![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() |
Archives |
WP:CSD A6 is not for spam- there is no CSD specifically for spam. Petros471 18:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I would like you to give me a oppurtunity to show you I know what I am doing before you make a judgment on me. I believe I can prove myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JakeDHS07 ( talk • contribs) .
Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports gathered on
my RfA, which passed with a final tally of
0x0104/0x01/0x00. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on
my talk page. Misza 13, the rouge-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing! NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated
ROT-26 algorithm. |
![]() |
You have too much time on your hands. -- CharlotteWebb 15:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Please be aware: not meeting WP:MUSIC is not a criterion for speedy deletion. It never was, and never will be. I had tried to use WP:PROD to get the article deleted, but by removing the tag, you contested it. Now, I've sent it to WP:AFD. In the future, please try to understand the difference between not meeting WP:MUSIC or WP:BIO and the relevant speedy deletion criterion, which is articles on people or groups of people that don't even assert any importance or significance. Also, in the future, if you see an article up for WP:PROD that you think can be speedied, leave the prod tag in place in case the speedy deletion is denied. Mango juice talk 19:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Ooops. Okay then, let's rewind. This doesn't need a week of afd. -- CharlotteWebb 19:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
I must have done something wrong here, and now it's getting sent to AFD on a technicality. I would suggest that this process needs a bit more work before we allow people to blindly follow it. -- CharlotteWebb 20:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Have you been monitoring the discussion? Might you reconsider your nomination? If you withdraw it, we can speedy keep, and close the AfD. PT ( s-s-s-s) 22:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Greetings. There is a Barnstar for stub-sorting up for proposal here. If you'd like to participate in the discussion, we'd much appreciate it. Thanks, and have a great days. :) SynergeticMaggot 18:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
|
|
|
I'm just putting the template there to fill them in later. I apologize if I have done something injurious. The Coffee Shop That Smiles Upon The River 15:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for closing this AfD. In my opinion, it was a complete waste of time. I was going to reclose it again today, since there really isnt any reason to delete it, but you beat me to it :) SynergeticMaggot 21:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks for helping fend off the vandals while Gregorian chant was on the main page. I wasn't prepared for the level of vandalism. It's heartening to know how efficient and diligent you WP admins and editors are to revert it! Peirigill 07:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you make specific recommendations as to what needs to be done to the page? It's a list. It's sourced, it has an lead section that explains what it is. According to Wikipedia:Lists, I think that's all it needs. Am I mistaken?— Chidom talk 06:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
the template is like the small version on every other page with a 24 article except the jack bauer article. Please can we bring this page in line with every other as cahnging the whole template is now moot. As this is the only page not in line with all the other please do not now go around chaning all of the other pages i will consider it vindictive and a personal attack.-- Lucy-marie 11:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
We need to get the content of "Reema" into "Reema Khan". "Reema Khan' is an incomplete version of "Reema".
Reema is a popular name in Indian sub-continent and "Reema" page should ideally list all artists/celebrities with their first name "Reema". I tried doing that but you seem to have reverted it.
Kindly make the desired changes.
Thanks! Sameer -- Sameer81 17:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Good retitle on that. That whole article is a big fat mess, I feel a bit overwhelmed by it. Josh 19:20, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
This is a friendly reminder of the AfD's that non-administrators should be closing. We appreciate your work at AfD in closing completed discussions, but per Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions, non-administrators may only close decisions which are unambiguous "keep" decisions, or variants thereof. A couple of the AfD's that you've closed recently wouldn't qualify. Thank you -- Samir धर्म 12:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
On what grounds did you revert my edit to this article? Adam 01:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, you added {{ cleanup-infobox}} to TJHSST with edit summary "ughh". What's wrong with the infobox? Thanks. ~a ( user • talk • contribs) 04:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Take one guess, seriously. This needs to be converted to use an infobox template of some sort. --— CharlotteWebb 11:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Listen, just what do you think you're doing? I can't revert your idiotic actions because the title I want the page at is currently redirecting to the original title, which I changed some months ago. I know this organ better than any other Wikipedian, so please allow me kindly to name its WP article as common sense - and not Wikipedia naming policy - dictates. -- RichardHarrold 20:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Hmm... indefinte might be a little bit harsh. Did he not have any good edits? — CharlotteWebb 14:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do not insert POV material in the 'Jews for Jesus' article. Thank you. ParadoxTom 20:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
What do you think needs changed? If you would tell me I would be happy to do so as soon as possible in order to make the article meet standards. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.24.12.173 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry didn't notice I was not signed on. Idaho Juvenile Detention Centers page you added clean up tag to. Tuluvas2 18:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi CharlotteWebb, thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which was closed as successful today with a finaly tally of (56/0/3). I will be very careful at first to avoid any mistakes. Please feel free to leave a message in my talk page if you have any comments/suggestions about me in the future. Once again, thank you! -- WinHunter ( talk) 09:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC) |
Hi! Why did you close this early? People had been advocating deletion, and it was scheduled to stay open 4 more days. Thanks! -- badlydrawnjeff talk 18:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
What's this? You yourself said:
You seem to be sending mixed messages. Let's try being a bit more straightforward. What effect, precisely, are you seeking to achieve? — CharlotteWebb 19:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Wow, you sure got to Tomo Razmilovic pretty quick - if only everything in this encyclopedia were fixed so quickly. Keep it up...best, Paul 16:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Why did you revert my changes to the "Nigger" article? I'm also curious why the link to my talk page is the blockip command??-- Ujhm2 08:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
I have noticed when you closed the above AfD, you did not remove the category template, "REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD". By deleting this when closing it pulls the discussion out of the category. I have deleted it from this discussion, but if you could review any other closures you have done recently and remove the tag from them it would be greatly appreicated. Thanks. -- Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 14:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring the rennet article (Wolfgang 11:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)) —The preceding comment was actually added by Bioren ( talk • contribs).
