An article you recently created,
Drake(Bart Baker song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PATH
SLOPU
06:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, CheatCodes4ever!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
David.moreno72
07:51, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
|
All singles from the EP are aa part of the full-length album also. So please revert all your recent edits. Neel.arunabh ( talk) 15:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Mii Channel Theme requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Mirror Cracked ( talk) 06:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello CheatCodes4ever,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CG5 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 01:49, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
CG5, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
AaronWikia (
talk)
02:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Famous(Mason Ramsey EP), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PATH
SLOPU
14:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Tom Thum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
PATH
SLOPU
04:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 07:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 08:43, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Level 1(Cheat Codes EP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 08:48, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Daniel Budden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Nahal (T) 07:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Excuse me, I am creating a redirect page in case one of my songs is used in something famous, they can use that link to the redirect to iTunes Store! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 02:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn’t know I was being disruptive. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Would my user page be a good redirect if it did get used in something famous? (Don’t worry, I’m not creating one unless it is featured in something famous) CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Cutie(Daniel Budden song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Nahal (T) 08:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello CheatCodes4ever,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Theme Music EP for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 07:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
I am writing this ages after this was added to my talk page. I need to note that it is deleted now, as you know, but some of the things you said are not true. Peppa Pig’s My First Album exists as a page, and you say the artist dosen’t have an article. Fun fact: the artist actually does have an article. The one about the TV show is basically the artist’s article. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 20:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever,
Thank you for creating Theme Music From Peppa Pig.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add references with in-depth coverage about the subject from independent reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability and notablility requirements.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 07:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I've Been Waiting for You (ABBA song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page So Long ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello CheatCodes4ever,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peppa Pig discography for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 09:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selfish(Jessica Mauboy Song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selfish(Jessica Mauboy Song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 19:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Selfish(Jessica Mauboy Song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Lopifalko (
talk)
10:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Comfort Page requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Not intended to be an encyclopedic article
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha ( talk) 09:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Comfort Page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram ( talk) 09:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created,
Comfort Page, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's
guidelines for new pages, so it will be
removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the
sandbox for any tests, and consider using the
Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Your first article. You may also want to read our
introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.
jaclar0529 (
talk)
09:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TenPoundHammer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
What You See Is What You Get (album), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?)
20:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I fixed the refs in Bing Bong Christmas. Please look at the changes I made and use that information to fix the refs in your article Bing Bong Zoo(Peppa Pig song), thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 16:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
The article Bing Bong Christmas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Zero independent notability. Fails WP:NSONGS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
20:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited So Fresh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello CheatCodes4ever,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2016 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
TomCat4680 ( talk) 08:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Genius is a WP:USERG website. We do not cite websites where users can go on the website and add whatever they like with minimal oversight. It's like citing a fake news blog. We don't do it, so stop adding Genius links to all these articles. They will be removed. Thank you. Ss 112 01:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Oh, and your claims of "not doing pages anymore" clearly didn't last very long. You asserted that you're semi-retired but two days after this, you attempted to create So Fresh: The Hits of Spring 2016. Ss 112 01:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
“They can add whatever they like”. And that’s not what Wikipedia is?
I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Don't get discouraged. There is a learning curve but it's not steep. If you have questions or concerns feel free to drop me a line. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 06:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I don’t actually go on talk pages. I don’t know why, I’m just not allowed to for some reason. Here’s the problem, I can’t do links to refs because even though I’ve had another box open for me to see how to do it right, it never works. Please tell me what’s going on. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Also, why do you only make pages of people who are famous? There are some people who know them and they might want to look them up.
But can you just tell me why this won’t work, for example? [1]
Then...
When you are editing a page and looking to add a reference first mark the spot where you plan to add the reference and then go to the top of the editing box. Then click on the word "Cite" towards the right of the top of the editing box. This will expand the toolbar and you will see a drop down box with the word "Template" in it. That's your tool for adding references. Click on the drop down menu and then click on which type of source you are using. Then fill in each field that is applicable. When you are done you can either preview it or just click "insert" and it will put the reference code in the spot you had first marked with your mouse. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 22:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Also by the way, do not tell me that So Fresh isn’t notable. That’s not what I’m asking. I’m saying that I have copied the coding of people doing refs that work, and for some reason, I do the exact same thing and it dosen’t work.
