Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
Aristophanes68(talk)03:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Hello, Caspal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Het Sinterklaasjournaal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request
userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
here.
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on
reliable sources to
verify information, especially about
living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the
Leo Canjels article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions.
GiantSnowman08:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
For starters the dutch Wiki page about mr. Canjels say's he's born in Princenhage [1]. Since "Princenhage" didn't have a English article, it probably wasn't mentioned in English. the local new website of Princehagen named it in a memorial article . [2]. also the football magazine "voetbal international" mentions it in an article about his passing. [3]. greetings
Caspal (
talk)
06:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your contributions to
Haagse Beemden. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
I understand the importance of sources. What I did is translated the Dutch article into English. I assumed that the Dutch article had been fererified. I did my best to resource new sources because the links in the Dutch article don't exist anymore.
Caspal (
talk)
07:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Haagse Beemden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its
talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Breda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Sloterdijk. Such links are
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.)
Thanks for your contributions to
WK AdoptieKids. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
the sources are the newspaper article and the homepage of the tournament. They are in dutch. if you let me know witch things need to be pointed out in the article. I'll fix a link but it's stil in dutch
Caspal (
talk)
14:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I've found and added sources all in dutch I'm afraid. with these I hope I've met the required provenance of the content of the article
Caspal (
talk)
18:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your contributions to
Chassé Theater. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at
Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.
Waqar💬13:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
good day, I just translated the Dutch article witch unfortunately has no sources either. but working for the theater foor 27 years I know the story. I will try to find backup for the claims.
Caspal (
talk)
14:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Chassé Theater and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.
Hello, Caspal!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
06:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)reply
sorry I don't understand. at first I just translated the Dutch article witch had no reference at all. by now I've added 7 reference like the architecture yearbook, the link to the architect Hertzberger, the history story's on the Chasse Theater webpage and a few english references. I also found the interview wicht architect Hertzberger from 1995. I have no idea what the references of Wiki should behold.
Caspal (
talk)
07:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)reply
For notability according to the most common guideline,
WP:GNG, we need to see
significant coverage, directly of the subject and not some indirectly related matters, in multiple (3+) secondary sources that are both
reliable and entirely independent of the subject and of each other. Secondary sources means newspapers, magazines, books, TV and radio programmes. But even if the sources are secondary, their coverage may not be: eg. an interview (in the case of your draft, the interview of the architect) is a primary source, as it is the person talking about their own work; similarly, articles based on press releases or other publicity materials are primary, even when they appear in a typically secondary publication, because they are the issuer of the press release telling the world about themselves. HTH, --
DoubleGrazing (
talk)
08:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)reply
tanks for your thanks for your answer. I am curious why a distinction is made between the different wiki languages and articles. In addition to the press and the architects' yearbook, there are probably more references to be found, but I expect they will have the same source. the Dutch article has no sources at all. I also sometimes see fewer or no references besides the homepage in the English-language articles. the architects' yearbook is almost a blueprint of the building and could be a conclusive source in itself. I will save the information and see if I offer it again in the future.
Caspal (
talk)
07:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:WK AdoptieKids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted.