This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Is it not better to have some fleet information than none at all? Fleet info is hard to come by. SurferSquall ( talk) 03:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

if the information is really scarce; maybe the topics is not notable in the first place. Hence it fails WP:GNG. Ckfasdf ( talk) 03:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

It doesn’t have to be readily available to be notable. SurferSquall ( talk) 04:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Taken from WP:GNG, A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Ckfasdf ( talk) 04:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Again, that doesn't apply here, whether or not something is covered in news sources does not change whether or not people may want to know it SurferSquall ( talk) 02:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

It IS Wikipedia Policy and I am pretty much sure all other editor in Wikipedia will share the same thought. Please feel free ask other editor for other comments. Ckfasdf ( talk) Ckfasdf ( talk) 03:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Can you please undo the recent 2 edits done in the article Indian Armed Forces. I don't know why the user decided to change the flags in the infobox to logos. I would have reverted that myself but the article is protected. Sorry for the inconvenience but I saw on your user page that you are military enthusiast, so I decided to ask you for help. Thank you in advance. Regards Job Chodh Du ( talk) 12:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)