I know enough about this topic - thats I contributed most of the new stuff as well in German as in English - I only do not know, why this nice guy deleted all - so thanks again (Wolfgang 15:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC))
Wow! How'd you do that so quickly? I was just starting to clean up double redirects, saw that you had changed my Move (from Help Desk (Web Comic) to Help Desk (webcomic), went back to fix what was now a triple redirect, only to find you had beaten me to that one too! --Bob 18:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Oops. I don't get why it would work that way... I thought including a template would replace the tildes with the sig of the person making that edit... oops! Sorry! I put it back... thanks for catching that.
Herostratus
16:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
why did u revert my edits, i think the dendrofilial flower orgasm and the positioning of the text are very noteworthy. In regards to the latter, many film posters do this, see Deuce Bigalo: European Gigalo. The film is about sex and the poster clearly insinuates the text as a penis. Qrc2006 23:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, your "minor" edit in the Louis Le Prince was not really a minor edit right? The problem is you've merged the References (or Sources) section with the Bibliography. Actually I did not used all works existing about Le Prince (the biblio), but only a part of this corpus (quoted sources). By merging the two in a single "References" section it's like i had used all existing books to build the article which is untrue, there is possibly others points of view in some of these books. Cliché Online 17:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. It'd never been vandalized until last week, and now it's been vandalized 3 times in less than a week. Anyway, thanks for fixing it. ~ ONUnicorn ( Talk / Contribs) 16:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
~ ONUnicorn ( Talk / Contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
|
|
|
Thank you for catching the recent edits to the Johnny Cash page by 208.102.42.211. I agree with reverting the changes given how much material was simply blanked without comment. However, I think there was a baby in some of that bathwater, so to speak. I'm going to attempt to extract some of the useful-seeming edits for brevity that seem to have been in among the hacking and cutting.
Just, you know, so as to not make the same error as 208.102.42.211, and actually take things more moderately and talk about them and such. - Stellmach 21:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Per your question on the deletion review page, see here. Regards, Newyorkbrad 21:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
You know - I've placed that infobox on over 800 articles... and I looked at your change, where you moved the commented out text to the top... and I looked at it again. Such a simple thing, but it makes sense (and looks better)! Where were you 799 edits ago. :) Thanks.-- Bookandcoffee 02:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
ReyBrujo has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Regarding this userbox, it is one of the most Aww! ones I have ever found in Wikipedia. Don't give up! -- ReyBrujo 06:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Aw c'mon, lighten up. But OK, in future I'll try to be more tactful toward murderers Homicido-Americans. But anyway I do appreciate your note.
Herostratus
18:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm a long-time Wiki reader, but recent editor/contributor. I'm somewhat overwhelmed by what I should do in the case of vandalism. A vandal struck "Buddha" on Sept 11 and you reverted his changes. Since then he has struck "Council of Trent". I don't know what to do now that I realize he's done it multiple times (just an IP address, no username - 72.25.155.34), so I'm writing this here. What do I do next? I reverted his changes. I'm assuming you'll reply here on your page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MobileOak ( talk • contribs) 20:43, September 25, 2006
I've added a copy of the article in my sandbox - see User:JoshuaZ/Sandbox. JoshuaZ 20:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Please use the G.W. Bush talk page before editing the opening again. The information you added is already mentioned elsewhere, and is not important enough to be in the openning. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolakitty ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 27 September 2006
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. I think I made somebody grumpy. Cheers! Tony Fox (arf!) 01:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. You currently have three (3) reverts on George W. Bush for a 24 hour period on ending on September 27, 2006. Lolakitty 02:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I see you're having fun, but my first three edits consisted of finding the correct version to revert to. My fourth edit consisted of reverting to it a second time after seeing that your arguments on the talk page were weak and amounted to accusations of bias. I have no further comment. — CharlotteWebb 02:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Under the year 467 BC, you have added an entry about Halley's comet first being observed in that year. I have tried to find another reference, other than the one you have added, to confirm this date. The internet reference you refer does not seem to give any explanation to support a first sighting as early as 467 BC.
As you may notice, I am slowly adding entries from various published sources on historic events from 500 BC forwards. None of my source documents have any reference to Halley's Comet being observed as early as 467BC. Can you help with any other sources??
Thanks
-- Chaleyer61 09:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 40 | 2 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
New speedy deletion criteria added | News and notes |
Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | RSS Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Charlotte, thanks for your revert on Galatasaray article. That user is really a problem for months.:)-- Ugur Basak 21:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)