Hello Chunghaukim,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lalamove for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vinod 06:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Chunghaukim. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Lalamove, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 11:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chunghaukim. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
15:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC) |