa ( talk) 20:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wayne Dupree, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SmartSE ( talk) 17:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cligbksr, the in depth coverage does not have to be from NYT or WaPo. Center-right media are also RS such as Fox News or Washington Times. May I suggest that you ask the closing admin to WP:REFUND to your userspace (userfy) and when a source or 2 pop up you'll be ready to move to article space. I noticed you create well-written articles. Perhaps this may be of interest DYK for Newbies. I am watching this page – Lionel( talk) 09:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
I undeleted the previously deleted article and its talk page and moved them into your user space at User:Cllgbksr/Dupree draft 1 and User talk:Cllgbksr/Dupree draft 1, left a note about that at Draft talk:Wayne Dupree#Readiness for mainspace. – Athaenara ✉ 04:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Cllgbksr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Cllgbksr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I am rejecting this submission. If anyone thinks that the subject is notable, they can request that the deleted article be undeleted for comparison, or they can ask for Deletion Review.
Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Hello, Cllgbksr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Cllgbksr/Dupree draft 1.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 02:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wayne Dupree, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Cllgbksr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Wayne Dupree".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot ( talk) 05:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)