On Spotify, it says that Jacob Sartorius’s Better With You is an album, https://open.spotify.com/album/5B6tCFDLdMHbd1P3p8ApL5?si=wAbuAS-mTD26vi-i72kIoQ, so can you try that? (Also by the way, there is no source for it being an EP, there is a source for it being an album anyway)
Just why do you just create pages of people who are famous? There are some people out there who know them. Oh and by the way, my song “Cutie” has over 1,000 streams on Spotify, and Girl In Red has a page because of her debut single has over 1,000 streams on Spotify, and I can tell because barely any of her songs charted. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Would you accept a page for Bart Baker’s debut album, Celebritease, if it had good references? Just asking.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Be Alright (Dean Lewis song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Responding to your edit summary: We still have to mention it though. According to WP:COVERSONG, no we don't. It clearly states "Only cover versions/renditions important enough to have gained attention in their own right should be added to song articles. Merely appearing in an album track listing, a discography, etc., is not sufficient to show that a cover version is noteworthy. Cover songs with only these types of sources should not be added to song articles, either as prose or in a list." So this particularly cover song does not need to be mentioned until it has met WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 22:55, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Daniel Budden, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — J. M. ( talk) 01:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Super Bass, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Rob
van
vee
12:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that
your user page may not meet Wikipedia's
user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively, you may add
{{
Db-u1}}
to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you.
Schazjmd
(talk)
01:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:CheatCodes4ever, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ad Orientem ( talk) 03:14, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 04:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
I removed all the things that make the page need to be deleted. You cannot delete it anymore!
One question, can I still make an Infobox for myself and my discography? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 04:38, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Want You Back (5 Seconds of Summer song), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
22:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on
Better Place (Rachel Platten song). This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Rob
van
vee
04:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Um, excuse me, I just changed the date which was shown on the album! On the album page for Wildfire, it says the single date is March 25, 2016. On the page, it says April 4. I changed it to a date on the page for Wildfire, which may not have been sourced, but neither was April 4. By the way, I said “album says so” in my edit summary, so don’t revert it! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 19:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I was just changing the date to what it said on the album “Singles” in the Infobox. How is that disruptive? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I just believed the album date was more reliable than the single. The reason is because, I honestly think that album articles are created before the song page sometimes. When somebody creates an article for a Song after that, I’m pretty sure it would be a different person. It’s because they believe something else, and usually, it’s a theory that came after it, and I think the first one is right. CheatCodes4ever Talk To me 4:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Alright, I’ll stop doing it. I won’t do that again CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Love You (Billie Eilish song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello CheatCodes4ever,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Regard (artist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren ( talk) 00:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove
speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with
Regard (artist). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the
talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.—
J. M. (
talk)
06:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
YouTube. —
J. M. (
talk)
05:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry. How do I create pages without having to create a Red link for them and clicking on it to create a page? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 18:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Jessie Paege has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sources do not establish notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Rob
van
vee
05:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Excuse me, the sources do establish notability, she has over 1 million subscribers on YouTube! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 18:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever! I'm
OxonAlex. I have replied to your question about a submission at the
WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. ~~
OxonAlex
- talk
08:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Nevada is notable enough, his song “The Mack” peaked at number 9 on the ARIA!!! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 02:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Nevada is notable enough! His single “The Mack” peaked at number 9 on the ARIA CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 02:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nevada (DJ) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevada (DJ) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 ( talk) 01:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Jacob Sartorius discography.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk)
05:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
What did I do? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 19:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Jessie Paege, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
23:01, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Last Text(Jacob Sartorius song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 22:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
It’s just a redirect and it’s perfect. Why was it deleted? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 00:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, somebody reverted everything! Blame them! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regard (artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regard (artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. © Tbhotch ™ ( en-3). 03:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on
Regard (artist). This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please start reliably sourcing your edits. Your problematic editing is becoming disruptive.
Rob
van
vee
13:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect PP2 (album), created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 23#PP2 (album).
