This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
khandayat
Hello. I saw the khandayat article is totally propaganda. The user P.sitansu intensionally relating gouda caste with khandayat. I am from odisha and I studies many books and articles like tribe and caste of odisha and Bengal by HH risely, Hindu caste and sect by j bhattacharya, Madox settlement report, Cuttack Gazetteer by IAS Tara Dutta, God,People and caste system by LK Mohapatra, Generology of paika rebellion by akio tanabe, Peasant militias of odisha by Prasant Pradhan and many more. All the source says the same. Khandayat caste has relation with chasa caste. That's why khandayat are cultivator. But no source says gouda has any connection with khandayat. The fact is Khandayat and chasa are same caste. He misused a book of hc das which is a translation of a odia dictionary.
I think he is a gouda by caste and intentionally doing this. Pls do something against this vandalism.
Sekharblack123 (
talk)
03:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your edit. But again sir, khandayat caste not originated from gouda. That is a very week source. Other authentic book not even mentioned gouda caste in khandayat articles. Gouda caste people used to carry Savari and palinki of khandayat and chasa still now. Pls try to remove khandayat originated from gouda line. That line is completely wrong.
Sekharblack123 (
talk)
17:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Chariotrider555! Your additions to
Ramayana have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper
paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create
copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see
Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to
verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not
original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images.
Fair use images must meet all ten of the
non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the
public domain (PD) or under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also
Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be
blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk)
21:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)