![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Chris G.: It is my own photo, so there are no copyright issues. But I don't see how to insert that copyright tag into the file. HELP!
John Barnes (BARNEJ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barnej ( talk • contribs) 16:14, April 30, 2009 (UTC)
As someone who has traveled down this particular road, I'd suggest being quite careful. It took me about ten seconds to definitively prove what some suspected from your logs. Cheers. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 00:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I have copywrite permission for the photograph you have tagged, but i am noob so have no idea how i tag it correctly!! any help would be appreciated. ta. DanDNA ( talk) 10:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
hi chris
i have added an attribution to the file of stan gooch, but it is now not showing up on his wiki page. if you dont mind could you have a quick look and see if i have done it right, and if so reinstate the image. many thanks for your help. DanDNA ( talk) 13:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Chris! Thank you for your messages dated 30 April and 1 May on File:ZeynepKoltukBizimEvinHalleriScreenshot.png. I am about to revise some images I uploaded in the past for which I could not catch up later regarding precisions, mostly due to lack of time. I think I will let this one gently get deleted to replace it with a more up-to-date image, of the character the actress is playing in her new series. I am assuming Template:ScreenshotU, together with the complete relevant information, will be the right one. Regards. Cretanforever
Can you give me a hand with deleting this article i made. it called I Want to Kill You Like They Do In the Movies. I want it to be deleted because it gives no new information that can't already be found at The High End of Low. So could you delete it? I already Blanked it. The Most Angry Pissed off Gaming Nerd 21:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 21:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Just a quick note to say that the archiving by your bot seems bugged just now. Thanks for the hard work. -- Dweller ( talk) 09:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Do you think you've sussed it now? -- Dweller ( talk) 13:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just noticed that this file, File:Khre-com.PNG was deleted because it was unused. I was hoping that it could undeleted because I've just reverted some changes to the article it was used in. I've been a bit busy for the past few weeks and didn't notice the changes to the article until now.
This image is a screen shot of an remake of Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories. The original game is a 2D Game Boy Advance game, while the remake is a 3D PlayStation 2 game. The screen shot illustrates a significant visual change between the two, but it was replaced with File:KingdomHeartsReCoMCover.jpg, an image of the remake's cover art, which does not add much to the reader's understanding in my opinion.
Please let me know if this it can be undeleted, or if I should just upload another version. ( Guyinblack25 talk 22:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC))
![]() |
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | |
For backlogging Category:Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status :) Stifle ( talk) 14:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
Just wondering how Yet Another Redirect Cleanup Bot was doing. I noticed he's done very little since approval, and I was curious whether things were okay with it, or when you expect it to be running at full throttle. (I ask mainly because there are two open requests by other people to do much the same thing, and I want to know whether or not to tell them you have it covered.) All the best, – Quadell ( talk) 14:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Chris, All mine are cc-sa-attrubition required. That's how the thing is tagged. Not sure how you editied the sock talk page. Should redirect to my main acount talk Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock ( talk) 20:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Chris, this is the file in question:
Description |
SNACE Armagnac | ||
---|---|---|---|
Source |
See: Re: Armagnac.jpg in dispute Email from artist releases the image for use on wikipedia. | ||
Date |
May 1, 2009 | ||
Author | |||
Permission ( Reusing this file) |
See below. | ||
Other versions |
|
See: Re: Armagnac.jpg in dispute
Please see the information; I am now removing the PUIC tag from the image. FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 12:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)"
From: richard.ferriere@free.fr Subject: Re: Armagnac 3-view Date: May 4, 2009 2:28:55 AM CDT (CA) To: wzuk1@shaw.ca
Hello,
You are free to use and modify the drawing to illustrate your paper
Regards
Richard FERRIERE
Mail Original -----
De: "Bill Zuk" <wzuk1@shaw.ca> À: "richard ferriere" <richard.ferriere@free.fr> Envoyé: Dimanche 3 Mai 2009 12h27:47 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Armagnac 3-view
Dear Richard
I have just written an article on the Sud-Est (SNCASE) SE-2010 Armagnac and wanted to add a 3-view. I located one of the 3-views on the Wings 2.12 website. Using this drawing as a basis, I made a composite drawing. Is it possible to get your approval to use the original drawing on the website for the composite drawing?
Here are the two: Original:
My composite:
Bill ... in my other life, a meek and mild librarian... Zuk (in the email, both images were attached to show the changes made) FWiW, I am now removing the PUIC tag. Bzuk (talk) 12:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC). FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 11:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC).
Here the deletion is visble. Last changes since 66.91.229.175 deleted by this bot: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=XDarwin&diff=next&oldid=259381169 . Hope it helps, to improve it! Logictheo ( talk) 17:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I know, I am a nuisance. According to the Bot's userpage, it works every 24 hours. It seems it normally operates much more frequently than that - does it mean 24 hours after the "done" or "notdone"? Seems to be a bit sleepy of late, but perhaps that's my perception.
Do you think you could put a couple of lines of info in lay speak on the userpage, so morons like me can easily understand the basics of what it does when? -- Dweller ( talk) 10:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 12:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
I've got a fairly small piece of code that I wrote for a few friends to help them keep up with their watched pages on IRC in realtime, but it kind of has an error on line 195 (if($d[1] == '001')), it's an undefinend offset so I assume it can't get data from the socket. It's got three classes, one for the main loop, one for auxiliary functions, and one for connection. My friend recommended I talk to you since you've scripted some pretty impressive code, and I'd be really thankful if you took a look. If you haven't got the time it's cool. -- Yamakiri 17:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
$this->manager = new manager( $config['net'] , $config['nick'] , $config['port'] , $config['chan'] , $config$
). --
Chris
09:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Please whitelist File:Death.jpg and File:Death (DC Comics).jpg from your bot. These files need to be merged, the image and the text should both be at File:Death (DC Comics).jpg and File:Death.jpg deleted so Commons:File:Death.jpg shows through properly. I reported this to one of the noticeboards awhile back but nothing happened. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 03:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm a little annoyed that I received no notification that File:Moo2BuildMenu400.png was up for deletion. Did you check its "What links here?" Please see Master of Orion II#User_interface -- Philcha ( talk) 13:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned talk page bot recently put several "File talk" pages in the speedy deletion queue, and they were deleted; I noticed you restored one of them. Can you tell me when orphaned file talk pages should or shouldn't be deleted? I haven't done much with file and file talk deletions. (Watchlisting) - Dank ( push to talk) 04:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Why did you indefinitely block Malathion ( talk · contribs) with the summary "Abusing multiple accounts - prevent account creation" ? -- Ryan Delaney talk 10:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar | |
This shiney star is for your bot's great work tagging images without copyright information. It's a great idea, and well executed. Thanks! – Quadell ( talk) 00:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC) |
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Your bot added a no license tag to this image, but there is a license tag present. Can you please check what might have caused this? Stifle ( talk) 14:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Chris. I've gone ahead and approved the Orphaned talkpage deletion bot, but I still encourage a bit of caution at first. It's hard to fully test an adminbot, and inadverant deletions can cause a lot of trouble. Could you only delete a hundred pages or so per day for a while, as a sort of pseudo-test, so we can make sure there are no problems? Thanks, – Quadell ( talk) 18:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
I think that we should probably come up with a better-worded reason for denying MOPLOOI's unblock request [1]. How about "Your reason only supports the block."?— C45207 | Talk 10:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)