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 20:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
I have blanked the page. Since I don’t know how do, please delete it. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peppa Pig (British singer and rapper) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
TomCat4680 ( talk) 22:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Child singer. We are going to end up at
ANI very soon at this rate. Your aversion to sourcing is highly disruptive.
Rob
van
vee
05:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
The subject shows notability, she has over a million subscribers. If her birthdate and full name source is not reliable, I can remove that. Any other unsourced content that needs to be sourced I can remove it. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:12, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I replied to the part about Jessie Paege being declined! How did it end up here? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I’m not doing edits anymore. I might visit Wikipedia to find things out, but I don’t edit anymore because now I understand that I do not understand how to edit this website. I’d like to apologise to anyone who I disagreed with because I didn’t understand things. I’m going to stop. Also, please don’t say anything mean if you reply to this like “Yay He’s Gone!” because I tried and I’m going to stop. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 09:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
I just don’t know what I could edit that would be helpful, and what page I could create that would be notable. I tried to create a page for One Direction’s song “ Na Na Na (One Direction song)” because the first thing I have to mention is that it peaked at number 86 in Australia. That probably isn’t a very high number. The second thing I have to say is that it also peaked at number 27 in Ireland. I sourced the page with the sources on One Direction discogaphy (which it now redirects to) that said it charted in these countries. The pages were redirected to One Direction discography, (as I said before), which I’m a little confused about. Also, I created a page called In This Place (Julia Micheals song) which I thought peaked at number 3 on Billboard, but it was Children’s Music Charts (I’m starting to think it was also a Billboard chart, but not the official Billboard Hot 100) but wouldn’t that be enough? I’m a little confused. After all, 3 is an extremely high number on the charts. Not really something about music, but probably about being notable, later, I created a page for the Talking Tom and Friends character, Angela, it was marked for deletion (very recently). I thought the character is notable because Talking Tom and Friends is an extremely successful show, and the character Angela is an extremely populated character. She has a toy, she has two apps, a third one is coming, in the show, she is like the third main character and she is literally the girlfriend of the main character. I don’t get what else notability is for a character, because it’s not like a character is like a song, album or EP that charted. It’s more like a popular character, and that’s what Angela is. Can you tell me where I went wrong? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 20:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Also, I think that the page I created might have been In This Place (song) Though.
I did read what you wrote. By the way, improving an existing article, I don’t really know many. I did help Child singer, a bit, but would you mind giving me an example of an article that needs to be fixed? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 22:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Oh and by the way, if what I said wasn’t related to what you were talking about, I’m sorry. Speaking of what you said, I will listen to what users say and be careful with my edits. You said I should spend my time improving articles, which is what I’m going to do. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 02:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Angela (character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I don’t see how this character has achieved independent notability to have its own article. A redirect would be fine but the title of this article is ambiguous (there must be lots of characters named Angela).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me
09:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angela (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Mirror Cracked ( talk) 20:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
The Mirror Cracked (
talk)
17:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
I’m going to retire because you want to block me even though I’m just trying to help. If I’m not helping the Wikipedia, I’m just going to retire. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The root cause of all the problems you're facing is that you haven't been paying any attention to the advice anyone gives you. That doesn't come across as confident, it comes across as immature.
Saying you'll retire only to immediately turn around and say you're not retiring likewise tells us that you don't really understand how things work here. I've written a guide that covers a variety of problems new users face, and there's a game that explains how to edit properly. If you do get to stay on this site, I strongly recommend you play that game and look over my guide before getting involved in anything.
Some people might hesitate to block you if you promise to not edit anything until you complete the tutorial game and study my guide -- but you have to follow through on it. You can't just start up the tutorial, quit it after the first page, and then lie about having read the guide because it will show when you go and screw things up again. But this might not work, thanks to your history of ignoring what everyone tells you, threating to leave, misunderstanding our "clean start" rules, and unretiring immediately after retiring. Ian.thomson ( talk) 00:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
I have been listening. I have re-replied to Robvanvee’s advice on “I’m Retiring”. I am not going to create articles anymore until I am sure about them. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 02:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Also by the way, I will read that. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 02:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
I have read everything from that, however, I have not clicked on much pages with a blue link. Do I need to do that, or just read the page? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Also, I’m trying to play the game, but when I click “Start the adventure” it dosen’t work. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
CheatCodes4ever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I want to start editing Wikipedia all over again and I just want to have a fresh start. This does not mean I want to start a new account, this means I want people to forget about everything I did earlier but I will use the same account. Also, you can’t blame me for not being very good at Wikipedia. I am still learning, as I am a kid. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As noted, this account is not directly blocked. If you are still unable to edit, you will need to tell the exact word-for-word message that appears when you attempt to edit, along with any other IP address or username that appears. 331dot ( talk) 12:51, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
When I try to edit, it dosen’t work. If this is about the IP address 101.177.163.148, I am not that account. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tones and I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Read Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy.
