This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
When you turned RFC bot back on it removed the listing for Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#Nominating articles with unreliable sources for BLPPROD from both Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies. For some reason the bot is confusing the BLPPROD RFC with an RFC in the village pump that is supposed to be listed as unsorted. Can you look into getting it listed? (I had manually added it when the bot was blocked/disabled, but now it is removing my addition again) Monty 845 14:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Appreciate your message about the copyright issue. This image was copied from Commons and cropped (see file there) The original image showed both sides of the coin, and only one was relevant to illustrate the particular article I used it for. I just copied the permissions template from Commons, so I don't know why that doesn't work. Since you have a command of copyright law, could you take a moment to look at the Commons permission, and either tell me what's wrong or fix it? Thanks. Cynwolfe ( talk) 13:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Why did One bot move the MfD for Book:Food to the heading "January 1, 1970" at the bottom of WP:MFD? ( diff) Dynamic| cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 15:41, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Here, the bot should have warned about the SUL conflict rather than indicating no problems. I previously wrote about this here. Please advise, – xeno talk 15:45, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Please see question here. Thanks. -- Noleander ( talk) 19:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
How can I stop GA bot from making edits like this? Background: TonyTheTiger created the GAR for Antone Davis to make a comment, but declared that he would not be reviewing it. I deleted the subpage to help the bot out, and now the bot keeps saying the Antone Davis article is being reviewed by "???" Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)