Don't post your name or age again. Saying you're a kid in Australia is fine, but don't get any more specific than that. Ian.thomson ( talk) 02:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Full years are preferred per MOS:DATERANGE, so that means we prefer "2019–2020" rather than "2019–20". While another part of the guideline page says we can shorten the year where space is limited, space is not particularly limited in the header of a wikitable that is significantly wider than the text "Chart (2019–2020)". So please stop making unnecessary edits or "correcting" people when you're not even correct. Thank you. Ss 112 05:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Please stop messing with things you don’t understand such as you did here. All you’re doing is creating more work for other editors who have to fix your mistakes. Just leave well enough alone. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 06:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry. I just thought of being nominated for deletion would be described an "issue", but I guess I was wrong. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Eagleash ( talk) 04:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Why did you create a redirect from a user page to the user's talk? That user's last edit was in July 2015. Also, why did you do the same at an IP's user page? Johnuniq ( talk) 05:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not redirect other editors' userpages to their talk page, as you did at
User:Danieldart, without a good reason and providing an explanation. Thank you.
Eagleash (
talk)
09:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi CheatCodes4ever! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
RickinBaltimore (
talk)
19:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)But I am here to build an encyclopedia, and I do listen to advice. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
CheatCodes4ever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
RickinBaltimore blocked me saying “Not here to build an Encyclopedia”, but that isn’t true. They also said that I don’t listen to advice, but I actually do. This could relate to Robvanvee’s advice on I’m retiring, which I probably just couldn’t understand. I re-replied more related to the subject. I read a guide about editing wikipedia, and I read the full thing. There was a game I needed to play, but I couldn’t, because when I clicked “Join the adventure!” It didn’t work. I want people to forget about what I did before and have a fresh start, but with this account. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 20:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. That said, I am taking the view that the issues here are more likely related to general competence than anything deliberately disruptive. I suggest taking a break for at least a year, and then come back and you can ask to be unblocked per WP:SO. I may also consider unblocking you earlier if you can find an experienced editor willing to adopt you. But for now I think you need a break from here and some time to consider what you want to do and how you are going to fit in with the project on a constructive basis. Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I"m sorry. I tried to help Wikipedia. I guess I just didn't understand. I'm trying to do the Wikipedia Adventure, but there have been many issues. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 22:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
CheatCodes, two weeks ago you said you wanted a fresh start yet since that time there has not been any improvement in your editing, and more importantly you still the fail to grasp the core concept of notability as it applies to this encylopedia. You may want to ask if you can participate in and complete the Wikipedia Adventure as a condition before being allowed to edit again. You click on "Mission 1" not "Join the Adventure" to get started. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 20:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I’m still confused though. When I click on Mission 1, it just says “Check your stats”. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
No. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
The adventure requires editing, which I can't do. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I have now done an edit on the talk page, which helped me do the adventure. I have received a badge, but then I have to click Make it even better! And it isn't working. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 22:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I do listen to advice! I’m not lying! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 01:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
-- 21:47, Thursday, January 9, 2020 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 21:54, Thursday, January 9, 2020 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 21:54, Thursday, January 9, 2020 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
I"m happy too. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
YAY! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
CheatCodes, what is the point of above? You're going to lose user talk access if you continue with these types of edits on your talk page. Please don't use your talk page as a sandbox. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 02:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, but why can’t I edit my user page and sandbox while blocked? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
How were their edits similar? They created a page for Apple & Blackcurrant Juice. I work on music! CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 04:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for my editing to Wikipedia. I am sorry for everything I did - including using my talk page as a sandbox. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Okay, I will take a break. I might not take a year off, but I will take a break for at least two or three months, I will probably take more. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
I just want to say one more thing, can you unblock Magicworld888? Users think the account is me, but it’s not. The reason they think so is because it is using the same IP address as 101.177.163.148, and that user was told it was “obvious” that they were me, but I’m not them. So I would like you to unblock Magicworld888. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Also I would like to say that I know that you did not block any of those users, but since you are an admin, you can block and unblock users. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
They created a page for apple and blackcurrant juice. How is that related? I work on music. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 04:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
To that person who said I should have a three year block, what they said is actually quite offensive. I’m sure there are many matured people out there who don’t know how to edit the Encyclopedia. Age has got nothing to do with editing skills. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
I was using Wiiuplayer, but I have a reason. When I created the account, it was because I wanted to edit on Wii U, but at the current time I was using Money12122, and I did not know my password off by heart, I was logged in permanently to Money12122 on my iPad, so that’s why I could still use it after creating Wiiuplayer. I also originally didn’t know my password to CheatCodes4ever off by heart either when I continued editing with Wiiuplayer after creating CheatCodes4ever. However, now I know my password to CheatCodes4ever off by heart so I will not use Wiiuplayer anymore. Hope this is an excuse. I’m sorry if it isn’t. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to ask about something. Does anyone know any wikis where you can write whatever you want which looks more like this rather than how the fandom ones look like? Just wanted to ask. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Why? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
But why should I not be able to edit the talk page? Please tell me why. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 08:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sammy (singer). Since you had some involvement with the Sammy (singer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CG5, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mehki Raine, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehki Raine.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 13:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " CG5".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 14:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tom and Angela (musical group). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17#Tom and Angela (musical group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 ( talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eliza Bird, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Drake (Bart Baker song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Drake (Bart Baker song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Eliza Bird".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Cyrus discography".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo ( talk) 08:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jimmy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo ( talk) 11:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Figures (Jessie Reyez song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot ( talk) 01:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
I have received your email requesting to be unblocked. Any unblock request should be made via the WP:UTRS system. Given your history of socking and block evasion, I would be reluctant to support any unblock for at least one year and then only after a check user has confirmed no evident socking. Best regards... - Ad Orientem ( talk) 09:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Figures".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 02:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Drink Too Much".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — Nnadigoodluck 🇳🇬 09:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Let It Grow".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Bing Bong Zoo".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, CheatCodes4ever. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Drake".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
User requests unblock at UTRS appeal #43693 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
@ Ad Orientem: could restore TPA? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Ad Orientem has retired.. Restored TPA so user nay request unblocking here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
CheatCodes4ever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
(This request was copied from the text on the UTRS unblock request.) So basically, I got blocked on Wikipedia because I was not competent enough to edit; I kept creating articles for random things because I didn't understand the notability guideline. I had previously used two accounts: One that I retired from because I wanted a clean start, and one that I used to edit Wikipedia on the Wii U since I had forgotten my password at the time but could still use my accounts due to being permanently logged in to them on my iPad (I have remembered my passwords now). But when I came clean, I forgot to mention that I stopped using the account, and so I got blocked. And now it is time to come clean about everything. Magicworld888 is someone I know, I suggested that they edit Wikipedia in good faith but that isn't really enough - it's still kind of meatpuppetry if you suggest it. I'm sorry about this. Sadly, I also told them to create a new account - Buttersongs (and they also used Buttersongs2 for reasons that are stated on Buttersongs2's userpage). I am so sorry that I did this. I also had the stupid idea to create a new account but I would hold my toy to press on the keys so it "wouldn't be considered block evasion" even though it admittingly was. But that was a year ago. I'm sorry for all of the stuff that I did there, it was all wrong and I wish I never did it. But I can assure you, I am now competent enough to edit Wikipedia again. I read WP:GNG and I now understand that I need to have reliable secondary sources that are independent and cover the topic significantly, and they must create an assumption, not a guarantee, meaning that they can't be an advertisement or something like that. So if I am eligible to be unblocked, can you please unblock me? Thanks, CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 17:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Seems to me you just made a perfectly good statement why you shouldn't be unblocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:50, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@
Jpgordon What do you mean?
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
19:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
If you mean that thing about the sockpuppeting, I did that when I was immature. I used to be stupid and I didn't understand things. I wasn't smart at all. I've improved my maturity and intelligence since then and I wish I never did that.
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
22:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello? @
Jpgordon
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
05:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
CheatCodes4ever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My previous unblock request was denied and the admin who denied the request said that they were not going to reconsider and if I wanted to be unblocked then another admin could look into it. I recommend reading that unblock request first so you understand what I'm talking about. Now, I want to note that I am very sorry for everything I did, but please understand that I really wish I never did that and I was immature back when I did it. I don't want my youth to prevent me from doing what I want to do in future. I'm very sorry, but I just want to edit Wikipedia again so I can contribute by creating articles for notable things, adding content with reliable sources and dealing with vandalism and other disruptive edits. And if I can't be unblocked now, is there at least some time where I can come back to Wikipedia? Thanks, CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 04:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You will need to demonstrate that you have changed since you were blocked by showing a potential substantive edit(more than fixing spelling or grammar) you would make if unblocked. This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
{{infobox name|...}}
);[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
);[[Category:Name]]
);{{Foo stub}}
);== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet;Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
"{{reflist-talk}}
. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "
" to your talk page. Thank you.
331dot (
talk)
08:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
{{
Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@
331dot: can you please block my other accounts?
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
17:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
@
331dot: Are you still there?
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
10:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can someone please tell me what's wrong with my coding? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)}}
Okay. Understood. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Alright, then.
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
02:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
@
Jmcgnh: However, I thought that redirects exist because they were mentioned on an article with a notable topic, not because their topic was notable.
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
21:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Or perhaps you are thinking of
redlinks? – links that do not point to an article at present but which someone thinks may be notable.
— jmcgnh
(talk)
(contribs)
22:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Oh okay, I thought you were saying that Spotify was not something that would guarantee notability for The Lorax Singers. As much as I do agree with that and also agree with not using Spotify as a source at all, I wasn't trying to suggest the topic was notable. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 03:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
CheatCodes4ever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Alright, Here's my next unblock request. I'm sorry for everything I did in the past. I just want to explain everything. First off, please read my previous unblock requests. They will help you decide whether or not I should be unblocked. Secondly, about me not listening to advice, I would like to say that I do not know why I didn't listen to advice. What can I say, I was immature then. I really don't know why. One thing I know is that I am very much aware that a song/album charting does not make it notable, and it especially does not make the artist notable. An artist must have reliable secondary sources that are independent and have significant coverage of the topic. In terms of what they mean: "reliable" means that the website can be trusted. This often means a site that is A. Not user-generated and does not have an option to edit B. Provides evidence that what is said to happen happened C. Is professionally made. "Independent" means that they are specifically about the topic. If one were to make an article about a singer, their own website would not be an appropriate source. "Significant coverage" means that the topic is addressed in detail, and the site also must make a presumption, not a guarantee. A guarantee would typically be an advertisement or something, like if it said "Don't be fooled by (insert information here), these people are extremely talented artists", that would be a "guarantee", and therefore, the source would not be one that proves notability. In addition, I personally would like to participate more in reverting vandalism and unsourced/poorly sourced content rather than creating articles. I feel like I will be better at that and it will be easier for me to not disrupt the encyclopedia. Regardless, I would like to say that the reason why I didn't learn for nearly two years was because I didn't communicate with anyone on talk pages. I am sorry to anyone who tried to help me before the date of November 23, 2019, I did not communicate back then. My refusal to communicate/go on talk was due to the fact that certain people in the real world told me not to go on talk for some reason. I would also like to apologize for my somewhat rude and immature behaviour in the past. I am very, very sorry for what I did and please understand that I now understand why I was blocked. Please can I be unblocked? Thanks, CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 23:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per the banning policy, specifically the section about community bans, "Editors who are indefinitely blocked by community consensus, or remain indefinitely blocked after due consideration by the community, are considered 'banned by the Wikipedia community'". Looking at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1027#Competency_issue_with_CheatCodes4ever, this has practically happened here. You are thus not eligible for a normal unblock by a single administrator and must appeal to the community instead, following the instructions at WP:UNBAN (create a new {{ unblock}} request directed at the community asking for an unban, and ask for the request to be copied to WP:AN). Your unban request should: a) specifically describe the issues that led to the ban ("everything I did in the past" is unspecific, put the actual explanation at the top of your request instead of at the bottom); b) credibly promise that you will not make the same mistakes again (your current request somehow implies this, but doesn't seem to make actual specific promises), and c) provide specific examples for helpful contributions that are currently prevented by the block (will you join WP:CVUA? Can you provide specific examples for non-biographical (!) unsourced content that currently exists on Wikipedia and should be removed?). ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CheatCodes4ever ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Okay, I think I'm officially ready now. Please read my previous unblock requests for more information. ToBeFree has told me that I am banned and this needs to be moved to WP:AN, so here we go. In terms of what I was blocked for, I was blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. This was because I didn't listen to advice in the past and it made everyone think I was WP:NOTHERE. As stated in my previous unblock request, I do not no why I didn't listen to advice back then. I guess I could say I was immature? I honestly don't know how to explain it. I really don't. But for what it's worth, it took 22 months for me to start using talk pages. From January 2018 to October 2019, I never talked with people on talk pages. In fact, I used to not even go on my talk page, so if someone sent me a really long message, I wouldn't have read it all (so in other words, if you're reading this @ Jmcgnh:, as much as you don't have much to do with this, I noticed you sent me a message here on my old account, but I never read all of it until about 14 months later, so I just wanted to say, I'm sorry about that). Anyway, I have now learnt to use talk pages. Back to me getting unblocked, if I do get unblocked I would like to make edits such as these edits along with participating in reverting vandalism/unsourced edits. I'll probably end up doing other stuff, but one thing's for sure: I won't cause as much trouble as I did in the past. You can learn more about that here. In terms for what I did do in the past, I continuously added unsourced content. This was because I kept forgetting to add a source. However, from now on, I will try my hardest to remember to add a source. In addition, I created lots of articles for non-notable topics. If you have read my previous unblock request, you will see I have learnt from that and now understand how the notability system works. Please could I be unblocked? Thanks, CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per this discussion the community has come to a consensus to deny your unblock request. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:45, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ ToBeFree: Please could you move unblock requests 6 and 7 to WP:AN#CheatCodes4ever's unblock request and ping all of the users who participated in this discussion? Thanks, CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
[[User:Username|Username]]
for a more failsafe approach. If there are questions about the procedure itself, feel free to ping me for any questions. To take one away from the beginning: The duration of this discussion isn't fixed, but you can generally expect at least 72 hours, up to weeks. If the discussion is archived automatically and you believe that there was consensus for unblocking despite no action happening, please ping me as well. All the best,
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
09:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC)@
J. M.: @
Yamla: @
DoubleCross: @
RickinBaltimore: @
Kinu: I no longer think the kappaphobia topic is a notable topic, or at least, I no longer think those sites are reliable, also please see my previous unblock requests for more information.
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
22:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
@
HighInBC: The editors that I just pinged have not responded to my message, so I don't think it's fair to close the discussion yet. There has only been one new vote since I pinged the users.
CheatCodes4ever (
talk)
06:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
@ HighInBC: Okay, but it's still an unfair argument. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 21:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
What Wikipedia policy states that you can't use stores as sources? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 11:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)}}
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can you copypaste a URL while citing sources? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 07:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Me Brain Hurts and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#Me Brain Hurts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nominator comment: This is unrelated to your current status; I'm following wiki practice in notifying the creator of a redirect of the deletion. It's just due to the title of the song being corrected, rendering the redirect an orphan.
23skidoo (
talk)
19:51, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
is open. User needs to appeal at AN. Mulling allowing them to edit AN directly, to optimize the appeal's process. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 16:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
@ Deepfriedokra: The unban discussion on administrators' noticeboard appears to have been archived despite no official discussion closure by an administrator. What should be done? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 20:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
User may an unblock request no sooner than six months from today, and only if they have a significant number of problem-free, non-trivial edits on another wikimedia project. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 16:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
I will not be responding to your email. Please do not email me again. -- Yamla ( talk) 14:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The redirect
The Mii Channel Theme has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 1 § The Mii Channel Theme until a consensus is reached.
thetechie@enwiki:
~/talk/ $
17:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)